|
|
Subject:
International Relations
Category: Reference, Education and News > Education Asked by: andresmialdea-ga List Price: $10.50 |
Posted:
18 Mar 2003 13:09 PST
Expires: 17 Apr 2003 14:09 PDT Question ID: 177848 |
What evidence is there that states are losing their influence over global governance to non state-actors? |
|
Subject:
Re: International Relations
Answered By: surajambar-ga on 18 Mar 2003 18:48 PST Rated: |
Hello. A convincing argument can indeed be made that the role of non-state actors in governance is increasing at the expense of state power. Such an argument is made by Irfan ul Haque in Non-State Actors and Global Governance (http://www.g24.org/haque.pdf) and by Volker Rittberger in his book _Global Governance and the United States System_ (abstract available: http://www.unu.edu/unupress/new/ab-globalgov.html). Certainly it is true that transnational organizations do have an increased role in global governance. The World Bank's insistence upon states to enact certain policies in order that they continue to receive loans and aid is an obvious example. Taking out these loans is of course technically the choice of the leaders of the states, but the consequences of these choices certainly include a loss of influence over governance for future leaders and especially for the people of that state. Information about just one instance of a World Bank decision overruling one of a government (Mozambique) is available at http://allafrica.com/stories/199710260030.html. Other examples are rather easy to find on sites critical of World Bank policies. However, it is important to not that the major point of authors like ul Haque is that these transnational non-state actors actually wind up benefitting rich nations (and thus their governments) and can also be considered, if one wishes to portray them in this way, as an extension of the rich nations' governments' power. This would be, if it is the case, merely a reflection of the relationship between governments and businesses that has long existed. See the history of the British East India Company (http://www.wikipedia.org/wiki/British_East_India_Company) for an example. At the same time, it is clear that these actors think of themselves as independent and act as if they are. Please let me know if you need clarification before you rate this answer. Thanks for your quesiton and thanks for using Google Answers. Search strategy: global governance non state actors ://www.google.com/search?hl=en&lr=&ie=ISO-8859-1&q=global+governance+non+state+actors&btnG=Google+Search surajambar-ga |
andresmialdea-ga rated this answer: |
|
Subject:
Re: International Relations
From: neilzero-ga on 20 Mar 2003 10:23 PST |
Some, not all, consevatives and right wingers agree that freedom is being userped by rich and powerful internationalists. Few Democrats nor liberals are of this opinion. In my city of almost a million persons (Jacksonville, Florida), the local school board seems to rubber stamp whatever our mayor wants often 22 to nothing. Anti mayor debate is rarely even tolerated by the school board and some other groups that should be independent, or at least debate the pros and cons. Some of these programs are based on international objectives, so it appears we rushing toward a world dictatorship controlled by mostly by rich and powerful internationalists. Try conspiracy theories in a search engine. Much of this is nonsense designed to cause us to reject all conspiracies, but I believe our planet is heading toward big trouble. Do you think anyone with any authority reads any of the letters or E-mails we send the UN,WTO,NATO,GATT,NAFTA,CFR,Bildabergers, or Club at Rome? |
If you feel that you have found inappropriate content, please let us know by emailing us at answers-support@google.com with the question ID listed above. Thank you. |
Search Google Answers for |
Google Home - Answers FAQ - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy |