Hello and thanks for the interesting question.
I believe you are thinking of the three kinds of creator or artist
described in Plato's "Republic": God, the craftsman and the painter.
According to this system, God would be equivalent to your "creating
from nothing", the craftsman - a carpenter in his example - is
"creating from what exists" and the third artist is the painter who,
as a mere imitator, is not classified as a true creator. (A very
controversial view in our culture, I think!)
Plato used beds to illustrate his point: the concept of a bed
originating from God, an actual bed made by a carpenter and a
representation, or imitation, of a bed painted by an artist.
"Well then, here are three beds: one existing in nature, which is made
by God, as I think that we may say --for no one else can be the maker?
No.
There is another which is the work of the carpenter?
Yes.
And the work of the painter is a third?
Yes.
Beds, then, are of three kinds, and there are three artists who
superintend them: God, the maker of the bed, and the painter?
Yes, there are three of them.
God, whether from choice or from necessity, made one bed in nature and
one only; two or more such ideal beds neither ever have been nor ever
will be made by God.
Why is that?
Because even if He had made but two, a third would still appear behind
them which both of them would have for their idea, and that would be
the ideal bed and the two others.
Very true, he said.
God knew this, and He desired to be the real maker of a real bed, not
a particular maker of a particular bed, and therefore He created a bed
which is essentially and by nature one only.
So we believe.
Shall we, then, speak of Him as the natural author or maker of the
bed?
Yes, he replied; inasmuch as by the natural process of creation He is
the author of this and of all other things.
And what shall we say of the carpenter --is not he also the maker of
the bed?
Yes.
But would you call the painter a creator and maker?
Certainly not.
Yet if he is not the maker, what is he in relation to the bed?
I think, he said, that we may fairly designate him as the imitator of
that which the others make."
"THE REPUBLIC", by Plato
translated by Benjamin Jowett
(as posted on the Internet Classics Archive at MIT)
BOOK X: 595a - 608b
[sections 10, 11 and 12]
"(Note: speeches in the dialogue have been numbered simply in order to
permit easy reference in class discussion. They are not part of the
original text and they do not mark distinctions of content. )"
http://www.msu.org/intro/content_intro/texts/plato/republic5.html#comm20
You might be interested in these comments combined with direct
quotations from Plato:
"Plato on Imitation"
Republic 595c-608b
Prof. Eric Steinhart
http://www.wpunj.edu/cohss/philosophy/courses/phil399/PLATO.HTM
You'll quite often find this discussed as the "three beds" idea. If
you're interested in more commentary, you should find it amongst these
search results:
://www.google.co.uk/search?hl=en&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&q=plato++%22three+beds%22&btnG=Google+Search&meta=
There are, of course, many translations and commentaries on the
"Republic" in libraries and bookstores. I haven't found anything
specifically about this concept of three kinds of art/creativity but
here's one introduction to Plato's philosophy which has sections on
art and imitation.
An Introduction to Plato's Republic, by Julia Annas. OUP (1981)
(See the 'look inside' feature and click on 'index'.)
http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/0198274297/qid=1048855882/sr=1-10/ref=sr_1_10/104-4837228-6150320?v=glance&s=books
I hope this is helpful. Please ask if anything needs clarification,
and I'll do my best.
Leli
search strategy
I had a feeling it was Plato and started with:
Plato "three kinds"
://www.google.co.uk/search?q=plato+%22three+kinds%22+&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&hl=en&btnG=Google+Search&meta=
My next search was:
Plato "three kinds" bed artists Republic
://www.google.co.uk/search?hl=en&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&q=plato+%22three+kinds%22++bed+artists+republic&btnG=Google+Search&meta= |
Clarification of Answer by
leli-ga
on
28 Mar 2003 09:09 PST
Thanks for getting back to me.
I'm sorry my answer doesn't quite match your sense of what you're
after. At first glance, Plato's categories of artist seem to match
your requirements quite well: "creating from nothing", "creating from
what exists" and so on.
Broadening this out to look at creation too, I imagine what you are
remembering derives from either Plato or Aristotle; but of course they
have been so influential that their ideas, with slight variations,
turn up all over the place.
Aristotle was inspired by Plato, his teacher, but developed his own
philosophy too. They were both rather inclined to put things into
categories, especially three kinds of this or that, and naturally both
thinkers discussed topics with a huge scope. Creation is inevitably
mentioned in various different contexts.
When Aristotle discussed change, he was commenting on the process of
creation/creativity:
"According to Aristotle every change involves three factors: (1) a
feature or form that exists as a result of change; (2) the earlier
absence of this form; and (3) the matter that was always there but
which, as a result of the change, is now characterized by the form in
question. In the case of a statue the three factors are the form of
the statue; its previous lack of form; and the material from which it
was made."
://www.google.co.uk/search?q=cache:XPeF5MP13MgC:chemistry.mtu.edu/PAGES/HISTORY/aristotle.html++aristotle+three+substance+OR+substances&hl=en&ie=UTF-8
He also had a view of the cosmos and creation which divided the
universe into three 'substances':
"Within the universe there are three kinds of substance: 1) that which
is sensible and perishable (plants and animals), 2) that which is
sensible but not perishable (heavenly bodies), and 3) that which is
neither sensible nor perishable (the rational soul in man and in
God)--and is thus 'eternal.'"
http://www.newgenevacenter.org/biography/aristotle2.htm#departure
Both philosophers' ideas have been discussed by hundreds of people
over the centuries and each individual scholar has put his own shade
of meaning on the metaphysics, theology, aesthetic theory etc. It may
be that you have read something that tied Plato's ideas about artists
into some broader view of creation, or perhaps something analyzing
Aristotle's thoughts on creation.
I don't know of, nor have I been able to find, any well-known
threesome of Greek or Latin words describing different kinds of
creativity. It seems possible that one particular commentator might
have devised a set of three words to help with interpreting Plato's
and/or Aristotle's texts.
Hoping this helps, I wish you good luck with your studies.
If you want a good online source of classical texts translated into
English, try the Perseus project:
http://www.perseus.tufts.edu/cache/perscoll_Greco-Roman.html#text1
They include Plato's "Timaeus", sometimes called his "creation story".
Regards - Leli
|