![]() |
|
![]() | ||
|
Subject:
sensitivity of wildlife to noise levels
Category: Science > Biology Asked by: tej-ga List Price: $15.00 |
Posted:
05 Nov 2002 19:51 PST
Expires: 09 Nov 2002 11:49 PST Question ID: 100019 |
I need to know how various wildlife respond to different noise levels in decibels. What is the quietest sound they can hear, when do they sense danger, when do they flee. I realize different species are more sensitive to different frequencies. For this let's assume that the noise source produces all frequencies at the same levels. The kinds of animals I need to cover are fish, deer/elk/moose, birds, bears, butterflies, and maybe amphibians and reptiles--common animals that you might see if you were, say, canoeing down a river in north america. It can be for a specific species like "King Salmon" or general like "most fish." Another way to answer this question would be: how far away could these different animals hear a 100 decibel noise source, how far away would they sense danger and how far away would the noise be loud enough that they would flee? | |
| |
| |
|
![]() | ||
|
There is no answer at this time. |
![]() | ||
|
Subject:
Re: sensitivity of wildlife to noise levels
From: neilzero-ga on 06 Nov 2002 08:05 PST |
Generally animals with good hearing sensititiy can hear any sound as loud as the background noise level, which can be quite low durring a snow fall with no wind. Like humans, they tune out ordinary sounds, such as distant thunder, but respond to sounds a preditor might make even when it is several db below the noise level. As a result the animal might not respond to a 90 db sound of one sort, but bolt in terror at a 60 db sound. Minor differenses in pitch, harmonics, modulation, rate, attack, intermodulaton distortion and other qualities of sound may make 30 db (plus) differnce in the scare factor. Like humans they learn to tune out, the sound of the interstate, the roar of a water fall, and similar repetitive noises. Experienced woodsmen can make an educated guess how each animal would resond to the sound of an artificial duck call (or other) but generally each sound would need to be tested for months to determine if it repelled specific animals at a distance of one KM or one meter where the same sound is a million times louder than at one meter. Neil |
Subject:
Re: sensitivity of wildlife to noise levels
From: neilzero-ga on 06 Nov 2002 08:11 PST |
I got that backwards the last word should be KM not meter. |
Subject:
Re: sensitivity of wildlife to noise levels
From: unstable-ga on 08 Nov 2002 01:05 PST |
Also please take note that you would have to take into account how far the sound would travel by itself. This is in general affected by the frequency of the sound, as well as the original amptitute (or loudness) and the general surroundings i.e. any material that would deflect, muffle the sound. the research that you want is pretty hard to determine without some cruel manipulation on the animals themselves, as unlike human hearing testing where you could get the human to signal to you whether they could hear a sound or not, we would need to wire up the animals and try to detect if the neurons within the ears were firing signals corresponding to different degrees of loudness to different frequencies - not a very kind test that anyone would want to inflict on any creature. |
If you feel that you have found inappropriate content, please let us know by emailing us at answers-support@google.com with the question ID listed above. Thank you. |
Search Google Answers for |
Google Home - Answers FAQ - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy |