|
|
Subject:
Size of stars and planets
Category: Science > Astronomy Asked by: douglascarey-ga List Price: $3.00 |
Posted:
27 Feb 2003 10:41 PST
Expires: 04 Mar 2003 06:41 PST Question ID: 167907 |
Can a rocky planet (like earth) be larger than a star? If not, why not? Can a star start out as a planet (a non-gaseous one like earth) and then grow so large as it accretes more mass that it actually turns into a star when nuclear fusion ignites? |
|
There is no answer at this time. |
|
Subject:
Re: Size of stars and planets
From: thenextguy-ga on 27 Feb 2003 14:20 PST |
As an object gets larger, it becomes more and more able to capture and hold gases which move quickly (hydrogen and helium). Once they can be held, because they are the vast majority of matter, you could keep accumulating them until you form a star. Of course, if something else nearby becomes a star first, it's quite likely to blow away all the other gas around when it ignites. The outer planets formed where temperatures (and therefore the speeds of hydrogen/helium atoms) were low, so it was easier for them to grow by grabbing the nearby gas. Earth and the inner planets got too warm while they were too small to hold on to these gases. Hope that helps. No charge ;-) |
Subject:
Re: Size of stars and planets
From: xarqi-ga on 27 Feb 2003 15:32 PST |
First part: yes. Consider the case of a neutron star - it may be as small as 30km in diameter. Something more Earth-like? How about white dwarves - approximately the same size. Second part: probably. Consider Jupiter - a wannabe star if ever there was one. It radiates more energy than it receives from the sun. Let it accrete a bit more gas, and who knows. Cool question BTW. |
Subject:
Re: Size of stars and planets
From: iang-ga on 28 Feb 2003 05:45 PST |
If we define a star as being capable of sustained nuclear fusion, the minimum mass is about 80 times that of Jupiter (I'm ignoring brown dwarfs since they can't sustain fusion). This is equivalent to more than 25,000 Earth masses. The size, however, wouldn't be much more than Jupiter, which is a bit over 1400 times the volume of Earth. So, making the huge assumption that a rocky planet that size wouldn't collapse under its own gravity, you could have a rocky planet larger than a star. I'll guess no for the 2nd question, on the grounds that there wouldn't be enough material laying around to be accreted. Once fusion starts in a star the solar wind does a pretty good job of blowing away anything that's not already a sizeable lump. Ian G. |
If you feel that you have found inappropriate content, please let us know by emailing us at answers-support@google.com with the question ID listed above. Thank you. |
Search Google Answers for |
Google Home - Answers FAQ - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy |