cwiii --
The hourly rates of lawyers at Wilmer, Cutler & Pickering as of late
2001 were reported to a U.S. Bankruptcy Court in connection with the
firm's representation of Enron. As reported by law.com:
"Wilmer, Cutler & Pickering, the only D.C.- based firm with a
significant Enron gig, is charging its regular rates for work as
special counsel to the Enron Board of Directors' Special Committee.
Partners William McLucas, Charles Davidow and Joseph Brenner bill
between $375 and $650 an hour. The firm charges $340 to $465 for
counsel, $195 to $335 for associates."
Law.com/"Inadmissible: Feeding From Enron Bankruptcy Trough"
http://216.239.53.100/search?q=cache:QTfz2lOiY2kC:www5.law.com/dc/story_template/inad0211.shtml+billing+rates+Washington+law+firms&hl=en&ie=UTF-8
(This is a Google cache copy of the document, since the link to the
original page did not work for me.)
The hourly rates of Covington & Burling were reported in a National
Law Journal compilation of rate information based on a 2001 survey of
the nation's 250 largest law firms. That survey indicates that
Covington's hourly rates are $325-$575 for partners and $160-375 for
associates. The complete survey results may be found here:
The National Law Journal (December 2001)
http://www.law.com/special/professionals/nlj/billing_rates_firm_by_firm.html
The hourly rates of Arnold & Porter have not been published on the
Internet, as far as I can tell after substantial research. The firm
did not reply to the National Journal survey (nor did Wilmer, Cutler).
This is not surprising, since many law firms justifiably consider
billing rates to be competitive information, and from my personal
knowledge of various Washington firms, I believe that Arnold & Porter
is likely to be one of them.
Also, in light of changing market conditions for legal services, many
firms are now negotiating flexible billing arrangements with clients,
including such features as caps and fixed fees. A good discussion of
this phenomenon may be found in a December 4 National Journal article
that is excerpted here:
Trial.com/Litigation News Archive (90% of the way down the page to the
heading Tuesday, December 4, 2001: "Rates rose at Many firms"
http://www.trial.com/Blogger/2001_12_01_Trial-BlogArchive.htm
Google Search Terms:
"billing rates" Washington law firms
://www.google.com/search?hl=en&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&q=%22billing+rates%22+Washington+law+firms&btnG=Google+Search
"hourly rates" "Arnold & Porter"
://www.google.com/search?hl=en&lr=&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&safe=off&q=%22hourly+rates%22+%22Arnold+%26+Porter%22&btnG=Google+Search
"billing rates" "Arnold & Porter"
://www.google.com/search?hl=en&lr=&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&safe=off&q=%22billing+rates%22+%22Arnold+%26+Porter%22&btnG=Google+Search
"Arnold & Porter" hourly fees
://www.google.com/search?q=%22Arnold+%26+Porter%22+hourly+fees&hl=en&lr=&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&safe=off&start=30&sa=N
I hope that this information fully meets your needs. If any of the
above needs clarification, or if any of the links don't work, please
let me know.
mark-ga |