![]() |
|
,
0 Comments
)
|
| Subject:
RC series calculation
Category: Science > Physics Asked by: noggywoggy-ga List Price: $4.00 |
Posted:
02 Feb 2003 09:15 PST
Expires: 04 Mar 2003 09:15 PST Question ID: 156343 |
Derive an expression for the ratio of the output voltage over the
input voltage, Vout/Vin, in the circuit shown in Figure 1, in terms of
the resistances, R1 and R2, the capacitances, C1 and C2, and the
frequency, omega, of the input signal. Use complex representation of the
impedances in the circuit and, thus, express the ratio, Vout/Vin, as a
complex number.
Fig. 1:
+---R1---+
+----+ +----+------+
| +---C1---+ | |
| | |
| +-+-+ |
Vin | | |
| R2 C2 Vout
| | | |
| +-+-+ |
| | |
| | |
+------------------+------+
|
|
Ground
Thanks! |
|
| Subject:
Re: RC series calculation
Answered By: shivreddy-ga on 02 Feb 2003 13:14 PST Rated: ![]() |
Hi,
Thank you very much for your question. I appreciate the innovative
pains you took at reproducing that circuit. I have tried to give you a
detailed analysis below.
Consider the R1C1 arm:
The equivalent impedance value can be calculated this way.
( R1/jwC1 )/( R1 + (1/jwC1) ) --- (1)
where R1 is the resistance. 1/jwC1 is the impedance of the capacitence
arm. Note 1: w = Omega ( the frequency)
Note 2: j = imaginary part operator in a complex number
(1) can be reduced to
R1 / ( jwC1R1 + 1 ) --- (2)
The same analysis done above holds for the R2C2 arm:
The equivalent impedance value can be calculated this way.
( R2/jwC2 )/( R2 + (1/jwC2) ) --- (3)
(3) can be reduced to
R2 / ( jwC2R2 + 1 ) --- (4)
Now in an impedance division network, the Vout = k2/(k1+k2) times the
Vin. Where k1 and k2 are the two arms discussed above.
Hence,
(Vout / Vin) = k2/(k1+k2)
= (R2 / (jwR2C2 + 1) ) / [(R2 / (jwR2C2 + 1) ) + (R1 / (jwR1C1 + 1) )]
= R2 / { R2 + R1 [(jwR2C2 + 1)/(jwR1C1 + 1)] }
= R2(jwR1C1 + 1) / { R2(jwR1C1 + 1) + R1(jwR2C2 + 1) }
= (R2 + jwR1R2C1) / { (R1 + R2) + jwR1R2 (C1 + C2) } -- (5)
This can be conjugated and expressed in the form of a complex number.
If numerical vaules are given it would be easier to simplify further.
I hope this helps!
Thank you once again for your question.
Warmest Regards,
Shiv Reddy |
noggywoggy-ga
rated this answer:
Thanks! Spot on. |
|
| There are no comments at this time. |
If you feel that you have found inappropriate content, please let us know by emailing us at answers-support@google.com with the question ID listed above. Thank you. |
| Search Google Answers for |
| Google Home - Answers FAQ - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy |