Google Answers Logo
View Question
 
Q: Basis of U.S. Drug Law ( Answered 5 out of 5 stars,   0 Comments )
Question  
Subject: Basis of U.S. Drug Law
Category: Relationships and Society > Law
Asked by: iswhatis-ga
List Price: $10.00
Posted: 03 Dec 2002 21:44 PST
Expires: 02 Jan 2003 21:44 PST
Question ID: 118904
Based on what (if any) objective criteria does the U.S. government
consider the drug Ecstasy (MDMA) to be of the same level of threat
("schedule 1") as Heroin and Crack?  Any concrete, specific
information on any objective foundations of drug "schedules" is a
welcome addition to your answer.
Answer  
Subject: Re: Basis of U.S. Drug Law
Answered By: pkp-ga on 04 Dec 2002 00:36 PST
Rated:5 out of 5 stars
 
Hi iswhatis,
 
The scheduling of MDMA has indeed been controversial! It was a very
interesting question to research.
 
There are three federal criteria for classifying a drug as schedule 1:
  *	Has a high potential for abuse. 
  *	Has no currently accepted medical use in treatment in the US
  *	A lack of accepted safety for use of the drug under medical
supervision.
 
For a complete description of the drug schedules see:
      http://www.sissify.com/juice/dea_schedule.html
 
Here is a quick summary, with several links that follow giving many
more details that follow about the arguments placed forth and policics
of MDMA's classification.
 
Summary
-------------
MDMA was initially temporarily placed into Schedule I by the DEA under
emergency scheduling provisions on July 1st, 1985 just as hearings
were about to commence to determine the appropriate scheduling.  In
May of 1996 the hearings concluded and the judge found no basis for
the schedule 1 classification and recommended schedule 3. John Lawn,
Regan appointee to the position of Administrator of the DEA refused to
accept the judges recommendation. Administrator Lawn decreed that
effective November 13, 1986, MDMA would be permanently placed in
Schedule I, not Schedule III. Harvard Professor Lester Grinspoon sued
the DEA and won. The court vacated MDMA’s Schedule I status, and
remanded the case to the DEA for reconsideration. The DEA's Lawn
quickly stated they had reconsidered the evidence but still concluded
that MDMA belonged in Schedule I. His primary argument was that there
were no *published* studies showing the medical usefulness of MDMA.
Remarkably, the decision has stood since that time.
 
Currently its status is:
 
       CLASSIFICATION	Hallucinogen
       LEGAL STATUS	Controlled
       SCHEDULE	Schedule 1
 
The following dates are relevant to MDMA scheduling issues:
7/27/1984    DEA announced that it was moving to add MDMA to the 
                      list of Schedule I substances
7/1/1985       MDMA temporarily placed in schedule 1.
summer 85 MDMA scheduling hearings begin
12/22/1987	 MDMA removed from schedule I because of improper 
                       procedure in DEA's original emergency
scheduling.
3/23/1988	MDMA permanently placed in Schedule I w/o challenge.
 
For a detailed look at the scheduling history of MDMA, check out, 
"The Politics of Medicine: the Scheduling of MDMA"
http://www.cognitiveliberty.org/dll/mdma_scheduling_history.htm
 
This article is an excellent summary of the arguments used for MDMA's
scheduling, as well as the politics involved. If I could quote this
whole article in my answer I would, as I think it gives all the
details you are looking for. Most interesting is:
 
"On May 22, 1986. In a comprehensive opinion, Judge Young found that
MDMA did not meet a single one of the three criteria necessary for
placement in Schedule I. Judge Young reported that MDMA had a safe and
accepted medical use in the US under medical supervision. Furthermore,
he found that the evidence failed to establish that MDMA had a high
potential for abuse. Based on his thorough examination of the
evidence, Judge Young recommended that MDMA be placed in Schedule III,
which would allow doctors to use it in therapy and prescribe it, while
still keeping it unavailable to the public at large."
 
The article goes on to give the reasons that the DEA's John Lawn gave
for keeping MDMA schedule 1, the lawsuit that followed and the
resoning again given by Lawn to regain schedule 1 status.
 
For the complete report of these MDMA hearings see, "UNITED STATES
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE Drug Enforcement Administration
In The Matter Of MDMA SCHEDULING"
 
http://www.mninter.net/~publish/mdma.htm
 
Search terms used: 
why mdma schedule 1 drug
drug schedule Has no currently accepted medical use in treatment
 
I hope this answer meets your expectations!
iswhatis-ga rated this answer:5 out of 5 stars and gave an additional tip of: $1.00
My first time using this service, and you really delivered.

Comments  
There are no comments at this time.

Important Disclaimer: Answers and comments provided on Google Answers are general information, and are not intended to substitute for informed professional medical, psychiatric, psychological, tax, legal, investment, accounting, or other professional advice. Google does not endorse, and expressly disclaims liability for any product, manufacturer, distributor, service or service provider mentioned or any opinion expressed in answers or comments. Please read carefully the Google Answers Terms of Service.

If you feel that you have found inappropriate content, please let us know by emailing us at answers-support@google.com with the question ID listed above. Thank you.
Search Google Answers for
Google Answers  


Google Home - Answers FAQ - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy