Google Answers Logo
View Question
 
Q: pledge of Allegiance - under G-d ( Answered 5 out of 5 stars,   0 Comments )
Question  
Subject: pledge of Allegiance - under G-d
Category: Reference, Education and News > Current Events
Asked by: nukethepandas-ga
List Price: $3.00
Posted: 05 Nov 2002 19:37 PST
Expires: 05 Dec 2002 19:37 PST
Question ID: 100013
What are some reasons why the words "under G-d" should be removed from
the pledge, and what are some reasons why they should not be removed?
Answer  
Subject: Re: pledge of Allegiance - under G-d
Answered By: ephraim-ga on 05 Nov 2002 21:10 PST
Rated:5 out of 5 stars
 
Nukethepandas,

The following article describes how the 9th Circuit Court ruled that
the current incarnation of the Pledge fails three different tests
created by the courts to decide if The Pledge was constitutional under
the Establishment Clause. The tests are (a) the Lemon Test, (b) the
Endorsement Test, and (c) the Coersion Test:

[Summary of 9th circuit ruling on The Pledge]
http://www.nassp.org/services/legal_pledgeall.html

Note that the 9th Circuit’s ruling only applies to those states within
the circuit. These states are also specified in the article.

Basically, these tests combine in this case to mean that because
“under God” was added in 1954 as a response to atheist communism,
because public school teachers are required to use these words in a
government-supported public school classroom, and because students may
not realize they have the right to refuse, the recitation of those
words in public schools should not be permitted.

Those who disagree seem to feel that the recitation of the pledge is
simply “ceremonial deism” which is simply a fancy way of saying that
we say it by rote without actually thinking about the meaning. A group
called Keep The Pledge explains its view here:

http://www.keepthepledge.com/editorials.php

Keep the pledge confirms the 1954 origin of the words “under God” in
their page about the history of the pledge:

http://www.keepthepledge.com/history.php

You can read the entire ruling (which includes the judge’s reasoning)
here. Note that this also includes a partial dissent from one of the
judges who heard the case:

http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/ca9/newopinions.nsf/FE05EEE79C2A97B688256BE3007FEE32/$file/0016423.pdf?openelement

If you’d like to read more about this, I’d recommend clicking on the
following Google search where you’ll find much more information about
this rather heated topic of debate:

[Google search: court + “pledge of allegiance”]
://www.google.com/search?as_q=court&num=100&hl=en&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&btnG=Google+Search&as_epq=pledge+of+allegiance&as_oq=&as_eq=&lr=&as_ft=i&as_filetype=&as_qdr=all&as_occt=any&as_dt=i&as_sitesearch=&safe=images


I hope this provides the information you’re looking for. Feel free to
ask for clarification if needed.

/ephraim
nukethepandas-ga rated this answer:5 out of 5 stars
Thank you, the information you provided me with will help me a lot!

Comments  
There are no comments at this time.

Important Disclaimer: Answers and comments provided on Google Answers are general information, and are not intended to substitute for informed professional medical, psychiatric, psychological, tax, legal, investment, accounting, or other professional advice. Google does not endorse, and expressly disclaims liability for any product, manufacturer, distributor, service or service provider mentioned or any opinion expressed in answers or comments. Please read carefully the Google Answers Terms of Service.

If you feel that you have found inappropriate content, please let us know by emailing us at answers-support@google.com with the question ID listed above. Thank you.
Search Google Answers for
Google Answers  


Google Home - Answers FAQ - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy