I use the 9210 Communicator as the principal contacts base , i.e. I
enter my contacts in the phone and then through PC Suite ,
synchronize from Communicator to Outlook . However the fields (
addresses , faxes , names etc ) do not correspond.Only a few do.
Consequently data gets lost , is duplicated etc..Also after back up
and restoring to Communicator from Outlook things disappear or end up
in the wrong place.
The Nokia helpline people say that you have to start entering info in
Outlook and then synchronize towards the Communicator.This would not
be the preferred solution for me.Has anybody with Communicator
experience got a good solution please ?? Is Outlook perhaps not a good
choice ? |
Request for Question Clarification by
tisme-ga
on
01 Dec 2002 06:09 PST
Hello,
After reading your posts over again, I think I didn't really answer
this question. Did you post the other message because you wanted me to
tackle this question?
tisme-ga
|
Request for Question Clarification by
tisme-ga
on
01 Dec 2002 10:06 PST
Hello katan,
I have requested that my answer be removed from your $10 post so I am
posting this here again:
I have started researching this problem and have been coming up with
some useful information. I will summarize my finding for you later
today.
To help me test out some of the solutions it would be great if you
could, upload a sample of the file that you are importing to
Microsoft Outlook with FAKE contact information. Also tell me what
version of Outlook you are using (2002 may not be compatible but 2000,
98 and 97 should be). Finally if you can, export the file into text
format (tab-delimited) and provide me with a place to download that as
well.
I also want you to know that because the product website and
specifications clearly say that this product should be compatible with
Outlook, that if you cannot get this working, you can request a
different phone or a refund from the company. In essence, this is
false advertising. I had a similar problem with a wireless network
that was advertised as being fully compatible with Windows 2000 but
was not.
Sorry for the misunderstanding, it was early in the morning and I
thought you were saying that my other answer had solved your problem.
I look forward to your response to this clarification request.
tisme-ga
|
Clarification of Question by
katan-ga
on
02 Dec 2002 03:32 PST
i have responded
|