I have come across an all-natural way to increase female sexual
response, through a very particular diet and special exercise. There
is no hope of getting funding for a double-blind placebo-controlled
study because there are too many variables and the approach is not
patentable. Also, one of the first steps is to eschew birth control
pills and antidepressants, so the approach is the subject of some
hostility from the medical community. I am feeling rather discouraged
because while I have some very good anecdotal evidence, I have no
credibility and I am not a doctor or a scientist. Each one of my
steps has excellent science behind it, but no one has examined the
result of putting the five steps together, which is nothing short of
remarkable.
I have tried contacting the foremost urologist specializing in female
sexual dysfunction, I have tried enlisting participants from the
primary online messageboard for FSD, I have contacted the Our Bodies,
Ourselves Boston Women's Health Book Collective, I have contacted Gina
Ogden, I have contacted my midwife, I have posted to Oprah's online
messageboards, I have written to Betty Dodson and Lou Paget and I have
come up with nothing. I have decided that I need to start off with a
biased group of women that would be open to my approach, even though
it would compromise the study somewhat, just to get women to try it.
I am looking for a listing of groups of women
a.) open to talking about sexual matters
b.) distrustful of the medical establishment
c.) interested in healthy living and natural approaches to healing
d.) of menstruating age
e.) willing to take control of their own sexuality
f.) if possible, located in the Boston area but I am very flexible
about location, will travel anywhere in the United States. |
Request for Question Clarification by
politicalguru-ga
on
29 Jan 2003 09:03 PST
Do you need help in finding such a group of women? If not, what is
your specific requirement of the researchers?
|
Clarification of Question by
zaneblue-ga
on
29 Jan 2003 09:11 PST
Yes I need help in finding such a group of women. I have already
contacted all the groups of women that I can think of that fall into
this category and been turned down, so I was hoping to find additional
groups I could contact. I was hoping for some sort of listing that I
could work my way through. Sorry I was not more clear
|
Request for Question Clarification by
websearcher-ga
on
29 Jan 2003 09:18 PST
Hi zaneblue:
Thanks for the clarification. :-)
What would be of great help to us would be a list of the groups you
have already contacted, so we don't suplicate your efforts.
Thanks.
websearcher
|
Request for Question Clarification by
websearcher-ga
on
29 Jan 2003 09:36 PST
Of course, "suplicate" in the previous message should read "duplicate". :-)
websearcher-ga
|
Clarification of Question by
zaneblue-ga
on
29 Jan 2003 09:38 PST
Um, I thought I did list the groups of women I have contacted in my
original question. I apologize again for being unclear. Would it
help to give the five steps? The whole approach is spelled out on my
website, www.orgasmicdiet.com I didn't want to post the URL
originally because I thought it might be construed as advertising,
although I'm not selling anything. But maybe it will help with
narrowing down the search to see what I would want the women to do.
|
Request for Question Clarification by
websearcher-ga
on
29 Jan 2003 09:40 PST
Hi zaneblue:
Please forgive my thickness. I didn't realize that what you wrote
represented a *complete* list of your efforts.
I will attempt to find you more possibilities now.
websearcher-ga
|
Request for Question Clarification by
acorn-ga
on
16 Feb 2003 18:06 PST
First, please understand that I'm not trying to disparage you, your
work or your efforts, but simply to understand.
Why do you personally wish to set up a double-blind placebo-controlled
study...or any study at all...'before the end of the year' or at any
time at all? Throughout the discussion here you say that you're not a
doctor or scientist, you're not selling anything, you already have
"very good anecdotal evidence", have almost been on Oprah, and you
have so much [science behind your ideas] that large research
institutions are interested in conducting larger studies on them".
I understand that you say you want to 'change the world' and want
women to know their options. This is laudable.
But what I'm trying to understand is why you think that a study by you
would be seen as being of scientific validity (and I'm not talking
about 'white coat' validity) or, indeed, any validity at all? It's
one thing for you to claim 'excellent science' but that's easy for
anyone to claim, unfortunately.
Why not work with what you have...a theory and anecdotal
evidence...and write articles for the numerous women-related ezines,
using your name, by the way, and establish credibility that way?
After all, if your goal is to get women to know of this option,
getting the word out seems to be what you want to do, not have a
study...heck, how many women STILL don't know about the G-spot...or
tell their partner if they do...even after the Ladas, Whipple and
Perry study?
FYI - I read your website and was struck by a couple of things. One
was that it didn't seem to be 'by' anyone. The only place there was
even any contact information was on the Message Board page, and that
was only the zaneblue email address. I can understand that you might
want to avoid the bother that could be associated with having a
sexuality-related website, but when your site refers to "the
publishers of this website deny any liability or responsibility for
loss or damage allegedly caused by information on this site" but has
no contact info anywhere at all other than an email address, that does
not speak well as to the credibility of the site.
In addition, while your website makes many claims, there are few
citations/references to support them and almost all of the sites you
do cite are not studies themselves, but summaries with no links to the
studies themselves.
For example, one link is "A new study from the University of Virginia
says many of the newer mood-enhancing drugs, antidepressants, cause
significant sexual dysfunction" but when you click on that link, you
go to yet another page on the same website that is of an online
conference that has absolutely nothing to do with the UVa study.
Another citation summary links to the identical summary in a campus
newspaper.
I can certainly understand your wanting to make your website
understandable by the layperson, but there's nothing really there that
supports your 'excellent science' research claim, even though the site
'sounds' scientific. Also I couldn't even find any anecdotal evidence
on the website that this works or that anyone has even tried it.
Your theory may very well be right on the money but without my
understanding your motivation for running a study by yourself, I can
only think that your attempts to run your own study are not the way to
go.
|
Hi zaneblue:
Please don't feel like you're at fault here. I obviously am not
getting it. I think I may be the wrong Researcher for this question. I
am going to request that my answer be removed by the Google Answer
editors so that someone else can give it a shot. That way my ramblings
won't cost you anything and you will get the best possible service.
:-)
I have appended some of your most recent details below so that they
will be available for the next researcher who tries to answer (the
Clarification Request below will be removed as well). And please don't
be discouraged - I think your question is well within the scope of
this service - we just needed to flush out the details and get you the
right Researcher.
Sorry for the delay and thanks for your patience.
websearcher-ga
**********from customer**************
I guess I should list a summary of the approach
here--first step, give up birth control pills and all stimulants,
including antidepressant drugs, second step, take a regimen of
vitamins (listed on my website) and high dosages of fish oil, third
step, follow a high-protein diet similar to the Zone diet--lots of red
meat, fruits and vegetables, high in saturated and monosaturated fat,
fourth, get the PC muscles extremely toned, very extremely toned,
using vaginal cone weights, and fifth, eat lots of dark chocolate.
I think bisexual women's groups would actually be a bit hostile to the
study, but I will give them a try anyhow. The result of my approach
is to produce incredibly easy vaginal orgasms, and combined with the
high natural testosterone levels that the approach produces, makes a
woman--how do I put this?--almost excessively interested in a certain
part of the male anatomy.
Groups that are primarily feminist groups such as NOW have a large
contingent of militant lesbians--there is much controversy over women
trying to have vaginal orgasms at all, especially in the lesbian
community. Also NOW is very strongly in favor of birth control pills.
The fourth suggestion isn't suitable at all--I'm not looking for
future customers, as I have nothing to sell--I'm trying to get a small
study, maybe thirty or forty women, completed by the end of this year.
I was hoping for women's groups more in line with the ones I had
already tried. Also, as I said, being local to Boston is not
necessary; it would be a nice extra. The other criteria hold much
more weight.
*************************** |