![]() |
|
![]() | ||
|
Subject:
Are hands-free car phones safer
Category: Reference, Education and News Asked by: gadlen-ga List Price: $17.00 |
Posted:
29 Mar 2003 02:11 PST
Expires: 28 Apr 2003 03:11 PDT Question ID: 182750 |
Are hands-free cell phones safer to use in cars than non-hands-free phones? Specifically, compare the number of serious accidents and fatalities of two groups: accidents where driver hands-free cell-phone usage was determined to be at least a contributing factor vs. driver non-hands-free cell phone usage being determined to be at least a contributing factor. There is lots of general advice on this subject floating around mainly advocating hands-free and "abstinence", but my initial research has yet to find that hands-free cell phones are any safer. Thanks! |
![]() | ||
|
There is no answer at this time. |
![]() | ||
|
Subject:
Re: Are hands-free car phones safer
From: kemlo-ga on 29 Mar 2003 04:37 PST |
The trouble is that very few dead people will own up to using a phone at the time of their accident |
Subject:
Re: Are hands-free car phones safer
From: gadlen-ga on 29 Mar 2003 10:13 PST |
>The trouble is that very few dead people will own up to using a phone >at the time of their accident You bring up 2 important issues: - People are reluctant to admit inattention due to cell phone usage. - Dead men tell no tales. On the first point, hopefully the question, a comparison between non-hands-free and hands-free will get past that. The educated guess is that the two groups would be about as likely to admit cell-phone inattention. For example, if both groups admitted inattention (or the inattention was somehow found out) only 30% of the time, the comparison would still be valid; we could still determine which mode is more dangerous. On the second point, there will still be a decent amount of reporting. Actually, it's likely that this reporting would be higher, since the person that was on the line with the now deceased person has less incentive to hide the inattention, and this person will also be likely to come forward, wanting to relay their story about their last minutes with the deceased to family and emergency personnel. Similar to my first point, it's probably reasonable to assume that an equal percentage of both groups would be represented. So all we're missing now are the reporting statistics from both groups. |
Subject:
Re: Are hands-free car phones safer
From: pinkfreud-ga on 29 Mar 2003 10:31 PST |
I have not found recent accident statistics comparing the two groups. Here you will find some related information that may be useful: "In sum, we found that conversing on either a hand-held or hands-free cell phone led to significant decrements in simulated driving performance. We suggest that the cellular phone use disrupts performance by diverting attention to an engaging cognitive context other than the one immediately associated with driving. Our data suggest that legislative initiatives that restrict hand-held devices but permit hands-free devices are not likely to reduce interference from the phone conversation, because the interference is, in this case, due to central attentional processes." National Safety Council http://www.nationalsafetycouncil.org/library/shelf/inincell.htm Here is an excerpt from a 1997 study that found no significant safety advantage for hands-free car phones: "A total of 26,798 cellular-telephone calls were made during the 14-month study period. The risk of a collision when using a cellular telephone was four times higher than the risk when a cellular telephone was not being used (relative risk, 4.3; 95 percent confidence interval, 3.0 to 6.5). The relative risk was similar for drivers who differed in personal characteristics such as age and driving experience; calls close to the time of the collision were particularly hazardous (relative risk, 4.8 for calls placed within 5 minutes of the collision, as compared with 1.3 for calls placed more than 15 minutes before the collision; P<0.001); and units that allowed the hands to be free (relative risk, 5.9) offered no safety advantage over hand-held units (relative risk, 3.9; P not significant)." New England Journal of Medicine http://content.nejm.org/cgi/content/short/336/7/453 |
Subject:
Re: Are hands-free car phones safer
From: chelseaanne-ga on 31 Mar 2003 16:47 PST |
There have been numerous studies done on the effect of mobile phone use on driver performance. Most have shown that there is a negative effect on decision making performance when doing complex driving tasks such as left-turning and weaving. It is more the fact that your attention is taken away from driving than the physical holding of the phone. Therefore phones of any kind are a distraction to driving. The journal "Accident Analysis and Prevention" has published quite a few studies on this subject that are worth looking at. The one I have in front of me at the moment is by Cooper et al Called "The impact of hands-free message reception/response on driving task performance" in Accident Analysis and Prevention vol 35 issue 1 Jan 2003. |
If you feel that you have found inappropriate content, please let us know by emailing us at answers-support@google.com with the question ID listed above. Thank you. |
Search Google Answers for |
Google Home - Answers FAQ - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy |