![]() |
|
![]() | ||
|
Subject:
News Coverage of Afghanistan before/after 9/11
Category: Reference, Education and News Asked by: mschulman-ga List Price: $4.00 |
Posted:
07 May 2002 07:29 PDT
Expires: 08 May 2002 09:56 PDT Question ID: 13580 |
Some time ago, I found from a source I can't remember an analysis which demonstrated how dramatically references to Afghanistan had expanded AFTER September 11 2001. This shows the way the news media do not cover, then cover, then do not cover, events. Can someone point me to the source and pertinent quotations for this information? |
![]() | ||
|
There is no answer at this time. |
![]() | ||
|
Subject:
Re: News Coverage of Afghanistan before/after 9/11
From: abs-ga on 07 May 2002 07:45 PDT |
I think that it is discusting how everybody has seemed to forget about what happened that day 'September 11' i think that the public should be informed on the progress or lack of |
Subject:
Re: News Coverage of Afghanistan before/after 9/11
From: joanne64-ga on 07 May 2002 08:13 PDT |
Hello, There is an article here http://www.msnbc.com/news/696580.asp?cp1=1#BODY called: "Q&A: How 9-11 Changed Media Coverage". Quotes include: "In August, there were just a handful of journalists covering Afghanistan. Four months later, an estimated 1,200 international correspondents covered the United Nations discussions in Bonn, Germany, on establishing an interim government for Afghanistan." Hope that helps! |
Subject:
Re: News Coverage of Afghanistan before/after 9/11
From: mschulman-ga on 07 May 2002 08:47 PDT |
joanne64, thank you for the citation. It does help, though I am still seeking a *quantification* of this. As i recall, it was quite astounding -- the order of magnitude of coverage AFTER so far surpassed before (and, yes, who knew where Kabul was before?). |
Subject:
Re: News Coverage of Afghanistan before/after 9/11
From: mvguy-ga on 07 May 2002 09:44 PDT |
From the Columbia Journalism Review: "American newspapers have carried more stories about Afghanistan on page one in the four months since the September 11 attacks than in the previous four decades." There are also other interesting statistics in that article. http://www.cjr.org/year/02/1/parks.asp However, it's unclear whether that opening statement is a statement of verified fact or merely rhetoric. Perhaps the most thorough study of pre-Sept. 11 news coverage is this document, "Western Interests in Afghanistan and their Consequences for the American People." It details in depth the ups and downs of the New York Times' coverage of Afghanistan, but it doesn't provide a comparison for after Sept. 11. http://www.asap-net.org/archive/new_afghan_us_1.pdf This is also of interest: Rudman-Hart Commission Warns of Terrorist Attack: Why Did the News Media Ignore It? http://www.brook.edu/dybdocroot/comm/transcripts/20020206.htm I wish I had the time to give you a direct answer to your question, because it's an interesting subject. I hope this helps you or one of the other researchers. |
Subject:
Re: News Coverage of Afghanistan before/after 9/11
From: mschulman-ga on 07 May 2002 14:18 PDT |
mvguy, that citation goes in the right direction for what I seek, and I thank you. I remember a still more specifc enumeration, but this will do if I can't get that one. Thanks again. |
If you feel that you have found inappropriate content, please let us know by emailing us at answers-support@google.com with the question ID listed above. Thank you. |
Search Google Answers for |
Google Home - Answers FAQ - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy |