This answer has not been rated.

This answer has not been rated.

This answer has not been rated.

This answer has not been rated.

This answer has not been rated.

This answer has not been rated.

Perfect.
Thanks.

This answer has not been rated.

Initial answer was probably 3 stars, but follow-up clarifications were
excellent and brought the rating up to 5. This was definitely money
well spent, because doing it myself would have taken many hours, and I
would still have missed some of the finer points.

This answer has not been rated.

Thanks so much. Outstanding detail and clarity in the answer to my
question. Very quick response.  Nice to know I can get this type of
advice where it won't hurt my pocket. I'm sure I will be asking more
in the future. Thanks to all.

Regards

Ralph

poor answer and even poor follow-up !!

This answer has not been rated.

This answer has not been rated.

thank you

I do appreciate the knowledge and effort of Siliconsamurai although
his suggestions didn't happen to do the job for me.

Thank you all for your help and input, very much appreciated.

Outlook: It seems the easiest solution would be to use Outlook to
break them up, however a few of our clients use Netscape and I'm not
sure it has that capability.  So we need a backup plan...

Ureach: The problem is, per Earthlink Tech Support, if we connect
through Earthlink then we are required to use their servers (smtp)
because of spam controls on their network.  And you're right,
Earthlink doesn't offer a premium service with larger email
attachments.

use our website: a possibility

whalemail: a more appealing possibility, although I wonder if it works
both ways.  ie, if the client needs to send us something, can they use
our whalemail account?  I'll check out their website.

filesplitter: sounds a bit hokey, but still a possibility

mailserver: too much work/ more than we need

Once again, thank you for your suggestions.  I definitely wouldn't
rule any out just yet.

ed

This answer has not been rated.

Wanted place to sell them for me - not where i could sell them.

Good answer with sources = credibility to the answer. Use of bullet
points would have been a plus for reader.

Some good information in answer. But too much emphasis on the benefits
of the AutoCAD2002, which is a very expensive solution to the
situation. The client is looking for either free or inexpensive
solutions, which the answer touches on also.

This answer has not been rated.

This answer has not been rated.

Thanks!

This answer has not been rated.