| If A1, A2, A3, A4, A5 are a random sample of size 5 from a geometric
distribution with p=(1/3)
then what is the Moment Generating Function of M=A1, A2, A3, A4, A5
Also, how is Y distributed. | 
| Clarification of Question by
mms03-ga
on
08 Dec 2002 18:51 PST
 There's a typo in the original question. 
If A1, A2, A3, A4, A5 are a random sample of size 5 from a geometric
distribution with p=(1/3)
then what is the Moment Generating Function of M=A1, A2, A3, A4, A5 
Also, how is M distributed.
 | 
 | Request for Question Clarification by
mathtalk-ga
on
08 Dec 2002 18:57 PST
 Hi, mms03:
Taken at face value it would seem that M is something like a 5-tuple
of values A1, A2, A3, A4, A5, but that doesn't make much sense.
Is it possible you meant for M to be the maximum of those five values?
 or their minimum?  their average?
Please clarify the definition of M for us.
Thanks in advance, mathtalk-ga
 | 
 | Clarification of Question by
mms03-ga
on
08 Dec 2002 19:12 PST
 Sorry for the confusion.
Actually M=A1+A2+A3+A4+A5
 | 
 | Clarification of Question by
mms03-ga
on
09 Dec 2002 01:16 PST
 This is the same question again..but without mistakes this time
If A1, A2, A3, A4, A5 are a random sample of size 5 from a geometric
distribution with p=(1/3)
then what is the Moment Generating Function of M=A1+A2+A3+A4+A5 
Also, how is M distributed.
 | 
 | Request for Question Clarification by
mathtalk-ga
on
09 Dec 2002 07:22 PST
 Thanks for the clarification.  One more question:  When you ask "how
is M distributed?", are you looking for an explicit expression for the
probability density function of M?  It is clear from the computation
of the moment generating function of M that it is _not_ again a
geometric distribution, and the question of "what kind of
distribution" M has does not appear to have any succinct answer.
regards, mathtalk-ga
 | 
 | Clarification of Question by
mms03-ga
on
09 Dec 2002 10:45 PST
 by saying 'How is M distributed' I am merely looking for the name of
the distribution with its parameters.
For Example only, If M was distributed Normally I would say "M has
normal distribution with N(a,b) where a and b are meu and sigma
squared respectively.
 | 
| Hi, mms03-ga:
The geometric distribution is a discrete probability distribution
related to the binomial distribution.  If we have repeated independent
trials X_1, X_2, X_3, . . . of an experiment with probability p of
success, the random variable Y = n where X_n is the first success has
the geometric distribution with parameter p.  Explicitly:
Pr(Y = n) = p(1 - p)^n, n = 1,2,3,...
The moment generating function for a single geometric distribution is:
f_Y(t) = E( e^(tY) ) 
= (e^t)p /[ 1 - e^t(1-p) ]
= p/[ e^(-t) - 1 + p ]
for which see:
[Properties of the Geometric Distribution]
http://www2.kenyon.edu/people/hartlaub/MellonProject/geometric4.html
Now if A_1, A_2, A_3, A_4, A_5 are independently identically
distributed random variables, the moment generating function of their
sum is the product of the individual moment generating functions, see:
http://www.npac.syr.edu/users/gcf/CPS713STAT/node41.html
Thus:
f_M(t) = E( e^(t(A_1 + ... + A_5)) )
= E( e^(t A_1) ) . . . E( e^(t A_5) )
where we have used on the independence of the A_i's thus far.
Since all the random variables here have geometric distribution with
parameter 1/3, we further deduce:
f_M(t) = ( (1/3)/[ e^(-t) - (2/3) ] )^5
Finally you ask what distribution M has.  I don't think that this this
question has a succinct answer.  From the form of the moment
generating function one can plainly see that the M does not have a
geometric distribution or any other easily labelled form that I'm
aware of.  We can however derive expressions for the probability
densities associated with M:
Pr(M = n) = SUM Pr(A_1 = k_1)...Pr(A_5 = k_5) OVER k_1 + ... + k_5 = n
Hope this helps!
regards, mathtalk | 
| Clarification of Answer by
mathtalk-ga
on
10 Dec 2002 17:21 PST
 Hi, mms03-ga:
Thanks again for pointing out that the sum of the five identically
distributed geometric random variables amounts to a negative
binomially distributed random variable.
I made a picture of the five geometric processes running in parallel:
0 0 0 1 ...
0 1 ...
1 ...
0 0 1 ...
0 1 ...
From this perspective it is not obvious that the sum of number of
trials required to reach 5 "successes" would be a random variable with
a negative binomial distribution.
If only I had pictured the processes in "series":
(0 0 0 1 ...)(0 1 ...)(1 ...)(0 0 1 ...)(0 1 ...)
then after eliminating the "tails", the picture would be much clearer.
 It does amount to the same distribution, since waiting for 5
successes in one process is equivalent to 1 success in each of 5
processes.
regards, mathtalk-ga
 |