Google Answers Logo
View Question
 
Q: Size of stars and planets ( No Answer,   3 Comments )
Question  
Subject: Size of stars and planets
Category: Science > Astronomy
Asked by: douglascarey-ga
List Price: $3.00
Posted: 27 Feb 2003 10:41 PST
Expires: 04 Mar 2003 06:41 PST
Question ID: 167907
Can a rocky planet (like earth) be larger than a star? If not, why
not? Can a star start out as a planet (a non-gaseous one like earth)
and then grow so large as it accretes more mass that it actually turns
into a star when nuclear fusion ignites?
Answer  
There is no answer at this time.

Comments  
Subject: Re: Size of stars and planets
From: thenextguy-ga on 27 Feb 2003 14:20 PST
 
As an object gets larger, it becomes more and more able to capture and
hold gases which move quickly (hydrogen and helium).  Once they can be
held, because they are the vast majority of matter, you could keep
accumulating them until you form a star.  Of course, if something else
nearby becomes a star first, it's quite likely to blow away all the
other gas around when it ignites.  The outer planets formed where
temperatures (and therefore the speeds of hydrogen/helium atoms) were
low, so it was easier for them to grow by grabbing the nearby gas. 
Earth and the inner planets got too warm while they were too small to
hold on to these gases.

Hope that helps. No charge ;-)
Subject: Re: Size of stars and planets
From: xarqi-ga on 27 Feb 2003 15:32 PST
 
First part: yes.  Consider the case of a neutron star - it may be as
small as 30km in diameter.  Something more Earth-like?  How about
white dwarves - approximately the same size.

Second part: probably.  Consider Jupiter - a wannabe star if ever
there was one.  It radiates more energy than it receives from the sun.
 Let it accrete a bit more gas, and who knows.

Cool question BTW.
Subject: Re: Size of stars and planets
From: iang-ga on 28 Feb 2003 05:45 PST
 
If we define a star as being capable of sustained nuclear fusion, the
minimum mass is about 80 times that of Jupiter (I'm ignoring brown
dwarfs since they can't sustain fusion). This is equivalent to more
than 25,000 Earth masses. The size, however, wouldn't be much more
than Jupiter, which is a bit over 1400 times the volume of Earth. So,
making the huge assumption that a rocky planet that size wouldn't
collapse under its own gravity, you could have a rocky planet larger
than a star.

I'll guess no for the 2nd question, on the grounds that there wouldn't
be enough material laying around to be accreted. Once fusion starts in
a star the solar wind does a pretty good job of blowing away anything
that's not already a sizeable lump.

Ian G.

Important Disclaimer: Answers and comments provided on Google Answers are general information, and are not intended to substitute for informed professional medical, psychiatric, psychological, tax, legal, investment, accounting, or other professional advice. Google does not endorse, and expressly disclaims liability for any product, manufacturer, distributor, service or service provider mentioned or any opinion expressed in answers or comments. Please read carefully the Google Answers Terms of Service.

If you feel that you have found inappropriate content, please let us know by emailing us at answers-support@google.com with the question ID listed above. Thank you.
Search Google Answers for
Google Answers  


Google Home - Answers FAQ - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy