|
|
Subject:
unix operating system
Category: Computers > Operating Systems Asked by: vpb-ga List Price: $3.00 |
Posted:
23 Dec 2002 13:04 PST
Expires: 16 Jan 2003 03:52 PST Question ID: 132835 |
Explain with suitable examples the facilities provided by any widely available named shell of your own choosing to support: (a) command substitution (b) filename substitution (c) shell script production | |
| |
|
|
There is no answer at this time. |
|
Subject:
Re: unix operating system
From: zhiwenchong-ga on 23 Dec 2002 13:40 PST |
I use bash. briefly: a) command substitution: 'alias' b) filename substitution: symbolic links. 'ln -s' c) shell script production: umm... 'vi script.sh' ? |
Subject:
Re: unix operating system
From: vpb-ga on 24 Dec 2002 04:51 PST |
hi why don't you use ksh, Linux is usually bundled with the 'Bourne again shell' (bash).so use ksh. thank you |
Subject:
Re: unix operating system
From: vpb-ga on 25 Dec 2002 15:25 PST |
hi Maniac Happy Chirstmas Question ID: 132835 i haven't got any better definition i think you can choose cat command you know it will display contents of file and contents of line in the file so on... do it your best and easy to under stand that's it no more complaints thank you |
Subject:
Re: unix operating system
From: zhiwenchong-ga on 26 Dec 2002 14:21 PST |
Oh, well, I only use bash because it's there. There may be better shells out there but I like bash because it's familiar. Even on BSD machines I set my default shell to bash. I don't write sh scripts anymore. I write my scripts in perl -- there are not too many things that i can do with shell scripts that i can't with perl. Besides, perl replaces sed/awk in one line. As for filename substitutions, I'm sorry for the boo-boo. ln -s...pah... what was I thinking?! |
If you feel that you have found inappropriate content, please let us know by emailing us at answers-support@google.com with the question ID listed above. Thank you. |
Search Google Answers for |
Google Home - Answers FAQ - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy |