Hi probonopublic,
Good day again, and thanks for your question. You don't know how
delighted I am to see a cricket question come up on Google. There have
been only 1 or 2 others to date.
>>> As everyone knows, the English cricket team in Australia has been
humiliated yet again.
Doesn't every cricket team get humiliated in Australia? :-) Only the
Kiwis have shown some sort of resistance of late, but they landed up
on the losing side.
Australia have devastated and decimated every cricket team they have
played against of late (barring India in India). Even if you look at
the Indian series, Australia were one wicket away from winning the
series. The VVS Laxman 281 and Rahul Dravid 180-odd innings followed
by Harbhajan Singh's magic saw the Indians through in the Kolkata
(Calcutta) test. The Chennai (Madras) test [which I saw in the
stadium] was anyone's game. A couple of bad decisions by Asoka
(Ashocker) de Silva cost Australia the match in my opinion. But in the
end, the series was 2-1 to India, and thats what the following day's
papers said, and thats what Wisden's archives will say forever. I'm
not complaining :)
Coming back to the English cricket team, they have always been out of
sorts after the retirements of the three G's - Gooch, Gatting & Gower.
The retirement of Atherton was the final nail in their coffin. The
English team seem to be heading to even lower heights with Alec
Stewart's retirement around the corner and news that Darren Gough may
never play cricket again. Caddick is due to retire. So, what does
England have to do?
I suggest the following which are realisic (blackmagic, voodoo
etc..... don't & won't work)
* Change the captain. Nasser Hussain *was* a good captain, but of late
he gives up very easily. Maybe a person like Micheal Vaughan or Marcus
Trescothick should be given the job. Graham Thorpe isn't a bad idea
either
* Find a good replacement for Alect Stewart. James Foster impressed a
bit in India, but I don't think he has the stuff for international
cricket
* Modify the county system. This is one thing which I believe is the
main cause for lack of good quality players in England in India - too
many domestic teams. Each team hardly has one or two national-team
players and so the other players are rarely exposed to quality players
in the opposition. In the Indian circuit, batsmen who score tons of
runs fail miserably in international matches. Same is the case with
bowlers picking up wickets. I feel that if the English domestic
circuit is modified in such a way that players are regularly exposed
to other 'quality players' in the opposing side, things will look
brighter. Look at Australia...only 6 or 7 domestic teams. Each team
has close to 5 or more Australian national-team players, and so
playing a match against a side is almost like playing a match against
an entire Austalian team. At one count, there were 9 test players in a
New South Wales Side.
* Bring in a quality off-spinner. Aussies struggle against quality
off-spin. Whatever happened to Robert Croft?
* Get a new fitness trainer. No English player seems to be fit.
Of course, if you're into voodoo and witchcraft, you might try the
match-fixing option first ;) The just concluded India-West Indies
series in India was grossly fixed in my opinion. I wonder how many
agree with me.
England can't do much in this Ashes series. A 5-0 defeat is staring at
them. However, they might just pull one back. But, this seems highly
unlikely. The England ODI side is a much better side than the test
side. All the best to England for the 2003 World Cup, but as an
Indian, I would prefer seeing India win (I guess I'm dreaming too
much!)
If you have any clarifications, please don't hesitate to ask. I will
answer any of your queries related ot cricket. I'm a cricket
journalist and partly-own a cricket website.
Warm regards,
aditya2k |