Google Answers Logo
View Question
 
Q: Enclosed offices with doors versus cubicles in the workplace ( Answered 5 out of 5 stars,   3 Comments )
Question  
Subject: Enclosed offices with doors versus cubicles in the workplace
Category: Miscellaneous
Asked by: eric123-ga
List Price: $20.00
Posted: 15 Nov 2002 00:03 PST
Expires: 15 Dec 2002 00:03 PST
Question ID: 108198
There is a long standing debate about whether high tech workers are
more productive in enclosed offices or in open cubicles.  HP has its
employees working in "cube farms" while Sun likes to have everyone in
closed offices, even though the quarters are quite cramped.

I am looking for articles and statistical data or studies that show
that workers are more productive in the open environment of a cube
workspace.  It is important to show that productivity rates are
higher, quality of work is higher, enjoyment of work is higher, and
team morale and a sense of synergy is higher... when workers are in
cubicles.  Anything that shows that workers are sufficiently happy,
feel they are interrupted not too much, and that their privacy is well
respected would be good.  My manager is trying to move our team from
our well lit cubes to enclosed, dark "cave like" offices, and we need
all the ammo we can find to prevent it from happening.  I need more
than one piece of data, preferably as many as possible with concrete
study numbers, to prove my case.

Request for Question Clarification by knowledge_seeker-ga on 15 Nov 2002 06:39 PST
Hi eric123, 

Can you describe your current and proposed office spaces a bit more?
I'm thinking maybe the argument will have to be made using some other
criteria. For example, I have heard (and can research it further if it
works here) that natural sunlight is conducive to productivity.

Maybe give us a short list of the main differences between the two
spaces-- Size, lighting, workstation styles, number of people per
space, etc.

Thanks - K~

Clarification of Question by eric123-ga on 15 Nov 2002 07:18 PST
Here's some more info...  My team has one manager who is in an office,
and 5 engineers who are in cubicles.  (I'm the CEO, and the manager
reports to me.)  The manager has data (primarily provided by some
research in the mid-1980's, and from a book called PeopleWare), that
shows that people are more productive in offices.  The manager likes
offices.  He wants them all moved to offices.

However, the engineers could care less.  They aren't really requesting
the move.  I've setup the company to have an "open environment" (e.g.
cubicles, with just a few offices), to foster collaboration.  It's
been like that for 6 years.

He's provided a compelling PowerPoint presentation to the team, trying
to convince them that they will have higher productivity if they are
in offices, even though they aren't asking for them.  I want to
provide opposing research that shows that low-walled cubicles, with
the ability to hear what's happening around you and participate more
actively, actually produces an increase in communication.

I'd rather leave other factors out of it, such as whether there is
more natural light in the cubicles or the offices.

My best bit of data that I have is that I've heard about HP having
done this research and found it better to put everyone in cubicles...
Answer  
Subject: Re: Enclosed offices with doors versus cubicles in the workplace
Answered By: knowledge_seeker-ga on 15 Nov 2002 11:07 PST
Rated:5 out of 5 stars
 
Hi eric123, 

First of all, I have to say, if you intend to speak in defence of the
cube, you are in trouble.  Cubicles are clearly out. There is nothing
good said about them anywhere. Cube-farms are not the way cubicles
were intended to be used by their developers, and their misuse has
caused most offices to exude the warmth of, say, an ice-tray.

However, that said, this does NOT mean a return to enclosed offices is
the answer. Many studies agree that that’s even less-desirable than
cubism. No, the key to today’s high tech work environment is shared
knowledge, collaboration, and the generation of ideas. And to do that,
and open space pod environment is ideal.

Here I’ll focus on the defence of open spaces as opposed to the closed
office environment.

This first article has pretty much everything you need in it. I’ve
read the entire thing. It is well documented, addresses real cases
(mostly focused on scientific research companies, but includes HP) and
explains clearly the need for information flow and worker proximity.

I’ve extracted for you some excerpts from the section on HP 
[beginning on page 38]. I strongly urge you to take the time to read
the whole article. There is quite a bit of useful information in it,
including graphs correlating distance between workers and knowledge
flow.

----------------------------

SOCIAL DESIGN 
The Link Between Facility Design, Organization Design, and Corporate
Strategy


“ The goal [at HP]  was to create an environment where a team could
really be a team, where rich interaction would be the norm, and where
complex projects would be completed in compressed time frames.

“A year later, the 15-person experiment was judged so successful that
a new space for 30 people was developed using the principles validated
from the first experiment.”

“IRL researchers found that the new spaces supported more frequent,
more spontaneous interactions. Perhaps the most significant finding
was that collaborations in the experimental spaces lasted three times
longer and occurred twice as frequently as those in traditional
environments. In addition, the need for team meetings was almost
entirely eliminated.”

SOCIAL DESIGN 
The Link Between Facility Design, Organization Design, and Corporate
Strategy
http://www.wdhb.com/fr/publications/socialdesign.pdf

------------------------------

This article lays out some good arguments for the open plan --

OPEN PLAN OR PRIVATE OFFICE?
Derrick Van Mell (May 18, 2000)

The debate in office planning between the benefits and costs of open
plan— workstations” or cubicles—versus private offices could be
simplified. Here’s a checklist of ideas to put things in perspective.

THE CASE FOR OPEN PLAN
http://www.vanmell.com/Articles/OPEN%20PLAN.PDF


And, by the same author –

OFFICE DESIGN & PRODUCTIVITY
Derrick Van Mell (April 26, 2000)
http://www.vanmell.com/Articles/OFFICE%20PRODUCTIVITY.PDF


--------------------

One key use of open space plans is in the field of Knowledge
Management (KM). The sharing of knowledge can be the best argument for
an open space office.

Seven schools of Knowledge Management

“6. The Spatial School

This school centres on the use of space or spatial design to
facilitate knowledge exchange. … Basically, co-presence and
socialisation is used as a means of knowledge exchange and creation.
In other words, the approach seeks to facilitate the creation of
social capital by offering sociable spaces. Examples are provided by
Skandia's Future Centre on the Stockholm Archipelago or the BA head
office British Airways at Waterside near Heathrow Airport.

Seven schools of Knowledge Management
http://www.knowledge-portal.com/knowledge_and_innovation/the_seven_km_schools.htm



“There are a small number of specific examples where KM principles
have been applied to specialised areas, such as Edvinsson's Skandia
Futures Centre, or "Creativity Laboratories" e.g. Hoechst-Celanese,
the UK Post Office Innovation Centre, West London Training and
Enterprise Council Executive Studio, and the Ernst and Young
Accelerated Solution Environment.”

http://www.poolonline.com/archive/issue10/iss10fea5.html

-----------------------------------

One operative phrase that is used in office space management is,
“serendipitous meeting” or “spontaneous interaction.”  These are
interactions that occur between people who “accidentally” run into
each other or just find themselves talking casually in an open
workspace. In a creative environment these interactions are paramount
to generating new ideas


Office Trends Impacting Design


“Collaborating teams are often supported by dedicated workrooms,
libraries of shared files and information, visual access to one
another, and informal gathering spaces immediately adjacent to their
usual workspaces.”

“It is important that appropriate uses of technology and work process
are analyzed prior to the development of work space so the most
appropriate tasks and processes are optimized. Proximity to
appropriate work mates and services will facilitate efficient work
process, and often stimulates creative thinking.”

“Serendipitous meetings and conversations are viewed as important to
teamwork and collaboration.”

Office Trends Impacting Design
by Marilyn Farrow, FIIDA
Corporate America Today
http://www.iida.org/organization/forums/office_trends.html

------------------------------

This excerpt from an article describes the positive aspects of a team
environment as it pertains to IT programming partners, but the essence
is exactly what you are looking for.


“Team members find each other much more approachable. They will
struggle with questions or lack of information for less time before
getting themselves out of their chair and going to ask the right
person a question—because now they know that person quite well. The
rapport and trust built between team members gives them the courage to
ask each other for advice and guidance without feeling vulnerable and
insufficient.”


Overcoming Management Resistance to Pair Programming
[scroll to the last section on this page for the above reference]

http://216.239.39.100/search?q=cache:jIcfQXTIO5IC:www.informit.com/isapi/product_id~%257BE5B6D9E7-B572-4BA3-BC63-F16974DF8980%257D/st~822202F4-E865-472D-B32F-BE77D3B7ACE1/content/index.asp+office+design+workstation+environment+collaboration+cubicle&hl=en&ie=UTF-8

----------------------------

“..the project team nature of today’s workplace demands that an
emphasis be placed on connectivity.”

Architecture Matters in the New Economy
Good Design is Good Business:  Design Strategies for the New Economy
http://www.archrecord.com/CONTEDUC/ARTICLES/02_01_1a.asp


----------------------------

One of the biggest arguments AGAINST open space environments is the
distraction caused by sound. Telephones can be a major source of sound
distraction. Several companies that I read about have solved that
dilemma by issuing cordless phones to employees and providing a small
sitting area where one can go to the phone privately.

Other fixes can be found here:

Productive Silence
Noise Distraction Affects Employee Satisfaction and Productivity
http://www.ccrllc.com/images/Buildings%20-%20Fred%20Folsom%20article%20-%2005.17.02.pdf


SOUND MASKING - IT'S A MATTER OF BALANCE
A CASE STUDY OF KNIGHT-RIDDER INFORMATION, INC. 
MOUNTAIN VIEW, CA     BY PAUL DE GROOT
http://www.lencore.com/soundmasking_knightridder.htm

Related to sound is the speech privacy issue. This too can be solved
by used of portable phones and available private spaces.

“In a survey of seven office buildings during the past two years, as
many as 72% of respondents were dissatisfied with speech privacy in
their workplace.”

Speech Privacy in Offices
http://www.cbe.berkeley.edu/RESEARCH/briefs-acoustics.htm



------------------------------

More information

This article addresses both sides of the story and is rather technical
in nature. Probably more suited to your engineering mind than my
researcher mind.

THE COMPLEX ADAPTIVE WORKPLACE – A THEORETICAL LINK BETWEEN OFFICE
DESIGN AND PRODUCTIVITY?
http://www-mmd.eng.cam.ac.uk/mcn/pdf_files/part5_4.pdf



BIBLIOGRAPHY OF STUDIES LINKING FACILITY DESIGN WITH PROFITABILITY
http://www.ksba.com/research/biblio.pdf


Collaborative Settings
Fostering Teamwork in the Workplace
HERMAN MILLER – WHITE PAPERS
http://www.hmeurope.com/WhitePapers/wp_Collaborative_Settings.pdf


To what extent does workplace design and management affect
productivity?
http://www.officeproductivity.co.uk/nm/publish/opn_19.html


-------------------------------


Ironically, you are fighting the opposite battle than most CEO’s. For
years now companies have been trying to drag their high tech employees
out of their office spaces and into a shared environment. That fact
that your employees are willing to stay where they are certainly works
in your favour.

Finally, although I’ve given you plenty of ammunition to argue your
case, I should mention that many of the articles I came across argued
against the open-space model unless issues of sound, lighting,
privacy, and air quality are addressed.

I would suggest that the final decision depends on the dynamics of
your group, the need for information flow and sharing of ideas, and
the actual business processes your company employs.

Best of luck in your argument. 


- K~

search terms:

office design workstation environment
open space office collaboration
open space office productivity
open-plan office productivity "case study"
“open space” office productivity "case study"
eric123-ga rated this answer:5 out of 5 stars
Well thought out and goes far beyond the question I asked.  Thank you.

Comments  
Subject: Re: Enclosed offices with doors versus cubicles in the workplace
From: coachschorr-ga on 15 Nov 2002 00:33 PST
 
The simple fact that your team doesn't want to do it isn't enough? 
I'm sure there are studies that show both ways -- personally I prefer
an office to a cube, but that's my personal preference.

I would think different people will react different ways.  What's
important is what's best for you and your team.  If it's going to kill
morale then your manager should rethink the idea.

-Coach-
Subject: Re: Enclosed offices with doors versus cubicles in the workplace
From: tehuti-ga on 15 Nov 2002 00:55 PST
 
I also think personal preference is important here.  I have my own
office with door that is kept firmly closed at all times.  I would
resign immediately if someone tried to force me into some cubicle or
open-plan scheme, or even if I was made to share my office with one
other person.
Subject: Re: Enclosed offices with doors versus cubicles in the workplace
From: bikerman-ga on 15 Nov 2002 04:56 PST
 
Hello,

I'm afraid that all the surveys I could find showed that productivity
was better when employees had their own (even small) offices instead
of being in a cubicle environment.

Having said that, I agree with the other commenters here.  IMHO, happy
people are going to do a better job, and if your team is happier in
cubes, then it probably be more productive that way.  Of course, my
opinion doesn't mean anything to your manager. :)

Sorry,
bikerman-ga

Important Disclaimer: Answers and comments provided on Google Answers are general information, and are not intended to substitute for informed professional medical, psychiatric, psychological, tax, legal, investment, accounting, or other professional advice. Google does not endorse, and expressly disclaims liability for any product, manufacturer, distributor, service or service provider mentioned or any opinion expressed in answers or comments. Please read carefully the Google Answers Terms of Service.

If you feel that you have found inappropriate content, please let us know by emailing us at answers-support@google.com with the question ID listed above. Thank you.
Search Google Answers for
Google Answers  


Google Home - Answers FAQ - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy