|
|
Subject:
Over 1,000 Comments, please!
Category: Arts and Entertainment > Movies and Film Asked by: probonopublico-ga List Price: $2.00 |
Posted:
16 Feb 2003 00:55 PST
Expires: 18 Mar 2003 00:55 PST Question ID: 161982 |
Please help to make this the most commented upon Question EVER! When Hollywood decides to film my life story, I expect that the finale will be a masked ball to which all Google Researchers, Questioners and Commentators will be invited. The masks are obviously required in the interests of confidentiality. However, my question is: Who would YOU like to represent YOU on screen? (Since it's only hypothetical, you can choose people who are alive or dead) In case you wondered, Pierce Brosnan will be playing me. | |
| |
| |
|
|
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
Answered By: omnivorous-ga on 26 Feb 2003 20:35 PST Rated: |
A gross. | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
|
probonopublico-ga
rated this answer:
and gave an additional tip of:
$5.00
So, we've reached the end of the line and the answer's a Gross. Well done, everyone. It's been great fun. There's a lot of talent out there and it's a pleasure to enjoy your company. Kindest regards Bryan |
|
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: justaskscott-ga on 16 Feb 2003 11:13 PST |
1,000 comments! I doubt it'll happen ... but okay, I'll submit comment #1. |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: missy-ga on 16 Feb 2003 11:14 PST |
Brian, As much as I adore Pierce Brosnan, I'm a bit miffed that you won't be playing yourself. How am I supposed to get you to autograph your book for me if you're not even there?? Wah! --Missy |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: justaskscott-ga on 16 Feb 2003 11:16 PST |
And now for comment #2 ... a comment with content ... hmm, how about Robert De Niro ... you talkin' to me? ... you asking a question to me? ... ;-) |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: googlenut-ga on 16 Feb 2003 11:16 PST |
O.K. Mr. Bond, I'd like Halle Berry to play me. |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: justaskscott-ga on 16 Feb 2003 11:17 PST |
Dang, missy beat me to number #2 ... but now you're up to 4 comments! |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: justaskscott-ga on 16 Feb 2003 11:17 PST |
Or 6! |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: tutuzdad-ga on 16 Feb 2003 11:49 PST |
My cousin, Arthur Hunnicutt, will play me. There will also most certainly be a number of love scenes with Halle Berry. Dad |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: bobthedispatcher-ga on 16 Feb 2003 11:50 PST |
I don't have any comment at all ;-) |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: voila-ga on 16 Feb 2003 11:52 PST |
Dead: Tallulah Bankhead/Groucho Marx Alive: Grace Zabriskie/Jack Nicholson |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: bobthedispatcher-ga on 16 Feb 2003 11:52 PST |
Or I could comment that I have a comment about not having any comment. But I forgot what it was |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: hammer-ga on 16 Feb 2003 11:53 PST |
I'd like to be played by whoever is the current Morris the Cat at the time of filming. - Hammer |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: kemlo-ga on 16 Feb 2003 11:54 PST |
Hi probonopublico, How pretentious can you get. L&K Kemlo |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: jbf777-ga on 16 Feb 2003 12:24 PST |
Wonder if an error message will be displayed after a certain # of comments. :) jbf777-ga |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: thx1138-ga on 16 Feb 2003 12:40 PST |
Hi Probonopublico. Having seen a picture of you, I think James Garner should play you (I think you look like him/he looks like you, whatever!) As for someone playing me....Rutger Hauer or Max von Sydow...... All the best THX1138 |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: filian-ga on 16 Feb 2003 13:04 PST |
Janeane Garofalo would play me. She'd have to be a more conservative Janeanne in some ways but she's the person I can most identify with on many subjects plus she's short like me. :) If it were a big classic type film, maybe Joan Fontaine. |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: tisme-ga on 16 Feb 2003 13:07 PST |
who is Pierce Brosnan? |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: gan-ga on 16 Feb 2003 13:07 PST |
John Prescott |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: scriptor-ga on 16 Feb 2003 13:33 PST |
Hmmm ... if I can choose only a living person to impersonate me on the silver screen, I would like Rowan Atkinson... |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: duncan2-ga on 16 Feb 2003 13:34 PST |
#18 ? One should always play oneself when possible. (Stunt doubles are optional.) |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: sublime1-ga on 16 Feb 2003 13:35 PST |
I think there is a pagelength limit which will cut us off before 1000. Since the actors representing us will be wearing masks at the ball, I'm not sure it matters, but I'll take Brad Pitt... |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: jeremymiles-ga on 16 Feb 2003 13:43 PST |
I like the idea of jack nicholson, but someone said him already. Can we have him twice? |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: jeremymiles-ga on 16 Feb 2003 13:43 PST |
Does the 1000th commenter get the $2? |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: tisme-ga on 16 Feb 2003 13:45 PST |
What if 1000th is not a researcher?? tisme-ga |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: omnivorous-ga on 16 Feb 2003 14:04 PST |
Definitely Steve Martin, though he'd have to do something about the white hair. We're both "wild and crazy guys!" |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: voila-ga on 16 Feb 2003 14:05 PST |
Okay, okay, jeremymiles can be Jack. I'll be now played by Harry Dean Stanton. Cary Grant/dead will be cast as probonopublico; Dennis Hopper/alive. |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: ryan222-ga on 16 Feb 2003 14:37 PST |
Jeremey Irons for me, please. |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: guillermo-ga on 16 Feb 2003 15:25 PST |
Jack Lemmon at 42 would be the perfect one for me. Now, closer to my age -though younger-, I choose John Cusack. |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: tehuti-ga on 16 Feb 2003 15:38 PST |
Who else but Marlene Dietrich.... |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: pafalafa-ga on 16 Feb 2003 15:38 PST |
It's ridiculous to think that people will spend their time posting comments here. ...ooops! |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: justaskscott-ga on 16 Feb 2003 15:42 PST |
I agree with pafalafa. ;-) |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: nellie_bly-ga on 16 Feb 2003 15:56 PST |
Dame Judy Dench |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: leep-ga on 16 Feb 2003 16:12 PST |
I'd like to be played by probonopublico-ga. |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: nelson-ga on 16 Feb 2003 17:36 PST |
Gale Harold, who plays Brian Kinney on Queer as Folk |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: mathtalk-ga on 16 Feb 2003 18:00 PST |
See if Raymond Burr is available... -- mt |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: acorn-ga on 16 Feb 2003 18:10 PST |
Sophia Loren at any age :-) |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: efn-ga on 16 Feb 2003 18:29 PST |
#36. I think Buster Keaton would be best qualified to capture the subtle nuances. |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: aceresearcher-ga on 16 Feb 2003 18:42 PST |
Janeane Garofalo, with her dry, sarcastic wit and down-to-earth pragmatism, would definitely be my choice to play me. No one else even comes close. :) |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: darrenw-ga on 16 Feb 2003 21:15 PST |
here's another |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: darrenw-ga on 16 Feb 2003 21:16 PST |
and another |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: hailstorm-ga on 16 Feb 2003 21:23 PST |
Wile E. Coyote, Super Genius. |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: toecutter-ga on 16 Feb 2003 21:50 PST |
Humongous from "The Road Warrior" |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: missy-ga on 16 Feb 2003 22:10 PST |
Hrm. So I've been thinking. As long as we can choose from the Dearly Departed, I'd like Rita Hayworth to play me. 'Cause, like, WOW! --Missy |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: j_philipp-ga on 17 Feb 2003 02:05 PST |
Peter Sellers, he could impersonate about anyone. |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: j_philipp-ga on 17 Feb 2003 02:05 PST |
Does anyone actually keep track of how many comments are posted? |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: j_philipp-ga on 17 Feb 2003 02:06 PST |
Also, does it count if the exact same thing is posted more than once? |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: j_philipp-ga on 17 Feb 2003 02:07 PST |
Oh, to answer my own question: the number of comments is right on top of this page! |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: j_philipp-ga on 17 Feb 2003 02:13 PST |
Funny. I'm not able to post the same comment twice. |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: ravuri-ga on 17 Feb 2003 03:15 PST |
I'd want Robin Williams to play me. He's acted as the researcher type before (e.g., Awakenings, Flubber). I just can't see some of those other actors as a studious, hunched-over-the-computer character. |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: knowledge_seeker-ga on 17 Feb 2003 04:11 PST |
Jessica Rabbit; She's not bad, she's just drawn that way. |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: politicalguru-ga on 17 Feb 2003 05:22 PST |
hmmmm... I would be probably like to be there myself, so my name would be on IMDB as "as herself". I was never in the movies, except for once in high school. |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: knowledge_seeker-ga on 17 Feb 2003 11:13 PST |
That reminds me; why do they always change animal's names in movies? "Chip played by Champ." What's the point of that? -K~ |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: pinkfreud-ga on 17 Feb 2003 11:47 PST |
I have been told numerous times that I resemble Bernadette Peters, so she would be a good choice to play me on the silver screen. Like me, she's over 50 and still feisty. She sings better than I do, too. If Bernadette is unavailable, Bette Midler would be a most excellent replacement. If neither of these ladies can be persuaded to portray Pinkfreud-ga, I would settle for Meryl Streep in a red wig. I bet Meryl could do a fine job with the Oklahoma accent. My husband will be played by Mel Gibson. No substitutions permitted. ;-) ~Pink |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: kemlo-ga on 17 Feb 2003 12:19 PST |
I would like to be played by Barry Humphries |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: apteryx-ga on 17 Feb 2003 14:15 PST |
Fun question! I would like to be played by Julie Christie or Candace Bergen...but if a face like one of theirs looked back from my mirror, I would have had a different biography <sigh>. Like Pinkfreud, I'd like to cast the husband's part too! Sean Connery for me, thanks. (My husband won't mind that--as long as he can cast Darryl Hannah to play me.) Apteryx |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: steph53-ga on 17 Feb 2003 14:25 PST |
I'd like Goldie Hawn to represent me!!! |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: robertskelton-ga on 17 Feb 2003 14:26 PST |
For me: Michael Hutchence or Heath Ledger. Although this is a tittilating discussion, imagine if we had famous actors posting messages about which researcher they would like to play... |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: cerebro-ga on 17 Feb 2003 14:31 PST |
this seems insane, but ok, let me be Jack Nicholson. |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: hailstorm-ga on 17 Feb 2003 14:35 PST |
all work and no play make hailstorm a...something something. |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: igabe-ga on 17 Feb 2003 15:30 PST |
This is a start.... |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: googlenut-ga on 17 Feb 2003 15:42 PST |
Will I get to meet Pierce? |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: luciaphile-ga on 17 Feb 2003 17:00 PST |
Not that there's any physical resemblance, but I'd like to see myself played by a youngish Rosalind Russell . . . |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: angy-ga on 17 Feb 2003 22:57 PST |
Sarah Bernhardt |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: aceresearcher-ga on 17 Feb 2003 23:06 PST |
Okay, if we're casting spouses, then mine would have to be played by Kevin Kline, because he's got the same sly wit. If Kevin's not available, expertlaw-ga would be my next choice, because he's got it, too. ;-) |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: voila-ga on 18 Feb 2003 08:10 PST |
Spouse = Mitch Hedberg/Catherine Deneuve (alive) Montgomery Clift/Montgomery Clift (dead) |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: byrd-ga on 18 Feb 2003 09:08 PST |
Ok ok, this is goofy, but just to help you meet your goal, make it Anna Friel, a British actress supposedly on tap to play the lead in an upcoming movie ( http://movies.yahoo.com/shop?d=hp&cf=prev&id=1808408065 ) about the Nachthexen, the WWII Soviet women pilots of the 588th night bomber regiment. A good friend of mine gave me the nickname of "Nightwitch" as a compliment some years ago, and I've used it as a handle ever since. Their story is a fascinating one and mostly unknown in the U.S., so if anyone's interested, have a gander here: http://students.pratt.edu/~rsilva/sovwomen.htm (watch out - music on site). Good luck gettin' your 1,000 comments ... --Byrd |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: pafalafa-ga on 18 Feb 2003 17:50 PST |
Things are slowing down a bit, so I'll add two. |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: bio-ga on 18 Feb 2003 18:50 PST |
67 and counting... |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: hailstorm-ga on 18 Feb 2003 21:36 PST |
Anyone know if this is now the most commented question in GA history? |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: sublime1-ga on 18 Feb 2003 21:55 PST |
This question had 101 comments: https://answers.google.com/answers/main?cmd=threadview&id=50956 |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: sycophant-ga on 19 Feb 2003 00:46 PST |
I'd like Jack Black to play me. |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: probonopublico-ga on 19 Feb 2003 01:02 PST |
C'mon Folks ... 101 to beat (Well spotted Sublime One) Keep commenting! I don't want to have do them all by myself. I shall now be bringing Daisy (my Yorkshire Terrier) to the Masked Ball. She's gonna be played by Michelle Pfeiffer (Hope you're reading this, Mitch) |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: chromedome-ga on 19 Feb 2003 06:25 PST |
I dibs Patrick Stewart to play me...similarly deep-voiced and follicle-free. I don't mind that he's older...heck, I'm eighty when I roll out of bed and it takes me a good two hours and several coffees to get back down to 39. |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: probonopublico-ga on 20 Feb 2003 12:53 PST |
I am posting this anonymously. |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: probonopublico-ga on 20 Feb 2003 12:58 PST |
Well, this is certainly useful for finding out how your friends are. Where's willie and bobby??? OK, it's gloves off time. No more 5 stars and tips for any of the non-commenters. And only ONE comment each from Missy and PinkFreud? C'mon mesdames, don't you want to make history? |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: probonopublico-ga on 20 Feb 2003 13:00 PST |
Correction: For 'how' read 'who' ... (It's the champagne.) |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: bobbie7-ga on 20 Feb 2003 13:13 PST |
Hi Brian, I would like to played by Linda Carter. --Bobbie |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: pinkfreud-ga on 20 Feb 2003 13:16 PST |
Somehow I thought it would be cheating to make more than one comment. I shall take this opportunity to give some exposure to a bit of my doggerel (or is it birderel?) AIR A PARENT The Googlebird lays her eggs in the air, But the Googlebird's mate is always there To cache the eggs in a cup. The Googlebird's body is upside-downed, So she can't distinguish 'tween sky and ground, And her down is downside up. The Googlebird's egg-drops are seldom planned. She lays them free-form, you understand: Loose as a goose, and free and breezy, The Googlebird likes 'em "ova easy." ~Pink |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: pafalafa-ga on 20 Feb 2003 13:26 PST |
Subject: Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please! From: pafalafa-ga on 18 Feb 2003 17:50 PST Things are slowing down a bit, so I'll add two. |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: kemlo-ga on 20 Feb 2003 13:38 PST |
I |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: kemlo-ga on 20 Feb 2003 13:38 PST |
DO |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: kemlo-ga on 20 Feb 2003 13:39 PST |
THINK |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: kemlo-ga on 20 Feb 2003 13:39 PST |
ITS |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: kemlo-ga on 20 Feb 2003 13:40 PST |
CHEATING |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: kemlo-ga on 20 Feb 2003 13:40 PST |
FOR |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: kemlo-ga on 20 Feb 2003 13:41 PST |
PRPBONOPUBLICO |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: kemlo-ga on 20 Feb 2003 13:42 PST |
TO |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: kemlo-ga on 20 Feb 2003 13:42 PST |
POST |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: kemlo-ga on 20 Feb 2003 13:43 PST |
HIS |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: kemlo-ga on 20 Feb 2003 13:43 PST |
OWN |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: kemlo-ga on 20 Feb 2003 13:44 PST |
COMMENTS |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: kemlo-ga on 20 Feb 2003 13:47 PST |
Sorry probonopublico, 1341 PST was cut and pasted. I don't know how it went wrong. |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: thx1138-ga on 20 Feb 2003 14:05 PST |
There was a young chap called Jahnke who took up spying as a prank at the end of the war he thought 'what a bore!' and ran off with a loan from the bank ----------------------------------------- There was a young chap called Kurt who with danger was always a flirt his spying was revered until he disappeared Please continue............ |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: phi-ga on 20 Feb 2003 22:34 PST |
IF i ask for a buck from everyone .errrr a charity to make me a millionaire. how many would would i get !? :-| ? say which Question is the currently the most commented one anyways? |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: sublime1-ga on 20 Feb 2003 22:47 PST |
There was a young chap called Kurt who with danger was always a flirt his spying was revered until he disappeared... ...and ended up under the dirt. |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: sublime1-ga on 20 Feb 2003 22:57 PST |
probono said: "Well, this is certainly useful for finding out how your friends are." They're fine, thank you very much... : ) "OK, it's gloves off time. No more 5 stars and tips for any of the non-commenters." You cad! "And only ONE comment each from Missy and PinkFreud?" Well Pinky made her curtain call, and Missy is in the process of being 'missed' by all of us, for the moment... Now don't you feel bad?!? |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: probonopublico-ga on 21 Feb 2003 00:57 PST |
Hi, Sublime One Please be aware that ANYONE who calls me a cad will be automatically docked TEN STARS and any tips already given will be retracted. There are ways! However, there is still time for a grovelling apology and if you can find 20 supporters who can also enter a plea for mitigation ... (Separately on this page, please) ... Will all those in favour of the Sublime One, say so NOW! |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: easterangel-ga on 21 Feb 2003 01:12 PST |
I want to be played by a cartoon character like Bart Simpson. |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: omnivorous-ga on 21 Feb 2003 03:33 PST |
We've already passed 1,000 Base4! |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: cobrien-ga on 21 Feb 2003 05:45 PST |
oooh ooh !! Angelina Jolie!!!! (not that I look anything like her, but hey, I can dream, can't I???) |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: cobrien-ga on 21 Feb 2003 05:45 PST |
Just wanted to be no 100 ( one tenth of the way there!!) |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: gitana-ga on 21 Feb 2003 09:05 PST |
When my life story becomes a Lifetime t.v. movie of the week I expect to be portrayed by Maria Conchita Alonzo who has sunk so low in her career that she can't get better work. |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: tisme-ga on 21 Feb 2003 09:08 PST |
woah 12% of the goal is now complete... I wonder how much bandwidth this will cost Google? tisme-ga |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: tisme-ga on 21 Feb 2003 09:08 PST |
err i meant 10.2% (now 10.3%) |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: probonopublico-ga on 21 Feb 2003 10:57 PST |
Missy Which of my books would you like me to autograph for you? Kindest Bryan |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: probonopublico-ga on 21 Feb 2003 11:01 PST |
I do hope that Kemlo (the Pessimist) will let us know when we have overtaken ID 50956 ... |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: kemlo-ga on 21 Feb 2003 12:26 PST |
Dear probonopublico I will of course let you know the moment this happens- And not a moment sooner. Kemlo |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: probonopublico-ga on 22 Feb 2003 07:55 PST |
Comparisons are odious ... But 207 comments for a $2 question seem 100 times more powerful than only 206 comments for a $200 question. Right? |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: probonopublico-ga on 22 Feb 2003 07:57 PST |
Oops! Not 207, silly, only 107. 207 is next week's score. |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: probonopublico-ga on 23 Feb 2003 01:13 PST |
It's time someone posted an answer. As this is a historically important event, are there any suggestions as to who should answer? |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: digsalot-ga on 23 Feb 2003 01:52 PST |
My nomination for 'question answerer' is the person who posts the 1000th comment. If it is a researcher who reaches that goal they can answer own their own. If it is a non-researcher who hits the magic number, then the non-researcher can request the researcher of his/her choice to provide an answer in the non-researcher's name. Just leave the question open and let it run its course through to the bitter end. |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: digsalot-ga on 23 Feb 2003 01:53 PST |
Because if you do leave your question open till the bitter end, |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: digsalot-ga on 23 Feb 2003 01:54 PST |
it will be seen by more people, |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: digsalot-ga on 23 Feb 2003 01:55 PST |
since every time somebody adds something to it |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: digsalot-ga on 23 Feb 2003 01:56 PST |
it pops back to our attention again. |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: digsalot-ga on 23 Feb 2003 01:57 PST |
And someone might come along who hadn't seen it before |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: digsalot-ga on 23 Feb 2003 01:58 PST |
and might consider |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: digsalot-ga on 23 Feb 2003 01:58 PST |
adding something of their own. |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: digsalot-ga on 23 Feb 2003 01:59 PST |
Just something to think about. |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: probonopublico-ga on 23 Feb 2003 03:01 PST |
Thanks a lot, Digs. Good thinking! |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: digsalot-ga on 23 Feb 2003 04:40 PST |
Anytime |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: sublime1-ga on 23 Feb 2003 14:15 PST |
probonopublico said: "Please be aware that ANYONE who calls me a cad will be automatically docked TEN STARS and any tips already given will be retracted." "There are ways!" "However, there is still time for a grovelling apology and if you can find 20 supporters who can also enter a plea for mitigation ... (Separately on this page, please) ..." While some might construe this as an indication that, having now set the official record for number of comments, probonopublico has a somewhat expanded hat-size, I, personally, just can't afford the loss of ten stars and related tips. I will therefore, here and now, offer a 'probono publico apologio', accompanied by sufficient grovelling to make a convincing display for the masses. *grovel* *grovel* *grovel* P.S. I offer the following alternatives to the offending 'cad' word: rascal rapscallion rogue knave rascal scalawag scallywag varlet :) |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: sublime1-ga on 23 Feb 2003 14:18 PST |
rascal-ga: "Please forgive sublime1" |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: sublime1-ga on 23 Feb 2003 14:19 PST |
rapscallion-ga: "Please forgive sublime1" |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: sublime1-ga on 23 Feb 2003 14:20 PST |
rogue-ga: "Please forgive sublime1" |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: sublime1-ga on 23 Feb 2003 14:20 PST |
knave-ga: "Please forgive sublime1" |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: sublime1-ga on 23 Feb 2003 14:21 PST |
scalawag-ga: "Please forgive sublime1" |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: sublime1-ga on 23 Feb 2003 14:22 PST |
scallywag-ga: "Please forgive sublime1" |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: sublime1-ga on 23 Feb 2003 14:22 PST |
varlet-ga: "Please forgive sublime1" |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: kemlo-ga on 23 Feb 2003 17:35 PST |
. |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: probonopublico-ga on 23 Feb 2003 22:20 PST |
Well ... I am somewhat mollified, O Sublime One ... But, although there were TWO rascals on your list, only ONE has risen to your defence. Or am I seeing double? |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: shivreddy-ga on 23 Feb 2003 22:48 PST |
131 Am looking forward to more electrical problems from you... Shiv Reddy |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: j_philipp-ga on 23 Feb 2003 22:58 PST |
Are people still participating in the challenge? |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: j_philipp-ga on 23 Feb 2003 23:01 PST |
I would like to use the space to construct a little experiment regarding what is linked, and what is not. http://www.example.com http://example.com http://example http://www.example http://www.example.com/example.cgi?a=1+2+3 www.example.com example.com www.example.org www.example http:// http://www/ http://example. http://www.com http://www.example/.com ftp://example.com ftp://www.example.com mailto:info@example.com news:alt.example https://www.example.com https://example.com examplehttp://www.example.com/example |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: sublime1-ga on 23 Feb 2003 23:21 PST |
j_phillip... Can you give me an example of what you mean? |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: sublime1-ga on 23 Feb 2003 23:22 PST |
probonopublico... You are, of course, correct - there *were* two rascals, but one of them, rapscallion that he is, abandoned me. |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: sublime1-ga on 23 Feb 2003 23:35 PST |
test: info@example.com |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: j_philipp-ga on 23 Feb 2003 23:37 PST |
Sublime1, I would like to give you an example of what I mean, but what are you referring to? Some more testing: wwwcom www.com www..com www...com www....com www.example.com,www.example.com www.example.com,example |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: j_philipp-ga on 23 Feb 2003 23:39 PST |
Testing again: mailto:example mailto:example.com mailto:example@example mailto:example@example.com (mailto:example@example.com) (mailto:example@example.com ) ( mailto:example@example.com) ( mailto:example@example.com ) |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: sublime1-ga on 23 Feb 2003 23:42 PST |
j_phillip... Good job on the mailto:info@example.com ! |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: sublime1-ga on 23 Feb 2003 23:43 PST |
I was just funning about giving me an example... :) |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: intotravel-ga on 23 Feb 2003 23:46 PST |
For da man: Nicholas Cage, and for da woman ... I don't think I could share him with anyone! hmmm ... I like Kathleen Turner as in 'Body Heat' (but not as in Virgin Suicides, directed by his cousin, Sofia Coppola) and as a person; they were together in Peggy Sue Got Married. He is the Mae West! * There was a young chap called Kurt who with danger was always a flirt his spying was revered until he disappeared ... into an astral adventure with Burt. |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: probonopublico-ga on 24 Feb 2003 00:10 PST |
Hi, Shivreddy Many thanks for EVERYTHING, including the electrical stuff. If I were to post a question on Marie Corelli's theories re electricity (as in her Heliobas trilogy: Ardath, etc.)... Would you rise to the challenge? |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: probonopublico-ga on 24 Feb 2003 00:17 PST |
With all the talent lined up for the Masked Ball, I fear that there's going to be many a mad rush ... Accordingly, would guests please specify NOW who they would wish their dance partners to be? First come, first served. Please note that there may only be time for 250 dances. |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: serenata-ga on 24 Feb 2003 00:27 PST |
I'm no Ginger Rogers (in fact, I probably dance more like Mister Rogers) ... but I'll take Fred Astaire any old day. I figure he can make even a gal with two left feet look good! They don't call me grace ... Serenata |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: shivreddy-ga on 24 Feb 2003 01:02 PST |
145 Sure will, even if I dont/cant, there are excellent researchers aboard this vessel who would love to pin down fantasy logic... lets see what you got! Will you be sending out Gold bordered invites? I like this one >> www.com Shiv Reddy |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: politicalguru-ga on 24 Feb 2003 06:27 PST |
Three questions: |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: politicalguru-ga on 24 Feb 2003 06:28 PST |
1. Who would be playing Jahnke? |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: politicalguru-ga on 24 Feb 2003 06:28 PST |
2. Do we need body doubles at the nude scenes? |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: politicalguru-ga on 24 Feb 2003 06:28 PST |
3. Do we need stunts? |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: politicalguru-ga on 24 Feb 2003 06:29 PST |
OK, four questions: |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: politicalguru-ga on 24 Feb 2003 06:29 PST |
4. What would be on the soundtrack? |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: googlenut-ga on 24 Feb 2003 07:13 PST |
I would like my dance partner to be Pierce Brosnan of course! He did quite well in the Thomas Crown Affair. |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: sublime1-ga on 24 Feb 2003 07:51 PST |
Is anyone being played by Meg Ryan? I could look at her sweet mug up close in a slow dance all night long. |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: pinkfreud-ga on 24 Feb 2003 08:05 PST |
Regarding dance partners... Since I don't dance, I'd like to see the fabulous Gregory Hines dancing with my stunt double. |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: probonopublico-ga on 24 Feb 2003 09:46 PST |
This is getting to be too much for one man to handle ... First, Byrd: Yes Anna Friel is OK because she's a Lancashire lass, born in Rochdale ... which (as every Google Researcher knows) is right next door to Oldham - my home town. Sorry, Googlenut but if Halle Berry (who's mother comes from Liverpool, another Lancashire lass) is there then to Hell with Pierce Brosnan, I shall play the part myself. (Google Researchers will be aware that Jolson himself played the part of Jolson singing Swanee in The Jolson Story.) Sorry, Sublime One but if Meg Ryan is there (and why not?) then, again, I shall have to twirl her round the dance floor. Sorry, Political Guru, YOU have landed the job of Musical Director. (Fully dressed please!) Regarding Kurt Jahnke, if Scriptor can manage more than a few words of German, French, English and Spanish ... then he can audition for the part. Dankeschoen. |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: bobbie7-ga on 24 Feb 2003 09:59 PST |
I would like a slow dance with Antonio Banderas, Val Kilmer and Al Pacino. |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: kemlo-ga on 24 Feb 2003 10:40 PST |
As i've said before I will be played by Barry Humphries His dancing partner will be Dame Edna Everidge. |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: kemlo-ga on 24 Feb 2003 10:45 PST |
Hi probonopublico, How much more pretentious can you get. There is no chance of exceeding 200 comments. H&K Kemlo |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: probonopublico-ga on 24 Feb 2003 11:25 PST |
Oh dear, Kemlo Ever the pessimist! When you (or the actor who is playing you) are on the dance floor, then please don't leave your handbag where it might get stolen ... Or it will ... And that's a promise! |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: pinkfreud-ga on 24 Feb 2003 11:44 PST |
Bryan, Perhaps Kemlo/Dame Edna would sashay away and stop needling you with his/her hatpin if you would answer his/her question regarding how much more pretentious you can get. I know that I, for one, could get a whole heck of a lot more pretentious than this. Trusting you are the same. ;-) (Many thanx for the fun thread!) ~Pink |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: robertskelton-ga on 24 Feb 2003 14:58 PST |
I have feeling that, seeing as 1,000 comments is totally unachievable, the question title contains a typo, and Mr pbp-ga really was only after 100 comments. Therefore I see no need for me to add anything, as we are already up to 160. Doh! 161. |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: ericynot-ga on 24 Feb 2003 15:41 PST |
Sam Elliott por favor. Lean, laconic, and with the proper dose of bemused humor. He always seems to be riding a horse or a Harley. And, he's married to Katherine Ross. Works for me. |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: seizer-ga on 24 Feb 2003 15:46 PST |
I'd hate to be played onscreen by anyone other than myself - after all, a spot of high school acting should be experience enough for any rôle, right? Right? ;-) |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: bowler-ga on 24 Feb 2003 15:46 PST |
This is a lot of filler. And I don't think the same person commenting several times should count. For the true winner for most comments go to the original: http://answers.google.com/answers/main?cmd=threadview&id=50956 |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: serenata-ga on 24 Feb 2003 17:23 PST |
Does it count of Probonopublico comments himself??? Sort of pads those numbers, doesn't it? Still don't call me grace ... Serenata |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: pinkfreud-ga on 24 Feb 2003 18:14 PST |
Kemlo, A fellow Researcher has taken me to task for having been rude to you. I spoke in jest, and certainly meant no offense. I apologize if any offense was taken. ~Pink |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: probonopublico-ga on 24 Feb 2003 21:28 PST |
Dear RobertSkelton Another pessimist! My only regret is that I was not MORE ambitious. I should have gone for a million. |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: sublime1-ga on 24 Feb 2003 22:28 PST |
pbp.. I shall dance with Meg Ryan while your twirling with Halle Berry. I also want a shot at cutting the rug with Katharine Ross while ericynot is dancing with her hubby. |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: probonopublico-ga on 24 Feb 2003 23:18 PST |
Dear Pink On behalf of Kemlo (who is somewhat shy) I have to say that no one could possibly take offence at any comment made by you. Keep a-commenting! B |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: filian-ga on 25 Feb 2003 10:59 PST |
In my movie there'd be lots of gratuitous male nudity -- the full monty up the wazoo. I of course, er the person playing me, would be the only female so she'd get all the male attention. The men starring in my film would range from Rupert Graves, Kevin Spacey, Brad Pitt, Edward Norton, Guy Pearce, Luke and Owen Wilson to Jude Law, Orlando Bloom, Colin Firth and even Harvey Keitel (because he is The Man). My boyfriend/husband/lover would be played by the one and only Jake Gyllenhaal. Yes indeedy. The soundtrack would be a mix of opera and classical music to new wave romantic and goth punk with these bands taking part: Flesh for Lulu, The Cure, The Smiths, The Housemartins, Thrashing Doves, Depeche Mode and of course, Voice of the Beehive. Toodle pipski! Filian |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: pinkfreud-ga on 25 Feb 2003 11:19 PST |
Gee, I sure do like Filian's list of male co-stars. Actually, I would settle for a ménage à quatre involving Kevin Spacey, Jude Law, and Orlando Bloom. Or any of 'em solo. I'm easy. Filian, I have quite a bit of amateur theatrical background. May I play you in your movie? If so, you might want to play me in my movie. If you like Mel Gibson, that is. ;-) ~Pink |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: shivreddy-ga on 25 Feb 2003 11:50 PST |
Yawn, 172! Shiv Reddy |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: pafalafa-ga on 25 Feb 2003 12:17 PST |
comment |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: justaskscott-ga on 25 Feb 2003 18:08 PST |
No comment. |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: digsalot-ga on 25 Feb 2003 18:43 PST |
I'm gonna play myself of course. |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: digsalot-ga on 25 Feb 2003 18:43 PST |
They're gonna put me in the movies. |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: digsalot-ga on 25 Feb 2003 18:44 PST |
They're gonna make a big star outta me. |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: digsalot-ga on 25 Feb 2003 18:45 PST |
They tell me I'm gonna make the big time. |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: digsalot-ga on 25 Feb 2003 18:46 PST |
And all I gotta do is act natchurlly. |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: digsalot-ga on 25 Feb 2003 18:46 PST |
I think that was a song. |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: digsalot-ga on 25 Feb 2003 18:47 PST |
If not |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: digsalot-ga on 25 Feb 2003 18:47 PST |
It should be. |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: justaskscott-ga on 25 Feb 2003 18:47 PST |
Big Star: http://directory.google.com/Top/Arts/Music/Bands_and_Artists/B/Big_Star/ |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: justaskscott-ga on 25 Feb 2003 18:48 PST |
Act Naturally: http://www.stevesbeatles.com/songs/act_naturally.asp |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: justaskscott-ga on 25 Feb 2003 18:51 PST |
Big Time: http://www.rollingstone.com/videos/playvideo.asp?sid=4385&cf=59 |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: justaskscott-ga on 25 Feb 2003 18:51 PST |
Just trying to illustrate what Digsalot is saying. |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: shivreddy-ga on 25 Feb 2003 22:08 PST |
Just to bring this question back to the front page... Shiv Reddy |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: politicalguru-ga on 26 Feb 2003 04:55 PST |
With all due respect to Scriptor, if he plays two parts (one as Scriptor and another as Jahnke), it would make it look like a cheap soap opera or B-Movie. I suggest John Thaw or Michael Caine (especially the young ones). If you're looking for a German actor, I recommend Armin Mueller-Stahl. However, after seeing the brilliant "Painist" (if you haven't seen it yet - go!), I must say that Adrian Brody demonstrated quiet good acting and ability to speak different languages (German, Polish and of course English, I saw it in the original version!). |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: politicalguru-ga on 26 Feb 2003 04:58 PST |
Regarding the gals' discussion on the famous male nude scene, I feel a little bad that the young Sean Connery is not in. He is, after all, the first, one and only Bond. |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: politicalguru-ga on 26 Feb 2003 04:59 PST |
I'll dance with David Bowie (who is also an actor): http://www.absolutelyric.com/a/view/David%20Bowie/Lets%20Dance/ |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: politicalguru-ga on 26 Feb 2003 05:01 PST |
Must agree with Filian's fine choice of music. However, I also thought the Boo Radleys "Wake Up" is a great opening song for a beginning of a film. |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: websearcher-ga on 26 Feb 2003 05:51 PST |
Definitely Tom Cruise for me. I was once told I look like him (but I don't think I do). websearcher-ga |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: politicalguru-ga on 26 Feb 2003 06:06 PST |
a fifth |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: politicalguru-ga on 26 Feb 2003 06:07 PST |
of the goal |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: politicalguru-ga on 26 Feb 2003 06:07 PST |
is almost |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: politicalguru-ga on 26 Feb 2003 06:07 PST |
here |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: politicalguru-ga on 26 Feb 2003 06:07 PST |
that is |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: politicalguru-ga on 26 Feb 2003 06:07 PST |
20% |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: politicalguru-ga on 26 Feb 2003 06:08 PST |
of the required |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: politicalguru-ga on 26 Feb 2003 06:08 PST |
comments (200) |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: liner-ga on 26 Feb 2003 06:48 PST |
I don't know why anybody would respond to this question! I know that I certainly would not add to the cause! |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: justaskscott-ga on 26 Feb 2003 10:27 PST |
I agree with liner-ga. ;-) |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: digsalot-ga on 26 Feb 2003 10:31 PST |
Yea!!!!!! |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: digsalot-ga on 26 Feb 2003 10:32 PST |
We're back. |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: digsalot-ga on 26 Feb 2003 10:34 PST |
I almost did the same thing politicalguru did and post a comment as an answer. |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: digsalot-ga on 26 Feb 2003 10:35 PST |
So I can understand how PG must have felt when the answer popped up. |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: kemlo-ga on 26 Feb 2003 12:03 PST |
Add a bonus prize to politicalguru, Five comments in the same minute, how do you do it? |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: kemlo-ga on 26 Feb 2003 12:08 PST |
to Pink All comments made and taken in Jest. But if I see a sombulant tiger I poke it with a sharp stick LL Kemlo |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: justaskscott-ga on 26 Feb 2003 12:22 PST |
Let's see ... |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: justaskscott-ga on 26 Feb 2003 12:22 PST |
... how can you post five comments in the same minute ... |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: justaskscott-ga on 26 Feb 2003 12:23 PST |
... I think it can be done ... |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: justaskscott-ga on 26 Feb 2003 12:23 PST |
... by opening "Add a Comment" in five windows ... |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: justaskscott-ga on 26 Feb 2003 12:23 PST |
... and submitting comments in each of them ... |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: justaskscott-ga on 26 Feb 2003 12:23 PST |
... wait, this is six! |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: justaskscott-ga on 26 Feb 2003 12:25 PST |
Dang, I split the comments over the course of 2 minutes. At least I tried. :-) |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: justaskscott-ga on 26 Feb 2003 18:21 PST |
Several hours since the last comment ... |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: leep-ga on 26 Feb 2003 18:52 PST |
Ok. Testing. |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: leep-ga on 26 Feb 2003 18:52 PST |
I really have nothing more to say. |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: leep-ga on 26 Feb 2003 18:52 PST |
Except |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: leep-ga on 26 Feb 2003 18:53 PST |
For |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: leep-ga on 26 Feb 2003 18:53 PST |
A |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: leep-ga on 26 Feb 2003 18:53 PST |
Comments |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: leep-ga on 26 Feb 2003 18:53 PST |
In |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: leep-ga on 26 Feb 2003 18:53 PST |
This |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: leep-ga on 26 Feb 2003 18:53 PST |
Question |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: leep-ga on 26 Feb 2003 18:53 PST |
Anyhow, |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: leep-ga on 26 Feb 2003 18:53 PST |
Rock |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: leep-ga on 26 Feb 2003 18:54 PST |
On! |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: pinkfreud-ga on 26 Feb 2003 19:10 PST |
There once was a fellow named Bryan Who started a thread that's undyin'. A kilo of answers? A masked ball with dancers? Pinkfreud will applaud him for tryin'. |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: justaskscott-ga on 26 Feb 2003 19:28 PST |
There is a Researcher named 'freud Who temperment'ly is never annoyed Her first name is pink A woman, I think, Whose comments are always enjoyed. Gee, that's the first limerick I've tried in years. Could be better, could be worse. Anyone else want to have a go? It's a long way to a thousand .... |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: sublime1-ga on 26 Feb 2003 19:56 PST |
It's also a long way to Tipperary... |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: sublime1-ga on 26 Feb 2003 19:58 PST |
Of |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: sublime1-ga on 26 Feb 2003 19:58 PST |
course |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: sublime1-ga on 26 Feb 2003 19:58 PST |
paying |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: sublime1-ga on 26 Feb 2003 19:58 PST |
a |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: sublime1-ga on 26 Feb 2003 19:59 PST |
'rary' |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: sublime1-ga on 26 Feb 2003 19:59 PST |
penny |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: sublime1-ga on 26 Feb 2003 19:59 PST |
at |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: sublime1-ga on 26 Feb 2003 19:59 PST |
time |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: sublime1-ga on 26 Feb 2003 20:00 PST |
is |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: sublime1-ga on 26 Feb 2003 20:00 PST |
*also* |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: sublime1-ga on 26 Feb 2003 20:00 PST |
long |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: googlenut-ga on 26 Feb 2003 20:11 PST |
Wow! You people have been busy. I think we may get to 1000 if we sustain this rate. |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: omnivorous-ga on 26 Feb 2003 20:48 PST |
Well maybe I just hit the wrong button . . . now it's appearing as an answer. We can always withdraw my "gross" non-comment. |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: politicalguru-ga on 27 Feb 2003 04:06 PST |
I'm the last one! |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: probonopublico-ga on 27 Feb 2003 08:13 PST |
Now ... Who said 244 was the max? |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: kemlo-ga on 27 Feb 2003 10:38 PST |
So what was the question that launched........... |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: kemlo-ga on 27 Feb 2003 10:40 PST |
Finger trouble, its still accepting comments |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: kemlo-ga on 27 Feb 2003 10:45 PST |
two hundred and fortynine and you will be pleased to read i am running out of steam. |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: hailstorm-ga on 27 Feb 2003 19:48 PST |
probonopublico, Why exactly did you rate this question's answer five stars with a tip? The answer had absolutely no relation to the original question asked, and the Researcher displayed poor math skills on top of that! I would have asked for a refund... |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: probonopublico-ga on 27 Feb 2003 21:02 PST |
Hi, Hailstorm I'm a simple soul who believes EVERYTHING uttered by every Google researcher (especially Missy, Pinky, Bobbie and Ace). It's the doctrine of infallibily that they share with governments and politicians. I also believe in Father Christmas. Please don't disabuse me. |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: politicalguru-ga on 28 Feb 2003 04:13 PST |
I think someone else might have a bit of math problems as well. 200 is exactly 20% of 1000 - or did we recede to 500? |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: politicalguru-ga on 28 Feb 2003 04:15 PST |
Regarding Bryan's trust and faith in other human beings (especially if they are GARs), I suggest a quote from Neil Young: "Take my advice, don't listen to me...". |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: probonopublico-ga on 28 Feb 2003 04:21 PST |
Hi, Political Guru You have obviously overlooked the crossing of the International Date & Data Lines which have multiplier effects on all Internet-based calculations. |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: digsalot-ga on 28 Feb 2003 13:29 PST |
It |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: digsalot-ga on 28 Feb 2003 13:29 PST |
is |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: digsalot-ga on 28 Feb 2003 13:30 PST |
not |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: digsalot-ga on 28 Feb 2003 13:30 PST |
the |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: digsalot-ga on 28 Feb 2003 13:30 PST |
end |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: digsalot-ga on 28 Feb 2003 13:31 PST |
of |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: digsalot-ga on 28 Feb 2003 13:32 PST |
line |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: digsalot-ga on 28 Feb 2003 13:33 PST |
yet |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: digsalot-ga on 28 Feb 2003 13:33 PST |
even |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: digsalot-ga on 28 Feb 2003 13:33 PST |
omniverous |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: digsalot-ga on 28 Feb 2003 13:35 PST |
did |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: digsalot-ga on 28 Feb 2003 13:35 PST |
inadvertantly |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: pinkfreud-ga on 28 Feb 2003 17:13 PST |
Hey, I just noticed that Bryan's actual question was "Who would YOU like to represent YOU on screen?" The answer given by Omnivorous was "A gross." Gee, Omnivorous, that could be any one of a number of actors. Tom Green springs to mind... :-D |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: googlenut-ga on 28 Feb 2003 20:12 PST |
268 |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: easterangel-ga on 28 Feb 2003 20:23 PST |
Well. I'm not giving up yet! |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: shivreddy-ga on 28 Feb 2003 21:01 PST |
I dont understand why this cannot reach 1000 Shiv Reddy |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: probonopublico-ga on 01 Mar 2003 01:52 PST |
I wonder what all those other Google researchers who have not yet commented are doing? |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: kemlo-ga on 01 Mar 2003 02:07 PST |
They don't want to play with the little children |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: tan-ga on 07 Mar 2003 13:25 PST |
This is 273. I would be played by Liza Minelli and it would be a musical. A musical comedy. Co-staring Clint Eastwood. Can it get any funnier? |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: probonopublico-ga on 07 Mar 2003 13:33 PST |
Hey ... We're on the move again! Many thanks, Tan, we'll reach 1,000 yet. C'mon folks, more comments please ... Will EVERYBODY who has previously commented please reappear? And tell your friends, too. |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: cmaury-ga on 07 Mar 2003 14:08 PST |
just helping this thing on it's way. Any actor foolish enough to take the role of me would have their work cut out for them. |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: pafalafa-ga on 07 Mar 2003 14:49 PST |
Hey...I thought this thing had reach some sort of unbreachable cosmic limit. Goes to show what I know... |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: probonopublico-ga on 07 Mar 2003 22:05 PST |
I am having difficulty finalising my list of dance partners. Would anyone who is prepared to forego the honour and pleasure, please let me know immediately. Thanks! The Masked One |
Subject:
My sister says I look like Joe Cocker
From: sergeantshultz-ga on 08 Mar 2003 23:45 PST |
With a little help from my friends... The song sounds appropriate for this bonafide occasion. http://admin.pressplay.com/duet/sampler/sampler.html?opcode=search&type=artist&id=10000302&class=artist&artist_id=10000302&LID=3487313 I would try to do what you just might construe with a bit of luck you wont give a chuck So we bid SWEET ADIEU If any one starts with the 999 beers on the wall I personally am going to fart in their presence, no it wont be pretty! |
Subject:
Sergeant Schultz is a Genius
From: probonopublico-ga on 09 Mar 2003 00:18 PST |
I had never thought of changing the Subject Line. |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: probonopublico-ga on 10 Mar 2003 14:12 PST |
What colour (color for some of our colonies) masks do attendees intend to wear? (This information is required for security reasons) Please note that your comments may be recorded for training purposes. |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: probonopublico-ga on 11 Mar 2003 13:34 PST |
Where's Websearcher? What a geek! |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: liner-ga on 11 Mar 2003 14:37 PST |
I said it earlier and I am saying it again: I will never deign to play around with such a silly game of simply adding comments for the sake of comments. |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: jumpingjoe-ga on 13 Mar 2003 09:34 PST |
Finally adding a comment... under duress! Good work with all this Bryan, you're following up the sentiment behind your handle. er... Jack Nicholson can play me in the movie of my life:- we can save money by just redubbing the occasional line of One Flew Over the Cuckoo's Nest. |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: aceresearcher-ga on 13 Mar 2003 09:45 PST |
[quote="probonobublico"]I'm a simple soul who believes EVERYTHING uttered by every Google researcher (especially Missy, Pinky, Bobbie and Ace).[/quote] Good. It's nice to know I'm fooling SOMEBODY. ;-) |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: snapanswer-ga on 13 Mar 2003 16:16 PST |
Just waiting so that I could post comment #285... and now it has happened. |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: sublime1-ga on 13 Mar 2003 16:26 PST |
piffle |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: andywall-ga on 13 Mar 2003 16:28 PST |
What a blast! |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: j_philipp-ga on 14 Mar 2003 22:53 PST |
[Space left intentionally blank] |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: sublime1-ga on 14 Mar 2003 23:37 PST |
this document contains no data |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: journalist-ga on 15 Mar 2003 07:27 PST |
Eenie, meanie, chili beanie... |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: journalist-ga on 15 Mar 2003 07:32 PST |
Now that my crystal ball has unfogged....Lily Tomlin. (I also believe she'd make a fine President because she would certainly add corners to the Oval Office.) |
Subject:
Comments
From: omnivorous-ga on 15 Mar 2003 07:50 PST |
TGI Saturday. |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: pinkfreud-ga on 15 Mar 2003 09:00 PST |
>> What colour (color for some of our colonies) masks >> do attendees intend to wear? As might be expected, I shall be "in the pink." |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: sublime1-ga on 15 Mar 2003 16:35 PST |
An asynchronous request is pending. |
Subject:
Probonopublico? Me a Genius? <'(((><
From: sergeantshultz-ga on 15 Mar 2003 17:18 PST |
Do any of you have a great website that you would love to share with your friends? Like http://hardtofindseminars.com or http://www.sowpub.com/cgi-bin/forum/webbbs_config.pl or ? |
Subject:
Me a genius? Wow, that explains the mood swings! ~~~~~~^~~~^~^~^~><)))'>~~~~~^~^
From: sergeantshultz-ga on 15 Mar 2003 17:28 PST |
Where oh where are you tonight? I searched the world over, thought I'd found true love... You (rippppp) another and _____ I was gone. Living or dead? Any actor or non-actor, hopefully someone you recognize, eh? Did everyone see Google's cute Albert Einstein making up the first o in the main google page? It was his birthday yesterday (3-14). I guess me being called a genius has me considering new characters to play me. Einstein has too much hair though, I guess he could get buzzed. Later |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: probonopublico-ga on 15 Mar 2003 21:50 PST |
Coming up for 300 ... |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: kemlo-ga on 16 Mar 2003 01:43 PST |
But who wants to be the three-hundreths |
Subject:
Re: Over 10,000 Comments, please!
From: kemlo-ga on 16 Mar 2003 01:45 PST |
When if I wait a little while it will be me |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: kemlo-ga on 16 Mar 2003 01:48 PST |
See Bryan I told you so, you won't make it past 100 comments never mind 300, Not a chance in the world. |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: probonopublico-ga on 16 Mar 2003 02:08 PST |
Hi, Kemlo Good to hear from you again. We haven't yet fixed a venue for the Masked Ball. Any suggestions? Regards PSAW |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: j_philipp-ga on 16 Mar 2003 04:00 PST |
Let me start a little free-style everyone-can-participate mystery story. What you do is write some sentences every time, cut them off before the end, then wait for another *-ga to take over the sentence. --------------------- It was a stormy winter night when private Researcher Samspade locked a question that would change his life forever. The question title was ... |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: tehuti-ga on 16 Mar 2003 04:36 PST |
Come now, let us not be too hasty in giving away the secret. After all, we don't want a horde of researchers breathing down sam's neck, ready to snatch the lock away from him as he fails to renew it for the fourth time, due to his alarm clock failing to ring at 3.22 am. Suffice it to say, that it offered the astounding price of $2 for a 10,000 word thesis that required extensive experience in... |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: hammer-ga on 16 Mar 2003 07:28 PST |
...onomatopoeia. Sam shook his head as he clicked the Answer button. It would be a lot of work, but he had the necessary expertise from his younger days, when he was as a... |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: missy-ga on 16 Mar 2003 07:32 PST |
...quantum physics. Though he had studied physics briefly in college, he had forgotten most of what he had learned. Still, it wasn't like his answer was actually going to be ready - this was another case where he was certain that it would be copied and pasted into Word, auto-spellchecked and called a term paper. Even so, he was enjoying the physics brush-up, and had 15 Mozilla tabs open when... |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: digsalot-ga on 16 Mar 2003 09:08 PST |
from out of the blue came a black horse, galloping at full speed and carrying a purple haired Valkerie from the far north. Samspade jumped from his chair in amazement and as he was gazing at the incredigle sight he... |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: digsalot-ga on 16 Mar 2003 09:08 PST |
from out of the blue came a black horse, galloping at full speed and carrying a purple haired Valkerie from the far north. Samspade jumped from his chair in amazement and as he was gazing at the incredible sight he... |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: probonopublico-ga on 16 Mar 2003 09:39 PST |
Hi, Digsalot Was that TWO different black horses? |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: knowitall22-ga on 16 Mar 2003 10:53 PST |
For comments to total one K We need more to enter the fray So whomever you are Whether near or afar Please send in more nonsense today For the lead in my movie biography? The obvious choice is that stalwart, handsome and agile action hero.(Hint: His first name is Sylvester.) No, no, no! Not Stallone! The other one! Sufferin' succotash! |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: digsalot-ga on 16 Mar 2003 10:56 PST |
No probo - just a problem with posting. LOL, I didn't think the first one had gone through before I corrected the spelling typo in "incredible." There is only one horse and only one purple haired Valkerie. She will acknowledge no rival. - - - Now back to the story. |
Subject:
!!!___,,,^.".^,,,___!!!
From: sublime1-ga on 16 Mar 2003 12:06 PST |
Biplex port is initializing. Wait a few seconds and redial. |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: steph53-ga on 16 Mar 2003 15:09 PST |
"from out of the blue came a black horse, galloping at full speed and carrying a purple haired Valkerie from the far north. Samspade jumped from his chair in amazement and as he was gazing at the incredible sight he..." ...knocked his chair over and fell. Just before he hit the floor, the purple haired Valkerie reached down and effortlessly lifted him up onto the horse... |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: tlspiegel-ga on 16 Mar 2003 16:45 PST |
off course... uh... I mean of course. |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: j_philipp-ga on 17 Mar 2003 19:37 PST |
... when his alarm bell rang and awoke him from this chaotic nightmare. That's when Samspade realized he had the question locked for 1 hour and 55 minutes already. Panicking, drooling, he jumped up from the carpet where he had landed and into the chair, reaching for ... |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: j_philipp-ga on 17 Mar 2003 19:38 PST |
Below comment is wrong. |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: j_philipp-ga on 17 Mar 2003 19:39 PST |
Above comment is right. |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: digsalot-ga on 18 Mar 2003 19:17 PST |
Oh |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: digsalot-ga on 18 Mar 2003 19:17 PST |
my |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: digsalot-ga on 18 Mar 2003 19:18 PST |
word |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: digsalot-ga on 18 Mar 2003 19:18 PST |
today |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: digsalot-ga on 18 Mar 2003 19:20 PST |
deadline |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: digsalot-ga on 18 Mar 2003 19:21 PST |
and |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: digsalot-ga on 18 Mar 2003 19:21 PST |
so |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: digsalot-ga on 18 Mar 2003 19:21 PST |
many |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: digsalot-ga on 18 Mar 2003 19:22 PST |
to |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: digsalot-ga on 18 Mar 2003 19:23 PST |
do |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: digsalot-ga on 18 Mar 2003 19:23 PST |
327 |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: digsalot-ga on 18 Mar 2003 19:23 PST |
328 |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: sublime1-ga on 18 Mar 2003 19:52 PST |
A syntax error was encountered while processing a script. |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: sublime1-ga on 18 Mar 2003 19:53 PST |
Loopback detected.. |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: sublime1-ga on 18 Mar 2003 19:54 PST |
Cannot access TCPCFG.DLL. |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: sublime1-ga on 18 Mar 2003 19:54 PST |
The phone number, including prefix and suffix, is too long. |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: sublime1-ga on 18 Mar 2003 19:55 PST |
The PPP packet is invalid. |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: sublime1-ga on 18 Mar 2003 19:55 PST |
PPP terminated by remote machine. |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: sublime1-ga on 18 Mar 2003 19:56 PST |
PPP timeout. |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: sublime1-ga on 18 Mar 2003 19:56 PST |
The Remote Access IP configuration is unusable. |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: sublime1-ga on 18 Mar 2003 19:57 PST |
No active ISDN lines are available. |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: sublime1-ga on 18 Mar 2003 19:58 PST |
RasMan initialization failure. Check the event log. |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: sublime1-ga on 18 Mar 2003 19:58 PST |
Error changing password on domain. |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: sublime1-ga on 18 Mar 2003 19:59 PST |
X.25 diagnostic indication. |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: sublime1-ga on 18 Mar 2003 20:01 PST |
Cannot detect carrier. |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: sublime1-ga on 18 Mar 2003 20:02 PST |
A person answered instead of a modem. |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: j_philipp-ga on 18 Mar 2003 21:31 PST |
(Comment 343 is reserved for future use.) |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: missy-ga on 18 Mar 2003 21:36 PST |
Out of cheese error. |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: missy-ga on 18 Mar 2003 21:36 PST |
Please reinstall universe and hit restart. |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: missy-ga on 18 Mar 2003 21:37 PST |
We're sorry, but the page you are looking for does not yet exist. |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: missy-ga on 18 Mar 2003 21:38 PST |
Redo From Start. Reality Domain Error. |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: j_philipp-ga on 18 Mar 2003 21:38 PST |
Unexpected Error: Object 'Comment 347' does not exist. Please consult help. |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: j_philipp-ga on 18 Mar 2003 21:39 PST |
Oh Missy you stole my comment! |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: j_philipp-ga on 18 Mar 2003 21:40 PST |
Missy, behind you -- a $200 dollar question! |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: j_philipp-ga on 18 Mar 2003 21:42 PST |
150.00 USD United States Dollars = 570.000 MYR Malaysia Ringgits xe.com - The Universal Currency Converter http://www.xe.com/ucc/ |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: j_philipp-ga on 18 Mar 2003 21:44 PST |
[Comment has been cancelled.] |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: j_philipp-ga on 18 Mar 2003 22:31 PST |
From my Unnecessary Links Collection: The Poorly-Drawn Lamp Page http://www.flamingmayo.com/poorlydrawnlamps/ |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: seizer-ga on 19 Mar 2003 04:49 PST |
Error: printer on fire (no, really: http://www.eeggs.com/items/1037.html ) |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: farzin-ga on 19 Mar 2003 08:33 PST |
dsfsadfasd |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: farzin-ga on 19 Mar 2003 08:34 PST |
ummm thats funny |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: carpediem-ga on 19 Mar 2003 09:38 PST |
Comment # 357 My choice is Heather Graham....the flamboyant version of myself;) |
Subject:
Re: Over 358 Comments, please!
From: kemlo-ga on 20 Mar 2003 16:30 PST |
We have the venue, we have the costumes. what we need next is the menu. how many courses and their contents. |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: probonopublico-ga on 22 Mar 2003 05:27 PST |
Just stopped for a few minutes ... Now, are we already for the next big surge forward? |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: pafalafa-ga on 22 Mar 2003 07:20 PST |
There's nothing much happening with the *real* questions (i.e., the one's I can earn some money on) so I just thought I'd drop in another comment here. Keep on keeping on... paf |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: probonopublico-ga on 22 Mar 2003 07:55 PST |
On behalf of my producers, I am pleased to report that Heather Graham will be made VERY welcome. Hope you're following this, Heath. Thanks, Carpediem (Now that's a funny alias!). |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: kemlo-ga on 23 Mar 2003 08:47 PST |
Hi Probonopublico Just wondered what young master feral has to say about this question LoL Kemlo |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: sublime1-ga on 23 Mar 2003 10:15 PST |
A flea and a fly in a flue were imprisoned so what could they do? Said the flea "let us fly" said the fly" let us flee" so they flew through a flaw in the flue. |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: probonopublico-ga on 23 Mar 2003 11:48 PST |
Hi, Simon (Kemlo) & The Sublime One No news from Feral on this. as yet. But, Sublime One, You just get better and better. Are you perfect? (Or should I post a supplementary?) LOL Bryan |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: j_philipp-ga on 23 Mar 2003 21:31 PST |
"Success is sweet and sweeter if long delayed and gotten through many struggles and defeats." -- Amos Bronson Alcott |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: j_philipp-ga on 23 Mar 2003 21:32 PST |
"We fall forward to succeed." -- Mary Kay Ash |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: j_philipp-ga on 23 Mar 2003 21:32 PST |
"Success is a journey not a destination. The doing is usually more important than the outcome." -- Arthur Ashe |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: j_philipp-ga on 23 Mar 2003 21:32 PST |
"The most successful men in the end are those whose success is the result of steady accretion." -- Alexander Graham Bell |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: j_philipp-ga on 23 Mar 2003 21:33 PST |
"It is the man who carefully advances step by step, with his mind becoming wider and wider ... who is bound to succeed ..." -- Alexander Graham Bell |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: j_philipp-ga on 23 Mar 2003 21:33 PST |
"Success is often the result of taking a misstep in the right direction." -- Al Bernstein |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: j_philipp-ga on 23 Mar 2003 21:33 PST |
"When all is said and done, success without happiness is the worst kind of failure." -- Louis Binstock |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: j_philipp-ga on 23 Mar 2003 21:34 PST |
"Success means winning the war, not every battle." -- Edwin C. Bliss |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: j_philipp-ga on 23 Mar 2003 21:34 PST |
"The first and most important step toward success is the feeling that we can succeed." -- Nelson Boswell |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: j_philipp-ga on 23 Mar 2003 21:34 PST |
"To guarantee success, act as if it were impossible to fail." -- Dorothea Brande |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: j_philipp-ga on 23 Mar 2003 21:35 PST |
"The only thing that separates successful people from the ones who aren't is the willingness to work very, very hard." -- Helen Gurley Brown |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: j_philipp-ga on 23 Mar 2003 21:35 PST |
"A minute's success pays the failure of years." -- Robert Browning |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: j_philipp-ga on 25 Mar 2003 01:28 PST |
So much for pep talk. |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: kemlo-ga on 25 Mar 2003 10:37 PST |
j_philipp How much is a pep torque ? Priced at sence per pound. Kemlo |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: kemlo-ga on 25 Mar 2003 11:21 PST |
Hi Bryan Just a thought, perhaps it is a good thing feral did not post on this question, considering what Google did to the site he did post at. It would be a great pity to have it erased before you reach your goal. Regards Simon (I see some E-mailers end with the words "Hugs and Kisses" :-))) |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: probonopublico-ga on 25 Mar 2003 11:23 PST |
I recall that Alexander Graham Bell's telephone didn't work ... Until his pal at the Patent Office tipped him off about Elisha Gray's patent that did work ... thus giving Bell the chance to modify his own patent application which had an earlier priority. So, Bell's success was based on fraud! |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: kemlo-ga on 25 Mar 2003 11:40 PST |
Hi Bryan Nice to hear about your grandmother. In the nineteen fifties I used to live near there at a place called Hatfield Borstal. But I was only there two and a half years. Was that the one where both patents were filed on the same day within hours of each other. Regards Simon |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: probonopublico-ga on 25 Mar 2003 11:48 PST |
Hi, Simon (Please note that I am the supreme authority on etiqette.) You're right about the patents being filed the same day. But Bell was the only one with the patent agent in his pocket. KR B |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: probonopublico-ga on 25 Mar 2003 11:54 PST |
Kindly note that, on this day, I have decided and I therefore decree that the letter 'U' is no longer necessary after 'Q' in the English language. Please pass this important decision on to all your contacts. Many thanks. |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: sublime1-ga on 25 Mar 2003 20:42 PST |
This qite radically changes the nature of the qestion, but it would be silly to qit now. We must qench our thirst for the answer to this qery as qickly as we can. |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: snapanswer-ga on 25 Mar 2003 22:05 PST |
Just waiting so that I could post comment #385... and now it has happened. |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: probonopublico-ga on 25 Mar 2003 23:42 PST |
SnapAnswer? Waiting for #385 does not impress me as being very snappy. Will you be changing your nom de guerre when (if ever) this is permitted? |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: kemlo-ga on 25 Mar 2003 23:46 PST |
1. Two vultures board an airplane, each carrying two dead raccoons. The stewardess looks at them and says, "I'm sorry, gentlemen, only one carrion allowed per passenger." |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: kemlo-ga on 25 Mar 2003 23:48 PST |
. Two boll weevils grew up in South Carolina. One went to Hollywood and became a famous actor. The other stayed behind in the cotton fields and never amounted to much - he became known as the lesser of two weevils. |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: kemlo-ga on 25 Mar 2003 23:57 PST |
A group of chess enthusiasts checked into a hotel and were standing in the lobby discussing their recent tournament victories. After about an hour, the manager came out of theoffice and asked them to disperse. "But why?" they asked, as they moved off. "Because," he said,"I can't stand chess-nuts boasting in an open foyer." |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: probonopublico-ga on 26 Mar 2003 04:22 PST |
Hi, Simon, aka Kemlo the Magnificent Those are actually rather good ... I don't suppose that you have 600 more? KR B |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: digsalot-ga on 26 Mar 2003 14:02 PST |
OK |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: digsalot-ga on 26 Mar 2003 14:04 PST |
Here is 1 - - - - If the count stops before 10, it means I'm getting "document contains no data" messages again. |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: digsalot-ga on 26 Mar 2003 14:04 PST |
Anda 2 |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: digsalot-ga on 26 Mar 2003 14:05 PST |
Anda 3 - - - Have you ever heard of Lawrence Welk? |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: digsalot-ga on 26 Mar 2003 14:06 PST |
Try for 4 |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: digsalot-ga on 26 Mar 2003 14:06 PST |
5 - - up to a quarter of a score. |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: digsalot-ga on 26 Mar 2003 14:08 PST |
6 - - Pick up Stix - - but that's another story. Stix hasn't been working her corner lately. |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: digsalot-ga on 26 Mar 2003 14:09 PST |
7 - A very unlucky number if you happen to be playing the Big 6 or Big 8 at the dice table. |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: digsalot-ga on 26 Mar 2003 14:10 PST |
8 - My birth weight |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: digsalot-ga on 26 Mar 2003 14:11 PST |
9 - - Toe the line. |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: digsalot-ga on 26 Mar 2003 14:12 PST |
10 - - Now back to my pen. |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: digsalot-ga on 26 Mar 2003 14:14 PST |
Personally, I vote for "Lorainne's Barefoot Grass" - - I need the $15. |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: kemlo-ga on 26 Mar 2003 14:23 PST |
Two Eskimos sitting in a kayak were chilly, so hey lit a fire in the craft. Unsurprisingly it sank, proving once again that you can't have your kayak and heat it too. |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: kemlo-ga on 26 Mar 2003 14:27 PST |
A woman has twins and gives them up for adoption. One of them goes to family in Egypt and is named "Ahmal." The other goes to a family in Spain; they name him "Juan." Years later, Juan sends a picture of himself to his birth mother. Upon receiving the picture, she tells her husband that she wishes she also had a picture of Ahmal. Her husband responds, "They're twins! If you've seen Juan, you've seen Ahmal." |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: kemlo-ga on 26 Mar 2003 14:33 PST |
These friars were behind on their belfry payments, so they opened up a small florist shop to raise funds. Since everyone liked to buy flowers from the men of God, a rival florist across town thought the competition was unfair. He asked the good fathers to close down, but they would not. He went back and begged the friars to close. They ignored him. So, the rival florist hired Hugh MacTaggart, the roughest and most vicious thug in town to "persuade" them to close. Hugh beat up the friars and trashed their store, saying he'd be back if they didn't close up shop. Terrified, they did so, thereby proving that...(are you ready) . Hugh, and only Hugh, can prevent florist friars. |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: kemlo-ga on 26 Mar 2003 14:36 PST |
Mahatma Gandhi, as you know, walked barefoot most of the time, which produced an impressive set of calluses on his feet. He also ate very little, which made him rather frail and with his odd diet, he suffered from bad breath. This made him ....(Oh, man, this is so bad, it's good) ......A super calloused fragile mystic hexed by halitosis. |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: kemlo-ga on 26 Mar 2003 23:26 PST |
Hi Bryan I've just read my comment "381" and have come to a thought you mite think I was an inmate in the Borstal. Far from that, my father was a deputy governor there. As to Lincolnshire, I'm not a "Yellow Belly" as I've only lived heir for twenty six years since my retirement. Rgd. Simon |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: kemlo-ga on 26 Mar 2003 23:32 PST |
Hi Bryan It is now taking thirty four seconds to display this page and we are only at four hundred and eight. Extrapolate this to one thousand comments Rgd. Simon |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: johnfrommelbourne-ga on 27 Mar 2003 07:10 PST |
Does the fact that I have no comment to make on the subject matter at hand constitute as a true comment as per the 1000 you are seeking or is this comment therefore not considered a comment at all. |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: probonopublico-ga on 27 Mar 2003 07:30 PST |
Hi, Simon (aka Kemlo the Magnificent Thanks for the further jokes. 'Since your retirement'? ... And I thought you were only a youngster! Hi, Johnfrommelbourne Any comment is welcome - especially from you ... (Creep, creep) Rgds Bryan |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: kemlo-ga on 27 Mar 2003 12:21 PST |
I spillced coffcee cincto my kcey boardc.c As a rcesulct, c's gcet inctermixcced with cwactever I ctypce. Plcease replace mcy kceyboard. ccthanks. |
Subject:
Engineers are so smart...
From: sergeantshultz-ga on 27 Mar 2003 19:24 PST |
A Lawyer, A Doctor and an Engineer were posed with that question, "Is the glass half full or half empty?" Well the Lawyer says, "It's obviously half empty... We're you hurt? Did someone steal it? Let's sue!" The Doctor says, "It appears to be half full but we can make it complete... Do you have insurance?" The Engineer says, "It's obvious that job is using twice as much glass as is needed." As usual... Sgt. Shultz knows.... Nuthing! |
Subject:
Will the real probonopublico stand up?
From: sergeantshultz-ga on 27 Mar 2003 19:57 PST |
Okay now go check the lock at your front door. Then go to the bathroom and pull out the little box from the upper left corner of your medicine chest, bring it back to your pc. On the back of the box, locate the third line down. Place that third line into your google search field and post the top result here as soon as possible. Remember this is a vitally important mission, we will release more information to you ater your post. Hurry! . . ? ? ! What are you waiting for? |
Subject:
ater could be after
From: sergeantshultz-ga on 27 Mar 2003 19:59 PST |
Now get going! |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: flashv-ga on 27 Mar 2003 20:26 PST |
Two Kiwis (New Zealanders) are walking toward each other, and one is carrying a sack. When they meet, one says, "Hey Marvin, watcha got in th' bag?" "Jis' some lambs." "If I guesses how many they is, kin I have one?" "Hey, if ya guesses right, I'll give you both of 'em." "OK. Ummmmmmmm .... five?" Had to be a part of the 'K' quest, please forgive this Aussie sharing some Kiwi ribbing as part of the process but individual motivation is a personal matter and the joke does contain semi-relevant numerical matter. Good luck . |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: probonopublico-ga on 27 Mar 2003 22:38 PST |
WOW ....... Will this never end? Is this perpetual motion? |
Subject:
"The Comment of Dreams"
From: flashv-ga on 28 Mar 2003 00:12 PST |
probonopublico-ga, Just write it. They will come. |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: flashv-ga on 28 Mar 2003 00:14 PST |
Occurs to me too probonopublico-ga that in the pursuit of this lofty goal, your email must be getting a pounding, with all of these comment notifications. Indeed this must be considered a labour of love for you. |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: cmaury-ga on 28 Mar 2003 07:44 PST |
Here's my comment: I like cheese |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: flajason-ga on 28 Mar 2003 10:09 PST |
"Aw, people can come up with statistics to prove anything, Kent. 14 percent of all people know that. " - Homer Simpson |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: turkeyvanfan-ga on 28 Mar 2003 11:20 PST |
Some day everyone will visit turkeyvan dot com. But don't go there yet, its not ready. EAT TUUUUUUUUUUUURRRKKEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEYYY! |
Subject:
Re: Mis-spelling of our English
From: kemlo-ga on 28 Mar 2003 11:30 PST |
Hi Bryan Just wanted to use this page to point out that to make you feel more at home I am delibretley mis-spelling the occasional word. So please do not feel embarraced in pointing out these as examples to others less litterate than ourselves. Regards Simon |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: kemlo-ga on 28 Mar 2003 11:34 PST |
Ohhecknowmyspacebarhasgonetosleepithinkitwaswhenipushedthekeyboardlockbymistakenowiwillhavetorestartseeyousoonregardskemlo |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: intotravel-ga on 28 Mar 2003 16:38 PST |
As Nasruddin emerged form the mosque after prayers, a beggar sitting on the street solicited alms. The following conversation followed: - Are you extravagant? asked Nasruddin. - Yes Nasruddin, replied the beggar. - Do you like sitting around drinking coffee and smoking? asked Nasruddin. - Yes, replied the beggar. - I suppose you like to go to the baths everyday? asked Nasruddin. - Yes, replied the beggar. - ...And maybe amuse yourself, even, by drinking with friends? asked Nasruddin. - Yes I like all those things. replied the beggar. - Tut, Tut, said Nasruddin, and gave him a gold piece. A few yards farther on, another beggar who had overheard the conversation begged for alms also. - Are you extravagant? asked Nasruddin. - No, Nasruddin replied second beggar. - Do you like sitting around drinking coffee and smoking? asked Nasruddin. - No, replied second beggar. - I suppose you like to go to the baths everyday? asked Nasruddin. - No, replied second beggar. - ...And maybe amuse yourself, even, by drinking with friends? asked Nasruddin. - No, I want to only live meagerly and to pray, replied second beggar. Whereupon the Nasruddin gave him a small copper coin. - But why, wailed second beggar, do you give me, an economical and pious man, a penny, when you give that extravagant fellow a sovereign? Ah my friend, replied Nasruddin, his needs are greater than yours. |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: kemlo-ga on 28 Mar 2003 17:46 PST |
Has anyone noticed the bad design of computer keyboards today. Whenever I place my mug of coffee on the keyboard to stir in the sugar it will invariably topple over and slop. My previous computer had a cup holder that slid out from the front, a well thought out design. My current one (an iMac) does not. Any one any suggestions on the problem? Is it worth posting this as a qestion? |
Subject:
Where's the Ketchup?
From: sergeantshultz-ga on 28 Mar 2003 19:48 PST |
(') (') o^o <~~~> W |
Subject:
ocilbuponoborp
From: sergeantshultz-ga on 28 Mar 2003 19:52 PST |
We can all hope... and pray that probonopublico has bigger fish to fry than this lil' thing. Same thing goes for us... Pierce Brosnan eh? |
Subject:
Comments: 2 for a dollar
From: sergeantshultz-ga on 28 Mar 2003 19:58 PST |
THE time draws near... The artists' create pictures of the images in their minds. The writers' create pictures of the images they want in our minds. We voyeurs of these slide shows wait for more. What are you waiting for? |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: j_philipp-ga on 28 Mar 2003 21:58 PST |
Quote: chris.com - ASCII Art Collection - Betty Boop http://www.chris.com/ascii/ .$$$b ... 4$$$$be... 9$b zd$$$$$$$$$$$$$e .z$$$$$$$$$$$ J$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$c d$- z$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$. $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$L $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$. $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$b 4$$$$$$$$$$P"" '$$F$**$$$$$$$$$$$$$$**$$$$$$$$$ $$$$$$$$$$F . ^"" ^*$$$$$* %e$$P*$$$$$ 4$$$$$$$$$$$$ *%" $$$$$ $$$$$$$P d$$b d$$c $$$$ $$$$$$$ .$" ^ "L $$$$$F $.d$$$$$$F . P ^F "*$$% *$$$$$$$$$e$ $ ^c $$. "$$$$$$$$$$" ." 4 . z 4$$$ ^$$$$$$" ^r J $ z .f '$$P *$$$$$ 3.z$$$*$L.F 4$$$$$ z '$" $$$$$$. 3$. 3$$$$ 'P $$$$F 3$" $%. *$$$$$$$$b $$$ 4 .$$$F 'F4$$$e$ .. 4$$$$$$$$P $"" 4 d$$P F^$$$$F $$$$$$$$$$" 4. $ ^. d" 3$$% ^"$$$$$ * $e...z$" *c $$ L4F 4P$ $ 4 ""$"F^ "**P"- $ $ 4r4$%.F P $ $ $be$*$e .$Ld% ^ *$. 4$$F JP**" .$*$$bec. ...z$$$$$P$$$bee$$**% d" "" ^*c d "c $ "e. J" .. .... $ "b $ d$$$$$$$ e$$$$$$b$*$. 4" d$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$ "$c $ 4$% $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$ ^"b. JF $L $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$F ^$e..z 4$ J"*k ^$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$P ^P .$ ^P *b 4$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$F .P .@ d" $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$ P z$" JF $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$ $ J* -$ $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$r d" dF .$ $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$c. J% $" $" $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$P*$e$$$% z d" $ d$$$$$$$$$$$$$$**" ^$r^r e" 4F .$ d$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$r 3r4..$" J$ 4$" .$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$ $ $" .$$$$b. J$ :$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$P.de.zd$ $ ..eue$$$$$(* z$" .$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$C$ $ z$P*"""" $$ $d$* $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$"JF d$$ $$*" $$ $" :$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$" ^$P ^#*$$- .$"3 $ $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$E $$$$eb zeee$$$$F4F $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$L 4$. ^ ""#$$"" *$$$" $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$b *" $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$P $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$ 4F 4$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$"4$""""" $$$$P" $$$$$$$$$$$$P"*$$$$*" 4" .. $ '$$$$$$$$$$F 4$$$e$ 3$P 3$$$$$$$$" 4$$$$$.d$F ^*$$*"*% J . b F $ *. F 4F $ J b 4 L 4b $ J- $ % .F $" d $ $" :F F $ .$ 4- d" d" 3 4P d" $ <$ d" $ d% J$ $ $ 4$$ 4F 4F 4" $ 4 $ :# $ P $ 4P * F 4F 4F 4r d $ 4* $ $ P d" $ 4F 4" d% 4 J $ J% 4 .F $ 4% J 4% d" .$ F $ dF P d" F J$ $$ F dP J $$b L 4P ^F $$$$F * .$ .$ $$$$$$edF 4$$c.d$" $$$$$r 4$$$$$" "**$P |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: probonopublico-ga on 28 Mar 2003 23:33 PST |
Wow, J Philipp That's AMAZING! Can you now do a drawing of Pinky, please? KR Bryan |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: j_philipp-ga on 29 Mar 2003 00:42 PST |
Bryan, That certainly would need official authorization from Pink herself! Let me see if I can provide you with an alternative. |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: j_philipp-ga on 29 Mar 2003 00:48 PST |
Step away some meters from the monitor please: * oO.*'*oxoo *BB' *O*' 'oW* *BO *W* ' *BO oo * *Bo oB''*'BOB **''*o** *o''OxB' *BO B''*.OW' *Bo oWo' OBW **B* **O ,B* oBO *BO Oo BW* oBB OWo *OW'**B '*Oo oB' .BB *BO oBxBo'''' 'xBx '*oB''OWW OW***O' *O*'*BB' xO* *BO oBW *xBB 'oW' OBB* *Wo *ooO *O* '*o*x*' *BO BBB *BWBx,' *WO' oWWB OO*' xOo* .O** oxB, B##* 'WWBBOOW *****''*' '''' '''' *B*'**OBB ''' '**'' B ,*W* *Bo B B B B B BB BB BBBBB oxB* 'B*' O O B B B B BB B B BB B BB 'oOBBBBo*' OO OOO O Make ascii art from bitmap pics http://www.haugdahl.com/bmp2txt/bmp2txt.html |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: kemlo-ga on 29 Mar 2003 00:52 PST |
.,,,,,,,,,,,, ,;%%%%uuuuuuuuuuuuu%%%\ /%%%%%uuuu====####uuuuuu%%%% /%%%%%uuuu.....===###uuuuu%%%%%% , '''''\%%%%%uuu....##.===##uuuu%%%%%%%% ,'''''''')####\%u....../==#/uuu%%%%%%%%%%% ,'''''/#########\%mmmmmmmmmmmmm%%%%%%%%%%%; #\''/##########(mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmnu%%'%%%%%%% ###############(mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmnuu%%'%%%%%%; u\###########/ (mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmnuu%%'%%%%%%%% uuuuuEEE \mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmnuuu%%'%%%%%%%%% uuuuuEEE .:::,#u,mmmmnnmmmmmmmmmnuuu%%;; %%%%%%%%% uuuuuu\##\:::::##uuummmmmmmmmmmmmmnuu%%;;;; :...%%%%%% uuuuu\#######/uuuuuuuuuu,mmmmmmnu%%...;;; ::...%%%% \uuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuu,mmnu/ \...;;; ::...%%% >####&&################<%%%% \;;;/ ::...%%% (#####&&&################%%%%%%% ::..%%% (######&&&&##############(%%%%%%%%%% ::%/ (####&&&&&&#############(%%%%%%%%%%%%% (#######&&&&&############(%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% (#########################(%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% (# (######################(%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% (#######################(%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% %%%(#####################(%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% %%%%%%(####################(%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% ;%%%%%%; (#################n'%%%%%%%%'%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% (%%%%%%%( ;%nn############nn'%%%%%%%%'%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% ;%%%%%%% %%%nnnnnnnnnnnnn'%%%%%%%%%'%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%(@@@) \%%%%%; %%%%nnnnnnnn'%%%%%%%%%'%%'n%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%(@@@@@) (%(%/ %%%%%nnnnnn'%%%%%%%%%%%'nnnn%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%(@@@@@@ %%%%%%nnnnnn'%%%%%%%%'nnnnnnnn%%%%%%%%%%%%%%(@@@@@@@ %%%%%%%nnnnnnn(%(%)nnnnnnnnnnnn%%%%%%%%%%%%%(@@@@@@@) .,;%%%%%%%%nnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnn%%%%%%%%%%%%%(@@@@@@@@ ,nnnnnnn%%%%%%%%%nnnnnn)nnnnnnnnnnnnnnn%%%%%%%%%%%%%%(@@@@@@@) /nnnnnnnnnnn%%%%%%nnnnnnnnnnn)nnnnnnnnn%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%/ (@@@@) (uu(uuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuu/ (uu;;;;;;;;;;;uu) (uu;;;;;;;;;;uu) (uuuuuuuuuuuuu) (uu)(uu)(uu) Susie Oviat |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: kemlo-ga on 29 Mar 2003 00:57 PST |
..uu. ?$""`?i z' `M .@" x" 'Z :#" . . f 8M '&H?` :$f U8 < MP x#' d#` XM $5. $ M' xM" .!"> @ 'f`$L:M R.@!` +` > R X "NXF R"*L k 'f M "$$ :E 5. % `~ " ` 'K 'M .uH 'E `h .x*` X ` .uf` * .@8 . 'E9F uf" , , 9h+" $M eH. 8b. .8 ..... .8` $' M 'E `R;' d?"""`"# ` E @ b d 9R ?* @ > K.zM `%M' 9' Xf .f ; R' 9 M .=` t M Mx~ @ lR z" @ ` ;" ` .u!"` .x*"` ..+"NP .z"" ? M#` 9 , , 9 M d! ,8P' R X.:x' R' , F F' M R.d' d P @ E` , P ' P N.d' '' ' ss X x . 9 .f ! . $b 4; $k / dH $f 'X ;$$ z . MR :$ R M$$, : d9b M' tM M: #'$L ;' M `8 X MR `$;t' $F # X ,oR t Q; $$@ R$ H :RP' $b X @' 9$E @Bd' $' ?X ; W `M' `$M d$ `E ;.o* :R .. ` ' "' ' @' '$o*"' -Philippe Chaintreuil |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: j_philipp-ga on 29 Mar 2003 01:07 PST |
I sense 500 is coming close. |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: j_philipp-ga on 29 Mar 2003 01:08 PST |
500 coming closer. |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: j_philipp-ga on 29 Mar 2003 01:08 PST |
500 coming closer every minute. |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: j_philipp-ga on 29 Mar 2003 01:08 PST |
Some more to reach 500. |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: j_philipp-ga on 29 Mar 2003 01:09 PST |
Getting closer and closer. |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: kemlo-ga on 29 Mar 2003 03:37 PST |
Sorry I thought you said PINK FLOYED |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: probonopublico-ga on 29 Mar 2003 03:42 PST |
Hi, Smion aka Meklo Now, I've split coffee all over my boardyek And I don't even drink the stuff. Is it infekshus? sgr nayrb |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: carpediem-ga on 29 Mar 2003 07:36 PST |
I would love to have the honour of a dance with Pierce Brosnan, but it looks like the lad's plate is full:( |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: probonopublico-ga on 29 Mar 2003 07:46 PST |
Hi, Carpediem Please don't be shy. I thought I made it clear that Heather Graham would be made very welcome. Very, very welcome. And Pierce will also be getting plenty of help from me. Please let me know which dances show you at your very best. KR Bryan |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: carpediem-ga on 29 Mar 2003 09:32 PST |
Hi Bryan, Well, I would have to say the Waltz, Foxtrot, Tango, Salsa, and the Bolero. And you? Anna |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: probonopublico-ga on 29 Mar 2003 09:54 PST |
Hi, Anna (Carpediem) I must be honest ... I have two left feet. And my partners always look (a) embarrassed and/or (b) in pain. That's why I shall get a stunt double ... Ideally, I'd like the guy who did the tap dancing for Richard Gere in 'Chicago' ... However, even though I am useless myself, I adore watching dancing, anything from ballet to tap. KR Bryan |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: kemlo-ga on 30 Mar 2003 00:55 PST |
Good morning everyone its 9.55am on this sunday morning |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: probonopublico-ga on 30 Mar 2003 01:51 PST |
Good morning, Smion (Kemlo) When you made your last comment, it may have been 9.55 a.m. within the Bucolic Shire of Leicester but the world is round and different people live in different TIME ZONES ... So, it's highly probable that it was actually 10.25 a.m. in Sunny Sussex because we are so much more advanced than you. Sorry, but I thought you would have known that! Too much coffee can make you hallucinate. Rgds Bryan |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: kemlo-ga on 30 Mar 2003 06:46 PST |
Hi Bryan The real reason your clock reads 10.25 is that you advanced it half an hour too far last night. please remember to, in the futre, advance or retard the clock only one whole hour at a time. the time is now 3;46 and being Sunday time for my bath must go Rgs Simon |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: probonopublico-ga on 30 Mar 2003 07:15 PST |
Hi, Simon But I don't even have a clock! (I rely on Daisy) I'm also surprised that you are taking a bath already ... It's not the First of the month until Tuesday (or so Daisy tells me.) Rgds B & D |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: kemlo-ga on 30 Mar 2003 10:17 PST |
Hi Bryan Nearest sunday to the end of the month. winter schedule. In the summer because I go swimming every week I don't need a bath so often. Now Bryan, Don't take this the wrong way but, I think, the reason Daisy yawns so much is that she finds living with you boreing. Now own up, you do read the scripts out to her for a reaction, Yes? Mmm I thought so. Sincerly yours Simon |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: probonopublico-ga on 01 Apr 2003 01:33 PST |
It has been suggested that the Masked Ball should be held in Manheim, PA. Would anyone know if there is a suitable facility there? Preferably a 17th Century Royal Palace that has been lovingly maintained by a succession of careful owners. Will ALL previous Commentators (and any new ones) please say 'Yes' or 'No'to this suggestion. Many thanks! By George, we'll pass 1,000 yet. |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: anlon-ga on 01 Apr 2003 08:02 PST |
Alack, alas, no castles suitable in Manheim, PA, but we do have two other lovely facilities to choose from: A Renaissance Faire grounds, compleat with anachronistic turkey legs and jousters, and/or the Auto Auction, which recently surpassed Chicago/O'Hare's lots as the largest carpark in the world (or so says local lore). I hear there's a haunted graveyard or two, as well. And cows. |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: probonopublico-ga on 01 Apr 2003 09:52 PST |
Hi, Anlon So Manheim, PA would not be the ideal venue then? I can't imagine why the Dance Committee would have recommended such a place. How about Wernerville, PA? Is that any better? Incidentally, I used to fly into Philadelphia frequently to visit a plant that my company owned in a place called Jamestown, NJ. Now, what did W C Fields say about Philadelphia? KR Bryan |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: anlon-ga on 01 Apr 2003 15:21 PST |
Wernersville, PA might suit better, as there is a lovely YMCA camp there. Is 40 minutes from Chez Anlon, though. Also, still no chateau, though certainly enough accomodation for the crowds drawn by the event of the season. The woods would be suitable for ghost story telling over the fire and s'mores. Not sure how this will work, though, as some mask materials might be highly flammable. Hmmm. Am working on costume for ball, sure to delight visitors from near and far. Sorry to hear about your frequent flights to Philly and travels to NJ. Hope your company paid for the therapy? Regards Anlon |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: sublime1-ga on 01 Apr 2003 17:45 PST |
kemlo said: "My previous computer had a cup holder that slid out from the front, a well thought out design. My current one (an iMac) does not. Any one any suggestions on the problem? Is it worth posting this as a qestion?" Just use the CD-ROM tray. That'll be $2, please... : ) |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: googlenut-ga on 01 Apr 2003 21:39 PST |
A picture from the ball: http://www.gregwilliamsphotography.com/portfolio/reportage/images/l4.jpg |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: probonopublico-ga on 01 Apr 2003 22:06 PST |
Wow, Googlenut, Many thanks A piccy of you and me together ... That should cause a lot of comment(s), PLEASE! Don't you think we make a great couple? KR Bryan |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: j_philipp-ga on 01 Apr 2003 23:24 PST |
What about Mannheim, Germany, then? |
Subject:
...
From: j_philipp-ga on 01 Apr 2003 23:25 PST |
Any comments? |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: j_philipp-ga on 01 Apr 2003 23:25 PST |
Should be a nice town. |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: j_philipp-ga on 01 Apr 2003 23:26 PST |
Can't load the Mannheim website at the moment. |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: probonopublico-ga on 02 Apr 2003 03:12 PST |
Hi, Anlon I am still undergoing therapy ... But should be OK on the night. KR Awestruck |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: j_philipp-ga on 03 Apr 2003 04:09 PST |
Internet Abbreviations AAMOF - As A Matter Of Fact |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: j_philipp-ga on 03 Apr 2003 04:10 PST |
Internet Abbreviations AFAIAC - As Far As I Am Concerned |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: j_philipp-ga on 03 Apr 2003 04:10 PST |
Internet Abbreviations AFAICT - As Far As I Can Tell |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: j_philipp-ga on 03 Apr 2003 04:11 PST |
Internet Abbreviations AFAIK - As Far As I Know |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: j_philipp-ga on 03 Apr 2003 04:11 PST |
Internet Abbreviations AISB - As I Said Before |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: j_philipp-ga on 03 Apr 2003 04:12 PST |
Internet Abbreviations AISI - As I See It |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: j_philipp-ga on 03 Apr 2003 04:13 PST |
Internet Abbreviations AWGTHTGTATA - Are We Going To Have To Go Through All This Again |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: j_philipp-ga on 03 Apr 2003 04:13 PST |
Internet Abbreviations AWHFY - Are We Having Fun Yet |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: j_philipp-ga on 03 Apr 2003 04:14 PST |
Internet Abbreviations BBIAB - Be Back In A Bit |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: j_philipp-ga on 03 Apr 2003 04:14 PST |
Internet Abbreviations BION - Believe It Or Not |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: probonopublico-ga on 03 Apr 2003 10:23 PST |
Right ... Now, it's gloves off time ... In short, BRIBERY From now on, every future Commentator will receive: A CONTAINER-full of VINTAGE VIRTUAL CHARDONNAY. And it's ready to drink NOW. So, c'mon folks and amaze your friends! |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: kemlo-ga on 03 Apr 2003 14:11 PST |
Sorry Bryan But some of us are under eighteen and are not allowed to drink alcohol by their Mum. Regards Simon |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: probonopublico-ga on 03 Apr 2003 22:24 PST |
Simon We all knew that you had not yet turned 18. Which raises an interesting point ... |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: kemlo-ga on 04 Apr 2003 14:24 PST |
In answer to one of many un-thought of qestions http://www.penrithcity.nsw.gov.au/usrpages/collect/1950s.htm |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: sublime1-ga on 05 Apr 2003 09:11 PST |
pbp... Your remark about future commentators reminded me of a story... Walter Cronkite was, at some point, in love with a Sweet Potato. Truly a beauty, she was, and Walter adored her with all his heart. She was the daughter of a Russett Potato and an Irish Cobbler. When his ardor became unreconcilable, Walter approached her father, the Russett Potato, and asked for her hand in marriage, but her father responded starchily that this could never be. Stunned, Walter tried to reason with the thick-skinned father, noting that he was well-off, well-known and that he didn't think his age was a problem. But the father was adamant. Finally, Walter pleaded with him, asking what the obstacle might be. The father peremptorily stated "I just won't have my daughter marrying some common 'tater". |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: probonopublico-ga on 05 Apr 2003 10:51 PST |
Many thanks for the link, Simon (Kemlo) ... "The page cannot be displayed" Although I am almost sure that I've seen it somewhere before. |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: probonopublico-ga on 05 Apr 2003 10:53 PST |
O, Sublime One ... What can I say? Just keep 'em coming and we'll get there yet. |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: knowitall22-ga on 05 Apr 2003 12:33 PST |
sublime1: Do you know how old that *common 'tater* joke is? I first heard it in the late 1930s...using Gabriel Heatter or Walter Winchell. Regards, knowitall22 |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: probonopublico-ga on 05 Apr 2003 21:06 PST |
Hi, knowitall22 You heard it in the 1930's? Now let's see ... That must make you ... Got it! You've now turned 40 ... Am I right? |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: probonopublico-ga on 06 Apr 2003 09:03 PDT |
So, who's going to take us past the 500 mark? I'm not very good at maths ... would that be the half way stage? MY MONEY IS RIDING ON KEMLO THE MAGNIFICENT ... C'mon Kemlo ... |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: kemlo-ga on 06 Apr 2003 11:28 PDT |
IH Bryan , try the music on this on, its great'h ttp://www.mumbaipolice.com/ olmeK sdrageR |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: kemlo-ga on 06 Apr 2003 11:41 PDT |
My mother was visiting one time when I was online. I remarked to her that the computer was running a little slow today. Her solution? Oil it. You can imagine how I cringe every time I think of it. |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: kemlo-ga on 06 Apr 2003 12:21 PDT |
Fact: The Science Museum sells chocolate bars shaped like floppy disks. Fact: Three year old kids see Uncle Simon using a floppy to play games. Fact: Computers are warm inside...even some quite expensive computers. I don't want to talk about it. |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: snapanswer-ga on 06 Apr 2003 13:28 PDT |
Just waiting so that I could post comment #487... and now it has happened. (#485 was unavailable). I have not considered changing my nickname from snapanswer-ga, though I might consider a name like slowcomment-ga. ;-) |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: knowitall22-ga on 06 Apr 2003 14:28 PDT |
probonopublico; Oh, how I wish you were right about my just turning 40!!! Turned 75 in Jan 2003. Yes, I did hear the common 'tater joke many years ago. Most jokes are of course current, but on rare occasions some REALLY OLD jokes are recycled, which is fine...if you haven't heard it, it is funny. Thanks for de-aging me...I needed that. Regards, knowitall22 |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: kemlo-ga on 08 Apr 2003 11:29 PDT |
Suprised that Probonopublllllllllllico has not been here. His actions have given me an idea, but then plagerism is my middle name. ( at my age my brane has not devoloped enough for original thought ) Kemlo [:+D |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: kemlo-ga on 08 Apr 2003 14:55 PDT |
Almost there |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: kemlo-ga on 08 Apr 2003 14:57 PDT |
The following is a large collection of stories and anecdotes about clueless computer users. It's a baffling phenomenon that in today's society an individual, who might in other circumstances be considered smart and wise, can sit down in front of a computer screen and instantly lose every last shred of common sense he ever possessed. Complicate this phenomenon with a case of "computerphobia," and you end up with tech support personnel having phone conversations that are funny in retrospect but seem like perfectly valid motives for wild machine gun shooting sprees at the time. You will read stories in this file that will convince you that among the human race are human-shaped artichokes futilely attempting to break the highly regarded social convention that vegetables should not operate electronic equipment. And yet, amidst the vast, surging quantities of stupidity are perfectly excusable technological mishaps -- but that are amusing nonetheless. After all, even the best of us engages in a little brainless folly every once in a while. |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: kemlo-ga on 08 Apr 2003 15:01 PDT |
Me: "Hi. I need a 25 pin RS-232 cable." * Sales Clerk 1: "What do you need it for?" * Me: "I need to plug a VT100 into a modem. I have both the VT100 and the modem, I just need at 25 pin male/female cable with RS-232 connectors." * Sales Clerk 1: "Let me get my manager." Huh? * Sales Clerk 1: in background: "I have a guy here who wants to plug his VCR into a modem." The sales clerk returned with another. * Sales Clerk 2: "Hello, sir. You can't attach a VCR to a modem." * Me: "That is not what I am trying to do. I need a 25-pin RS-232 cable -- that's all. Do you have cables for plugging into modems?" * Sales Clerk 2: "What do you want to plug into the modem?" * Me: "A VT100. It is a terminal. You plug it into a computer over a serial line, frequently a modem. I just need a 25-pin cable to go from the unit to the modem." * Sales Clerk 2: (to Sales Clerk 1) "He doesn't have a VCR. He wants to plug a VTR into his modem, so it is all right." Sales Clerk 1 handed me a cable. * Me: "This is a 9-pin cable. I need a 25 pin cable." * Sales Clerk 2: "Most PC's have 9 pins on their serial cards." * Me: "I am not attaching a PC. I am attaching a VT100. There are 25 pins on it -- it needs to plug into a 25 pin connector." * Sales Clerk 2: "Then use the small end to plug into your modem." * Me: "There are 25 pins on the modem as well. Do you have any 25 pin cables? All I need is a cable with 25 pins at each end." * Sales Clerk 2: "This is a 25 pin cable." |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: kemlo-ga on 08 Apr 2003 15:21 PDT |
And now a true story, Many years ago I while visiting the Leicester City library I wanted to read Cider with Rosie By Laurie Lee. looking through the card index I found it filed permanently in the wine making section. Of course being the responsible borrower that I was I immediately took the book out and then round to the local newspaper. They were mildly amused, took my photo and story, and published it. I still don't understand why the library staff were so hostile. Regards Kemlo. |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: pafalafa-ga on 08 Apr 2003 19:18 PDT |
I see you need 7 more comments to get to 500! |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: pafalafa-ga on 08 Apr 2003 19:19 PDT |
I see you need 6 more comments to get to 500! |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: pafalafa-ga on 08 Apr 2003 19:19 PDT |
I see you need 5 more comments to get to 500! |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: pafalafa-ga on 08 Apr 2003 19:20 PDT |
I see you need 4 more comments to get to 500! |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: pafalafa-ga on 08 Apr 2003 19:20 PDT |
I see you 3 need more comments to get to 500! |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: pafalafa-ga on 08 Apr 2003 19:20 PDT |
I see you need 2 more comments to get to 500! |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: pafalafa-ga on 08 Apr 2003 19:21 PDT |
BIN-GO! 500 |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: j_philipp-ga on 08 Apr 2003 21:23 PDT |
Half-time's over. |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: kemlo-ga on 08 Apr 2003 23:55 PDT |
There you are PBP I always said yu'd make it i've every confidence in you. Another two months. RGDS KML |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: sublime1-ga on 09 Apr 2003 13:44 PDT |
"Sticks in a bundle are unbreakable." Bondei proverb |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: sublime1-ga on 09 Apr 2003 13:46 PDT |
For probonopubllico: "Copying everyone else all the time, the monkey one day cut his throat." Zulu proverb |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: sublime1-ga on 09 Apr 2003 13:47 PDT |
"Happiness can grow from only a little contentment." Pygmy proverb |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: sublime1-ga on 09 Apr 2003 13:47 PDT |
"Always being in a hurry does not prevent death, neither does going slowly prevent living." Ibo proverb |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: sublime1-ga on 09 Apr 2003 13:48 PDT |
"If you understand the beginning well, the end will not trouble you." Ashanti proverb |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: sublime1-ga on 09 Apr 2003 13:49 PDT |
"When the mouse laughs at the car, there is a hole nearby." Benin proverb |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: sublime1-ga on 09 Apr 2003 13:49 PDT |
"Pride only goes the length one can spit." Congo proverb |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: sublime1-ga on 09 Apr 2003 13:50 PDT |
"Everybody loves a fool, but nobody wants him for a son." Malinke proverb |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: googlenut-ga on 09 Apr 2003 21:17 PDT |
The reasonable man adapts himself to the world; the unreasonable one persists in trying to adapt the world to himself. Therefore all progress depends on the unreasonable man. - George Bernard Shaw |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: hailstorm-ga on 09 Apr 2003 23:22 PDT |
Has everybody given up on this honorable goal? We're only about halfway there! |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: j_philipp-ga on 10 Apr 2003 04:04 PDT |
I haven't given up. |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: j_philipp-ga on 10 Apr 2003 04:05 PDT |
Matter of fact, I think we are all motivated enough to take it to 10,000 comments. |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: j_philipp-ga on 10 Apr 2003 04:05 PDT |
Or even 100,000. |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: j_philipp-ga on 10 Apr 2003 04:05 PDT |
Or 1,000,000. |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: j_philipp-ga on 10 Apr 2003 04:06 PDT |
10,000,000? |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: j_philipp-ga on 10 Apr 2003 04:06 PDT |
Nah, that'd be unrealistic. |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: j_philipp-ga on 10 Apr 2003 04:06 PDT |
OK, I'm awaiting my "Cannot Process" message any minute... |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: j_philipp-ga on 10 Apr 2003 04:07 PDT |
Nope, nothing yet... |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: j_philipp-ga on 10 Apr 2003 04:07 PDT |
Still processing... |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: j_philipp-ga on 10 Apr 2003 04:07 PDT |
This is almost like Internet chat, except I'm talking alone. |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: j_philipp-ga on 10 Apr 2003 04:08 PDT |
Maybe the bug has been fixed? |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: j_philipp-ga on 10 Apr 2003 04:08 PDT |
I wonder. |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: j_philipp-ga on 10 Apr 2003 04:08 PDT |
OK, let's just say the bug is fixed. |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: kemlo-ga on 12 Apr 2003 12:49 PDT |
526 comments |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: kemlo-ga on 12 Apr 2003 12:50 PDT |
527 comments |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: kemlo-ga on 12 Apr 2003 12:51 PDT |
528 comments, keep em comming ppl...... pls |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: kemlo-ga on 12 Apr 2003 13:21 PDT |
Sorrie that was just Little Robin playin arundwith my puter |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: hailstorm-ga on 14 Apr 2003 20:23 PDT |
the multiple comments are a little cheap though. how about this...if you were stranded on a desert island, and could eat only one vegetable for the rest of your life, what would it be? |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: sublime1-ga on 16 Apr 2003 17:06 PDT |
ummm...peanuts : ) |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: crocokoala-ga on 24 Apr 2003 16:53 PDT |
still going? |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: crocokoala-ga on 24 Apr 2003 16:53 PDT |
yup |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: stressedmum-ga on 29 Apr 2003 19:55 PDT |
Hey Probonopublico, you've been very quiet lately. I just found this one and couldn't let it pass without putting in my two bob's worth and come up with comment 534. I'm definitely the Vicar of Dibley *sigh* and if we can get Lozza Olivier up and running again, maybe he could play you. |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: probonopublico-ga on 30 Apr 2003 06:02 PDT |
Hi, Stressed Mum! I didn't know anyone cared ... Do you know that you are the ONLY person who has enquired about my well being? The truth of the matter is that I have been in a sulk. You see, a little bird told me that you were planning a big bash this coming Saturday and I was so hoping to get an invite. But when none came, I took to my bed and cried endlessly. However, I now feel better knowing that you (or you alter ego) will be coming to my masked ball. Kindest regards Probo |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: stressedmum-ga on 30 Apr 2003 06:33 PDT |
Awww, poor Probono Sure. Come to the party, it's going to be a blast. Can't believe I'm married to a 50 year old bloke. That makes me ... well ... that confirms the fact I was a child bride! BYO Chardonnay. |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: probonopublico-ga on 30 Apr 2003 07:17 PDT |
Hi, Stressed Mum Many thanks for the invite. I shall be there on Saturday for sure. Earlier today, I was doing my Satcho impersonation and it went down really well. WARNING: Once I've got the mike in my hand, they can never get me off the stage. Lots of the Very Best The Masked One |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: kemlo-ga on 30 Apr 2003 13:12 PDT |
Hi PBO Nice to see your back . I for one have missed you and your pithy, enlightning and educating comments. What was it, twentyeight days stoppage of leave? Kemlo |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: stressedmum-ga on 30 Apr 2003 17:34 PDT |
Satchmo, eh? We-e-e-ell hello-o-o-o-o, Probo, We-e-e-ell hello-o-o-o-o, Probo, It's so nice to have you back where you belo-o-ong, etc etc Polish that horn, Probo, you're due on stage in Oz on Sat'dee night! |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: scriptor-ga on 02 May 2003 05:35 PDT |
Have I already mentioned that, in my most humble opinion, "There's No Room To Rhumba In A Sportscar" and "Song Of The Shrimp" are among the worst songs Elvis Presley ever recorded? |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: journalist-ga on 02 May 2003 05:40 PDT |
Pith and vinegar, I'd say. LOOK! 540 comments so far with this posting. I believe you're going to do it, you old Pro, you. As for gala invitations, when you're ready for a party in south, you just let me know and I'll hold one in your honor. Complete with beer and cheese fries. :) |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: probonopublico-ga on 02 May 2003 06:49 PDT |
Hi, Journalist, Honey Many thanks for the encouraging words and, especially, for the invite. If you are holding a party then I'll swim across that Swanee River and I don't mind how many man-eating crocodiles I have to eat along the way. Actually, it's Daisy's birthday next Friday, the 8th ... She will be 13 ... And I am throwing a masked ball for her as a sort of dress rehearsal for the real thing. She looks really nice in an Elvis mask and I am going to suggest to her that she wears one permanently. Get that beer and stuff ready. The Old Pro |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: liner-ga on 08 May 2003 15:21 PDT |
(Proper Limerick Style, please. And only one more line per comment also.) A researcher once asked for some comments..... |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: apteryx-ga on 08 May 2003 22:40 PDT |
So sorry, liner, but I must point out that to get proper limerick form, you have to lead off with a line that scans: da-DUM-da-da-DUM-da-da-DUM. (That's for lines 1, 2, and 5, of course; 3 and 4 must go da-DUM-da-da-DUM.) The first suggestion below is conventional but boring; the others aren't much better, but they're a start. There once was a researcher who A researcher known as Pro-Bo A Google-A. guy known as Pro A researcher said, "Let us try [Next?] Apteryx |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: probonopublico-ga on 08 May 2003 22:50 PDT |
Hi, Liner & Apteryx Sorry ... But you are BOTH wrong! I am not a Researcher. I have referred your aspersions to my lawyers ... Or would you like to settle out of court? But, how about this ... There was a young lady called Pink And so on ... |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: apteryx-ga on 09 May 2003 23:01 PDT |
Oh, DEAR! I got too distracted by the point about limerick form to realize that the content was incorrect--like that old riddle about where the survivors are buried. I do regret my error. But I think liner's idea, Probono, was that the verse be about *you*--not Pink or any of our other esteemed GA celebrities. So--"A Google-A. guy known as Pro" still fits, but the rest won't do. Can anyone help? Apteryx |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: sergeantshultz-ga on 10 May 2003 22:05 PDT |
! ! !! !! !!! !!! O ' O W ^ ^ "A A" @@@@@ @@@@@ Q~~~~~~~~~~~~Q p q Hope your face is feeling better, Probonopublico. |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: sublime1-ga on 12 May 2003 08:44 PDT |
A Google-A guy known as Pro... a party decided to throw... How odd that he asked that the ball should be masked for researchers he didn't know! |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: probonopublico-ga on 12 May 2003 09:18 PDT |
The Google Guy known as 'Pro' Is not totally stupid, you know He hates those admiring glances From dames who fancy their chances So he dons a mask wherever he go. (I'm no poet) |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: kemlo-ga on 12 May 2003 10:30 PDT |
Nearly therre not long now |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: sublime1-ga on 12 May 2003 23:08 PDT |
That was very brave, PBP... Poetry obviously isn't your strong point, and yet you risked possible ridicule and ha-razz-ment to give it your best shot. I can only applaud your chutzpah, and express my deepest respect... (Along with the fact that, if your dancing rhythm isn't any better than your poetic meter, you can drop the mask...they'll run from you in droves when you step all over their feet.....) :razz: :p I apologize if this arouses any deep-seated neuroses... Your fan... sublime1-ga |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: probonopublico-ga on 13 May 2003 00:26 PDT |
Hi, O Sublime One You've got in in 1 ... a sublime 1, no less. My dancing is every bit as bad as my poetry. In fact, you were kinder than most. That's appreciated. PB |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: johnfrommelbourne-ga on 16 May 2003 04:03 PDT |
I cant believe people are still making comments when I would have thought the novelty of the exercise would have worn off ages ago. it is now the 16th of may where I am, Australia, so will be interested to see if i am the only comenter for this particular day?? John from Melbourne |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: mikomoro-ga on 16 May 2003 04:55 PDT |
Hi, John of Melbourne This is my first visit and I thought that this was a good place to start. I live in the UK. I wonder are there any other UK users ... Or am I the first? Mik |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: farzin-ga on 16 May 2003 08:34 PDT |
Are we still trying to get this to 1000 or have we stoped? |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: probonopublico-ga on 16 May 2003 08:44 PDT |
Hi, Farzin With your help, we'll top 1,000 easily. Many thanks! Bryan |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: farzin-ga on 16 May 2003 09:33 PDT |
Dear Bryan, Thanks for your answer. By the way I have a question. How do the Google Answers people (people who answer the questions) get their job? Your truly, Farzin |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: ragingacademic-ga on 16 May 2003 12:39 PDT |
I don't see 1,000 yet.... Tom Hanks... ragingacademic |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: hammer-ga on 18 May 2003 08:30 PDT |
Re: http://answers.google.com/answers/main?cmd=threadview&id=205359 I think you could make a killing by creating accessible versions of classic operas, by casting them with current pop/pop-rap stars. Imagine the powerful performance of Britney Spears as Tosca. In Sync (collectively of course) playing Figaro. The very thought of Nelly's rendition of the great aria from Pagliacci brings me to tears... Or, you could hire Rich Little to do voice impersonations of the great mimes. - Hammer |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: kemlo-ga on 18 May 2003 15:10 PDT |
Bryan The correct spelling is "PARROTS ". Regards Kemlo |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: pinkfreud-ga on 18 May 2003 15:48 PDT |
We are still amused. http://www.mortalwombat.com/Image/We_Are_Amused.jpg ~Pink |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: willie-ga on 20 May 2003 07:59 PDT |
And just in case you need another comment like a hole in the head, here's my contribution to "The End of the Pier" show I volunteer to play ukelele and do risque little "nudge nudge wink wink say no more squire" numbers in between mother-in-law and little winkle jokes. I've even got the garish stripey suit :) willie-ga |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: helpandrersearch-ga on 20 May 2003 08:27 PDT |
I dont think you could get 10000 comments. Too mo=uch. Nobody would do that. |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: pinkfreud-ga on 20 May 2003 11:49 PDT |
I'm not normally much of a party girl, but I have got to attend, in order to see Willie doing his "nudge nudge wink wink say no more squire" numbers in between my mother-in-law and somebody's little winkle. |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: probonopublico-ga on 20 May 2003 23:37 PDT |
Hi, Everyone And many thnaks (why am I always writing thnaks?) for your comments. Yes, Willie certainly will be a hoot, provided he leaves his bagpipes in Edinburgh. As for Helpandrersearch (now there's a handle that rolls off the tongue), I had only targeted 1,000 Comments, not 10,000. But, with your help, who knows what is possible? All the Very Best Bryan |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: politicalguru-ga on 21 May 2003 01:50 PDT |
No. 566: My suggestion always has to do with lots of good food and lots of laughs. That is, a reveu with the participation of the 5-stars-band, a magician (who? Scriptor, of course), a bird (that's me), a rabbit (that's pinkie), and some fine lady to saw in half. Pierce Brosnan *must* participate in our great gala event. |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: politicalguru-ga on 21 May 2003 02:13 PDT |
No. 567: hammer, you are tacky. I like it. Would there be plaid pants dancers in the back? Hammer's suggestion made me think, though. What if we create a show with all the shining one-hit-wonders? All those really bad actors? I wish Troy Mcclure was available. |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: kemlo-ga on 21 May 2003 10:22 PDT |
I have noticed that cruise-control will not work in reverse gear on my current car(Kia Magentis), as I find this very important aid to my driving can you point me in the direction of a manufacturer or model suitable to my needs? Regards Kemlo ------------------------------------------------------------------------ |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: hammer-ga on 25 May 2003 06:09 PDT |
*I'm* not tacky. Mandy Patinkin's album ... now THAT was tacky. - Hammer |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: kemlo-ga on 25 May 2003 11:09 PDT |
Dear Brayn How did your performance go on the night? Are you going to post the script for those of us unable to be present. Best Wishes Simon |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: probonopublico-ga on 26 May 2003 01:21 PDT |
Hi, Symon Regret to say that the production lacked polish: too many fluffed lines and screw ups and one of the readers was totally out of his depth. But the audience laughed in all the right places and clapped enthusiastically at the end. Also, I can now see how it can be improved. Many thanks for your interest. The Brayn |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: probonopublico-ga on 30 May 2003 05:54 PDT |
One of the most perceptive of the army of Researchers has pointed out that this question appears to be stagnating and we are still a long way away from the target. C'mon now EVERYBODY ... One great big effort and let's send the Comments up into the stratosphere. Many thanks in anticipation. Bryan 1111 |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: kemlo-ga on 30 May 2003 10:44 PDT |
Here you are then Bryan. Comment number six hundred (700) You can sirtanly count on me My mother always said I looked like a real count Regards Kemlo |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,001 Comments, please!
From: kemlo-ga on 05 Jun 2003 13:30 PDT |
A sunday school teacher was discussing the ten commandments with her five and six year olds. After explaining the commandment to "honor thy father and thy mother," she asked "is there a commandment that teaches us how to treat our brothers and sisters?" Without missing a beat one little boy answered, "thou shall not kill." |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: liner-ga on 05 Jun 2003 14:39 PDT |
I will not add a comment just to add a comment. |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: liner-ga on 05 Jun 2003 14:40 PDT |
And I will not add a comment again. |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: liner-ga on 05 Jun 2003 14:40 PDT |
Nor will I deign to add a comment this time either. |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: probonopublico-ga on 05 Jun 2003 22:36 PDT |
Eye Liner! Do you only post one liners? |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: tisme-ga on 06 Jun 2003 10:49 PDT |
test |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: liner-ga on 06 Jun 2003 12:05 PDT |
1: Probonopublico--- 2: Yes |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: sublime1-ga on 07 Jun 2003 08:33 PDT |
No comment... |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: nelson-ga on 07 Jun 2003 12:41 PDT |
Am I allowed to comment again? Well, I just did! |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: probonopublico-ga on 07 Jun 2003 22:39 PDT |
A Request for Clarification to Nelson Dear Nelson Do you still love me? Lady Hamilton |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: snapanswer-ga on 08 Jun 2003 00:24 PDT |
Could be close, I would hate to miss it. |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: snapanswer-ga on 08 Jun 2003 00:25 PDT |
Just waiting so that I could post comment #585... and now it has happened. |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: googlenut-ga on 12 Jun 2003 13:10 PDT |
Just dropping in to say hello. How are things PB? --- Jinx ;-) |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: probonopublico-ga on 12 Jun 2003 22:33 PDT |
High Jinx Where have you been? Every time I think of Halle Berry (most of the time) I think of you. Missing you already ... Piers |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: googlenut-ga on 13 Jun 2003 08:58 PDT |
Hello PB, Unfortunately, I am only a part time researcher. I'm stuck in a boring corporate job. I do try to drop in on GA whenever I can, it's much more fun than my fulltime job. Googlenut (AKA Jinx AKA Halle) |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: megagaga-ga on 14 Jun 2003 22:11 PDT |
If there are 500 Researchers and, say, at least as many Questioners ... Can someone please tell me why the number of comments posted here is still less than 1,000? Someone is obviously not pulling his/her weight? |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: apteryx-ga on 15 Jun 2003 00:28 PDT |
I don't think there's any lack of willingness, megagaga, or there wouldn't be 590 already (even though it's true that some folks have shamelessly inflated the numbers with obvious contrivances and repetition). I think the word just isn't getting out; after all, the challenge is four months old. What we need is the equivalent of the guy with the sandwich-board walking up and down in front of the showroom: people have to start putting links and cross-references to this page into their questions and answers. With some sort of legitimate tie-in, of course. How do you like that idea, Bryan? Apteryx |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: stressedmum-ga on 15 Jun 2003 04:12 PDT |
Hey there Probo, honey, how's life? It's been a while so I thought I'd drop in and add another comment to the collection. I'm going to a trivia night in a couple of weeks and I'd like to avoid looking like a twit. Can you or anyone out there suggest a 'must know' question ( and answer) that every self respecting trivia night contestant should know? Something specific to Awstralya would be grand. |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: probonopublico-ga on 16 Jun 2003 06:14 PDT |
Hi, Stressed Out Momma Life's great but I still have a hangover from that shindig you threw way back. I'm sorry but I can't think of any Trivialities that will make you shine ... so you are own your own ... Unless you want me to slip over and whisper in your ear. Usual place? All the best from PB now in Angleterre. |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: bowler-ga on 16 Jun 2003 13:29 PDT |
G |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: bowler-ga on 16 Jun 2003 13:30 PDT |
o |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: bowler-ga on 16 Jun 2003 13:30 PDT |
g |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: bowler-ga on 16 Jun 2003 13:30 PDT |
l |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: bowler-ga on 16 Jun 2003 13:30 PDT |
e |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: bowler-ga on 16 Jun 2003 13:31 PDT |
Oops, Either I don't know how to spell or one of my comments got screwed up. |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: probonopublico-ga on 16 Jun 2003 22:49 PDT |
Hi, Bowler Your spelling's great ... It's the G****e Bot that messes stuff around. From One Who Kowns |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: mikomoro-ga on 17 Jun 2003 04:16 PDT |
The cynics reckoned that the Comments would never reach 600. But NOBODY would have guessed that this landmark would have reached by Little Me. |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: vinsvixen2-ga on 17 Jun 2003 09:48 PDT |
#601...here's another one! |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: uniace-ga on 17 Jun 2003 19:03 PDT |
Just registered w/ GA and thought I'd do my part. No idea who'd play me though. Maybe I'll ask my girlfriend and post again later |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: stressedmum-ga on 18 Jun 2003 21:07 PDT |
Yep, usual place. Just above my neck. |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: pinkfreud-ga on 19 Jun 2003 20:13 PDT |
What an amazing batch of comments. Here, Bryan. This is for you, for making it all possible: http://www.mortalwombat.com/Special/Award.jpg ;-) |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: vinsvixen2-ga on 19 Jun 2003 20:40 PDT |
#605...& i forgot to answer the question before! okay, so it'd be vivica a. fox for me. & as for the hubby, vin diesel or lenny kravitz. (or both! i mean, hey, as long as we're in fantasyland here....) |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: vinsvixen2-ga on 19 Jun 2003 20:44 PDT |
or, hmmm... in that case, maybe i'll just play *myself* & merely cast the *hubby* role! >:-) yeah, that'd definitely work! |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: probonopublico-ga on 19 Jun 2003 22:53 PDT |
Gee, Pinky ... Many thanks. I will treasure the award, forever. I am truly humbled. KR PB |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: vinsvixen2-ga on 29 Jun 2003 12:27 PDT |
608-here's another one for ya.... |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: kemlo-ga on 04 Jul 2003 16:41 PDT |
There was a tradesman, a painter called Wayne, who was very interested in making a penny where he could, so he often would thin down paint to make it go a wee bit further. As it happened, he got away with this for some time, but eventually the Baptist Church decided to do a big restoration job on the painting of one of their biggest buildings. Wayne put in a bid, and because his price was so low, he got the job. And so he set to erecting the trestles and setting up the planks, and buying the paint and, yes, I am sorry to say, thinning it down with turpentine. Well, Wayne was up on the scaffolding, painting away, the job nearlycompleted when suddenly there was a horrendous clap of thunder, and the sky opened, the rain poured down, washing the thinned paint from all over the church and knocking Wayne clear off the scaffold to land on the lawn among the gravestones, surrounded by telltale puddles of the thinned and useless paint. Wayne was no fool. He knew this was a judgment from the Almighty, so he got on his knees and cried: "Oh, God! Forgive me! What should I do?" And from the thunder, a mighty voice spoke... Repaint! Repaint! And thin no more!" |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: probonopublico-ga on 06 Jul 2003 10:47 PDT |
Will this thing run and run? |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: sublime1-ga on 06 Jul 2003 12:37 PDT |
I must learn to spell Bryan with a 'Y'. |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: sublime1-ga on 06 Jul 2003 12:39 PDT |
Hmmm... It's not letting me add additional comments saying: I must learn to spell Bryan with a 'Y'. Let's see if this one takes... |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: sublime1-ga on 06 Jul 2003 12:42 PDT |
Yep. It took. Must be some kind of anti-flooding script preventing the addition of comments with the same content, but it seems I can add it to comments with new content. I must learn to spell Bryan with a 'Y'. |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: sublime1-ga on 06 Jul 2003 12:43 PDT |
4. I must learn to spell Bryan with a 'Y'. |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: sublime1-ga on 06 Jul 2003 12:43 PDT |
5. I must learn to spell Bryan with a 'Y'. |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: sublime1-ga on 06 Jul 2003 12:45 PDT |
For those who are wondering about my strange behavior, please see the rating remarks on this question: http://answers.google.com/answers/main?cmd=threadview&id=225712 |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: sublime1-ga on 06 Jul 2003 12:46 PDT |
6. I must learn to spell Bryan with a 'Y'. |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: sublime1-ga on 06 Jul 2003 12:48 PDT |
Okay, I'm starting to feel like Bart Simpson now, so I'm gonna grab my skateboard and split.... |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: kemlo-ga on 07 Jul 2003 13:46 PDT |
Bryan At the start of the Great war the government froze all bank accounts held in Britain and the Empire. Regardless of which bank it was held in. However, London branches of German banks would have held the accounts of neutral foreigners as well as British subjects. Because of this British managers were put in place under the supervision of the Bank of England. Also a commission was set up to examine the claims of, and pay compensation to foreigners who were unfairly treated. This commission was still in existence in 1939! Regards Kemlo |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: probonopublico-ga on 08 Jul 2003 07:56 PDT |
Hi, Simon Many thanks for the info on German banks during WW1. I never knew that! Regards Bryan |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: stressedmum-ga on 10 Jul 2003 06:44 PDT |
Just received an email from a friend containing the following pearl of wisdom (the email, not the friend): "There is a fine line between "hobby" and "mental illness." Read it and thought of my manic, scary patchworking friend and my obsessive, relentless junk collecting neighbour -- and then it reminded me that I haven't been to visit your question (qestion?)in, ooh, days. Anyway, it gave me an excuse to drop by and say 'g'day honey'. That's 621 and counting ... |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: probonopublico-ga on 10 Jul 2003 07:58 PDT |
D'day Stressed Out Mum Good to hear from you again. Have you pursued the trivial yet? And, if so, did you amaze everyone ... or not? Kindest regards Big B Note to EVERYONE ... tell your friends to Comment NOW! |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: thx1138-ga on 10 Jul 2003 08:15 PDT |
Commenting now! THX1138 |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: mvguy-ga on 10 Jul 2003 11:15 PDT |
How many comments do we have now? I promised I would add Comment #666 if nobody else does, and I want to make sure I do this right. |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: mvguy-ga on 10 Jul 2003 11:15 PDT |
Ingore the question. The answer's at the top of the page. Duh! |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: stressedmum-ga on 10 Jul 2003 16:54 PDT |
Hey Probo, yeah, we pursued the trivial and ended up coming third which out of 20 tables, satisfied our competitive spirit to some extent and we each won a Toblerone and a lottery ticket. We also won most of the raffles (dunno how, just call me lucky) and my sister shamed us all by winning the bubble gum blowing competition. She's on the wrong side of 50 and a very eccentric, bespectacled unbelievably clever thing who stood up there with all the dills who couldn't answer the questions and did her thing. It finally burst and went all over her glasses and was the clear winner. Oh the shame. There were some dodgy answers though, e.g. Who sang, "always look on the bright side of life" and everyone answered Brian, but of course it wasn't as any devout Monty Pythoner would know. We challenged loudly and got the point but everyone else also got a point so it didn't matter. I felt someone whispering in my ear and turned hopefully, thinking it might be dear Bryan coming to render trivial assistance but it was just my sister practising her bubble gum blowing technique. See you later in the 600s. |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: angely-ga on 11 Jul 2003 00:41 PDT |
EEEP! I was having so much fun reading all the comments that I forgot to post a comment! |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: angely-ga on 11 Jul 2003 00:46 PDT |
I signed up just so I could contribute to this cascade of comments--coincidentally coming across countless creative quips as I scrolled--(I consider myself quite content.) |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: angely-ga on 11 Jul 2003 00:49 PDT |
And, if possible, I'd like to be portrayed by a melange of Leoni, Delany, Anderson, Clinton, & Rabbit--brainy broads at large. (That's Chelsea, not Hilary, for those who might care...) |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: probonopublico-ga on 11 Jul 2003 09:50 PDT |
Hi, Angely Many thanks for accepting the invite. I believe that you are the first to nominate the five people selected. However, it would help if you could identify which bit is to come from where. Pamela Anderson I can guess; Rabbit must be the tail; Chelsea Clinton the hair ... but the others? Wow! What a melange ... I can see that you are going to be the Belle of the Ball. |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: skinnamarink-ga on 11 Jul 2003 22:44 PDT |
Thanks for the clarification Angley, I dread to think what Bill might have contributed. |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: vinsvixen2-ga on 12 Jul 2003 00:47 PDT |
632: here i am, dropping by to add another comment.... stressedmum, i laffed aloud about the "fine line" comment. yes, it certainly seems appropriate w/me & this particular question! :) |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: ravuri-ga on 13 Jul 2003 06:11 PDT |
I |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: ravuri-ga on 13 Jul 2003 06:12 PDT |
hope |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: ravuri-ga on 13 Jul 2003 06:12 PDT |
that |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: ravuri-ga on 13 Jul 2003 06:13 PDT |
this |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: ravuri-ga on 13 Jul 2003 06:13 PDT |
effort |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: ravuri-ga on 13 Jul 2003 06:13 PDT |
of |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: ravuri-ga on 13 Jul 2003 06:14 PDT |
mine |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: ravuri-ga on 13 Jul 2003 06:14 PDT |
will |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: ravuri-ga on 13 Jul 2003 06:14 PDT |
be |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: ravuri-ga on 13 Jul 2003 06:15 PDT |
somewhat |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: ravuri-ga on 13 Jul 2003 06:15 PDT |
helpful |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: ravuri-ga on 13 Jul 2003 06:16 PDT |
in |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: ravuri-ga on 13 Jul 2003 06:17 PDT |
the |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: ravuri-ga on 13 Jul 2003 06:17 PDT |
group |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: probonopublico-ga on 13 Jul 2003 07:15 PDT |
Hi, Ravuri Sorry, I missed that ... Would you mind repeating your comments? Kindest regards Bryan (Is 650 in sight? Or is 650 in sight? Or should that be a new question?) |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: techtor-ga on 13 Jul 2003 11:40 PDT |
There sure will be a lot. |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: stressedmum-ga on 13 Jul 2003 20:40 PDT |
Okay, it's 649. Hold that thought... |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: stressedmum-ga on 13 Jul 2003 20:42 PDT |
Ta da! 650. Thank you, thank you |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: stressedmum-ga on 13 Jul 2003 21:02 PDT |
I love this question! It's a bit like a comfy, not too tidy communal lounge room where people drop in and have a quick chat and a virtual cuppa then off they go again. And probo's such a congenial host. But then we'd expect nothing less from Pierce Brosnan, would we? Ah, is that the time? Gotta go and pretend that I'm working. Deadline's at 4.00pm so what am I doing here? |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: ravuri-ga on 14 Jul 2003 02:34 PDT |
to |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: ravuri-ga on 14 Jul 2003 02:37 PDT |
effort to |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: ravuri-ga on 14 Jul 2003 02:37 PDT |
reach |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: ravuri-ga on 14 Jul 2003 02:38 PDT |
one |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: ravuri-ga on 14 Jul 2003 02:38 PDT |
thousand |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: ravuri-ga on 14 Jul 2003 02:39 PDT |
comments. |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: ravuri-ga on 14 Jul 2003 02:53 PDT |
That reminds me of the classic Bob & Ray routine, "Slow Talkers of America." A comedy classic! If you haven't heard it, see if your local library has Bob & Ray on tape. I would have continued in the one-word-at-a-time format, but I didn't want to take away the pleasure of someone who wants to post comment #666... All The Best, ravuri-ga |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: kemlo-ga on 14 Jul 2003 17:03 PDT |
WHAT |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: kemlo-ga on 14 Jul 2003 17:05 PDT |
WHAT IS |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: kemlo-ga on 14 Jul 2003 17:06 PDT |
WHAT IS SO |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: kemlo-ga on 14 Jul 2003 17:08 PDT |
WHAT IS SO SPECIAL |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: kemlo-ga on 14 Jul 2003 17:10 PDT |
WHAT IS SO SPECIAL ABOUT |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: kemlo-ga on 14 Jul 2003 17:12 PDT |
WHAT IS SO SPECIAL ABOUT POSTING |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: kemlo-ga on 14 Jul 2003 17:14 PDT |
WHAT IS SO SPECIAL ABOUT POSTING SIX |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: kemlo-ga on 14 Jul 2003 17:16 PDT |
WHAT IS SO SPECIAL ABOUT POSTING SIX HUNDRED AND SIXTY SIX COMMENTS ON THIS QESTION ? |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: probonopublico-ga on 14 Jul 2003 21:13 PDT |
It's scary! Just a moment, there's someone coming down my chimney .... What am I saying? I don't have a chimney. Ahhhhhhhhhhhhhh! |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: angely-ga on 14 Jul 2003 23:54 PDT |
Hokay--Pam Anderson! That'd be cool--but no, sadly, Mr. Bryan, Sir (may I call you Bryan? With a 'y'?), that particular combination of names, (all of whom I have been compared to from time to time), should read thusly: Tea Leoni, Dana Delaney, Gillian Anderson, Chelsea Clinton, and Jessica Rabbit. Go figure. |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: probonopublico-ga on 15 Jul 2003 03:21 PDT |
Hi, Angely YES ... Please call me Bryan with a 'Y' Sounds to me as though you're pretty OK yourself and that any substitute would be a disappointment. But, as it's a masked ball anyway, who's going to know? Looking forward to meeting you soon. Kindest regards Bryan |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: techtor-ga on 15 Jul 2003 07:07 PDT |
This is 670. |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: techtor-ga on 15 Jul 2003 07:07 PDT |
And the 671st.... |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: techtor-ga on 15 Jul 2003 07:08 PDT |
672nd already. |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: techtor-ga on 15 Jul 2003 07:08 PDT |
673rd... anyone else? |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: mvguy-ga on 15 Jul 2003 07:46 PDT |
Hey, I was going to post comment 666! |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: stressedmum-ga on 16 Jul 2003 08:13 PDT |
You want Aussies? You got one. G'day Probo. Is the masked ball still a happenin' thang? If so, I can't remember who I originally said I'd come as so I'll come along as Muriel in Muriel's Wedding. Or maybe Helen Porter Mitchell who was, as you surely know, Dame Nellie Melba. I could say I'd come along as Nicole Kidman, but no-one would believe me! No, definitely Muriel material. |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: techtor-ga on 16 Jul 2003 08:37 PDT |
Mvguy, Did you mean 666 as sexsexsex? ;) |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: googlenut-ga on 16 Jul 2003 09:49 PDT |
Will the ball be in honor of Pierce Brosnan's award from the Queen? Britain to Honor Actor Pierce Brosnan http://www.miami.com/mld/miamiherald/entertainment/6300914.htm |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: probonopublico-ga on 16 Jul 2003 10:03 PDT |
Hi, Stressed One Nicole Kidman can come anyway. Seems like you, Muriel and Nikky will be the only two Aussies attending. Unless Chips Rafferty can get his act together. Do you remember Chips? High, Jinx Piers is getting the award on MY recommendation. After all, I don't want a nobody to represent me at the Masked Ball. Rgds PB |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: vinsvixen2-ga on 16 Jul 2003 14:56 PDT |
just dropping by to add another comment. i'm so amused at how pb posts all those other questions JUST to mention THIS one! :-) |
Subject:
THIS Poor thing is losing steam...
From: sergeantshultz-ga on 16 Jul 2003 16:27 PDT |
Maybe you need KEYWORDS that make people find it. Like Dressed like a Lactotarian... Or feeling my oats... Or "Pull My Finger"... or watercress... or Free... or going, going, gone or.... OH what's the use? It's just a silly old wish of PROBONOPUBLICO. (Exactly... who the heck is that?) Maybe played by the "Player" Judge Wapner? |
Subject:
Judge Wapner?
From: sergeantshultz-ga on 16 Jul 2003 16:32 PDT |
I know I am getting older but I aint that old! Guess we better stick with "the Cocker". |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: vinsvixen2-ga on 17 Jul 2003 23:52 PDT |
...back to add another one! |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: vinsvixen2-ga on 17 Jul 2003 23:52 PDT |
...and another! |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: vinsvixen2-ga on 17 Jul 2003 23:53 PDT |
...and another one! |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: vinsvixen2-ga on 17 Jul 2003 23:53 PDT |
...and yet another! |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: vinsvixen2-ga on 17 Jul 2003 23:54 PDT |
...and still another! |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: vinsvixen2-ga on 17 Jul 2003 23:54 PDT |
okay, |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: vinsvixen2-ga on 17 Jul 2003 23:55 PDT |
enough |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: vinsvixen2-ga on 17 Jul 2003 23:55 PDT |
of |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: vinsvixen2-ga on 17 Jul 2003 23:56 PDT |
this! |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: vinsvixen2-ga on 17 Jul 2003 23:57 PDT |
no |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: vinsvixen2-ga on 17 Jul 2003 23:57 PDT |
more |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: vinsvixen2-ga on 17 Jul 2003 23:58 PDT |
comments |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: vinsvixen2-ga on 17 Jul 2003 23:58 PDT |
from |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: vinsvixen2-ga on 18 Jul 2003 19:56 PDT |
me! |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: vinsvixen2-ga on 18 Jul 2003 20:03 PDT |
hey, is there a limit to the number of comments a person can post, in a 24-hour-or-so period? it let me post 13 of my last ones, one right after the other; then it wouldn't let me post any more until the next day. i even tried to post a comment on an entirely different question besides this one, & it STILL wouldn't let me! this happen to anyone else??? |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: probonopublico-ga on 19 Jul 2003 03:45 PDT |
Hi, Vinsvixen2 Many thanks for your support ... And your interesting observation. There is actually a Secret Police Force called GoogleBot. It's attached to MI5 (which is now run by NSA) and it patrols Cyberspace, looking for ... well ... people such as yourself. Everyone in the know suspected that something was going to blow up when the dreaded number 666 had been reached ... And now we know. Your sacrifice will not be in vain. And, don't worry, Tony Blair will mount a full scale enquiry. Regards PB |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: sublime1-ga on 19 Jul 2003 11:05 PDT |
vinsvixen2... Yes...if you do a page search on 'Tipperary', you will see the beginning of a string of 12 comments I was able to make before being 'cut off' like some overindulging lush. I suspect it is some sort of script to prevent 'flooding' - a term used in chat settings to indicate repeated posts by one individual which have a disruptive effect on the chat process. Since this is not a chat setting, as such, I don't know that repeated posts here represent the same inconvenience to others that they would in chat, but I suppose the setting of limits in this venue is not without some value as well. |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: sublime1-ga on 19 Jul 2003 11:06 PDT |
That said... |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: sublime1-ga on 19 Jul 2003 11:07 PDT |
I'm claiming the distinction of posting comment #700... : ) |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: stressedmum-ga on 19 Jul 2003 16:43 PDT |
Ooooh, 701 comments. Way to go, probo. We're starting to break through the clouds here. |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: stressedmum-ga on 19 Jul 2003 16:53 PDT |
G'day probo, honey Here's a few blatantly opportunistic comments, submitted for no other reason than to get you well and truly kick started into the 700s. After vinvixen2's experience with multiple commenting, however, I'll bundle them a bit. Hooroo. 1. A bicycle can't stand alone because it is two-tired. 2. What's the definition of a will? (It's a dead giveaway). 3. Time flies like an arrow. Fruit flies like a banana. 4. A backward poet writes inverse. 5. In democracy it's your vote that counts; in feudalism it's your count that votes |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: stressedmum-ga on 19 Jul 2003 16:56 PDT |
6. She had a boyfriend with a wooden leg, but broke it off. 7. A chicken crossing the road is poultry in motion. 8. If you don't pay your exorcist you get repossessed. 9. With her marriage she got a new name and a dress. 10. Show me a piano falling down a mine shaft and I'll show you A-flat minor. (apologies for the higher than usual groan-factor of some of these e.g. #9) |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: stressedmum-ga on 19 Jul 2003 16:58 PDT |
11. When a clock is hungry it goes back four seconds. 12. The man who fell into an upholstery machine is now fully recovered. 13. A grenade thrown into a kitchen in France would result in Linoleum Blown apart. (Oh dear, they're getting worse) 14. You feel stuck with your debt if you can't budge it. 15. Local Area Network in Australia: the LAN down under. |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: stressedmum-ga on 19 Jul 2003 16:59 PDT |
16. He often broke into song because he couldn't find the key. 17. Every calendar's days are numbered. 18. A lot of money is tainted. 'Taint yours and 'taint mine. 19. A boiled egg in the morning is hard to beat. 20. He had a photographic memory which was never developed. |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: stressedmum-ga on 19 Jul 2003 17:01 PDT |
21. A plateau is a high form of flattery. 22. The short fortune teller who escaped from prison was a small medium at large. 23. Those who get too big for their britches will be exposed in the end. 24. When you've seen one shopping center you've seen a mall. 25. Those who jump off a Paris bridge are in Seine. |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: stressedmum-ga on 19 Jul 2003 17:04 PDT |
26. When an actress saw her first strands of gray hair she thought she'd dye. 27. Bakers trade bread recipes on a knead to know basis. 28. Santa's helpers are subordinate Clauses. 29. Acupuncture is a jab well done. 30. Marathon runners with bad footwear suffer the agony of defeat. Okay. That's it. Dreadful weren't they. |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: probonopublico-ga on 20 Jul 2003 00:08 PDT |
Stressed Mum! G'day! (Not D'day, as I mis-keyed on an earlier occasion.) Many thanks for your Comments which I rate as follows: €€€€€ No, they're not kisses ... Please see 232965 for an explanation. Kindest regards PB |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: uzzz-ga on 20 Jul 2003 06:16 PDT |
. |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: politicalguru-ga on 21 Jul 2003 12:31 PDT |
What a lame attempt (successful nevertheless) to get us back here. |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: politicalguru-ga on 21 Jul 2003 12:32 PDT |
I must also note, that Omni deducted that the question cannot bear 1,000 comments, was wrong, and gor five stars AND a tip. Life is so unfair ;-) |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: probonopublico-ga on 22 Jul 2003 23:01 PDT |
Hands up ... All those who thought that we'd never get as far as we have ... And hands up, all those who truly believed. |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: journalist-ga on 23 Jul 2003 15:24 PDT |
713 |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: omnivorous-ga on 23 Jul 2003 15:37 PDT |
Whodda thunk it? But will it stop at 1,000? |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: vinsvixen2-ga on 23 Jul 2003 20:20 PDT |
715...just dropping by once more. |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: vinsvixen2-ga on 23 Jul 2003 20:25 PDT |
p.s. sublime1, thanx for the explanation. makes sense.... |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: hailstorm-ga on 24 Jul 2003 21:50 PDT |
slowly but surely, we are making progress towards the 1,000 comment goal. But I think 1,000 commenTORS will be unlikely. |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: probonopublico-ga on 25 Jul 2003 11:10 PDT |
Attention, please! Please look at Question 234933 and you may see your name listed in The Roll of Honour (yes, that's how 'Honour' should be spelled). And, if not, why not? |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: vinsvixen2-ga on 25 Jul 2003 22:58 PDT |
719... |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: apteryx-ga on 26 Jul 2003 16:23 PDT |
Oh, I was sure you'd make it. Am sure. People seem unable to resist silly little challenges that afford a sense of triumph without a great expenditure of effort. I think it's a way of thumbing one's nose at all the things we can't control in an out-of-control world, all the obstacles large and small that we just can't heave ourselves over, all the petty, divisive little rivalries and antagonisms that set us apart from one another in the workplace, in the supermarket checkout line, on the freeway, or wherever, that abrade our pleasure in kinship with our species and instead make us feel like alienated losers. Here's a chance to enjoy a sense of unity of purpose and ultimate victory, cheap, with some entertainment in the bargain. A sure-fire winner. I tried to help things along a time or two when they seemed to be lagging, but you're on the downhill side now and will probably coast to a finish. In fact, human nature being what it is, I wouldn't be surprised to see you log 1200 comments, 1500, 2000 . . . could this one grow unwieldy enough to crash the system? Apteryx |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: vinsvixen2-ga on 26 Jul 2003 20:57 PDT |
not much to say; just dropping by to add #721.... |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: answerfinder-ga on 28 Jul 2003 01:11 PDT |
This reminds me of school when I my teacher gave me lines for misbehaving or failing to complete my homework properly. On this occasion, prompted by probonopublico, I have 10 lines to submit asap................ I must check my answers at least five times before posting them. |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: answerfinder-ga on 28 Jul 2003 01:12 PDT |
I must check my answers at least five times before posting them. |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: answerfinder-ga on 28 Jul 2003 04:08 PDT |
I must check my answers at least five times before posting them. (2) |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: answerfinder-ga on 28 Jul 2003 04:09 PDT |
I must check my answers at least five times before posting them. (3) |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: answerfinder-ga on 28 Jul 2003 04:09 PDT |
I must check my answers at least five times before posting them. (4) |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: answerfinder-ga on 28 Jul 2003 04:10 PDT |
I must check my answers at least five times before posting them. (5) |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: answerfinder-ga on 28 Jul 2003 04:12 PDT |
I must check my answers at least five times before posting them. (6) |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: answerfinder-ga on 28 Jul 2003 04:13 PDT |
I must check my answers at least five times before posting them. (7) |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: answerfinder-ga on 28 Jul 2003 04:13 PDT |
I must check my answers at least five times before posting them. (8) |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: answerfinder-ga on 28 Jul 2003 04:14 PDT |
I must check my answers at least five times before posting them. (9) |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: answerfinder-ga on 28 Jul 2003 04:16 PDT |
I must chcek my answesr at least five timse before postign them. (10) |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: answerfinder-ga on 28 Jul 2003 04:17 PDT |
Oh D*!! I must check my answers at least six times before posting them. |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: vinsvixen2-ga on 28 Jul 2003 22:57 PDT |
734 |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: vinsvixen2-ga on 28 Jul 2003 22:58 PDT |
735 |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: vinsvixen2-ga on 28 Jul 2003 22:58 PDT |
736 |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: vinsvixen2-ga on 28 Jul 2003 22:59 PDT |
737 |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: vinsvixen2-ga on 28 Jul 2003 23:04 PDT |
738 |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: probonopublico-ga on 29 Jul 2003 04:20 PDT |
Hi, Vinsvixen2 You are a STAR! Many thanks. PB |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: bowler-ga on 29 Jul 2003 07:43 PDT |
As far as the original question, playing me in my life story would be Jim Carey and my leading lady would be: http://blog.outer-court.com/archive/2003_05_08_index.html The Goddess of GA! |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: probonopublico-ga on 29 Jul 2003 09:06 PDT |
Hi, Bowler! Many thanks for the great link. It's the best ever. You are an absolute genius .... But how did you find it? (I bet you used a Search Engine, right?) PB |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: apteryx-ga on 30 Jul 2003 00:34 PDT |
Gee, I found that a long time ago (yes, by a search on that very name, just out of curiosity) and read the whole set. Fascinating! Since the researchers obviously gave the interviews, I thought it must have been linked from GA pages somehow and I had just missed it. Well, now it is. Apteryx |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: victoriac-ga on 30 Jul 2003 11:50 PDT |
Hi, Everyone I'm Victoria, PB's elder daughter. My Dad has asked me to support him, so here I am. Here's an idea ... Why doesn't everyone else ask their spouses, sons and daughters to join in? LOL Victoria |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: smutzer-ga on 31 Jul 2003 07:52 PDT |
Looks like 743 |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: smutzer-ga on 31 Jul 2003 07:52 PDT |
Looks like 744 |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: smutzer-ga on 31 Jul 2003 07:53 PDT |
Looks like 745 |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: smutzer-ga on 31 Jul 2003 07:53 PDT |
Looks like 746 |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: smutzer-ga on 31 Jul 2003 07:53 PDT |
Looks like 747 |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: smutzer-ga on 31 Jul 2003 07:54 PDT |
Looks like 748 |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: smutzer-ga on 31 Jul 2003 07:54 PDT |
Looks like 749 |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: smutzer-ga on 31 Jul 2003 07:54 PDT |
Looks like you've got 250 to go.... |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: probonopublico-ga on 31 Jul 2003 09:24 PDT |
Wow Smutzer ... Many thanks! You are an absolute gem. Hope you return to continue the good work. Regards Bryan |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: vinsvixen2-ga on 01 Aug 2003 14:12 PDT |
bowler, thanx for the link. very entertaining. i only read pink's, but saved it to my faves folder so i can go back & read the rest, too. thanx again for sharing! |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: vinsvixen2-ga on 01 Aug 2003 15:10 PDT |
here are s'more ... until the Secret Police Force (GoogleBot) deems it necessary to CUT me OFF, that is! |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: vinsvixen2-ga on 01 Aug 2003 15:11 PDT |
754 |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: vinsvixen2-ga on 01 Aug 2003 15:12 PDT |
755 |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: vinsvixen2-ga on 01 Aug 2003 15:12 PDT |
756 |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: vinsvixen2-ga on 01 Aug 2003 15:13 PDT |
757 |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: vinsvixen2-ga on 01 Aug 2003 15:14 PDT |
758 |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: vinsvixen2-ga on 01 Aug 2003 15:14 PDT |
759 |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: vinsvixen2-ga on 01 Aug 2003 15:15 PDT |
TA-DA! here's 800!! |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: vinsvixen2-ga on 01 Aug 2003 15:17 PDT |
...just kidding! :-) |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: vinsvixen2-ga on 01 Aug 2003 15:19 PDT |
ok, so it's REALLY #762... |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: vinsvixen2-ga on 01 Aug 2003 15:20 PDT |
763 |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: vinsvixen2-ga on 01 Aug 2003 15:20 PDT |
764 |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: vinsvixen2-ga on 01 Aug 2003 15:21 PDT |
765 |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: vinsvixen2-ga on 01 Aug 2003 15:22 PDT |
766 |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: apteryx-ga on 01 Aug 2003 19:44 PDT |
Very cute, but doesn't it seem logical that a comment has to *say* something? Otherwise it isn't really a comment, now, is it? Apteryx |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: vinsvixen2-ga on 02 Aug 2003 02:07 PDT |
hmm, yeah, you are so right, apteryx! sooo, ya think someone oughta tell uzzz-ga about that??? (see comment #709) ;-) |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: probonopublico-ga on 02 Aug 2003 03:39 PDT |
This morning, I came down to find Daisy sitting on a clutch of eggs. I think there's six but a large seagull is on patrol who barks at me whenever I try to get close. I have to assume that the seagull has been having an affair with Daisy, behind my back. Will they be edible? Valuable? Or merely gullible? Advice, please. |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: apteryx-ga on 02 Aug 2003 12:13 PDT |
Depends. Is Daisy a cow? |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: probonopublico-ga on 02 Aug 2003 12:19 PDT |
Hi, Apteryx Many thnaks for your interest. Daisy is my 13-year-old Yorkshire terrier, so my query relates to Gull Terrier eggs. Regards Bryan |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: sublime1-ga on 02 Aug 2003 12:21 PDT |
Bryan... I think what you'll have there is a brood of gullible bird dogs... |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: vinsvixen2-ga on 02 Aug 2003 23:52 PDT |
nothing in particular to add (as usual); just dropping by for #773 |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: missy-ga on 03 Aug 2003 00:04 PDT |
Are we there yet? |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: trueparent-ga on 03 Aug 2003 00:33 PDT |
You folks need to advertise that a Comment can be made after the expiration date of a question. I believe that most people do not know that. |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: trueparent-ga on 03 Aug 2003 00:42 PDT |
Oh yes, I forgot; I think I would like Pee Wee Herman to represent me on screen....or maybe the Hulk.......I forget the names of the two/three actors, and the graphics folks. |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: googlenut-ga on 03 Aug 2003 00:46 PDT |
Is Victoria really your daughter? |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: probonopublico-ga on 03 Aug 2003 01:13 PDT |
Hi, Everyone ... And, particularly, Jinx. Yes, Victoria really is my daughter. Surely, you don't think that an attractive young woman would pose as my daughter unless it were true? I also have another daughter, Samantha, but (as far as I know) she has yet to make any comments, unless (of course) she has without telling me. And then there's Daisy but she's too busy sitting on her eggs at the moment. Bryan |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: googel-ga on 03 Aug 2003 03:58 PDT |
Confirmation: True, this line was added on 03 Aug 2003, between 03:57 and 58 PDT. |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: politicalguru-ga on 03 Aug 2003 07:26 PDT |
780 |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: politicalguru-ga on 03 Aug 2003 07:27 PDT |
I wonder how I got here: I was searching GA for something and found this question once again. |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: politicalguru-ga on 03 Aug 2003 07:31 PDT |
Now I found out which one it was that caught my attention. |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: politicalguru-ga on 03 Aug 2003 07:31 PDT |
By the way, despite what it seems, I am still looking for evidences. |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: probonopublico-ga on 03 Aug 2003 08:04 PDT |
Guten Tag, Tamar Does your cryptic remark imply that Victor Grayson is NOT dead? This is sensational. Please be VERY discreet when you post your answer ... Auf Wiedersehen Bryan |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: apteryx-ga on 03 Aug 2003 11:39 PDT |
Hi, Bryan Probo-- I am acually less worried about your Daisy, who seems to be taking care of herself...uh...himself?? you didn't specify, but I am now wondering who laid the eggs...than I am about the line "having an affair with Daisy, behind my back." This suggests that Daisy's putative intimacy with a seagull would amount to an act of infidelity to you. I am concerned, Bryan. Is everything all right where you are? Apteryx |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: snapanswer-ga on 03 Aug 2003 11:59 PDT |
Just waiting so that I could post comment #786... and now it has happened. |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: googel-ga on 03 Aug 2003 12:49 PDT |
Hi, Probonopublico-ga Thank you for the following valuable contribution of yours: " Subject: Re: to guillermo-ga re. "I should have built a team for this one" From: probonopublico-ga on 03 Aug 2003 12:30 PDT Hi, Googel Sorry, I don't have anything to contribute but, as you have been kind enough to comment on my questions, I thought that I ought to reciprocate. Good Luck! Bryan " Regards |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: vinsvixen2-ga on 03 Aug 2003 15:26 PDT |
re: "This suggests that Daisy's putative intimacy with a seagull would amount to an act of infidelity to you. I am concerned, Bryan. Is everything all right where you are?" ooh, apteryx! omg-i am rolling right now! that is hilarious! thanx for the laffs, vinsvixen2 |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: probonopublico-ga on 03 Aug 2003 22:47 PDT |
Hi, Apteryx, Googel & Vinsvixen2 "Is there a Vinsvixen1?", I wonder. Thank you for your concern. It's a great shock when a pet owner discovers that his little dog has been doing what other dogs have been doing over the years. Naturally, I believe that Daisy could have done better for herself than choose a seagull as a partner but they seem happy enough together, so who am I to judge? There's nothing wrong with me now that a few cases of Dom Perignon won't fix but you will have to be very resourceful to get them to me. However, I have every confidence in you. Regards Bryan |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: googel-ga on 04 Aug 2003 00:32 PDT |
Hi, Probonopublico How much would you pay for an advice which would go like: "Include in your future questions the request 'Please consider part of this question the task of copying at least the beginning of your posted answer to this question into a comment or adding a brief new comment to my question at http://answers.google.com/answers/main?cmd=threadview&id=161982 ' " ? Cheers |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: stressedmum-ga on 04 Aug 2003 05:27 PDT |
G'day PB honey, Just had to drop by and see how you're going. Up to 790 now, I see. Well done! How's Daisy? Have those eggs hatched yet? Here's a pet story from downunder for you that's just happened and we're still shaking our heads in disbelief. One of my cats has just done something very nasty and extremely clever -- we aren't sure if we should be mad or proud ... stresseddad just went to get his shoes out of the wardrobe and smelled that yucky, unmistakable pong of cat wee.He checked the carpet and the walls and they were pristine. He couldn't understand where it was coming from until he picked up his shoes. Yep, dear Bruce (the cat's called Bruce)has manouvered his ample feline posterior and *sat* on the shoe and filled it copiously all without spilling a drop. Impressive, huh? See you in the 800s. |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: missy-ga on 04 Aug 2003 11:11 PDT |
We still aren't there yet? This needs to be fixed! |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: missy-ga on 04 Aug 2003 11:12 PDT |
When you reach your goal and go on a world tour to celebrate, I must insist that you let me take you here for dinner: http://www.tonypackos.com Perhaps they'll even ask you to sign a bun? |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: tutuzdad-ga on 04 Aug 2003 11:22 PDT |
Maybe I should just post 207 more comments and declare a victory! tutuzdad-ga |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: morris-ga on 04 Aug 2003 12:55 PDT |
In response to: hammer-ga on 16 Feb 2003 11:53 PST While the cat's away, the mice will play. |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: kemlo-ga on 04 Aug 2003 17:23 PDT |
I AM VERY GOOD AT SPOTTING OTHER PEOPLES MISTAKES ON THE OTHER HAND I, MYSELF, DON'T MAKE ANY. I AM PREFECT. REGARDS KEMLO. |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: kemlo-ga on 04 Aug 2003 17:31 PDT |
Daisy is a silly bird He flits from bough to bough He lays his eggs in rubarb trees And whistles like a cow. |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: angely-ga on 04 Aug 2003 18:48 PDT |
Wow, I go on a leetle teeny camping trip and y'all get almost all the way to 800! Good job! It's time for a...MUPPET CHEER!!! (Close your eyes, open your mouth wide, tilt your head toward the sky, wave your hands just over your head and scream) |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: angely-ga on 04 Aug 2003 18:49 PDT |
Ready? 1... 2... 3... |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: angely-ga on 04 Aug 2003 18:50 PDT |
Go!!! "AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA" (cool. 800.) |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: probonopublico-ga on 04 Aug 2003 21:12 PDT |
WOW ... It's another good news day! We've passed 800 Comments (Thanks to one and all) I've come into $4.5 million (Nigerian) And, best of all, it's NOT a Seagull that's been barking at me; it's a SWAN! 'Aw go on', I hear you say, 'A swan? ... So Daisy won't have any ugly gullthings, after all ...' I must admit that I thought she'd have more sense than go swanning around with a seagull; I feel much happier to know that she's been gulling around with a swan. Bryan |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: googel-ga on 04 Aug 2003 21:41 PDT |
Hi Probonopublico-ga, Please, where is the bug in: " Subject: Re: finding air leaks in sealed plastic bag From: googel-ga on 04 Aug 2003 21:18 PDT Is it possible at all to apply ideas like: --after sucking out the air place the whole thing in heat room (with high pressure, perhaps) so that the plastic will lose its elasticity completely and take the foam's shape , then place it in a cool or cooler room (with high pressure again, perhaps) ? --after sucking out the air place the whole thing in heat room (with high pressure, perhaps) so that the plastic will lose its elasticity completely and take the foam's shape --while continuing the air sucking , then place it in a cool or cooler room (with high pressure, perhaps) ? " Regards |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: probonopublico-ga on 04 Aug 2003 23:06 PDT |
Hi, Googel Many thanks for sharing your idea with me. I cannot find any bug in your proposition but, with these things, you never know until you try them out. Even so, the exercise could lead to a more elegant solution. But, in terms of the original question, would it be possible to do the tests within the cost and time parameters set out? Fortunately, I don't have the problem but I am sure that the Questioner has been given a few things to mull over. Regards Bryan |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: googel-ga on 04 Aug 2003 23:41 PDT |
Thank you for spending your time on my question, Probonopublico. May I copy your opinion above to question " finding air leaks in sealed plastic bag" ? Yours |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: probonopublico-ga on 05 Aug 2003 00:12 PDT |
Hi, Again, Googel It's yours! And, again, many thanks for your support. Bryan |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: googel-ga on 05 Aug 2003 01:24 PDT |
thanks, Probonopublico. has been done. |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: googel-ga on 05 Aug 2003 01:28 PDT |
... and beginning with: " Subject: Re: finding air leaks in sealed plastic bag From: googel-ga on 05 Aug 2003 01:21 PDT Hi sven1791-ga, It would be very nice if you could address the questions raised by the opinion below re. my comment above. " Subject: Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please! From: probonopublico-ga on 04 Aug 2003 23:06 PDT ..." |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: googel-ga on 05 Aug 2003 01:42 PDT |
Subject: Re: finding air leaks in sealed plastic bag From: googel-ga on 05 Aug 2003 01:41 PDT ... and heat could be applied like by vacuum forming machines?! |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: megagaga-ga on 05 Aug 2003 04:37 PDT |
I was last here on 14 June ... and we still haven't reached the magic figure of 1,000. C'mon Guys & Gals .... One last great big effort! |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: mikomoro-ga on 05 Aug 2003 06:22 PDT |
Promises & Predictions Who said ... a) I will of course let you know the moment [when the number of comments exceed those made on ID 50956] this happens .... ? b) There is no chance of exceeding 200 comments ? c) I have feeling that .... 1,000 comments is totally unachievable ? |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: googel-ga on 05 Aug 2003 07:06 PDT |
Hi Probonopublico, It seems you have already achieved an additional prestigious world record: the most G-A nicknames posting comments to a Google-Answers question. I wonder who is the first one in the history of the Univers pointing to and naming this record ? ;) Thanks for the question. Cheers |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: googel-ga on 05 Aug 2003 11:34 PDT |
" Subject: Re: world record in nicknames at Probonopublico-ga's qstn ID 161982? From: googel-ga on 05 Aug 2003 11:28 PDT ... the number of nicknames listed (90 or so) at http://answers.google.com/answers/main?cmd=threadview&id=234933 seem to be easily greater already than the number 107 minus the number of non-new nicknames at http://answers.google.com/answers/main?cmd=threadview&id=50956 " |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: megagaga-ga on 07 Aug 2003 11:29 PDT |
Still only 812? Must do smething about that ... But what? |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: andrewxmp-ga on 07 Aug 2003 13:31 PDT |
"Who is pierce brosnan?" GAHHHHHH!!! |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: vinsvixen2-ga on 07 Aug 2003 15:05 PDT |
just dropping by to add one more... |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: vinsvixen2-ga on 07 Aug 2003 15:26 PDT |
ok, so i am JUST now getting into this "vaughn lowery" thing (the dancing joe boxer guy). not really "into" it, i guess; but just now finding out about all the hoopla over him, is what i mean. i almost never watch tv, so i had no idea he even existed until just a few days ago. i was reading thru the ga answered questions & someone asked who the guy was. since i'm a joe boxer girl (& always make sure my bookee has on his joe boxers, too!), i was interested. so, afta a few searches, i found out more than i'd've ever wanted to know about this guy. saw the commercials, the interactive game, his tv appearances; saw the fan sites, forums, chat boards, groups, etc.; etc. ... ETC! and now i must ask: WHAT IS THE BIG DEAL??! so, he dances around in his undies. yeah, okaaaay....AND??! am i just hopelessly not "with it" and just don't "get it"? i'll admit that, yes, i'm even an easily amused person; but i still just do NOT see this whole "vaughn" thing! |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: vinsvixen2-ga on 07 Aug 2003 15:28 PDT |
...hmm, not that vaughn lowery really has anything to do with this question. or anything else right now, for that matter. :-) just thot i'd throw it out there & see what everyone else had to say, tho. |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: googel-ga on 07 Aug 2003 15:37 PDT |
probonopublico-ga will be delighted --i guess-- to know that it wasn't a mistake, vinsvixen2-ga . |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: vinsvixen2-ga on 07 Aug 2003 15:42 PDT |
hee hee! :-) |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: vinsvixen2-ga on 07 Aug 2003 16:29 PDT |
hi bryan, dunno if there's a "vinsvixen1" or not. but i know there's a "vinsvixen" meandering around out in cyberspace somewhere. and how do i know this, you may ask? cuz she stole that very name from me! & therefore i couldn't have it for my email addy, like i'd wanted! >:-( so, i chose to be vinsvixen, 'also' --> "vinsvixen, too". i've never run into vinsvixen directly, but i've seen some of her postings in the --where else?-- vin diesel community, where i tend to hang out waaaay too much! :-) (but puh-leeeze don't tell anyone about that last bit. cuz then i may hafta 'fess up to what i've named my plants and my car; how many times i've seen "pitch black"; & exactly how many t-shirts (& otha articles of clothing) i have with his picture on it!) [and this from a 30-year-old, no less!] |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: probonopublico-ga on 07 Aug 2003 22:55 PDT |
Hi, Everyone! Many thanks for all your comments. Nice to see Stressed Mum around and how about that Vinsvixen2 ???? Only wish I knew what she's called her car and her plants ... Keep 'em coming! Bryan |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: academy589-ga on 08 Aug 2003 06:45 PDT |
Intriguing |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: academy589-ga on 08 Aug 2003 06:46 PDT |
#823 |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: bowler-ga on 08 Aug 2003 07:23 PDT |
http://www.alltooflat.com/geeky/elgoog/ |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: bowler-ga on 08 Aug 2003 07:28 PDT |
http://www.albinoblacksheep.com/text/victories.html |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: probonopublico-ga on 08 Aug 2003 07:35 PDT |
Hi, Again, Bowler You continue to amaze me ... But will your recent Comments survive the Bot Test? Kindest regards Bryan (PS I don't think that you are French .... Rght?) |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: bowler-ga on 08 Aug 2003 09:59 PDT |
PB, No, I'm not French although not many people will admit they are French in the U.S. nowadays. I'm not familiar with the bot test. Is it multiple choice? Thanks again! Bowler-ga |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: probonopublico-ga on 08 Aug 2003 10:10 PDT |
Hi, Again, Bowler The G Bot is a secret censoring service and I feel sure that it will not like: http://www.alltooflat.com/geeky/elgoog/ Lese majeste, no less. As regards: http://www.albinoblacksheep.com/text/victories.html C'est plus de Lese Majeste or (more correctly) Lese Napoleon. Oh! la! la! |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: vinsvixen2-ga on 08 Aug 2003 14:38 PDT |
just popping in to add #829 |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: vinsvixen2-ga on 08 Aug 2003 20:31 PDT |
googel, ok, i admit: i am too lazy to search back thru GA & find the answer on my own, sooo: what is up with you and this flosser gadget?? i keep seeing all these questions; and some are even being closed before they can be answered??? so, hey, what gives? what's the deal? jus' curious, is all.... |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: vinsvixen2-ga on 08 Aug 2003 20:33 PDT |
hmm, well, since i'm here: ...831 |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: vinsvixen2-ga on 08 Aug 2003 20:34 PDT |
832 |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: vinsvixen2-ga on 08 Aug 2003 20:38 PDT |
833 |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: vinsvixen2-ga on 08 Aug 2003 20:40 PDT |
834 |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: vinsvixen2-ga on 08 Aug 2003 20:43 PDT |
835 |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: vinsvixen2-ga on 08 Aug 2003 20:45 PDT |
836 |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: vinsvixen2-ga on 08 Aug 2003 20:49 PDT |
837 |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: vinsvixen2-ga on 08 Aug 2003 21:03 PDT |
838 |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: vinsvixen2-ga on 08 Aug 2003 21:04 PDT |
839 |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: vinsvixen2-ga on 08 Aug 2003 21:05 PDT |
840 |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: vinsvixen2-ga on 08 Aug 2003 21:06 PDT |
841 |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: probonopublico-ga on 08 Aug 2003 22:13 PDT |
Hi, Again, Vinsvixen2 You really are a star ... I only wish I knew what you've called your car and your plants ... Keep 'em coming! Bryan |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: googel-ga on 08 Aug 2003 22:57 PDT |
vinsvixen2-ga , great to know you follow the events here. have you seen the gadget already? |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: googel-ga on 08 Aug 2003 23:01 PDT |
and here is a donation for probonopublico-ga. hi, probonopublico-ga hope everything's OK there. best wishes |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: googel-ga on 09 Aug 2003 02:01 PDT |
" Subject: Re: 2*** grntd. A New Improved Flosser (#2) From: knowledge_seeker-ga on 08 Aug 2003 08:57 PDT Googel strings floss full of tension As taut floss is a tooth's best prevention But Megagaga girl's want Is a holder she'll flaunt To make flossing an act of pretension ...and yes I realize that Limericks result in an automatic one star deduction. It's a penalty I'm willing to live with. ;-) -K~ " |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: googel-ga on 09 Aug 2003 02:03 PDT |
" Subject: 5****grntd: Do you think a Probonopublico-ga qstn has most nicknames ever? Category: Miscellaneous Asked by: googel-ga List Price: $2.00 Posted: 06 Aug 2003 22:33 PDT Expires: 05 Sep 2003 22:33 PDT Question ID: 240971 5 stars and no Request for Answer Clarification guaranteed. Do you think a question of Probonopublico-ga has the most GA nicknames posting comments to same question, ever? Why do you think so? (Related questions: "world record in nicknames at Probonopublico-ga's qstn ID 161982?" "Confirm calc: World record in nicknames at Probonopublico-ga's qstn." "Count the no. of commenting GA nicknames in 2 questions" ) Answer Subject: Re: 5****grntd: Do you think a Probonopublico-ga qstn has most nicknames ever? Answered By: missy-ga on 06 Aug 2003 23:35 PDT Rated: Silly Googel, of course it does! The question in question already has the most comments ever, and only a bare handful of commenters there have posted more than one comment. It doesn't hurt that Bryan is a popular fella with a bit of a following here at Google Answers, and he keeps gaining new fans every day. If they keep posting to his question, he will absolutely maintain his position as customer with the most comments *and* different commenters with ease. Have a great night! --Missy googel-ga rated this answer: Hi Missy, Thank you for the answer. The thing is that according to question http://answers.google.com/answers/main?cmd=threadview&id=234933 and my count, when the question had only 600 comments the no. of commenters was 93 or so while the question http://answers.google.com/answers/main?cmd=threadview&id=50956 had 107 comments and according to my count it had 88 or so different commenting nicknames. Best regards, g " |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: probonopublico-ga on 09 Aug 2003 03:27 PDT |
Hi, Vinsvixen2 & Googel Many thanks for your continuing support. But I still haven't got a fix on what Vinsvixen2 has called her car and her plants. However, I have checked out Vivica A Fox (Vinsvixen2's alter ego) and WOW! Is she really something! Kindest regards Bryan |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: googel-ga on 09 Aug 2003 03:58 PDT |
if Vivica A Fox is Vinsvixen2 indeed, then is that really very important how Vinsvixen2 calls that car and those plants, probonopublico-ga ? cheeers, googel-ga |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: googel-ga on 09 Aug 2003 04:19 PDT |
the looks must have on impact on the mind since i should have written "does it really matter what names that car and those plants listen to"? |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: probonopublico-ga on 09 Aug 2003 07:06 PDT |
Hi, Googel Many thanks for your continuing interest. Regarding the names that Vinsvixen2 calls her car and her plants, I am merely passing on a request from Vivica A Fox who is slated to play her part. Vivica feels that she has to get into character if she is to do justice to the part. Moreover, I believe that Vivica will have heard the whispers that she is being considered for a star part in the next Bond movie. Please remember, you heard it hear first. Your Correspondent @ LA Confidential |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: googel-ga on 09 Aug 2003 07:36 PDT |
everything is recorded here, probonopublico-ga and Vinsvixen2 |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: googel-ga on 09 Aug 2003 08:22 PDT |
Subject: Mathematics Category: Reference, Education and News > Teaching and Research Asked by: rossy72-ga List Price: $2.50 Posted: 09 Aug 2003 08:14 PDT Expires: 08 Sep 2003 08:14 PDT Question ID: 241759 The development of our number system from ancient times, including the invention of zero Answer Comments Subject: Re: Mathematics From: googel-ga on 09 Aug 2003 08:19 PDT it was pretty slow until it reached zero. |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: googel-ga on 09 Aug 2003 10:40 PDT |
Subject: Re: Mathematics From: googel-ga on 09 Aug 2003 10:05 PDT then went infinitely small and under zero. Subject: Re: Mathematics From: googel-ga on 09 Aug 2003 10:18 PDT the latter situation lead to unnumarable imaginary numbers. |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: apteryx-ga on 09 Aug 2003 14:05 PDT |
Now, if those had just been added one line at a time . . . |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: apteryx-ga on 09 Aug 2003 17:56 PDT |
In case you're curious about why my last comment appears to make no sense, it is now comment #854, but it was #856 when I posted it. It immediately followed two full-length bitmapped images of young ladies who, uh, who, well, that's undoubtedly why they're not here any more. Apteryx |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: googel-ga on 10 Aug 2003 01:15 PDT |
Subject: Re: Mathematics From: vinsvixen2-ga on 10 Aug 2003 00:07 PDT :-) lol @ silly googel! |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: googel-ga on 10 Aug 2003 01:30 PDT |
Hi, Vinsvixen2 and Probonopublico May i copy the following to "Mathematics"? "Subject: Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please! From: probonopublico-ga on 09 Aug 2003 03:27 PDT Hi, Vinsvixen2 & Googel ... However, I have checked out Vivica A Fox (Vinsvixen2's alter ego) and WOW! Is she really something! Kindest regards Bryan " " Subject: Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please! From: probonopublico-ga on 09 Aug 2003 07:06 PDT Hi, Googel ... Regarding the names that Vinsvixen2 ... , I am merely passing on a request from Vivica A Fox who is slated to play her part. Vivica feels that she has to get into character if she is to do justice to the part. Moreover, I believe that Vivica will have heard the whispers that she is being considered for a star part in the next Bond movie. Please remember, you heard it hear first. Your Correspondent @ LA Confidential " Cheers |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: probonopublico-ga on 10 Aug 2003 01:58 PDT |
Hi, Googel I immediately called an extraordinary meeting of the Board for the sole purpose of discussing your request to copy Comments from this Question to another. After considerable debate, it was unanimously decided that: PERMISSION SHOULD BE REFUSED By Order of the Board (signed) Field Marshal Sir John Arabin Lintorn Simmons GCB GCMG Chairman Dated this Tenth Day of August 2003 Posted @ 0958 hours GMT (as near as dammit) |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: googel-ga on 10 Aug 2003 02:39 PDT |
Sir, thank you All For the acceptance of my request. But I changed my mind for reasons You will probably understand if / when I will explain in details. Yours sincerely, g |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: vinsvixen2-ga on 10 Aug 2003 13:42 PDT |
hi googel, if u happen 2 change your mind: yes, it's fine with me if you copy it to "mathematics." now, as far as sir john field marshal (etc.), i was somehow left out of this all-important meeting of the board he mentioned. "but, how?!" you may gasp in unadulterated shock & surprise. "well, beats the heck outta me," would be my answer. hmm, let's keep this just between me & u, but perhaps he learned a few things from stephen glass & jayson blair. ;-) so, perhaps, u should appeal; ask for a re-meet, a re-vote, re-count, and any other "re-" words u can think of; ask for minutes from this so-called meeting; find out who else was allegedly there. maybe it was *really* only him, daisy, & the gull (oops, i mean, "swan"). if so, then stephen & jayson *definitely* spring to mind! good luck! |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: apteryx-ga on 10 Aug 2003 14:37 PDT |
Here's a suggestion for Google Answers. In order to make sense of the thread on many question pages, we have to read the questioner's rating of the answer (with comment) at the right point in the thread. Probably it wasn't anticipated that so many of these (and not just this one!) would turn into protracted discussions. But of all the postings, the answer rating is the only one that has no date and time stamp. My suggestion is to show the date and time of the questioner's acceptance comment just like all the rest so readers can see where it comes in sequence in relation to all the other posted comments. Apteryx |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: vinsvixen2-ga on 10 Aug 2003 14:41 PDT |
what happened to the question someone asked GA about ebay user "andy46477"??? did a search & couldn't find it. was it deleted? if so, WHY??? it was hilarious! |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: vinsvixen2-ga on 10 Aug 2003 15:00 PDT |
someone *really* paid $1.04 for a one-dollar bill??! http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=3030328731&category=376&rd=1.html well, at least the shipping was free.... |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: vinsvixen2-ga on 10 Aug 2003 15:03 PDT |
$6 paid for an Air Guitar. *And* it's in excellent condition! http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=2541559555&category=621.html |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: vinsvixen2-ga on 10 Aug 2003 15:08 PDT |
bryan, if u need a little bit of bbq sauce for your cheesecake... http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=2934653625&category=1467&rd=1.html |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: apteryx-ga on 10 Aug 2003 15:08 PDT |
I've watched a guy auction off an ordinary straight-out-of-the-wallet $5.00 bill to a roomful of certified smart folks. It went for $550. |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: vinsvixen2-ga on 10 Aug 2003 15:10 PDT |
and that's no cheap imitation; it's the real deal! :-) |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: googel-ga on 10 Aug 2003 15:13 PDT |
Hi, Vinsvixen2 and Probonopublico May i copy the following to "Mathematics"? "Subject: Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please! ... Hi, Vinsvixen2 & Googel ... I have checked out Vivica A Fox (Vinsvixen2's alter ego) and WOW! Is she really something! Kindest regards ... " " Subject: Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please! ... Hi, Googel ... Regarding the names that Vinsvixen2 ... , I am merely passing on a request from Vivica A Fox who is slated to play her part. Vivica feels that she has to get into character if she is to do justice to the part. Moreover, I believe that Vivica will have heard the whispers that she is being considered for a star part in the next Bond movie. Please remember, you heard it hear first. Your Correspondent @ LA Confidential " |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: vinsvixen2-ga on 10 Aug 2003 15:24 PDT |
apteryx, OMG! puh-leeze tell me you merely forgot to add in the decimal point! you *really* meant five dollars and fifty cents, didn't you??! NOT five hundred fifty dollars?! [for a $5 bill] |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: apteryx-ga on 10 Aug 2003 16:00 PDT |
Yes, VV2, that's for real. I have seen the same guy pull this off at least 3 times now, and he has actually done it many more times than that. He does it as a fund-raiser, and the gimmick is that the loser has to pay up as well, but does not get the $5 bill. It doesn't take long (especially if there's a plant or two in the audience) to divide the room into competing sides. The most recent time I witnessed this, just a month ago in St. Paul, I ended up kicking in $20 myself. Added together, the winners' and losers' sides netted a record $1050 if I remember correctly. I don't know who ended up with the original $5, but my guess is it was tossed into the pot. I think of it as the monetary equivalent of Stone Soup. Apteryx |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: googel-ga on 10 Aug 2003 22:28 PDT |
" Your question: 4***grntd: 2***grntd of megagaga-ga, where from? was removed from Google Answers. The Google Answers editors have sent you an email to provide further details on this removal. If you have you have any concerns about this, please e-mail us at answers-support@google.com. Include the Question ID: 242153 and your Google Answers Nickname in any correspondence. " Why? Any Ideas? |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: probonopublico-ga on 11 Aug 2003 03:09 PDT |
WOW! Lots of fascinating comments. My thanks to you all but ... It's hard to squeeze info from Vinsvixen2 ... Please ... What do you call your car? I'm now popping over to see Apteryx ... I've got an invite to dinner. |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: probonopublico-ga on 11 Aug 2003 06:48 PDT |
Hi, Angely You never reported on your camping trip ... Where did you go? How was the weather? Did you enjoy it? Bryan |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: googlenut-ga on 11 Aug 2003 13:14 PDT |
probonopublico wrote: "Moreover, I believe that Vivica will have heard the whispers that she is being considered for a star part in the next Bond movie." She may have to fight me for the part! ~Jinx |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: googel-ga on 11 Aug 2003 14:00 PDT |
is everything Ok here? |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: googel-ga on 11 Aug 2003 14:01 PDT |
everything lokks Ok to me. how about you? |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: vinsvixen2-ga on 11 Aug 2003 15:26 PDT |
guess what i found out, everyone!!?? no graham crackers in the uk ---> no S'MORE'S in the uk! aaaack! the horror! how could i live my life without that warm melted chocolate co-mingled with the warm, smooshy, gooshy 'mallow that just bubbles & ooooozes oh-so-slowly outta the sides when u press the two crisp graham crackers together??? [yummy-kins galore!!] and, oooh: pleeze, pleeze, *pleeze* do NOT add peanut butter to it! (with a tall glass of cold, cold milk! or pepsi or green berry rush hawaiian punch!) i would be unable to contain myself from making a total pig of myself & eating ten zillion in one sitting! (slurp, gurgle, slop, chomp, crunch--warning: anyone with hypersensitivity to food sounds: stay far, far away!) [p.s. that was one of the *funniest* questions/answers i *ever* read! :-)] dear goddess, please let me never know the lack of my essential, ever-lovin' s'mores! forever & ever. amen. :-) |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: vinsvixen2-ga on 11 Aug 2003 15:53 PDT |
who posted comments to my question about the joe boxer/smiley face comforter?? [googel? bryan? anyone, anyone??] and what did they say? i got 3 emails that comments had been posted (1 comment yesterday; 2 today); i also got an email from the editors that the question had been removed. so, i never even got 2 c the comments! :-( since the question had been up for a while, i figure it must've been the comments that caused the removal. jus' curious, is all.... |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: mikomoro-ga on 11 Aug 2003 21:58 PDT |
Hi, Just checking in .... to see what's been happening. |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: mikomoro-ga on 12 Aug 2003 10:03 PDT |
Am I going to have to do the rest myself? C'mon Pinkfreud! |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: mikomoro-ga on 12 Aug 2003 10:04 PDT |
Am I going to have to do the rest myself? C'mon Missy! |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: mikomoro-ga on 12 Aug 2003 10:04 PDT |
Am I going to have to do the rest myself? C'mon Tehuti! |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: mikomoro-ga on 12 Aug 2003 10:05 PDT |
Am I going to have to do the rest myself? C'mon Digsalot! |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: mikomoro-ga on 12 Aug 2003 10:05 PDT |
Am I going to have to do the rest myself? C'mon Politicalguru! |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: mikomoro-ga on 12 Aug 2003 10:06 PDT |
Am I going to have to do the rest myself? C'mon G*Bot! |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: mikomoro-ga on 12 Aug 2003 10:14 PDT |
Am I going to have to do the rest myself? C'mon Apteryx! |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: mikomoro-ga on 12 Aug 2003 10:14 PDT |
Am I going to have to do the rest myself? C'mon Vinsvixen2! |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: mikomoro-ga on 12 Aug 2003 10:14 PDT |
Am I going to have to do the rest myself? C'mon Justaskscott! |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: mikomoro-ga on 12 Aug 2003 10:15 PDT |
Am I going to have to do the rest myself? C'mon Googlenut! |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: mikomoro-ga on 12 Aug 2003 10:15 PDT |
Am I going to have to do the rest myself? C'mon Stressedmum! |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: mikomoro-ga on 12 Aug 2003 10:16 PDT |
Am I going to have to do the rest myself? C'mon Bowler! |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: mikomoro-ga on 12 Aug 2003 10:16 PDT |
Am I going to have to do the rest myself? C'mon Mario Lanza! |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: mikomoro-ga on 12 Aug 2003 10:17 PDT |
Am I going to have to do the rest myself? C'mon Charlie Chaplin! |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: philthefluter-ga on 12 Aug 2003 12:21 PDT |
894 |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: philthefluter-ga on 12 Aug 2003 12:22 PDT |
895 |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: philthefluter-ga on 12 Aug 2003 12:22 PDT |
896 |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: philthefluter-ga on 12 Aug 2003 12:22 PDT |
897 |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: philthefluter-ga on 12 Aug 2003 12:22 PDT |
898 |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: philthefluter-ga on 12 Aug 2003 12:23 PDT |
899 |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: philthefluter-ga on 12 Aug 2003 12:23 PDT |
1,000 Bingo! We've made it at last! |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: probonopublico-ga on 12 Aug 2003 12:59 PDT |
Hi, Bowler As always, you continue to amaze. However, there are some Golden Rules about not communicating personal details through this facility, so I cannot say. Handsome devil, though, isn't he? PB |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: victoriac-ga on 12 Aug 2003 13:15 PDT |
Whoever it is, it's not Pierce Brosnan, and that's for sure. This guy looks as though he's eaten too much cheescake. |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: vinsvixen2-ga on 12 Aug 2003 13:53 PDT |
yeah, and not *enough* s'mores! |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: bowler-ga on 12 Aug 2003 14:55 PDT |
PB, Sorry about the earlier incident. Upon my request Google Answers has removed my comment. Since I have lowered your comment total I am upping again here with this comment. I have learned my Google Answes lesson. I hope I have not offended you. If it is any consolation you do look a bit like Pierce Brosnan. Bowler-ga |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: snapanswer-ga on 12 Aug 2003 20:43 PDT |
Just waiting so that I could post comment #905... and now it has happened. |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: probonopublico-ga on 12 Aug 2003 23:38 PDT |
Hi, Bowler As I would have guessed, you are the perfect gentleman. Many thanks! Just one thing .... Pierce Brosnan is, of course, A LOT older than me. PB |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: angely-ga on 13 Aug 2003 01:58 PDT |
Hi Bryan! Ah, the camping trip; a weekend in the country to soak up the quiet, peace & calm...of just over 100 members of my local pool league. So there was a lotta drinkin', a lotta volleyball playin', a lotta drinkin', a lotta truth'r'dare: we're a simple bunch, very easy to entertain. (rednicks and hicks mostly, and I count myself amongst them.) The injury toll was fairly low: 1 broken wrist (it does not pay to play volleyball in cowboy boots), 1 broken collar bone (gopher hole + dirt bike), 2 broken hearts and a bent ego. R**** C**** got kicked out of the league (again), A**** C**** won a pool cue (again), B**** H**** discovered the wonders of tequila (again). It was loads and loads of fun. (For the record: drinkin'-yes, volleyball playin'-yes, truth'r'dare-yes, injuries-no, breaks/bends-also no.) |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: angely-ga on 13 Aug 2003 02:01 PDT |
Oops, I mean, of course, "REDNECKS", (does this mean I have to give the spelling trophy back?) (Anyone know the address of my elementry school?) (Oh right. Google. Smart me.) |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: probonopublico-ga on 13 Aug 2003 04:01 PDT |
Hi, Angely Many thanks for the update. Now, if there are 100 members in your local Pool League and if each one of these were to post a Comment here ..... Much safer, too, and although it is highly recommended that Commentators should wear cowboy boots, I don't think that it's mandatory. Hang on a minute, I am just going to take mine off (The first time this year) ... No, they're well and truly stuck. So, perhaps later! Regards Bryan |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: techtor-ga on 13 Aug 2003 08:49 PDT |
Well, let's add some more. |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: techtor-ga on 13 Aug 2003 08:49 PDT |
Afer a while, more'll come. |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: techtor-ga on 13 Aug 2003 08:49 PDT |
Try this Guys: www.instantvoodoo.com |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: probonopublico-ga on 13 Aug 2003 10:49 PDT |
Oh, Gee, Techtor It's only a game! I thought it was going to be the real thing. Or is that just a taster? A cue for a question? Many thanks anyway. Bryan |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: omnivorous-ga on 13 Aug 2003 11:02 PDT |
913 on Aug. 13 -- time to start guessing when we arrive at 1,000. Bryan -- I hope that you have the honor. My guess: Sept. 1: 0100 PDT |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: probonopublico-ga on 13 Aug 2003 11:14 PDT |
Hi, Ominvorous Great to hear from you ... the clear and undisputed answerer of this question all those years ago. Thank you also for your prediction. I recall that when, on July 13, I predicted the date as October 1, someone (who shall be nameless) disagreed and, in a less than SUBLIME offering, predicted October 12. And now, that we're only 85 Comments away, I believe that your guess is way off. My guess is: Sept. 1: 0059 PDT Or some time before. Kindest regards Bryan |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: kemlo-ga on 13 Aug 2003 11:30 PDT |
To Bryan nearly there no lomg now. Kemlo To Pinky http://www.richsalter.btinternet.co.uk/ |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: probonopublico-ga on 13 Aug 2003 12:50 PDT |
Ominvorous .... Did I say 'Ominvorous'?? Very sorry, Omniporous, I do try my best. |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: bowler-ga on 13 Aug 2003 13:04 PDT |
My guess is August 27th, and the commenter will be of course, Probonopublico. My worry is what we do after it's over. It'll be like saying goodbye to an old friend. Not to worry, Bryan will think of more ways to keep us entertained. Keep up the good work! |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: lonelyone-ga on 13 Aug 2003 13:56 PDT |
Okey. I know I've not been invited to this party but... I'm gonna help you people to reach 1000 comments by adding this comment. :) Hope it helps! |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: scriptor-ga on 13 Aug 2003 16:39 PDT |
Elvis Presly - "His Latest Flame" (1961) A very old friend came by today cause he was telling everyone in town About the love that he just found And Maries the name of his latest flame Though I smiled the tears inside were a-burning I wished him luck and then he said goodbye He was gone but still his words kept returning What else was there for me to do but cry He talked and talked and I heard him say That she had the longest blackest hair The prettiest green eyes anywhere And Maries the name of his latest flame Would you believe that yesterday This girl was in my arms and swore to me Shed be mine eternally And Maries the name of his latest flame "His Latest Flame", written by Pomus and Shuman, was released as the b-side of "Little Sister". It reached #4 on the Billboard Hot 100 and stayed in the chart for 11 weeks. Greetings, Scriptor (Big Fan of The King) |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: cardinal22-ga on 13 Aug 2003 17:34 PDT |
I'll throw one in |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: probonopublico-ga on 13 Aug 2003 22:41 PDT |
Hi, there, LonelyOne It was good of you to drop by .... BUT What do you mean 'You are not invited to the party?' ... Please consider yourself invited. And it's great to see that Cardinal22 has visited. Please tell all the other Cardinals to pop by. The Pope, too, if possible. Hi, Again, Bowler. Many thanks for your prediction but I would bet money that I won't make Comment # 1,000. Regards Bryan |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: flashv-ga on 14 Aug 2003 21:53 PDT |
Wonderful stuff guys, the dream continues to live. Tis the 15th August today, here in Adelaide, Australia. My guess is the next 78 comments come through pretty fast when the word gets out, my guess is that we will have a result on the 21st August. All the best for the grand finale! |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: probonopublico-ga on 14 Aug 2003 22:19 PDT |
Hi, Flashv Many thanks for your comment & prediction. I can see that this Time Zone thing is going to be a real problem in getting an accurate fix on when # 1,000 is posted because, where I live (the UK), we celebrated August 21 five days ago. I have heard there's talk of switching calendars: I understand that we use a thing called 'The Gregorian' - but I don't take much notice of any new fangled ideas. Regards Bryan |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: claudietta-ga on 15 Aug 2003 18:39 PDT |
Salma Hayek |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: claudietta-ga on 15 Aug 2003 18:42 PDT |
Make that Natalie Portman- in my early youth. |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: probonopublico-ga on 16 Aug 2003 03:53 PDT |
A Cast Update ... Ten Garrulous GA-ers Searching for the stars. Ace landed Kevin Kline So then there were nine. |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: probonopublico-ga on 16 Aug 2003 03:54 PDT |
Nine Garrulous GA-ers Searching for the stars. Tehuti was perfect for Dietrich So then there were eight. |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: probonopublico-ga on 16 Aug 2003 03:54 PDT |
Eight Garrulous GA-ers Searching for the stars. Acorn had to be Sophia Loren So then there were seven. |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: probonopublico-ga on 16 Aug 2003 03:55 PDT |
Seven Garrulous GA-ers Searching for the stars. Candace Bergen became Apteryx So then there were six. |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: probonopublico-ga on 16 Aug 2003 03:55 PDT |
Six Garrulous GA-ers Searching for the stars. Voila got Catherine Deneuve So then there were five. |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: probonopublico-ga on 16 Aug 2003 03:56 PDT |
Five Garrulous GA-ers Searching for the stars. Thx1138 became Rutger Hauer So then there were four. |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: probonopublico-ga on 16 Aug 2003 03:56 PDT |
Four Garrulous GA-ers Searching for the stars. Pierce Brosnan choose me So then there were three. |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: probonopublico-ga on 16 Aug 2003 03:57 PDT |
Three Garrulous GA-ers Searching for the stars. Vivica A Fox got Vinsvixen2 So then there were two. |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: probonopublico-ga on 16 Aug 2003 03:58 PDT |
Two Garrulous GA-ers Searching for the stars. Guillermo became Jack Lemmon So then there was one. |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: probonopublico-ga on 16 Aug 2003 03:58 PDT |
One Garrulous GA-er Searching for the stars. Justaskscott suited de Niro So then there was zero. |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: mikomoro-ga on 16 Aug 2003 10:33 PDT |
Hello, Mission Control Land has been sighted. Countdown is starting: 63 to go .... |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: mikomoro-ga on 16 Aug 2003 10:34 PDT |
62 and counting |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: mikomoro-ga on 16 Aug 2003 10:34 PDT |
61 and day is done |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: mikomoro-ga on 16 Aug 2003 10:35 PDT |
60 is just 5 dozen left |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: mikomoro-ga on 16 Aug 2003 10:35 PDT |
59 and all is fine |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: mikomoro-ga on 16 Aug 2003 10:36 PDT |
58 I can't wait |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: mikomoro-ga on 16 Aug 2003 10:37 PDT |
57 is next to heaven |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: mikomoro-ga on 16 Aug 2003 10:37 PDT |
56 will do the tricks |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: mikomoro-ga on 16 Aug 2003 10:38 PDT |
55 (that's eleven times five) I think |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: mikomoro-ga on 16 Aug 2003 10:38 PDT |
54 who could ask for anything more? |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: mikomoro-ga on 16 Aug 2003 10:38 PDT |
53 (between you and me) |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: mikomoro-ga on 16 Aug 2003 10:39 PDT |
52 is just a few |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: mikomoro-ga on 16 Aug 2003 10:39 PDT |
51 ... Well done! |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: mikomoro-ga on 16 Aug 2003 10:40 PDT |
50 and over to you! |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: bowler-ga on 16 Aug 2003 11:08 PDT |
Remember when! http://216.239.33.104/search?q=cache:D8p_p9HKlXkJ:answers.google.com/answers/main%3Fcmd%3Dthreadview%26id%3D161982+%22most+commented+question%22&hl=en&ie=UTF-8 |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: vinsvixen2-ga on 16 Aug 2003 15:29 PDT |
we're almost there! |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: apteryx-ga on 16 Aug 2003 20:46 PDT |
Oh, what a thrilling, suspenseful finish! Do, do, do let's wrap this up with real words and not just empty counters. You know we're never going to do this again, so let's end it in style. Tell me, Bryan--when do we unmask? Apteryx P.S. I was enchanted to be enversed by you. EYHO, Julie Christie! |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: probonopublico-ga on 16 Aug 2003 21:49 PDT |
Hi, Vinsvixen2 & Apteryx It was lovely to hear again from my two favourite commentators. Yes, we are rapidly moving towards the Masked Ball itself and I have reserved a small annexe next to the Grand Hall, where there might be an opportunity to pierce the veil. Or to unveil the Pierce. Obviously, we cannot do this publicly as it would be in contravention of the rules of this community. Now, I am off to my dancing class ... Today, it's the minuet (Is that how you spell it?) Regards Bryan |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: mikomoro-ga on 17 Aug 2003 09:19 PDT |
Just popped by to say 'Hello'. I don't think that I have ever nominated the actor who's to play me. Well, I reckon Donald Sutherland is the man because we are both tall and we both look good in a beard. So that's my choice. Is that OK? |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: mikomoro-ga on 17 Aug 2003 09:23 PDT |
On second thoughts, Gene Nelson would be a good alternative. Because Doris Day is my very favourite female ever and I did enjoy their dancing together. 'Lullaby of Broadway' is my very favourite movie. |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: mikomoro-ga on 17 Aug 2003 09:25 PDT |
On third thoughts, it could be James Cagney. OK, so he was only tiny but I enjoyed his dancing, too, in "Yankee Doodle Dandy". Come to think of most dancers are tiny ... Perhaps that's why I can't dance? |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: mikomoro-ga on 17 Aug 2003 09:27 PDT |
Well that's it for now. I'm signing off. Will try and get back tomorrow .... As if anybody cares ? ? ? ? ? |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: philthefluter-ga on 17 Aug 2003 12:40 PDT |
Hey ... I haven't named the actor who will play me. It just has to be Sean Connery. A young Sean Connery. |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: philthefluter-ga on 17 Aug 2003 12:42 PDT |
Or Clint Eastwood. A young Clint Eastwood. Got his 'Blood Work' out on video recently. He's still got something. |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: stressedmum-ga on 17 Aug 2003 15:37 PDT |
Minuet? Oh, Probo, I thought we'd get to do the tango. I'm already get stitched into Olivia Newton John's black leather tart outfit from Grease. I can't minuet in that! |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: vinsvixen2-ga on 17 Aug 2003 21:05 PDT |
oh, kemlo! re: "To Pinky http://www.richsalter.btinternet.co.uk/ " omg! i laughed sooo hard just imagining her reaction! bad kemlo! bad kemlo! (but funny, nevertheless!) thanx 4 sharing! :-) |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: vinsvixen2-ga on 17 Aug 2003 21:08 PDT |
bryan, enjoyed your cast update. esp. #3. :-) |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: probonopublico-ga on 17 Aug 2003 21:45 PDT |
G'day Stressed Mum Did you say Olivia Newton-John? WOW! The Eighth Wonder of the World. However, I do want her for a private audition, soonest. Can you please arrange? Hi, Again, Vinsvixen2 You always make my day! Kindest regards Bryan (in John Travolta mode) |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: flashv-ga on 17 Aug 2003 23:38 PDT |
I squeeze one last relevant comment in as I think this whole 1000 exercise will go down in the famed annuls of Internetdom. I would like Hugh Jackman to play me, of course because Hugh is both suave and debonair but particularly because he speaks so eloquently, indeed a skill rapidly becoming lost in the "pop" world of today. Bravo again all! Viva La Millenium! |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: mikomoro-ga on 18 Aug 2003 07:54 PDT |
Did I hear that Olivia Newton-John was coming? Great. I am looking forward to singing a duet with her. Maybe we could make a record? |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: mikomoro-ga on 18 Aug 2003 07:56 PDT |
It occurs to me that there a host of other lovely ladies that ought to be invited. Now which Garrulous GA-er would like to be portrayed by Elizabeth Montgomery? |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: mikomoro-ga on 18 Aug 2003 07:57 PDT |
Still with the thought that just occured to me that there a host of other lovely ladies that ought to be invited ... Which Garrulous GA-er would like to be portrayed by Cyd Charisse? |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: mikomoro-ga on 18 Aug 2003 07:58 PDT |
Still with the thought that just occured to me that there a host of other lovely ladies that ought to be invited ... Which Garrulous GA-er would like to be portrayed by Vera-Ellen? |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: mikomoro-ga on 18 Aug 2003 07:58 PDT |
Still with the thought that just occured to me that there a host of other lovely ladies that ought to be invited ... Which Garrulous GA-er would like to be portrayed by Joan Leslie? Boy am I giving my age away? |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: mikomoro-ga on 18 Aug 2003 08:11 PDT |
In case anyone wondered (and why should they?) ... I have just turned 77. Now, I wonder, am I the oldest person who has commented on this Question? |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: philthefluter-ga on 18 Aug 2003 11:29 PDT |
I have now got my mask, a cloak and a large funny hat. Is there anything else that I need? |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: philthefluter-ga on 18 Aug 2003 11:30 PDT |
Is Jem coming? If not, why not? |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: probonopublico-ga on 18 Aug 2003 12:44 PDT |
Is Jem coming? Good question. I haven't seen any Comment from her. Jem! Jem! Jem! Is it something that we said? |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: probonopublico-ga on 18 Aug 2003 12:45 PDT |
Still no comment from Jem. I bet she's stuck on top of that bloody pedestal again. |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: jem-ga on 18 Aug 2003 12:57 PDT |
<<delicately brushing dust off as she descends MOMENTARILY from pedestal....>> Greetings and salutations all :) Bryan, you missed a fab dinner this evening - pan fried lemon sole with walnut crust. <<wafting gently and ethereally back onto pedestal....>> |
Subject:
Re: Over 2,000 Comments, please!
From: kemlo-ga on 18 Aug 2003 13:58 PDT |
When this is finneshed shalt we continue and try for another thousend in half the thyme |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: kemlo-ga on 18 Aug 2003 17:15 PDT |
i really |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: kemlo-ga on 18 Aug 2003 17:17 PDT |
think that all the single word comments and those silly numbers should be removed as not in keeping with the original qestion |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: kemlo-ga on 18 Aug 2003 17:21 PDT |
I am not on braodband yet and each page is taking over a minute to load |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: kemlo-ga on 18 Aug 2003 17:24 PDT |
i still think that all the single word comments and those silly numbers should be removed as not in keeping with the original qestion and as for that drawing of betty boop?????? |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: kemlo-ga on 18 Aug 2003 17:27 PDT |
Perhaps if i ask nicely |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: kemlo-ga on 18 Aug 2003 17:28 PDT |
the powers that be might delete |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: kemlo-ga on 18 Aug 2003 17:31 PDT |
the offending comments and we could start again and do it properly (-; |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: kemlo-ga on 18 Aug 2003 17:34 PDT |
I've got to go to bed now its nearly midnight and mums threatning to throw my computer out the window if i dont stop |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: probonopublico-ga on 18 Aug 2003 21:09 PDT |
Oh dear ... I have to go to court today (in London) so it's a very early start ... Am I going to miss all the action, the same way that I missed Jem's delicious sounding dinner? Don't know what happened to that dinner invite but Daisy arrived home very late and very much worse for wear, reeking of fish and Dom Perignon. She looked very pleased with herself. Can you buy pedestals on ebay? Will stop by later. Bryan |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: howtodoeverything-ga on 18 Aug 2003 21:19 PDT |
I would be played by... a violin. The movie would be directed by a street sign and would be filmed by a soapy water solution. |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: hailstorm-ga on 18 Aug 2003 22:04 PDT |
Can't believe we're almost there! I also can't believe this question is still alive almost six months after it started! So the next question is, who will post comment #1,000? (and will they get paid for it? ;-) |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: apteryx-ga on 19 Aug 2003 00:01 PDT |
Oh, dear, Bryan, that was the Dom Perignon I sent you. You must keep a better eye on deliveries, you know. You are going to miss the final countdown, I see, and too bad. Maybe someone will tape the action for you so you can play it back screen by screen--tomorrow! <blowing kisses> Apteryx |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: jem-ga on 19 Aug 2003 00:48 PDT |
<<Can you buy pedestals on ebay?>> Yes, but I've bought them all - I like to have one for each day of the week :) Daisy is a true connoisseur - we discussed the following in great depth as well as how we both seem to have a fondness for rose champagne and white burgundies. http://www.justchampagne.co.uk/popproducts.asp?pid=452&scid=171531 http://www.bbr.com/GB/db/product/38945B?sort_order_F=P&ID=null http://www.bbr.com/GB/db/product/40960B?sort_order_F=P&ID=C1ZRB6M2LKC00BM |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: kemlo-ga on 19 Aug 2003 03:14 PDT |
Hya PB Giving evidence to the Hutton enqirey are you? Safe return Kemlo |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: kemlo-ga on 19 Aug 2003 03:17 PDT |
Eight more to go , come on every body one last effort |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: kemlo-ga on 19 Aug 2003 03:20 PDT |
Oh golly gosh it looks like I will have to make them all up myself |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: kemlo-ga on 19 Aug 2003 03:26 PDT |
10,000 comments thats wot we realy should be aiming for |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: kemlo-ga on 19 Aug 2003 03:29 PDT |
How many days haws it been since the sixteenth of Febuary what has been the average numbre of comments per day? |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: kemlo-ga on 19 Aug 2003 03:33 PDT |
I like writing these comets as spelling and punctuation (wich I am very good at) reely matter. |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: kemlo-ga on 19 Aug 2003 03:37 PDT |
My computer just crashed and I have lost count of my entryes Are we there yet Daddy- are we there yet - are we there yet |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: kemlo-ga on 19 Aug 2003 03:40 PDT |
I have this dreadful feeling someone is waiting watching for 999 and beat me tuit |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: kemlo-ga on 19 Aug 2003 03:43 PDT |
I think this is nine hundred and ninty eight you can realy count on me |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: kemlo-ga on 19 Aug 2003 03:45 PDT |
Is this realy comment nomber one thousand or have I miscalculated |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: kemlo-ga on 19 Aug 2003 03:50 PDT |
And here is my very last posting on this Qestion its been nice writing to you all Regards Kemlo |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: stressedmum-ga on 19 Aug 2003 06:09 PDT |
You did it! Great effort. Here's a virtual vat of Bollie for you. Now, when does the party start? |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: stressedmum-ga on 19 Aug 2003 06:24 PDT |
I hit 'post comment' too early in my excitement to congratulate you. It's because this Olivia Newton John party outfit is so-o-o darned tight, I can't sit down to type. My hair's just about done and I'm teetering on those platform soles. How she ever danced in these, I'll never know. I think I'm ready for my audition, Bryan! I think Mikomoro is going to do a duet with me. What shall we sing? "Hopelessly devoted to Probo"??!! PS (Happy 77th birthday Mikomoro) |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: probonopublico-ga on 19 Aug 2003 11:30 PDT |
Wow! We're there and I missed all the action at the end. I only got home 20 minutes ago, so it's been a long day for me but a fascinating one in court. Incidentally a special thanks to the various Garrulous GA-ers who (unwittingly) helped me make my day in court so worthwhile. Regarding this question, my thanks to everybody who made it possible. It was great fun while it lasted but, please take note, this will be my last ever posting on this question. Believe it or not, I do have lots of other things to do and I received an interesting email whilst I was out that looks as though it will bring some more work for one of my companies. And, in all probability, this will lead to lots more questions that I shall be asking the Garrulous GA-ers (if they are up for it.) With my kindest regards to you all Bryan |
Subject:
at last--Over 1,000 Comments!
From: vinsvixen2-ga on 20 Aug 2003 22:35 PDT |
hi bryan, just wanted to pop in & say how much fun i had on this! glad we finally made it! it was great how everyone participated 2 make it all come together. thanx 4 making it possible! |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: hailstorm-ga on 21 Aug 2003 01:44 PDT |
Congratulations! I hope you will all move on to more productive uses of your time (myself included...) |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: snapanswer-ga on 21 Aug 2003 14:57 PDT |
One small comment for snapanswer-ga--one giant list of comments for Google-kind. |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: techtor-ga on 24 Aug 2003 06:23 PDT |
Hey Bryan, Glad you appreciated the voodoo thing, but it was a fun game. You see, it didn't help me make the 1000th comment, hehe. |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: omniscientbeing-ga on 17 Sep 2003 16:22 PDT |
I'll have an updated version of the computer "Hal" play me. |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: domfreedom-ga on 05 Oct 2003 11:32 PDT |
Why would you need over one thousand cormorants? Are you making a big bird pie to feed the whole world? If so, please be advised that, following a few simple calculations, I estimate the actual quantity of the afore-mentioned sea birds required to give every man woman and child one decent-sized portion of big bird pie, would exceed seven and a half billion. Three things bother me however: 1. you have not thought this through as even the world's biggest oven can only bake a two-billion bird pie, 2. what about the gas bill for your next quarter? 3. chicken tastes nicer. Keep it real. |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: mvguy-ga on 13 Oct 2003 09:35 PDT |
I was just curious to see if the goal had ever been reached here, and it has. I'm impressed! Has anyone counted to see how many commenters there are? Obviously many of us have written more than one. |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: joelpt-ga on 28 Nov 2003 14:52 PST |
This comment makes it a total of 110 unique commentors. Who Howmany probonopublico-ga 132 kemlo-ga 107 vinsvixen2-ga 81 sublime1-ga 77 j_philipp-ga 70 digsalot-ga 61 mikomoro-ga 42 googel-ga 34 politicalguru-ga 30 stressedmum-ga 22 ravuri-ga 22 justaskscott-ga 20 apteryx-ga 16 bowler-ga 14 pafalafa-ga 14 leep-ga 13 pinkfreud-ga 12 sergeantshultz-ga 12 googlenut-ga 12 answerfinder-ga 12 philthefluter-ga 11 techtor-ga 10 missy-ga 10 angely-ga 9 hailstorm-ga 9 smutzer-ga 8 snapanswer-ga 8 liner-ga 7 omnivorous-ga 6 shivreddy-ga 5 tisme-ga 5 flashv-ga 5 hammer-ga 4 farzin-ga 4 mvguy-ga 4 journalist-ga 4 knowledge_seeker-ga 3 megagaga-ga 3 carpediem-ga 3 aceresearcher-ga 3 thx1138-ga 3 knowitall22-ga 3 voila-ga 3 scriptor-ga 3 cobrien-ga 2 jem-ga 2 intotravel-ga 2 tutuzdad-ga 2 tehuti-ga 2 johnfrommelbourne-ga 2 cmaury-ga 2 jeremymiles-ga 2 crocokoala-ga 2 filian-ga 2 trueparent-ga 2 darrenw-ga 2 easterangel-ga 2 claudietta-ga 2 serenata-ga 2 bobbie7-ga 2 nelson-ga 2 victoriac-ga 2 bobthedispatcher-ga 2 academy589-ga 2 seizer-ga 2 steph53-ga 2 anlon-ga 2 robertskelton-ga 2 angy-ga 1 andrewxmp-ga 1 acorn-ga 1 websearcher-ga 1 turkeyvanfan-ga 1 andywall-ga 1 uzzz-ga 1 cerebro-ga 1 cardinal22-ga 1 byrd-ga 1 uniace-ga 1 domfreedom-ga 1 bio-ga 1 gitana-ga 1 chromedome-ga 1 sycophant-ga 1 nellie_bly-ga 1 phi-ga 1 morris-ga 1 ragingacademic-ga 1 ryan222-ga 1 mathtalk-ga 1 luciaphile-ga 1 lonelyone-ga 1 willie-ga 1 skinnamarink-ga 1 toecutter-ga 1 jbf777-ga 1 duncan2-ga 1 igabe-ga 1 howtodoeverything-ga 1 helpandrersearch-ga 1 tan-ga 1 guillermo-ga 1 tlspiegel-ga 1 omniscientbeing-ga 1 gan-ga 1 flajason-ga 1 ericynot-ga 1 efn-ga 1 jumpingjoe-ga 1 |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: kemlo-ga on 30 Nov 2003 12:24 PST |
Well done joelpt-ga Now how many of these comments relate to the original Qestion. How many could be called suplementry comments and how many are just pointless numbers. Kemlo |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: tytus-ga on 07 Dec 2003 08:56 PST |
About this masked ball, what appetizers will be served? Thanks in advance, Tytus |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: bondgirl8820-ga on 26 Dec 2003 17:02 PST |
Wow, it really doesn't matter to me who plays me, maybe Pam Anderson... but one condition, i HAVE to be the main love intrest of you (PIERCE BROSNAN!!!!!!!!) I LOVE HIM ahhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh!!!!!! Ok, yeah, cool idea maybe we can convince some company to make this phenominal movie! |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: aditya2k-ga on 06 Jan 2004 01:59 PST |
David Schwimmer |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: tuneman-ga on 06 Jan 2004 03:47 PST |
I think it would be Snoop Dogg?!?!?!? |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: bathrocks-ga on 16 Feb 2004 03:45 PST |
Sorry everyone, just found this question and had to add my own comment. Please ignore :-) M |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: jgrantl-ga on 18 Feb 2004 13:29 PST |
I like this |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: hailstorm-ga on 19 Feb 2004 20:48 PST |
1,020 comments now. I think our next goal should be to make the total HTML text of this question grow to over a gigabyte, and see if we can bring about some kind of buffer-overflow error that gives us total control of Google! Mwahahhahaahaaa! |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: kemlo-ga on 15 Mar 2004 11:34 PST |
http://dogbert.abebooks.com/servlet/BookDetailsPL?bi=26241777 |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: meonkeys-ga on 30 Mar 2004 20:51 PST |
Just wanted to hop on the bandwagon! -Adam Monsen |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: rogman-ga on 01 Apr 2004 06:50 PST |
It sound like a great idea, not sure who would play me though? Pierce Brosnan |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: mmerse-ga on 18 Apr 2004 12:53 PDT |
I will be played by one of the five female Asian actresses in Hollywood. Whose names no one knows, with the possible exception of Lucy Liu. I'm not picky about which one - most folks can't tell them apart anyway. Congrats on 1000+ Probonopublico - here's to 10,000! ;-) |
Subject:
I'm number 1025
From: norblits-ga on 22 Apr 2004 05:47 PDT |
I would like to see me as the leading actor of my close-up. TTFN Chris |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: bugg-ga on 22 Apr 2004 08:55 PDT |
well you reached your goal cos i am no.1026. if given the choice i would play myself but if i had to choose someone famous, i would choose Demi Moore because she is with Ashton Kutcher who is fit!! bugg |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: thorza-ga on 22 Apr 2004 20:08 PDT |
late, i know.. but you did say OVER 1000, so what's one more ;^) back OT, sean connery. (if he took classes to lean to speak OZ) |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: bathrocks-ga on 23 Apr 2004 03:08 PDT |
#1028 :-) I wonder how long this question can carry on for..? Any thoughts? Harrison Ford! |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: bathrocks-ga on 23 Apr 2004 03:22 PDT |
Ok, now I'm confused... Some places it says this question has 1027 comments, others it says 1028. Which one's right. Aagh! - Bad thought, if it can't count right then maybe we haven't reached a thousand after all!?!? |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: bathrocks-ga on 23 Apr 2004 03:24 PDT |
i know it should say "which one's right?" thought I'd get that in before anyone else does :-) |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: kyledewey-ga on 02 May 2004 21:48 PDT |
Please let me know when and where the ball is going to be Thanks -Kyle Dewey |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: icehummer-ga on 08 Dec 2004 05:28 PST |
Johnny Depp |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: fractl-ga on 08 Dec 2004 06:52 PST |
I would like to be played by the 1st robot actor! no anaimatronics (Jurrassic park) or people in robotic suits (ninja turtles, C3P0) I'm talkin' about a 100% robot...BOOYA! on a side note...is there a way to find an updatable list of the most commented questions on GA? -Fractlbot5000 |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: mwdavid-ga on 10 Dec 2004 14:20 PST |
Did we get into The Guiness book of world records yet? I just discovered this question today. You wouldn't believe how long it took to just skim through all the comments. I did enjoy the pictures about a third of the way down though. Oh...yeah and I would have to play myself. |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: purpleprogrammer-ga on 13 Dec 2004 10:29 PST |
This is rediculious. I refuse to participate! I will not post a comment. |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: jungalero-ga on 14 Dec 2004 14:28 PST |
Are you kidding me. No Steve Bushemi. What is wrong with you people? My dad would be Christopher Walken. Get it together. Quick. |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: crythias-ga on 18 Dec 2004 14:52 PST |
I've been told Michael Stipe of REM, maybe Bill Gates... maybe any of the ones who have visited www.ga-commenters.com, maybe even the Pillsbury dough boy. |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: ringjahn-ga on 16 Feb 2005 10:25 PST |
It is sure nice to see (and read) that comments are still coming in,two years on. I hope that the number of comments reaches 2000 by September 1 2005, 10000 by September 1, 2010 and 100000 by September 1, 2020 -Peter |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: llamaboy92-ga on 16 Feb 2005 17:32 PST |
I hope that the number continues to go up and can you invite me to the party? |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: ringjahn-ga on 17 Feb 2005 11:23 PST |
2,000 Comments!I hope it will happen with someboyelses help by 1/9! |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: ringjahn-ga on 17 Feb 2005 11:24 PST |
Sorry I meant "Somebody-elses".... |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: cabinteely-ga on 19 Feb 2005 08:36 PST |
I would like Paul Allen ,apparantly one of only two cofounders of the microsoft corporation,to represent me, because he he is not only a spendthrift, he (still) has to the loot to continue to do so. Not everybody knows what he looks like,so he would have to arrive in that mega-yacht of his,or failing that in Spaceship One ,straight from inner space. Pete |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: lonhan-ga on 21 Feb 2005 11:05 PST |
Here`s hoping that we have not reached the end of the line and that there will be even more ridiculous answers coming in! I hope too that some of the comments will actually answer the question asked! I would like me to be played in the masked ball ( whenever or if-ever that is to be)by the Queen of England ,Elisabeth the second(and other countries and of the Empire and of the Commenwealth). I would like her to majesticly portray me in my everyday roles: -alone in an empty downtown-Train (the royal carrage) -in my bedsit (the royal Loggia) -reading a book (royal seclusion) -.................. and so on ; all of course with the coronation crown on her head,and with all the pomp and cirumstance and so on. -Lonny |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: cabinteely-ga on 21 Feb 2005 11:38 PST |
In case you are wondering, Albert Einstein will be exhumed and brought back to life to play my role on the screen. Should I ever become famous ,the similarities between him and me would become obvious. |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: ringjahn-ga on 21 Feb 2005 11:43 PST |
Please allow Ernst Hemmingway to play my role on the big screen!. |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: bowmanjo-ga on 22 Feb 2005 02:21 PST |
I would like a member of the amatuer dramatics crew from www.freewebs.com/bookhits to play me. go and chek it out yourselves |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: poh-ga on 22 Feb 2005 11:27 PST |
Now this is a strange fantasy. Will the masked ball ever take place I wonder? If I have to have somebody else to play my role on the silver screen then ,well ,accepted , I do`nt really have to be there ,except maybe in my mind set. Since I am normally a kind,cordial and placid type ,I would most like me to be played out by somebody absurdly chorerical. How about the cartoon figure from Walt Disneys "Fantasia"-Donald Duck? Donald Duck can really play the court jester on my behalf by asking seemingly simple questions, offering higest prices (like 200 dollars,with a promise ,on my honour, of the maximum tip of 100 dollars) for the answer that more that exeeds my expectations. Donald (the duck) ,on my behalf would scream,or WRITE IN RUDE BLOCK CAPITALS ALL THE WAY THROUGH ......A NOTE BENE: that he (on my behalf )doesnt intetend to contact google editors to cancel any answer that doesnt quite hit. As part of the running joke, no matter what the answer is, Donald will claim ,and get a full refund. In a programmed fit of bad temper ,he will almost invariably claim that the researcher has gone off and answered a question of his own,and not the one posed. Maybe he will even come up with a long-winded comment that shows that he (Donald Duck)could have answered the question to his own full satisfaction in the first place (with a lot of blowing his trumpet in a wild comical temper tantrum ). If Donald Duck can`t play the role,because noone from the peanut gallery can draw him onto celluloid ,then Roger Rabbit will do. ---------------------------------------------------------------------Peter |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: popilapop-ga on 22 Feb 2005 19:03 PST |
Hi Probonopublico, When Google or who ever decides to film your life story please try to get Danny DeVito along to play me at the masked ball. He will be allowed to be obseqious because the other commentators and questioners and researchers need some time to suss out what he is really about to do on my behalf. He will be insidiuosly nice to all and sundry, no matter wahat they say to him. He should continually ask the same question again and again ,but using different words ,asking in effect that now his or my Web-Site is (finally ) up-and running ,what does everybody think. He will get to use my credit card without my permission, so he can be as generous as he wants on the price of that question. No matter what answer he gets for the question he will (on my behalf) be very very thankfull for the time and trouble the questioner gave to the answer. I somebody from the peanut gallery pops in with a diridingly insulting comment,like that his ( or my ) Website is a disaster and that there are by far too many spelling mistakes, he should thank them too. Every comment Danny DeVito makes on my behalf should sound like a thank you note and should be a really wet lick where-ever. He will continually pop by and ask this odious question in another form with my money and on my behalf and will invariably like all answers and comments ,whether to the point or not, whether good or bad. Just when this game gets too much to take my alter ego will step in,playing the other side in the masked ball to my split personality will be John McEnroe ( in younger years ,say at age 19,as a budding world championship tennis player). John McEnroe should play on my behalf with an answer that he, and he alone knows all the answers. He will give the Danny DeVito side of my personality the low down on what it really means to get a web-site up and running and this in no uncertain terms. The McEnroe side of me will have to give the DeVito side a really comprehensive make over ,telling Danny that its all ,all wrong, the colours ,the spelling ,the marketing concept ,everything is so terribly ,terribly wrong. The John side of me knows how to do everything better and will give cliched advice right on target,exactly right for my Danny side. Danny will thank my John profusly and tell him that if he (John) is not into copywriting , well , then he certainly should be. Then John will drop the hard-man facade and now a sobbing kid of nineteen years old again that he already has a web-site up and running to the theme of copywriting and once all the unwashed masses of the Google commenting community arive at McEnroes towel shop for copywriting ,well ,they will all need handkerchefs to clear their noses and dry their cheeks for the John McEnroe side of me has just gotten hiomself an unbelievably expensive server and needs money from everybody to keep out of debt and continue altuisticly to help the Cyberworld with Copywriting Advice. At lot of other famous people with then get a chance to play up their very own cameo-acting roles , each and everyone of the famous people play respectivly what a commentator ,researcher or Questioner asked them to, worthy of an Oscar as Meryl Streep. I hope that this can be done on my behalf to keep a fun storyline at the masked ball ,and to remind us ,yes each and everyone of us , can each and every day do something good for somebody he or she has never met before in their lives and never will again, just by stuffing an absurdly large sum of money in that unknown persons purse. At the end of the Film both sides of my personality ,played by Danny DeVito and John McEnroe ,will reunite as father and (typically) long lost son ,and wander off into the setting sun. Poppy |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: terrer-ga on 22 Feb 2005 22:10 PST |
Would very much like the figure Ardagh O`Hanlon play in father Ted ,thats Father Ted himself to be me ,well to play me anyway. Taking a while to push these 1000 comments up to 2000 is``nt it? Well at least the last few comments have sot of gotten around to answering the silly question. Petera |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: viffe-ga on 22 Feb 2005 22:17 PST |
Still do`nt know who YOU would like You to be represented on the screen. Like the idea of being represented at the masked ball though! Now we would have to enlist Mary Robinson, former president of Ireland and now doing other things to be me. She dont have to get to know me. She just have to be herself . Be nice to the unwashed masses and all that diplomatic stuff. Thats what she does at the moment, is`nt it? I will recognise myself when she does me. -fiffy |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: fegge-ga on 22 Feb 2005 22:22 PST |
----------we have not reached the end of the line. Not by a long shot.-----------------and the answer is`nt a gross------------------------------------------ ----------I want somebody alled Bill Clinton to play me------------------------- ----------That is enough Diplomats on the stage of the masked ball and on the silver screen ,do`nt you think??????----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Reggy |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: ngunga-ga on 22 Feb 2005 22:26 PST |
DO LET THAT DOG LASSIE PLAY ME ON THE BIG SCREEN: OK, I am not a dog ,and lassie is dead- but ,what the hell it is fantasy after all, is it not? Rudiger |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: idio-ga on 22 Feb 2005 22:34 PST |
Phil ,you have already said well done to everyone and yet the tread does seem to want to go on and on. It is only just beginning to get interesting. I want Gonzo from the muppets to play my part, if thzat is Ok with you. Will you be getting around to sending invites to the masked ball by E-Mail, by SMS ,by Telex, by Telefax or by mischevious comments to some innoculently asked question anytime soon? Does a certain number of comments have to be reached? It will take a bit of time now to even get up to 1100 at this rate. Maybe the numbers up and up like the stock exchange. When a magic number is coming close ,all the rats come out. Well come out now, all ye rats! Idiot |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: gearl-ga on 22 Feb 2005 22:37 PST |
Oh do let Mister Oscar Wilde back from a long stage absinence onto the floor of the ballroom ,in front of the cameras in order to play me! -Quentin |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: skeerson-ga on 22 Feb 2005 22:42 PST |
Why on earth are masks required in the intersts of confidentiality? I am going to have John Cleese playing me. No point in him wearing a mask on my behalf ,now is there? -Greer |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: yaire-ga on 22 Feb 2005 22:52 PST |
This question is not going to go stale now is it. Well I for one wo`nt let it! But it is getting colorful,gaudy even , so methinks t`would be quite alright if the one and only miss Piggy with all her frills ,feather boas ,finery and occasional unneccessary bouts of Karate would jump on stage to play me. No need for that cad , whatshisname, Kermit ,the...the... FROG to come along as an escort. Invite him out. Miss Piggy should be nominated for an Oscar in advance. No need to do any casting for a superstar of this calibre. I won`t be there at the masked ball because with miss Piggy herself there reprsenting me ,reading from the scripts beamed by photons from my humble bedsit into her silken gloves,well that would be too much. Hope she interferes with all the other private lives for me ,though! Yahoudi |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: trect-ga on 22 Feb 2005 22:55 PST |
The reverend Billy Graham will play out my role on the big screen. Can I come to the masked ball myself in person though! Trevor |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: ampay-ga on 22 Feb 2005 23:00 PST |
Let the comedian Lenny Bruce play my part on the silver screen. When and if the masked ball ever happens, I will make good on the invitation, however you send it out and when ever and I will come all the way from Italy to that Answers portion of Cyberspace to see the other gangling faces in their masks. I will be wearing a mask too of couse. How many copmments does anyone want though before we get serious about any big balls,here? Franco |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: siosce-ga on 22 Feb 2005 23:04 PST |
There is a lot of talent out here and it would be a pleaseure to enjoy their company. I should be played by Buster Rhymes. Do`ntask me why. Kenny |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: maretyr-ga on 22 Feb 2005 23:06 PST |
Dame Edna Everidge!- Wilma |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: noush-ga on 23 Feb 2005 00:23 PST |
Hello Bryan, it is not going to be any end of the line that quickly you know. This is going to be one of the exceptionally few parties in the whole world ,where the guests can invite themselves. For proof ,look here ,I am inviting myself. Nobody from the rest of the party even knows who I am. I will ,of course use my given privilige of coming wearing a mask, for obvious reasons as you say. Now to the original question ,now who is it that I want me to be play by. What kind of question is that? Neither you nor I know whether or when that is ever going to happen. It is a fantasy game. Let Bette Davis come back to life in the role of Lady McBeth . She can play me by ear, or herself, or Shakespeares character or whatever, I do`nt mind. As long as she is there. I hope to read some other character suggestions coming soon. ------------Missy---------- |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: noest-ga on 23 Feb 2005 00:34 PST |
Hi Bryan, How are you? Are you still up to reading this thread. As you can see other commentators ,of the unwashed kind, many of whom you have probably never heard of before , are suddenly raising their voices and bringing this thing back to life. It is a two part question. Will I come to The masked ball? How the hell would I know. You have`nt told us yet when and where it is going to take place,if at all. The second part of the question is directed at me, although you do`nt know me,and that is who would I like to be play by on the silver screen. Now what is a silver screen? Is that a movie or something like that? Oh well, if push comes to shove, and I have to make a decision, well what about Flipper ,the Dolphin ,from that childrens television series all those years ago, and still being seen in all those repeats on the BBC or any other of the worlds "local" stations. I do hope you will get more suggestions for your block buster movie, and that you wo`nt just rest satisfied with mine. `nugh sai.............cheers.....Randy |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: misag-ga on 23 Feb 2005 00:42 PST |
Hi Bryan, Here is yet another fool person helping to make this the most commented on question ever. We wo`nt give up at a thousand answers or even one thousand and sixty two as it now stands. Oh no, another question may very well catch up. How about aiming for two thousand by September. It is not moving along very fast now is it? Oh well. You do`nt know who I am either but I will stick my neck out and invite myself at your invite to the masked ball. And that even though I am not really a commentator ,yet. And , oh yes ,by the way I would like me to be played on the big screen by Buzster Keaton, for reasons that I will take the liberty to explain later. Golo |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: resis-ga on 23 Feb 2005 03:38 PST |
At long last ,there seems to be a little bit aof a move on with trival comments to this all important question. The first part I will ignore. I simply do`nt see the point of mutally estranged people planning to meet up sometime ,someplace (but not really at all) at a masked ball. The mind boggles at who we would all like to play ourselves. But I will go along with the loose rules of the game. Yes, I will oblige a handglove puppet called Gonzo from the Muppet Show to play me. He is neither here nor there , but neither am I . Sven |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: berste-ga on 23 Feb 2005 03:46 PST |
Bryan! Let us go full steam ahead , shall we ,and at least try to get 2.000 comments to your stupid qestions. I admittedly do`nt see a point to a masked ball, but because it is a fantasy game ,and because continual improvments in this Web-site may make it possible...I will invite myself along. Not sure wether it is ever going to happen though! And who am I having to play my role on the big screen? Sorry do`nt know. Ah, out on a limb say Tom Cruise, not just because he is good looking , but more because he is a total egomaniac, like myself. Let him, for mysake be the star of the film and let not any more then five minuites of film time go by without hTom Cruise himself reappearing, pointlessly . If only to prove that he can act. He can act himself very well and that is good enough for me. Rodger |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: wingeln-ga on 23 Feb 2005 03:55 PST |
Hey Bryan, we are rooting for this question not to be let go stale. I ,for one, would like to keep it fresh, for although it is a fantasy now, who knows , one day advances in Web technology and Film technology and Masked Balls held all over the plannet may be possible. One masked ball I will be there, if it ever comes to my attention that it is ever going to be held. let somebody please play my part in the Movie. Have you thought of a name for this blockbuster, no expenses spared movie yet. You wo`nt let Tom Cruise be the star and dominate every single scene will you. Let the Roman Julius Caesar play me. Let the director of the movie get him to ask his question without a credit card. He must have still a good credit rating ,2000 years after his demise at the hands of Brutus. Tommy |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: teric-ga on 23 Feb 2005 04:00 PST |
Such a lot of comments with content at last. Let Kirk Douglas play me. Do`nt forget to post the day ,date, time and place of the masked ball here in due course...prominently- Xero |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: ringjahn-ga on 23 Feb 2005 10:25 PST |
Bryan, if and when Hollywood gets to film your life story ,what would I be doing there? Elvis lives! Get him to play the part I have to play on the worlds stage! I do`nt get the bit about the masked ball though. Please explain! Or maybe that is an insider joke for died-in-the-wool Google Commentators,Reseachers and Questioners. Peter |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: cabinteely-ga on 23 Feb 2005 10:38 PST |
So this is a question said to be stagnating on the 23rd of May 2003. Well now we have the 23rd of Febuary 2005, and it is not quite. It is getting a fresh rush of blood to the head. I know of this question for over six months now but did`nt comment ,because I could`nt figure what it was all about. Is it just about getting oodles of comments?If so ,be satisfied with 1068 !It is going to be a bit of a slog getting that number up to even 1250 by the end of March. Is it about invites to a masked ball? That is`nt gonna take place any foreseeable time in our future now is it? Anyways ( as the last commentator said) would be an insider trip for thoese "died-in-the-wool" . As a fantasy game about YOU, YOUR life, and YOUR importance to mankind ,civilization and the entire universe it is fun. Pointless fun, but fun. Let a young Frank Sinatra play me in my cameo role in the movie of YOUR life BRYAN, pretty please. Good writing practice ,and sometimes goo for a good chuckle ,though. XXX |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: steph53-ga on 23 Feb 2005 12:11 PST |
To all you newbies in here.... FYI: Its nice that you want to keep this thread going, but Bryan does not read this post anymore. His original intention of hitting one thousand comments was achieved long ago... Steph53 |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: fasti-ga on 23 Feb 2005 21:28 PST |
It is sad to hear that ,although this thread is going ,and will continue to grow, the initiator or the question and all those apppetizing role playing games is no longer interested in it. Oh well. The comments are there anyway. We should look out for a role play fantasy forum or chat room for the best ideas here. Failing that ,maybe a book, with nobody (except maybe Goole Answers) owning the rights. Or maybe ,when I clear my credit card for use, I will reform the game rules , not specifically out fot garbage volumes of comments but for a busy landscape ,teaming with role models and alter egos. I am also pretty sure that somebody else will fall into this open pit of pointless comments real soon. Somebody we have never heard of before ,perhaps- but why spoil the fun by calling that person a newbie. This is better than a whole lot of blogs out there, and defies the laws of perpetual motion. It should`nt keep going and going, way past the finishing ling line but it does and will. William |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: ampay-ga on 24 Feb 2005 11:11 PST |
Let`s face it the question is two years and eight days old, and all these grand plans to let all and sundry invite themselves to a masked ball and then , at no expenses spared , let some long dead person or cartoon character or animal , play out their life story on the big screen is NOT GOING TO HAPPEN ! Our biggest sponsor , Paul Allen , has decided that he is no longer prepared to invest fortytwo billion dollars in the project, because he does`nt have fortytwo billion dollars any more, and besides, he would prefer to throw his money into building spaceships and finding alliens an nearby planets. Pierce Brosnan want forty-two million dollars to play Bryan in the film. No screen play has been written. The silly idea that there might eventually be 2,000 comments , or even 10,000, is just plain silly. Do you want to make this the most commented on question ever or what? And for what? What is the point? At the beginning most commentators simply ignored the question, and went off answering questions of their own. Later they began to question the meaning of the question. And to draw graffiti and stuff. Some just burped and squeeked. Even just writing the number of their comment. Recently the "newbies" have been showing up in droves and answering the Q. To no avail. It is not going to happen. There are over one hundred new questions appearing , and sometimes disapearing shortly afterwards, everyday. If the purpose of a comment is to answer a question: WHY NOT GO TO A RECENTLY ASKED QUESTION INSTEAD ? Comments posted here apparently serve no purpose at all , they never did , nor never will ! This place has become a compost heap for fastasy and nonsense, a place for interesting thoughts with no homes to go to....... Franco |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: fegge-ga on 24 Feb 2005 17:50 PST |
Comment number 1073: Even though our pied piper has abandoned us ,we rats want to keep on dancing. Bryan decided "long ago" that he reached the finishing line (perhaps with 1000 comments) and nee no longer stoop to conquer. However I myself will continue to back a winning horse, although , from the number of comments, way ahead of the rest of the field. It is not just about pushing the number of comments up from 1000 to 2000. That would be too easy. All we should do then is burp and squeek and drw graffitti and number our comments. How silly! No, for me, and I am sure (subconciously )for others, it is about the future of the Internet, or more moot Google Answers. Why? Well now that we are playing out a role-playing game for what it is worth, we are getting ready for a dive from a higher board. We shall soon know that we are ready for the initiation and practice of THE DICKENS METHOD ! What the dickens is the Dickens method. Check out "scrooge"and his ghostly visions past,present and future on a search! Visualise the internet, the seachable and deep web, and the "answers"cache of this site, in five years time (24th Febuary 2010) ! The questions, clarifications to them, answers, and eludications in the form of commts, will all be presented on a three dimensional landscape. With all the debris , junk, the days shopping, contact pin boards, letters sent and to be sent, Services, people, nature, the cosmos, scientific magnifications... ALL TO BE GRABBED AND MOVED AROUND AT THE USERS WILL: and this "answers"cache |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: fegge-ga on 24 Feb 2005 18:38 PST |
Comment number 1073: Even though our Pied Piper has abandoned us , we rats want to keep on dancing. Bryan decided "long ago" that he reached the finishing line (perhaps with 1000 comments) and need no longer stoop to conquer. However I myself will continue to back a winning horse, although , measured on a scale derived from the number of comments made, this question is way ahead of the rest of any other commented question. It is not just about pushing the number of comments up from 1000 to 2000. That would be too easy. All we should do then is burp, squeek ,draw graffitti and number our comments. How silly! No, for me, and I am sure (subconciously ) for others, it is about the future of the Internet, or more moot and to the point it is about the future of Google Answers. Why? Well now that we are playing out a role-playing game for what it is worth, we are getting ready for a dive from a higher board. We shall soon know that we are ready for the initiation and practice of THE DICKENS METHOD ! What the dickens is the Dickens method? Check out "scrooge"and his ghostly visions past,present and future on a search! Visualise the internet, the seachable and deep web, and the "answers"cache of this site, in five years time (24th Febuary 2010) ! The questions, clarifications to them, answers, and eludications in the form of commts, will all be presented on a three dimensional landscape. With all the debris , junk, the days shopping, contact pin boards, letters sent and to be sent, Services, people, nature, the cosmos, scientific magnifications... ALL TO BE GRABBED AND MOVED AROUND AT THE USERS WILL: We will explain,question and smart-ass-comment in comical speek bubbles. Because of the impending flood of information overload we should check : -Relevence before reading -Whether Audio,visual, readable,or in icons -our mother tongues as the language -flags and links for further research after having the object of our disire in three dimensions appear on the screen. Having the person, cartoon comic figure, animal or robot guide you through this huge cyber-landscape would help a lot. That is who YOU would like YOU to be played by on the silver screen. (Do`nt worry that it is actually blue or black or whatever). So, for the time being, let the roles continue to be cast here! Eventually we can set up an interactive Blog (using MySQL with PHP-nukes for instance) and pull out all the knots from this string. We are big boys (and girls and animals) now: we can take our punches. There is no father Christmas. The Stork did not bring you hanging from its beek to your parents. You do`nt pay hundreds of dollars a year to view a web-site sight-unseen. The masked ball is really taking place here and now , with all the answers brigade milling around this "answers"cache to this site. You can invite yourself in and out of this ball here and now in the year 2005. And provided you have acess to the internet: whenever you like. So the task has been made easier with a new attitude: You do`nt have run and rund and huff and pant to make this the most commented on question ever.........BECAUSE: In five years time a lot of megabite comments will become the norm. What a relief! Please just get down to answering the question asked! The share price of Google depends on your visualization of a blockbuster movie (with all those wierdos YOU would like having to play YOU) -in full surround sound,landscaped,coloured and animated to the third dimension. This may not be purely hypothetical, so the YOu to play YOU can be living or dead, real or imagined, rock,plant or animal, or whatever. Just whoever YOU want YOU to be YOU. I would like this thread to continue, even if pointlessly, even at a snails pace, even if it never gets past 1492 (or whenever Columbus discovered America) because it leads to some brilliant brainstorming. I have held back on providing those hyperlinks and samples (which I could have given) so that we do`nt go off too much from our main obligation to society. Never mind the last three nay-saying commentators (among others) who want to stamp this burning thread out! Please make the effort and post your comment about a YOU to be YOU here. Especially "newbies", who nave never been seen here nor there nor yonder within living memory. No need for nonsense multi-posting to drive up to a giga-number of comments. Your cyber-space needs you! Open this door first; you might get lost if you blogged somewhere else! On behalf of the missing Pied Piper -THANKYOU Reggy |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: ngunga-ga on 24 Feb 2005 20:32 PST |
Comment number 1075, Hi Reggy, I could`nt agree with you more that this thread needs to be strung out further although it has tied itself in some gordian like knots in places. I am amazed and am kinda wondering ,why this question has ignited so many comments in the last week or so ,despite it being two years old and despite Bryan ,who asked the question, saying over a year ago ,that it is the end of the line. Has it anything to do with them W-Lan hotspots all over Europe and the ability of so many internet users to chalk up to a hotspot? Or does this question simply strike a nerve, being as it is ,quintessential to the future of a Cyberspace ready to move over to a really fast lane? How come so many people are now even answering the question and not just burping and squeeking their comments to it? Tucholsky did tell other writers to lay it on thick so that the reader understands, but your alluding to the share price of Google is completely out of place here. Maybe thats powerful copywriter text but here it sounds like completely empty raw or pure hype.The future will take a little longer to get to that breakneck spead when wierdos,past, present and future guide the clueless around a stage chock-a-block full of gizmos to ask questions about.Google will be earning its money in the bylines for a good ten years or more to come and its share value is more decided by its shareholders evaluation of the whole marketplace then just one of some fortythousand silly questions in a cache. Now if you are not a copywriter,then you certainly should be. Feel chuffed if you like,but please do not make the mistake of posting your E-Mail address here or even the URL of your Web-site.Even if you cannot afford the costs of your server or whatever and are not too proud as not to be able to grovel for donations. We would take your advice, leave you standing there with outstreched empty hands and complain to the editors. Now another piece of fatherly advice is to write your comment next time out off-line before posting it online and avoid having one half of your comment being posted before the full and almost completely proofread comment is post. Thankyou for your brave and diligent efforts to keep this flame burning- Rudiger |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: fegge-ga on 24 Feb 2005 22:17 PST |
Comment number 1076 Now I do`nt want this thread disentangeling into a tit-for-tat-chat between you and me Rudiger.This is not a private chat, anybody in the world can read it.I do`nt have your e-mail-address. I am not a copywriter and do`nt have a website, though I do have a few bogs hosted at various other sites and forums . To avoid having my tediously worked out comment delated, I wo`nt give the URL here. In fact I do`nt even know how a copywriter works. I just work at the hotel reception and practice motivational talk and clear guidence . on our hotel guests who would like to know how to get from A to B and back to the hotel in time for supper. One half of the same comment being posted too early is a result of me typing online and hitting the post button too soo.Sorry. It was`nt meant to help get a really high number of comments to a stale question. Maybe this thread is gathering renewed interest because a series of comments showed that the core question is being addressed,ca`nt be answered and yet is thought provoking. Maybe too many of the initial comments were just burps and sqeeks to get the most comments ever. Maybe the vain hopes of being invited to a masked ball should have been dashed sooner. This could of couse just be a flash in the pan,just because so many users are getting faster connections. I suppose a lot of users know about blogs and Forums but have tried and failed to gather a reading public. Writing up a blog takes some planning before you get around to doing it. Keep this thread interesting; but do'nt forget to answer the question as: WHO WOULD YOU LIKE TO BE YOU ON THE FILMSET OF BRYANŽS LIFE STORY? Reggy |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: toinstio-ga on 25 Feb 2005 12:02 PST |
Comment number 1077 There was a knotted string 300 years ago in Lawernce Strnes Novel "Tristam Shandy" that the doctor could on untie by invoking all the saints ,angels and dieties known to him.This is a knotted string too. Maybe the root cause is that Bryan (Phobonopublico)did not really want an answer but was more interested in getting 1,000 relevant or completely irrelivant comments. He got mostly the latter.And giving him twice that amount of comments wo`nt make him feel any better.No wonder that he stopped playing pied piper. The joke about "inviting" all to a masked ball led oh too many lemmings off a cliff.The masks may be obviously required in the interests of confidentiality,but since we all run unter an allias anyway this runs to a wonderful cock and bull running metaphor that Mr Stern also liked. Like : stangers , who have never met ,and who never will; have never been seen by the others and never will be; do`nt reveal their real names; are not allowed to give any personal contact information; go to a ball, doŽnt know where, doŽnt know when, with masks on, represented by somebody famous , who doesŽnt know who the othere is. (untie the knots) As someone else said, that is what google Answers is about anyway: a masked ball. We can wait `til forever before it happens. Winnie the Pooh could`nt get his paws out of the other jar of honey either,because fools and horse do`nt know what a "screen" is. Is that something you undress behind at the doctors? Is that "the big silver screen" at the movies? Is it your "computer monitor". Or something you put in front of your open window to keep the flies out? I`ll answer the question in a comment,taking "screen" to mean the later. Bryan does`nt want a comment now. He does`nt know who I am ,and I am too late anyway. But since its the "wrong" answer ,I will wait and hope somebody will correct me. I would like Groby from Sesame Street to play me on the screen. He knows the difference between "near" and "far" and he knows the difference between "here" and "there", but no matter how many times he physically demonstrates ,the rat do`nt understand.So try again ,Groby! Next up explain the why of gravity ! And enjoy! Love: Martin |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: toinstio-ga on 26 Feb 2005 20:35 PST |
1078 The slow but steady continuing trickel of comments to the question of whom you would like to play you in the film of a life of Bryan shows that "it" is not stagnating. There is however a looming danger that it will stagnate ,because all mutants, variations and sidetracks (that can be hewed into some sort of comment)have, basicaly, been covered. And the animal has be run to one finishing line at 500, then other at 1000 and cannot quite make 2000 by September 1,2005. Not that there is any point. In five or six years time getting a thousand comments or more to a question like this (which can`nt be answered) will be commonplace ,at least here. All we can achieve is a place in new modern history annals, for having gotten an absurdly high number of comments. And somebody will soon get around to untieing the string,which is an analysis of the comments actually answering the question. My answer I will post as a comment, because the given and accepted answer is just inane. And because I am me and not YOU or him or her or that other person. Those commentators who like to split hairs have`nt agreed on what the screen should be,but for me it is to be the computer monitor. Bob Geldoff will be given the honour or playing me an that screen. It is oscr night tonight so I hope his preformance of himself being himself ( he ,admittedly, can`nt act)represents what I would like to be me. He ,like me, is brash, outspoken and good at piling on the rambling rhetoric so that the readers and listeners are almost invariably shocked out of their socks. The inane remarks that I would like to have him say for me should shake the developed world in it`s shoes, but that world has it so good ,while the people in the undeveloped world are languishing,being tortured and being killed off. Not many Google-Questions touch on this subject though, but Bob Geldoff is inteligent enough to intwine his (and my) views into a comment to any old question. Even if poor Mr Geldoff has to settle for a cameo role in the autobiography of probonopublico, Bob Geldoff (playing for me) should still be able to get some words in edgeways. Here`s to the string Richard |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: tronto-ga on 26 Feb 2005 22:28 PST |
... 1079 But there is no stagnation. The feverish pitch of the first seven months cannot be repeated ,`cause then you got 913 comments. Now it is just two or three a day. But thats not bad for a question that has been abandoned by its questioner, for having achieved the unachievable. I do`nt yet have the time to sort out the string ,and find out how many wothy answers are buried in amongst the comments. It`s a dirty job , but someones got to do it. Tell you what ,though, I`ll cast Margaret Thatcher from her swelled brest times as the british prime minister (but not as she now is, with the glory of being named Baroness but neither with power nor with influence. There is no screenplay to Bryans life except the one from Monthy Phyton,so if probonopublico has abandoned ship, then we would have to film that "Life of Br(y/i)an" with our iron lady represnting me at the helm. Jobs for the boys! Tim PS:the last two comments were from Toinisto-ga,but signed with two different names,almost as if he thinks he can pretend to be two different GA-commentators. Is that not schizophren ?Can we even allow that in here, now that we are not quite so desparate for a high number of comments ,as we once were ? |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: jarine-ga on 27 Feb 2005 03:01 PST |
. 1080 That somebody who is to play me in your grand new and upcoming blockbustermovie should be that certain somebody who can really, profusely and astoundingly thank everybody and anybody who has helped him ,or tried to help him, or has thought of wanting to help him,or who would have helped him had he asked for the help. With all those big name stars already off from the casting couch, Roberto Benigni will have to out preform himself in order to outpreform the others. He said to me that he do `nt know me and will only play me if the role is so over the top that he could be in contention for another Oscar. Well, I am over the top, but not over the hill. Roberto can be himself and at the same time be me ,is`nt that nice? Thank you everybody and especialy the thanks to Bryan ,who cannot be with us tonight,for letting me invite myself and an expensive representitive to this wonderful,wonderful event ,even if it never happens. I love you all,I love everybody! -Roberto |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: eastiona-ga on 27 Feb 2005 03:43 PST |
. 1081 Since even more talent is to be found out here : please allow me to chose a dead celebrety to represent me on screen. Not "the Benny Hill Show" is to be on the screen but the real, the one and only , Benny Hill himself. He does`nt have to try acting too hard, as if he ever would even try to act at all , because the natural smart alec that he was , is the construed smart alec that I am. Impervious to commenting on questions and the slapstick of getting away with oh so overt critique has been done par excelence by Mr. Hill. The number of telvision stations is increasing exponentialy thanks not only to cable and satelite but also to commercial-,pay-,and shopping channels. Now with Digital TV and TVio everybody in the TV owning world might get to see some old shows of his and might even get to like him. I hope he brings across some of my own inimitable humour too. Thanks for the opportunity of letting me invite him. Let`s hope that the answer to the question be one day not quite so hypotetical, and that some of these old fruits can be savoured on our screens. Brian |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: twotmich-ga on 27 Feb 2005 12:54 PST |
Wonder Woman for sure. Good luck w/ your comments. |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: trerric-ga on 28 Feb 2005 12:38 PST |
. 1083 Would you like to let another horse into the race? Now that the masked ball is already taking place at various location all over the Answers and despite the fact that this question has no administrator (except the editors when there is blatant spam) I would like to cast someone other than me to be me on the screen. Please let Marcel Proust be me. We may not know how the sounded like so give him some affected french accent like inspector Clouseau from the Pink Panther,but no I do not want Peter Sellers himself to play me.Proust would show my style of behaviuor better. Now do we get around to writing a screenplay ? Peter |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: rockslatestone-ga on 09 Mar 2005 05:33 PST |
I would like to have the cowarly lion play me. Reserved yet overcoming in his faults. |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: flann-ga on 09 Mar 2005 11:08 PST |
Myself |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: garfieldt-ga on 10 Mar 2005 07:48 PST |
I wouldn't mind John Cusack palying me, but I would want some royalties for it. |
Subject:
Re: Over 1,000 Comments, please!
From: nickb123-ga on 10 Mar 2005 07:56 PST |
I'd like Kyle Minogue to play me. I'm male, 6'1 and built like the preverbial brick out house (so it could be a bit of a challenge for her), but my wife thinks I have a cute bum, so Kyle would be perfect! |
If you feel that you have found inappropriate content, please let us know by emailing us at answers-support@google.com with the question ID listed above. Thank you. |
Search Google Answers for |
Google Home - Answers FAQ - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy |