|
|
Subject:
How does this site look on *your* browsers
Category: Computers > Internet Asked by: gan-ga List Price: $15.00 |
Posted:
11 Feb 2003 13:06 PST
Expires: 13 Mar 2003 13:06 PST Question ID: 160127 |
I'm looking for someone with access to as wide a range of internet browsers as possible, to report back to me how the main page of a site I am developing is displaying, and to tell me the main points regarding what doesn't appear to work / looks bad. Site has been developed so far using IE6, for a minimum resolution of 800 x 600. How does it look in IE4, IE5, Netscape, Mozilla, Opera, on a Mac, etc. I'm not looking for a highly technical SEO analysis, just a brief overview of what I should be attending to in order to try and avoid alienating viewers using different hardware / software. I just need you to appraise the main page, index.shtml, not any of the secondary pages. Does the loading time seem acceptable; what is your initial impression upon landing on the page from a user's perspective? Thanks. I'll be near my computer for the next 2 hours at least, for the purposes of clarification if needed. Tell me the worst - I have a thick skin ;-) http://www.ormskirkplumbing.co.uk/index.shtml | |
| |
| |
| |
|
|
Subject:
Re: How does this site look on *your* browsers
Answered By: bcguide-ga on 11 Feb 2003 13:45 PST Rated: |
Whoa, Just looked at your site in Netscape 4.7 ... decided to post the answer. All of your pretty pipes and java aps are over on the left hand side. Did you check to see if the Java scripts you are using work on anything but Explorer... most are not cross browser compatible. http://www.chiff.com/google-ga.jpg - here's a screenshot It lookes great in Explorer at any resolution, but anyone using Netscape is not going to be able to make sense of the site, Sorry. Do the search for tools to check compatibility. It's the only sane way to do this... and be very careful with java. Even some Explorer users have it disabled. One more comment - well, two. You have a lot of scroll beneath the end of the text and the end of the page. Unless you planned it that way - take the dead space out. Ideally, your first page shouldn't need any scrolling. You have a little, but it's ok. With the blank space it makes you scroll and there's nothing there until the virus software(?) link. The text: Installation: taps, sinks, toilets water heaters waste disposal units whole house repipe (water, gas, drain) kitchen & bath remodel Service & Repair: all plumbing fixture makes & models water line replacements & repairs frost damage leak detection could be a little larger. Sorry for the bad news... bcguide-ga |
gan-ga
rated this answer:
and gave an additional tip of:
$5.00
Thanks bcguide, bad news was essentially what I was looking for :) - Given me some good pointers there. Thank you for pointing me in the right direction. |
|
Subject:
Re: How does this site look on *your* browsers
From: highroute-ga on 11 Feb 2003 13:46 PST |
My screen is set to 1024 pixels in width. With IE 6 and with Mozilla 1.2.1 (the engine inside the current Netscape versions), I get a pronounced horizontal scrollbar even with the browser windows opened up to full screen (and I do not ordinarily open my browser windows up that wide). But there isn't actually any content out there ... just a length of pipe at the top. Something on that page is taking a very long time to load. I'm on the US West Coast with a high speed DSL connection. In Mozilla I do not see anything inside the loop of pipe, nor does anything happen when I "push the lever". IE6 shows "Installation" and "Service and repair" links there. Even if that worked universally, would someone using a text browser, including a person with impaired vision using a browser that converts printed text to audio, be able to navigate those links? I don't think so. I think it may be wise to avoid the fancy Web page design stuff, JavaScript and the like, just because you know how to do them. Unless you have a need for advanced techniques, why risk having your business Web site keep customers away or prevent them from learning everything they want to learn? The Web is full of solutions looking desperately for problems to solve, but most sites don't need them. Below your paragraph there are huge blocks of vertical black space. I think most people will never find your page's content way down there at the bottom. Your text contains many instances of the phrase "click here". See the following resource at the Web site of the W3C on that subject: http://www.w3.org/2001/06tips/noClickHere |
Subject:
Re: How does this site look on *your* browsers
From: gan-ga on 11 Feb 2003 13:58 PST |
Thanks for your comments highroute - it looks like the majority of my visitors are using some variant of Windows / IE, but yes regarding the point you made about text & audio browsers, that's going to receive some attention ;-) Thanks for alerting me to the 'click here' issue - was completely unaware of that. |
Subject:
Re: How does this site look on *your* browsers
From: gan-ga on 11 Feb 2003 14:05 PST |
bcguide - thanks for the Netscape 4.7 screenshot; I fell about laughing. I *was* a little worried about what would happen outside IE6 with the CSS! |
Subject:
Re: How does this site look on *your* browsers
From: ddelphi-ga on 11 Feb 2003 15:58 PST |
I'm using IE 5.50 and the site looks fine in my browser with the exception of the issues noted above. I do have a few design suggestions for you though. Just so you know, I've designed several websites for companies (one national) and the overriding theme has always been "keep it simple and clean." First impression of your site: The pipes are really clever. Second impression of your site: In addition to the above comments (with which I agree), I would change the font for "Ormskirk Plumbing." It's very blocky and the letters look too fat. I noticed you have a different logo on your van. Perhaps it would be a good idea to scan that logo in and use it instead. This will help keep your company "branded," and I'm sure you paid something for the logo in the first place, so it makes sense to use it here. Also, anyone who may have seen your vans around town will recognize the logo on your website. Also, the picture of the van looks like it was taken at night. I guess it fits in well with the background color (which is a whole other discussion - I'm not a real big fan of white lettering on a black background for a commercial site), but I can't see your logo on the van very well, or the van itself for that matter. The lever is very clever. Perhaps a bit too clever. I mean, it's always cool to have a neat gizmo like that on your website, and web designers and programmers are always very proud of them. But do you need it? Does it detract from the site? My answer is "no" and "yes." First, I didn't even notice it on my first viewing, and I was looking deeply at the site - a lot deeper than the casual surfer. You run the risk of having some very important content missed because a viewer didn't notice the neat gizmo hiding there. Second, in keeping with the directive to keep it clean and simple, the lever just adds an unnecessary layer, which is detracting from the content. An editing note: You have an apostrophe before the word phone in the second to last line of the first paragraph. OK Im through bashing your site! :-) Really not a bad site at all. Just a few things to fix is all. I wish you success with your website and with your business. If Im ever in the UK and have a plumbing emergency, I know who to call! - ddelphi |
Subject:
Re: How does this site look on *your* browsers
From: carnegie-ga on 11 Feb 2003 17:29 PST |
Dear Gan, One group of users you may care to consider is those using BT's internet-access telephone kiosks (in the UK); there are two sorts of these. The older variety, known as Multi.phone, were installed first and only at comparatively few sites, such as major transport interchanges: http://www.payphones.bt.com/2001/multimedia/multiphone.html The newer sort, BT Internet kiosks, are now being installed more generally around the country: http://www.payphones.bt.com/2001/multimedia/internet/kiosk.html I don't know what the browser is on the older sort, but it is certainly non-standard and fails to render many web sites (including even Google Answers) correctly. But its attempt at your site is particularly unhelpful: it makes a complete mess of the pipework and also fails to display (at least in any readable form) both your main title and most of the text of the page. Since the browser won't let me open more than one window, I cannot open Google Answers at the same time and so cannot conveniently describe the result any more accurately here. But you may well wish to take a look at the rendering yourself if you wish to attract custom from potential customers without home internet access. I haven't tried the newer sort of kiosk. I hope this helps. Carnegie |
Subject:
Re: How does this site look on *your* browsers
From: respree-ga on 11 Feb 2003 19:28 PST |
Hello: Using IE 6.0, screen resolution 1024 x 768. You might want to run your page through www.netmechanic.com. You have a few broken links. The page is a little on the 'heavy' side, but not annoying slow to load. Looks fine to me. However, if you set the text to large, it goes outside of the pipes (pretty clear your intent was to keep the text 'within' the pipes. Installation: taps, sinks, toilets water heaters <snip> Lots of 'dead' space on the bottom of your page. Unless there is a specific reason for it, I would recommend you remove it (it'll lighten the page a little). Also, I would rethink having your text run the entire width of the page. It's a little easier to read when its not so side. Hope that helps a little. Good luck to you. |
Subject:
Re: How does this site look on *your* browsers
From: br-ga on 11 Feb 2003 20:12 PST |
Your site looks very good. You already have plenty of comments in which to seek advice. On the site, I like that you give the user enough information on your first page. If it was any more than that, I would definitely not want to read it! Photographs are always great, they give you a look and feel. The van definitely represents your company. Maybe you want to add a picture of a plumbing job that is worth showing? Good choice of colors on the black-colored background. Here comes some suggestions.. Yes-- you do want to attract visitors to your site which they will say WOW!, but since this is a business site you really want to keep it simple and straight to the point by avoiding a site design which is too complex. The lever might be a bit confusing to visitors who arent very good with computers -- just a little hard to see and a different style of doing something. Instead, you might want to consider having a scrolling banner where the user will get all that content without hitting a lever (Also it will attract the eye!). There are many good JavaScript applications at www.dynamicdrive.com. They will tell you if they are cross-browser complaint. Your source code is very hard to read, infact it looks like it was generated. You might want to position elements in a table rather than dynamically. I also noticed that there are several pipe images surrouding the title. Using CSS, you can set one of the image's width to 100% (<img style="width: 100%" .. >) therefore the user's browser can be any size and it would be adjusted automatically. (This would only work in a table because your image would span across the entire browser otherwise). You really need to avoid dynamic positioning of elements because it's going to be more work than you need to be all browser compliant. Although this might seem easier (if you are using a web development tool), it will make your website much cleaner, smaller, and easier to handle. Great site! Best of luck, br :) |
Subject:
Re: How does this site look on *your* browsers
From: answerfinder-ga on 12 Feb 2003 02:06 PST |
Here's my contribution. I viewed it with images off and couldn't read the telephone number on the home page nor on his business card. answerfinder-ga |
Subject:
Re: How does this site look on *your* browsers
From: gan-ga on 12 Feb 2003 05:08 PST |
Just like to thank everyone who has taken the time to comment - appreciated. I have plenty to be getting on with! |
Subject:
Re: How does this site look on *your* browsers
From: owain-ga on 12 Feb 2003 15:01 PST |
Why do you have 1. underlined blue text 2. underlined blue text with [] round it 3. grey text with [] round it as links? A link is a link is a link is a link and should be the same colour and style throughout the site. I checked the site using W3C validator and it validated as correct HTML4 transitional. That's the good bit. The "Check if you're in my area - view my" text in grey on a white background is almost invisible, so however you did it is incompatible with a user selecting a user style sheet. On your map page you have a map with no proper ALT text and two links labelled "click here". They don't go to the same target, so they shouldn't have the same text. Some browsers - Opera included - can present links out of context, which is very useful when skimming through a page. "click here" should be avoided on websites as it excludes people who do not or cannot use mice or similar navigation systems. Links are obvious to all but the most experienced of Web users, and telling users "click here" assumes they know nothing about how their browser works. It's superfluous and condescending. Not everyone has sufficient manual dexterity to use a mouse. Not everyone can or will be using a visual screen. The web was designed to be accessible regardless of the technology used. The Service Area text list should be better linked, it should be set in correct case, and probably ordered in some logical way. You also need to bear in mind that people may be browsing with scripting disabled, either through compatability or security issues or because scripting does not work well with screen readers. You should really give the site a thorough check for accessibility. There are hints at http://www.rnib.org.uk/digital/hints.htm with useful links therefrom. Bear in mind in the UK the Disability Discrimination Act does apply to websites. Owain |
Subject:
Re: How does this site look on *your* browsers
From: gan-ga on 13 Feb 2003 07:26 PST |
Thanks Owain. Appreciated your inputs. At some point I will be testing with 'unplugged mouse & switched off graphics' - lot of work to do yet though :) |
Subject:
Re: How does this site look on *your* browsers
From: sparky4ca-ga on 22 Feb 2003 16:27 PST |
Hi, I just wanted to add some comments: First, I guess you've done some "repairs" as my Netscape 4.7 doesn't look anything like the screen shot lsited above. Now the comments: The pipes are "seated" correctly. The lever works, but even though I was expecting it to be there, it didn't sink in immediately that there even was a lever, let alone that it works. (On a side note, due to what I believe is an error in Netscape, when the lever is clicked, the cursor doens't stop being an hourglass until moved away from the lever.) Defineately try to get the van logo for your heading. While the colour you've chosen for hyperlinks does stand out, it is non-standard (especially since they aren'y underlined) and this could caus eproblems with anything trying to interpret the page (like speech recognition software or text to speech converters.) Also, the headings above your bullet list shouldn't be the same as the links when they aren't links. That can add confusion. Links are supposed to be underlined, and blue, and I would recommend sticking with that. While everything seemed to be working, Netscape was reporting a javascript error when your page first finished loading. I didn't see that again after clicking on the lever. Sometimes Netscape does that to indicate something as simple as a missing or extra semicolcon, or other minor things it doens't like. Your map page- I love the way the map fades into the black at the edges. I would, however, have either a little map of England next to it with a box indicating what we're looking at, or something along those lines, to put the map into reference. Of course, since I'm in Canada, not England, that may be simply my problem for not really being 100% sure where Ormskirk and Lancashire are. Be prepared for visitors from all over the world though, and you don't want to waste there time if they don't realize they're not looking at a site close to home. The counter was still taking quite a long time to load. Perhaps you should check out http://www.sitemeter.com instead? Also, there was a lot of space to scroll down and then find nothing but the little box for the counter. Main page again- You still have an apostrophe before phone. All the info below your name, needs to be cleaned up a bit. You have a little envelope that links to a javascript "tell_friend" but without clicking, or pointing at it and reading the alt-text, it's not clear what the envelope is for. Also, the lines of links and information don't flow well to the reader. There needs to be some sort of dividers between links, and maybe brighten it up a bit, or make it larger. I have a feeling a lot of people aren't going to read the areas. You have some interesting ideas on the site. You need to have a copyright notice, and since you have at least one area that collects email addresses (the tell a friend thing) you need to have a privay policy. Check out http://truste.org for a good sample (you can see my versions of it at http://ww.compusmartvan.com and http://www.discountgifts.ca as well.) Also http://www.p3ptoolbox.org has some interesting info about making your website compatible with personal privacy protection tools. You have a couple of links that pop-open new windows. That's not good unless you give some warning. On your contact card, it sounds like it's supposed to print automatically, but didn't. Beside your name is a little blue blob that when clicked opened up a stats4all page for your home page. For some reason, it wasn't showing any traffic before today. Really disturbing was the list of IP addresses of your visitors. There was mine at the top. And that's another reason why you need a privacy policy, so people know you're collecting IP addresses. The collecting them isn't all that bad, but the displaying them is. The contact card says: "Card available to UK visitors 8am - 10pm 24 hour service " Which I didn't really understand. How can the card only be available to UK visitors, and only at certain hours? I did a couple of quick checks: without images, the main page looks fine and makes sense. None of the images actually showed ALT-text until I hovered over them, but theree was a Title across the title area that was separate from the ALT tag for the title graphic. It sure looked funny seeing an image placeholder icon scrolling left to right where your flame thing is.! With javascript off, you have a white background. There is a vertical pipe going down the entire left habd side, which makes some of the text difficult to read. Every image is stakced up somewhere along the left edge of the screen. You might consider using tables to display your images instead of javascript/CSS. Unfortuneatly these days, with the security problems, and innundating waves of pop-ups, pop-unders, interstitials, and obtrusive over the text ads, as well as animated and sound banners, a lot of people browse with javascript off. |
Subject:
Re: How does this site look on *your* browsers
From: gan-ga on 22 Feb 2003 17:42 PST |
Thanks sparky4ca-ga - your time appreciated. Some very notable points there which I'll be attending to! |
If you feel that you have found inappropriate content, please let us know by emailing us at answers-support@google.com with the question ID listed above. Thank you. |
Search Google Answers for |
Google Home - Answers FAQ - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy |