Google Answers Logo
View Question
 
Q: limitations of the Theory of Relativity ( Answered,   2 Comments )
Question  
Subject: limitations of the Theory of Relativity
Category: Science
Asked by: jjc1965-ga
List Price: $5.00
Posted: 08 Dec 2002 08:58 PST
Expires: 07 Jan 2003 08:58 PST
Question ID: 121380
What are the limitations of Eintein's theory of relativity?
Answer  
Subject: Re: limitations of the Theory of Relativity
Answered By: googlenut-ga on 08 Dec 2002 14:06 PST
 
Hello jjc1965,

Einstein had two theories of relativity; the “Special Theory of
Relativity” and the “General Theory or Relativity”.

Dave Slaven, Ph.D. of Saginaw Valley State University, (“Dave's
Relativity Page”, http://www.svsu.edu/~slaven/relativity1.html)
describes it as follows:

“The theory of relativity is actually a two-fold work. First, there's
the Special Theory of Relativity, published in 1905. This was
basically Einstein's resolution of some paradoxes involving the speed
of light, and it describes the behavior of objects at very high
speeds. About ten years later, Einstein published the General Theory
of Relativity, an altogether more mind-blowing theory which provides a
more precise description of gravity than Isaac Newton did.”

“Dave’s Relativity Page” contains a very good introduction to Special
Relativity. He also links to a lesson in the general theory of
relativity, written by Nymbus
(http://www.svsu.edu/~slaven/gr/index.html).  In this lesson, Nymbus
begins by stating the following:

“Before beginning this brief article, dealing with the essential
features of general relativity, we have to postulate one thing:
special relativity is supposed to be true. Hence, general relativity
lies on special relativity. If the latter were proved to be false, the
whole edifice would collapse.”

However, it was the limitations of special relativity that lead
Einstein to the development of general relativity.

Frank Wolfs of the University of Rochester describes these limitations
as follows (http://teacher.pas.rochester.edu/Ast102Fall2002/LectureNotes/Lecture08/Lecture08notes.pdf):

"- Special relativity only applies to inertial reference frames, and
thus could not be used to describe anything involving but motion in a
straight line at constant speed.

- Therefore it could not be applied to situations involving forces,
such as electromagnetic forces involving charges and currents (though
it works well for light), or the force of
Gravity."


Wolfs goes on to provide that following description of general
relativity:

"- In the General Theory of Relativity space and time are closely
connected (space-time) and may be curved.

- When particle and light travel in space-time, they follow the
shortest paths between two points (the geodesic). The geodesics are in
general not straight lines; they are only straight if space and time
are not curved.

-  In general, space and time are warped, so that the geodesics are
not straight lines.

- Masses and energies present in space and time determine how space
and time are warped. This process is what we call gravity."


At the Astronomy Café website, in an article titled “Einstein's Cosmic
Fudge Factor” written by Sten Odenwald (Copyright (C) 1991. Sky
Publishing Corporation.),
(http://itss.raytheon.com/cafe/anthol/fudge.html) states the
following:

“In 1917, Albert Einstein tried to use his newly developed theory of
general relativity to describe the shape and evolution of the
universe. The prevailing idea at the time was that the universe was
static and unchanging. Einstein had fully expected general relativity
to support this view, but, surprisingly, it did not. The inexorable
force of gravity pulling on every speck of matter demanded that the
universe collapse under its own weight.

His remedy for this dilemma was to add a new 'antigravity' term to his
original equations. It enabled his mathematical universe to appear as
permanent and invariable as the real one. This term, usually written
as an uppercase Greek lambda, is called the 'cosmological constant'.
It has exactly the same value everywhere in the universe, delicately
chosen to offset the tendency toward gravitational collapse at every
point in space.”

The author goes on to state:

“Soon thereafter, theorists closely examining Einstein's model
discovered that, like a pencil balanced on its point, it was unstable
to collapse or expansion.”


He further states:

“Admitting his blunder, Einstein retracted Lambda in 1932. At first
this seemed to end the debate about its existence. Yet decades later,
despite the great physicist's disavowal, Lambda keeps turning up in
cosmologists' discussions about the origin, evolution, and fate of the
universe.”


The website of Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory includes an
article titled “The Flaws of General Relativity”
(http://aether.lbl.gov/www/classes/p139/speed/fgr.html) which states:

“A compilation of some defects of the conventional theory of
gravitation
It is generally assumed that Albert Einstein's theory of general
relativity is an adequate theory of gravitation. However, although it
has well passed all observational and experimental tests so far, some
theoretical arguments indicate that it will have to be replaced with a
more consistent theory.”

It goes on to list the flaws as follows:

“General Relativity Does Not Respect Local Energy-Momentum”
“General Relativity Predicts Space-Time Singularities”
“General Relativity Failed to Be Quantized”

The article provides a detailed description of each "flaw".


I hope you have found this answer satisfactory.  If not please request
clarification.

Good luck with your studies.
Googlenut-ga


Other references:

Edward L. Wright, UCLA Division of Astronomy and Astrophysics
http://www.astro.ucla.edu/~wright/relatvty.htm

NASA Goddard Space Flight Center
http://antwrp.gsfc.nasa.gov/apod/ap951219.html

School of Mathematical and Computational Sciences, University of St
Andrews
http://www-groups.dcs.st-and.ac.uk/~history/HistTopics/Special_relativity.html
http://www-groups.dcs.st-and.ac.uk/~history/HistTopics/General_relativity.html

MSN.com, “Clarifying Einstein’s rules of the road”, MSNBC News, July
19, 2000
http://www.msnbc.com/news/435007.asp


Google Search Terms:

einstein theory relativity limitations
://www.google.com/search?q=einstein+theory+relativity+limitations&hl=en&lr=&ie=UTF-8&safe=off&start=20&sa=N

"special relativity" "general relativity"
://www.google.com/search?hl=en&ie=ISO-8859-1&q=%22special+relativity%22+%22general+relativity%22&btnG=Google+Search

einstein special relativity limitations
://www.google.com/search?q=einstein+special+relativity+limitations&hl=en&lr=&ie=UTF-8&safe=off&start=70&sa=N

einstein general relativity limitations
://www.google.com/search?q=einstein+general+relativity+limitations&btnG=Google+Search&hl=en&lr=&ie=ISO-8859-1&safe=off

einstein theory relativity flaws
://www.google.com/search?q=einstein+theory+relativity+flaws&btnG=Google+Search&hl=en&lr=&ie=ISO-8859-1&safe=off
Comments  
Subject: Re: limitations of the Theory of Relativity
From: gwagner-ga on 08 Dec 2002 09:57 PST
 
I'm not sure this is the answer you are hoping for, but one limitation
is that I don't quite understand it...
 
gwagner-ga
Subject: Re: limitations of the Theory of Relativity
From: thenextguy-ga on 09 Dec 2002 10:26 PST
 
A few things regarding the comments from the Rochester site:  Special
relativity can, in fact, deal with accelerated motions.  See p. 153 of
Special Relativity by A.P. French (not a bad relativity book, but kind
of old).  French points out that, since acceleration is not an
invariant in SR, it's not something particularly useful to worry
about.  SR can handle it, though, and it can also handle
electromagnetism quite well.  SR and E&M are very tightly linked, and
I don't think there's a thing you need from GR to deal with E&M.  My
understanding is that GR is necessary to knit together the various
inertial frames of people all falling towards a central mass from
different directions.

Also, saying a geodesic isn't straight is not completely accurate. 
It's defined as the straightest path possible.  For example, if you
want to go between two points on the Earth which are both at 0 degrees
latitude, the shortest path (which stays on the surface) is the
Equator.  It may look odd if you view that surface from a higher
dimension (3rd), but nothing confined to the surface is shorter or
straighter.

GR is much harder to test, but just so you know, quantum
electrodynamics, which is SR combined with quantum mechanics, is the
most accurate theory ever developed, making predictions which are
confirmed by experiment to parts-per-billion or better.

Important Disclaimer: Answers and comments provided on Google Answers are general information, and are not intended to substitute for informed professional medical, psychiatric, psychological, tax, legal, investment, accounting, or other professional advice. Google does not endorse, and expressly disclaims liability for any product, manufacturer, distributor, service or service provider mentioned or any opinion expressed in answers or comments. Please read carefully the Google Answers Terms of Service.

If you feel that you have found inappropriate content, please let us know by emailing us at answers-support@google.com with the question ID listed above. Thank you.
Search Google Answers for
Google Answers  


Google Home - Answers FAQ - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy