![]() |
|
![]() | ||
|
Subject:
"Professional Fighter's Information"
Category: Sports and Recreation Asked by: xxxldaddy2000-ga List Price: $50.00 |
Posted:
11 Mar 2003 16:37 PST
Expires: 10 Apr 2003 17:37 PDT Question ID: 174887 |
I want all the known information concerning Johnny Palmer, a professional lightweight fighter from Columbus, Ohio who fought in the late 1950s and early 1960s as to who he fought; his won/lost record; where he fought; and, what his ranking was in the top ten, if any. |
![]() | ||
|
There is no answer at this time. |
The following answer was rejected by the asker (they reposted the question). | |
Subject:
Re: "Professional Fighter's Information"
Answered By: pafalafa-ga on 11 Mar 2003 18:35 PST Rated: ![]() |
Thanks for your question. According to the Boxing Record Archives site at: http://www.boxrec.com/boxer_display.php?boxer_id=015953 Johnny Palmer, a lightweight from Columbus, Ohio, had an 0-4 professional record as follows: 4/12/1958 against Angel (Robinson) Garcia in Havana, Cuba. Garcia, an experienced fighter, had a 28-3 record, but Palmer went 10 rounds, and lost by decision. The rest of his short career, however, wasn't quite as auspicious. 1/19/1960 against Solomon Boysaw (with a 22-1 record) in Akron, Ohio; Palmer lost by KO in the second round. Palmer fought twice against Len Matthews (34-8-3), once on 4/26/1962 and again on 5/28/1952, both times in Philadelphia. He lost both fights by a KO, in the 1st and 3rd rounds, respectively. ---------- A check on another boxing archives site at: http://www.boxing-records.com/ had no records for Johnny Palmer. ---------- It is certainly possible that Palmer fought more than four professional fights in his career, but if so, they did not make into the internet record books. I also checked old newspaper and magazine articles but again, there was no additional information to be had beyond the four fights listed above. And it is certainly unlikely (I'd go so far as to say "practically impossible") that Palmer was ranked as a lightweight given the record shown. If you have reason to believe Palmer had a more extensive career than is indicated by his 0-4 record, please post a Request for Clarification with any additional information you have. With some new leads in hand, I'll be glad to continue my hunt. | |
| |
| |
|
![]() | ||
|
Subject:
Re: "Professional Fighter's Information"
From: hammer-ga on 14 Mar 2003 04:51 PST |
xxxldaddy2000, On questions like this, the final answer is often arrived at by a dialogue between the Researcher and the Customer. We have no way to determine what you already do and do not know, therefore, we will sometimes present a chunk of information and ask if we are headed in the right direction before continuing. As Pafalafa stated, he considered his answer to be a good starting point, and was willing to continue with some feedback from you. Pafalafa is an excellent Researcher and, had you allowed him to continue, you would very likely have received a through and satisfying answer. I understand that such an experience can be frustrating, but I hope that this will not sour you on Google Answers permanently. Researchers like Pafalafa take the quality of their answers very seriously and would never deliberately "hustle" a customer. Best regards, - Hammer |
Subject:
Re: "Professional Fighter's Information"
From: missy-ga on 14 Mar 2003 05:26 PST |
I don't think it's fair to characterize Pafalafa as a hustler - he did exactly what every other Researcher does. He answered the question as asked. Pafalafa's high quality work is well known hereabouts, to the point where he's had several questions directed specifically at him. I'm quite certain that if you had simply engaged in dialogue with him to let him know what information you already had, he would have been able to find much more information. It's very helpful to the Researchers when a question clearly spells out what information a customer already has - it prevents duplication of information, and lets the Researcher know where not to look. --M |
Subject:
Re: "Professional Fighter's Information"
From: magnesium-ga on 14 Mar 2003 10:00 PST |
Since the question did not specify that an expert in boxing was required, and merely requested information (which was provided by the researcher,) I think the insulting rating is very harsh. From the Google Answers FAQ: "Your question will be answered by a Researcher. Google Answers Researchers are experts at locating hard-to-find information on the web, and through offline resources as well... All Google Researchers are tested to ensure that they are expert searchers with excellent communication skills. Some of them also have expertise in various fields. Your question may be answered by an expert in a particular field or by an expert searcher." http://answers.google.com/answers/faq.html |
If you feel that you have found inappropriate content, please let us know by emailing us at answers-support@google.com with the question ID listed above. Thank you. |
Search Google Answers for |
Google Home - Answers FAQ - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy |