Thank you for your research.  That's interesting about Oxford saying
its "website." Logically, it seems like it should be Web site (i.e.
the Web is a place and a site is a thing in that place, like New York
hotel).  Applying Oxford's logic, does that means its webpages,
webdevelopers, webservers, etc. (just a comment, no need to answer). 
Judging from the 10 to 1 preference of website over Web site, my guess
is that people are just to lazy to hit the Shift and space buttons...
=)  Thanks again.  An interesting diversion.

This answer has not been rated.

This answer has not been rated.

I cannot believe how fast you found this - I have been looking for
days!  Thank you so much!

This answer has not been rated.

This answer has not been rated.

This answer has not been rated.

justaskscott-ga does it again.  A subjective, esoteric question: a
swift, definitive answer. Though Keeler apparently has apostles who
find his books dazzling in their incomprehensibility, a survey of the
sites justaskscott referred me to underscore the icomprehensibility
and, for my money, leave out the dazzle. Well done, Sherlock.

Thank you -- very extensive.  But I should have stipulated more
condensed sources.  Not your fault -- mine.  It will be most useful to
me.

This answer has not been rated.

Info requested is not available in any great detail online yet but I
felt what was given was good for what was there to work with.

This answer has not been rated.

Thank You,the answer was efficient and complete.

This answer has not been rated.

This answer has not been rated.

This answer has not been rated.

This answer has not been rated.

Getting what'd really be helpful is not easily found so that's what
I'll constuct.  The researcher was generous with his time.

This response was NOT an answer to my question, and when I clarified
it I did NOT get a further response.  Sending a response to  someone
else's question was not helpful to me at all and, without quoting
source of information I have no way to evaluate the veracity of the
data. I would be willing to change my rating if I get a response back
from the clarification which I requested.

Thank you, justaskscott - you correctly understood that all I wanted
to know was how to do it for myself, and I figured it for a quickie. 
I tried searching by number, but you can imagine how well that worked.
 There is no separate search box just for question IDs (hint to the
Google Answers gods?).  So you have given me a full and perfect
response, and I thank you.

Apteryx

This answer has not been rated.

This answer has not been rated.

Thats the lady. Thanks

justaskscott-ga got as far as a human could possibly go in less than
48 hours. Speed was of the essence, as I was on deadline for a
magazine story. He put me in touch with just the right guy to answer
my question.  This was my first experience with this service, and if
every q. and a. works out as well as this, I'll be back again and
again.

Prompt and focussed, but also going beyond than the specifics I
requested; very helpful and time saving.

Thanks Scott.  Your answer is most helpful. The response time was great  
Emilyrose2

This answer has not been rated.

Quick, relevant, understandable to a non computer person and comprehensive

This answer has not been rated.

This answer has not been rated.

Thanks justaskscott,

I guess I'll have steep for a shorter time.  Also, based on the last
reference, perhaps I should switch to Oolong or Green tea.

Googlenut

This answer has not been rated.

This answer has not been rated.

This answer has not been rated.

thank you thank you i was at a mental blank and you answered in a
language i could understand thanks again and hope you have a lovely
day.

This answer has not been rated.

Persistence pays off! justaskscott-ga is the person to handle tough
questions about the history of the WWW.

This answer has not been rated.

This answer has not been rated.

This answer has not been rated.

This answer has not been rated.

This answer has not been rated.

wish it was better news.... but good job thanks :)