mother-ga was excellent.  The answers to follow-up questions were
quick and responsive.  The examples given were easy to understand. 
All-in-all, this was a great experience.  Thanks very much!

Really stuck with it until then end. thank you.

This answer has not been rated.

This answer has not been rated.

Thank you very much, this is most helpful and I'm delighted to learn
of this service.

Thanks for the info!  I'll make reservations ASAP!

Thank you for providing a great answer and excellent suggestions!  I
appreciate the time you invested.

Thanks, a very ingenious answer which turned out to be right.  I
checked on the label on the back of the machine!

The answer was comprehensive and offered advice for several avenues.
The statement that this was not offered by a qualified legal
representative made it seem implausible.   However, redemption was
made by quoting the exact statutes, laws, and documents that were
required to assess liability.

Thanks
Chrysse

This answer has not been rated.

This answer has not been rated.

Excellent job when many other researchers said impossible

This answer has not been rated.

Through research, and intimate knowledge! I had considered cork, even
thought of mentioning that in my question. The resealing part didn't
thrill me, and I hear that cork isn't too forgiving of golden
retrievers! So, it's laminate lane for me. Thanks very much!

***** Excellent response time and information.  I'm telling everyone about
Google Answers.  What a neat service!  Thank you.

This answer has not been rated.

This answer has not been rated.

This answer has not been rated.

This answer has not been rated.

This answer has not been rated.

This answer has not been rated.

Wow!  What an amzaingly thorough answer!  The best $5 I've ever spent!

I like how Mother clearly made a list. She also gave some knowledge
about the languages. Good Job!

This is a great answer.  The reviewer addressed issues I had not even
thought of, and the links she provided are going to save me a
substantial amount of time.  I am so glad I came here and that this
researcher was willing to help me.

This answer has not been rated.

This answer has not been rated.

All three answers were great and could potentially be the right book. 
I'll have to give them all a look.  Hmmmm...three books with the same
general plot all written around the same time.  So much for
originality!

While very nicely researched, I'm afraid that your answer lacks the
'insight' I was looking for.  I understand what the public facts are. 
What I was looking for is some insight into how the politics of the
prize committee works.  Unlike what has become the standard
(historical) answer that the committee clearly follows the edict to
give the prize to whomever 'shall have conferred the greatest benefit
on mankind', I have found that the prize is often used as a political
instrument.  The winners are chosen on criteria that I don't
completely understand (which I feel are at least partially based on
the prize winner's standing in the Physics community).  Richard
Feynman nominated Zweig for the prize.  Many well respected physicists
understand that there is something funny going on with the omission. 
A good answer might examine how the physics community was slow to
adapt to a fundamentally new idea, how Zweig fought for the physical
existence of the 'aces', while Gell-Mann left his options open and
repeatedly stated that they may simply be mathematical tricks.  A good
answer might look at how this initial period of uncertainty
contributed to the physics community's bias toward the more
established scientist's point of view (Gell-Mann) over the younger and
less well established scientist (Zweig).  Maybe the answer might even
offer some speculation on how Zweig's move to Neurobiology hurt his
chances for winning the prize.

This answer was detailed and helpful to us.

Thank you mother-ga for answering the question. 
Joel

This answer has not been rated.