Google Answers Logo
View Question
 
Q: the religion of islam ( No Answer,   5 Comments )
Question  
Subject: the religion of islam
Category: Relationships and Society > Religion
Asked by: yakker-ga
List Price: $10.00
Posted: 27 Mar 2003 10:21 PST
Expires: 01 Apr 2003 06:41 PST
Question ID: 181841
here in the south, the people i interact with have a general consensus
that the religion of islam is evil, wicked, and warlike.  this may
have to do with billy graham's son calling islam "an evil and wicked
religion" among other things.  are there any criticisms to the
following assertions that i've heard others make?

(1) islam teaches to "kill the infidel"

(2) there is nothing in the bible that promotes warfare against
non-believers

(3) by the letter of muslim law, the terrorists that kill christians
are doing the right thing.

(4) the bible teaches that any religion such as islam that does not
recognize christ as savior is wicked.  (or as i heard one person say,
"the bible makes it very clear that if you're not for him, you're
against him."

(5) the religion of islam is responsible for influencing those to kill
the people on 9/11

Request for Question Clarification by digsalot-ga on 27 Mar 2003 18:44 PST
Hello there again

I have a suggestion or you may even consider it a proposal.  The
question is in reality an enormous one.  Your suggestion that my
previous answer was shallow in parts is probably true.  Considering
the amount of information and research needed to give a comprehensive
answer, anything in the way of a relatively abbreviated answer may
come across as shallow. (or as opinion)

By that I mean that you are asking for evidence used to back each of
the claims and that must be researched extensively to find specific
scriptural chapter and verse in both the Bible and the Koran.  There
is also the fact that supporting Biblical verses and Koranic passages
can probably be found by the dozens.  We would need to know exactly
which verses, passages etc, are being used by the people and churches
in the south you are referring to.  We may find an excellent passage
which can be interpreted as a Koranic command to go kill Christians,
but if it is not the same one or ones being used by those you are
referring to, then the answer would be useless anyway.  I also think
we should take any of those passages which are taken out of context
and put them back into context.  Often what is being used to portray
Islam as a "killer" faith will be discounted by the preceeding or
following verses.

In order to find what passages are being used to support all of the
claims, means we will have to not only search the Bible and Koran but
make individual searches through many and various denominational
websites to determine what particular scripture is being used both to
support such claims and what particular scripture is being used to
refute them.  I feel that refutation is strongly needed in each of
these cases.  A full and detailed answer to your question could take a
researcher days.

My proposal is simply this.  Break it up into 5 individual questions. 
That will give you the advantage of getting perhaps a faster answer
and even more importantly, perhaps 5 different researchers each
tackling a different claim.  We are a very diverse bunch and having
multiple minds working on your questions at the same time could
provide much more and much richer information than having just one of
us spreading ourselves thin trying to do the whole thing.

That additional richness of information, considering the current
political climate, may be more important than ever in separating
common thinking and urban myth from reality.  In fact, I think your
question is one of extreme importance.  Questions about Islam are
scattered throughout the questions waiting for an answer.  Your
question, addressed in deserved detail, could go a long way to dispell
many erronous concepts.

If such a thing would be agreeable, I'm ready to tackle claim number 1
as of now.

Looking forward to your response.

digsalot

Clarification of Question by yakker-ga on 30 Mar 2003 15:08 PST
i'm going to follow your advice and split this question up into 5 and
close this question.

your answer to claim #1 presented the evidence that addresses (but not
refuting which is okay since it may not be refutable) the claim so i
would like you to claim the $7 reward that i will offer for it.  your
response to claim #2 did not present any evidence to refute the claim.
 it did not address the claim.  i would like to keep the new #2 open. 
if you are going to post responses to the new quesions, please try to
limit your answer to what was asked for.  it's undesirable to read
through a lot of posted text and realize that none of it addresses the
question.  i'm not sure the "historic background" you presented is
really relevant to investigating a religious text for evidence of a
claim held by so-called followers of the religious text.

Request for Question Clarification by digsalot-ga on 30 Mar 2003 19:36 PST
Thank you - I believe however I will leave part 1 open for another
researcher.  I also believe that answering a question such as this
without detailed background information about where such philosophies
arise is only half an answer.  Perhaps the second part of the answer
to part 2 was not yet posted when you submitted this clarification.

either way
Good luck
digsalot
Answer  
There is no answer at this time.

Comments  
Subject: Re: the religion of islam
From: digsalot-ga on 27 Mar 2003 14:34 PST
 
I will request that my answer be removed.  Those things which are
truly opinion, and I must admit many are, are based on decades of
experience with the subject matter involved. It has been a large part
of my career.  It would take the writing of volumes to clarify them.
 
It is also not in the nature of this service to collect money from
answers which the customer does not find satisfactory.
 
Best of luck in your research. 
 
digsalot
Subject: Re: the religion of islam
From: yakker-ga on 27 Mar 2003 15:53 PST
 
thanks.  for those wishing to address these claims, for each claim,
i'm particularly interested in references to the respective religious
text or law or culture.  for instance, a few of the references that
others have mentioned for claim #1 are the following:

Surah IX:111 says, "Surely Allah has bought of the believers and their
property for this, that they shall have the garden [i.e. heaven]; they
fight in Allah's way, so they slay and are slain; a promise which is
binding on Him in the Taurat and the Injeel and the Quran; and who is
more faithful to his covenant than Allah? Rejoice therefore in the
pledge which you have made; and that is a mighty achievement."

Surah II:191 says, "And kill them wherever you find them, and drive
them out from whence they drove you out, and persecution is severer
than slaughter, and do not fight with them at the Sacred Mosque until
they fight with you in it, but if they do fight with you, then slay
them, such is the recompense of unbelievers."

i know i've only initially put $10 for this.  for each of these
claims, i'll add an additional $5 if i determine if the claim was
addressed sufficiently, so completely answering all 5 claims in this
question is worth $10 + 5 * $5 = $35.  thanks.
Subject: Re: the religion of islam
From: tutuzdad-ga on 27 Mar 2003 17:00 PST
 
Because of the various interpretations, beliefs and in what context
each supporting "verse" can be used, I'd venture to say that with
little effort one could suppport either position, neither position or
opposing positions using carefully selected quotes and scriptures.
This is the nature of such beliefs. Because each religion has a number
of practiced disciplines varying in degrees ranging from
fundamentalist to orthodox to conservative, to quite liberal, it would
not be difficult to justify any number of positions with regard to
your question.

I'm afraid then, to your dismay, that your question (as asked) might
never be definitively answered. If you select a position for each
belief and ask for evidence (law) supporting it, you might get better
results.

EXAMPLES: 
Please show me theological references in the Qu'ran supporting the
following ISLAMIC FUNDAMENTALIST concepts that...

Please show me theological references in the Bible supporting the
CHRISTIAN CATHOLIC concept that...

You see, there are many different schools of thought within both Islam
and Christianity, some of which contradict religious beliefs within
the same basic disciple of practice.

I hope this helps.

Regards;
tutuzdad-ga
Subject: Re: the religion of islam
From: journalist-ga on 28 Mar 2003 06:43 PST
 
Dear Yakker:

I, too, live in the South (born and raised here) and I am unable to
comprehend why people who call themselves Christians choose not to
practice what they declare they believe in.  Yeshua taught
forgiveness, tolerance and love and anyone with a library card can
read for themselves a copy of the Koran and see that the precepts of
Islam are very similar to the core of Christianity.

When Timothy McVeigh, who claimed Christianity as his religion, was
found responsible for the Oklahoma terrorism, I don't recall people in
the US declaring a witch hunt for Christians or tossing Christianity
out the window because of one person's bizarre acts.  The same with
Hitler, who claimed Christianity, or Jim Jones or other men and women
of what I believe had a warped interpretation of scripture.

All religion is based on personal interpretation and it saddenes me
that people who call themselves Christians seek to so actively hate an
entire religion or people for what a few followers do.  The 9/11
terrorists followed *their* interpretation of *they thought* that
Allah wanted them to do.  That does *not* mean that they did what pure
Islam intends.

The Christian bible states "Stone disobedient children" (Deuteronomy
21:18-21) - do you think that when people of the Islam faith (or any
non-Christian faith) read that, they think that all Americans stone
their children when the child disobeys?  And consider this:

"Whosoever he be of thy seed in their generations that hath any
blemish, let him not approach to offer the bread of his God. For
whatsoever man he be that hath a blemish, he shall not approach: a
blind man, or a lame, or he that hath a flat nose, or any thing
superfluous, Or a man that is brokenfooted, brokenhanded, Or
crookbackt, or a dwarf, or that hath a blemish in his eye, or be
scurvy, or scabbed, or hath his stones broken; No man that hath a
blemish of the seed of Aaron the priest shall come nigh to offer the
offerings of the Lord made by fire: he hath a blemish; he shall not
come nigh to offer the bread of his God." Leviticus 21:17-21

Might Islamic followers think that means if a person is disabled, he
or she may not be welcomed by the Christian god?

I pray often that scales will be lifted from people's eyes when it
comes to hate.  If Billy Graham's son did indeed called Islam an "evil
and wicked religion" then I fear he is not the Christian he believes
himself to be.  "Evil and wicked interpretation of Islam," yes - but
to condemn an entire religion for what a few followers do?  If that is
the case, Christianity would be long gone before now.

Not all Southerners are hate-mongers just as all Islamic people are
not terrorists.  I realize I speak passionately here and from my own
opinion which is why I choose only to comment on your question. 
However, I believe that what Yeshua taught is worth personal
aspiration - he set examples of love, forgiveness and tolerance in the
way he lived his life and I believe his teaching are worth close
examination *and* emulation.
Subject: Re: the religion of islam
From: digsalot-ga on 28 Mar 2003 09:15 PST
 
Well, since I haven't seen anybody jump one way or the other here, I
will go ahead and address claim number 1.  I am also going to post
this as a comment so that there will be no charge made against your
card.

I still feel these points have to be addressed and, if need be, I will
answer all of them one at a time as comments and over a period of
several days.  There is still almost a month to go before the question
is expired.  So, if nobody else takes the plunge, we cannot post
partial answers and come back later to finish them.  Eventually you
will have the whole answer and you will have it as my guest because it
will come in one step at a time.

However, if somebody else does decide to answer since this is an
unlocked question, they may freely include these posts as part of
their own answer in order that they will not have to repeat what has
already been done, and will still be able to post a complete answer on
their own as required.

1 - Islam teaches to "kill the infidel

You have already given two examples of the Koranic scriptures in use
to attempt to establish this belief as fact by those who would foment
hate in the name of faith.  I will not only repeat them here but will
give you many, many more.  Then we will refute them and demonstrate
why they prove nothing.

ix:111 "Surely Allah has bought of the believers and their property
for this, that they shall have the garden [i.e. heaven]; they fight in
Allah's way, so they slay and are slain; a promise which is binding on
Him in the Taurat and the Injeel and the Quran; and who is more
faithful to his covenant than Allah? Rejoice therefore in the pledge
which you have made; and that is a mighty achievement."

ii:191 "And kill them wherever you find them, and drive them out from
whence they drove you out, and persecution is severer than slaughter,
and do not fight with them at the Sacred Mosque until they fight with
you in it, but if they do fight with you, then slay them, such is the
recompense of unbelievers."

ix.5-6: "Kill those who join other gods with God wherever you may find
them."

iv.76: "Those who believe fight in the cause of God..."

viii.12: "I will instill terror into the hearts of the Infidels,
strike off their heads then, and strike off from them every
fingertip."

viii.39-42: "Say to the Infidels: If they desist from their unbelief,
what is now past shall be forgiven them; but if they return to it,
they have already before them the doom of the ancients! Fight then
against them till strife be at an end, and the religion be all of it
God's."

ii.256: "But they who believe, and who fly their country, and fight in
the cause of God may hope for God's mercy: and God is Gracious,
Merciful."

viii. 15, 16: "Believers, when you meet the unbelievers preparing for
battle do not turn your backs to them. [ Anyone who does ] shall incur
the wrath of God and hell shall be his home: an evil dwelling indeed
".

ix.39: "If you do not fight, He will punish you severely, and put
others in your place."

ix.29,30: "Declare war upon those to whom the Scriptures were revealed
but believe neither in God nor the Last Day ,and who do not forbid
that which God and His Apostle have forbidden, and who refuse to
acknowledge the true religion [Islam] until they pay the poll-tax
without reservation and are totally subjugated.

That should be enough for us to start with.  As you can see, most any
of those standing alone may be used to back the statement that the
followers of Islam are commanded to "kill the infidel."  It is a very
impressive aray of material for those who wish to push such a concept.

Some or all of these Koranic verses are being used by some angry
anti-Islamic speakers and clergy who point to them and say: "See, the
God of the Koran commands all Moslems to kill non-Moslems."

In a multi-cultural society such as ours, this is a very dangerous
thing indeed.  When somebody tells us that our friend and neighbor,
who has always been friendly, helpful and kind, is secretly obligated
to kill us, many of us will begin to treat that friend and neighbor as
an enemy.  The accusation that the Koran teaches absolute jihad
against all non-Moslems is the kind of charge that helped convince
Christians in Bosnia to turn on lifelong friends and neighbors and put
them in concentration camps.

To add to the fire, here are a few more Koranic verses:

Kill the disbelievers wherever we find them 2:191

Fight and slay the pagans, seize them, beleaguer them, and lie in wait
for them in every stratagem. 9:5

Slay or crucify or cut the hands and feet of the unbelievers, that
they be expelled from the land with disgrace and that they shall have
a great punishment in the world hereafter. 5:34

And the Lord our god delivered him before us...and we took all his
cities at that time and utterly destroyed the men and the women and
the little ones, of every city we left none to remain.

Of the cities of these people, which the Lord thy God give thee for an
inheritance, thou shall save alive nothing that breatheth.

Actually, I just lied to you, and in front of the whole world.  The
last two verses are from the Bible. - Deuteronomy 2:33-4 and 20:16

I will be relating to them soon.  There is a reason I put them here.

If you look at other verses in the Koran, you will find a contrasting
message. - "Even if you stretch out your hand against me to kill me, I
shall not stretch out my hand against you to kill you." - also - "If
anyone murders an innocent person, it will be as if he has murdered
the whole of humanity."

You will also find that if the verses from the Koran I used above to
demonstrate that the Koran teaches the followers of Islam to "kill
infidels" are placed within their context rather than standing alone,
they relate to defensive actions rather than aggressive ones.  One of
the ones you used as an example, ii:191 contains the words "and drive
them out from whence they drove you out."  The very nature of that
phrase itself makes it clear that the verse is related to defensive
action to take 'after' one has already been attacked.  How so many
anti-Islamic people hearing those words, and how so many anti-Islamic
clergy who are spouting them, cannot realize what it is they have just
heard or have just spoken is far beyond my feeble brain to comprehend.

To illustrate the point, let's actually put ii:191 in context with
what comes right before and after:

ii:190 "Fight in the way of God those who wage war on you, and do not
commit aggression.  God does not like aggressors
ii:191 "And kill them wherever you find them, and drive them out from
whence they drove you out, and persecution is severer than slaughter,
and do not fight with them at the Sacred Mosque until they fight with
you in it, but if they do fight with you, then slay them, such is the
recompense of unbelievers.
ii:192 "Accomplish the Pilgrimage and visitation of the holy places in
honor of God, and if you are hemmed in by foes, send whatever offering
shall be the easiest, and shave not your heads until the offering
reach the place of sacrifice.  but whoever among you is sick, or has
an ailment of the head, must expiate by fasting, or alms, or an
offering.
ii:193 "But if they desist, then let there be no hostility except
against wrongdoers.  And one who attacks you, attack him in like
manner as he attacked you.  Observe your duty to God, and know God is
with those who ward off evil."

Now, even though ii:191 is used by anti-Islamic clergy as one of the
absolute proofs of Islam's command to "kill infidels," you can see
that when it is placed in context it is no more than "defensive"
instruction.  The "kill them wherever you find them" relates back to
the aggressors of ii:190. -   ii:192 gives instruction on how to
handle religious duties while "hemmed in by foes." - And ii193
instructs Moslems to lay down their arms if those who are attacking do
so. "But if they desist, then let there be no hostility except against
wrongdoers."

Here is another example of how Koranic scripture is twisted to
establish a claim that Moslems are commanded to "kill infidels."

viii.12: "I will instill terror into the hearts of the Infidels,
strike off their heads then, and strike off from them every
fingertip."

Quoting that passage as a stand alone Koranic verse, as those who are
demonizing Islam do, is the same as saying Patrick Henry said "Give me
death."  Of course we know that the real quote was "Give me liberty or
give me death," but when taken out of context it sounds ludicrous.

To explain how this Koranic passage is taken out of context, we do not
refer back to other text as much as we need to know the history of the
events it refers to and how it relates to the Koranic teaching itself.
 I would venture to guess that very few of the anti-Islamic agitators
have bothered to find out.

First of all, look at the way it is written.  Koranic passages such as
the ones dealing with defensive actions we already covered above read
as instructions.  However, you will notice this one does not.  It is a
first person narrative.  "I will instill terror..."  The passage
begins with "I."  In this passage, it is God speaking about what "He"
is going to do.  It is not speaking about what Moslems are supposed to
do.

Mohammed and his followers were attacked by surrounding tribes of
Pagans, not Christians or Jews.  Incidently, this particular tribe of
pagans practiced human sacrifice by burying selected daughters alive. 
Archaeological research has found much evidence of these people and
their practices.  Such practices enraged Mohammed, but that is beside
the point here.  In the verse cited,  God is explaining how he plans
to help the Moslems to victory.

Now this chapter in the Koran is quite long and I'm not going to quote
the whole thing here.  But the passage cited is verse 12.   For those
who believe or teach that this particular passage refers to an unwise
or unfair God who condemns all non-Moslems to a violent death, simply
keep reading.  When they reach verse 61, they will find - - "But if
the enemy incline towards peace, do you also incline towards peace and
trust in God, for he is the one who hears and knows.

Not only does this verse not relate to any command for Moslems to
"kill infidels," it actually goes on to tell Moslems to 'stop' killing
even 'daughter sacrificing pagans' as long as the pagans are willing
to be peaceful.

We can continue this right on through any of the Koranic quotes used
by the anti-Moslem Christian clergy but I think you can now see why
doing so in this kind of format would entail the writting of an answer
that would be virtually a book.  I think, perhaps, you can also see
why I said you have asked an "enormous question," one which will take
days to research and answer.  Each of your 5 claims will need to be
addressed in a similar manner.  And guess what?  There is so much more
than can be done, that this response is still "shallow" and may well
still be considered "opinion."

You mentioned the people in the South and their ability to believe
this rubbish without checking things out any further.  Please don't
just single out the South.  This is a nationwide problem.  It is
reprehensible, but none the less it is believed by millions of
otherwise good people.

If anti-Christians used the Bible in a similar manner (and many do),
they could convince many of their own that Christianity teaches its
followers to kill witches and stone to death disobedient children. 
They could quote chapter and verse all the scripture that supports it.

Scriptural literalism can be a heavy moral burden to bear.

In as much as this is a "comment" rather than a formal answer, and
because of the fact that I will be using many of the same resources
over and over as I go through each "claim," I will simply post all
citations at the same time at the end as a single "bibliography."

I hope this has helped you somewhat with claim number 1.

Will begin on number 2 now.

cheers
digsalot

Important Disclaimer: Answers and comments provided on Google Answers are general information, and are not intended to substitute for informed professional medical, psychiatric, psychological, tax, legal, investment, accounting, or other professional advice. Google does not endorse, and expressly disclaims liability for any product, manufacturer, distributor, service or service provider mentioned or any opinion expressed in answers or comments. Please read carefully the Google Answers Terms of Service.

If you feel that you have found inappropriate content, please let us know by emailing us at answers-support@google.com with the question ID listed above. Thank you.
Search Google Answers for
Google Answers  


Google Home - Answers FAQ - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy