|
|
Subject:
Mexico and Canada in 'Operation Iraqi Freedom'
Category: Miscellaneous Asked by: 4103-ga List Price: $2.00 |
Posted:
31 Mar 2003 19:51 PST
Expires: 30 Apr 2003 20:51 PDT Question ID: 184002 |
How many troops do Mexico and Canada have fighting in Iraq alongside the United States? |
|
Subject:
Re: Mexico and Canada in 'Operation Iraqi Freedom'
Answered By: websearcher-ga on 31 Mar 2003 20:02 PST Rated: |
Hi 4103: The short answer to your question is "none". Neither Canada nor Mexico are among the "Coalition of the Willing". However, there have been reports in the last cfew days of Canadian soldiers on exchange programs with U.S., British, and Australian forces who are currently in Iraq. The Canadian government assures that while they are in combat zones, they are "not in combat themselves". For more details, see: Canadian troops in Iraq, Ottawa concedes URL: http://www.thestar.com/NASApp/cs/ContentServer?pagename=thestar/Layout/Article_Type1&c=Article&cid=1049151785502&call_pageid=968332188492&col=968705899037 Quote: "About 31 Canadian officers are serving on exchange with British, Australian or American forces. A handful are in the war zone, some aboard AWACs command-and-control aircraft, others in command posts at or near the front." I hope this information helps with your research. If you need any clarification of the information I have provided, please ask using the clarification feature and provide me with additional details as to what you are looking for. As well, please allow me to provide you with clarification(s) *before* you rate this answer. Thank you. websearcher-ga Search Strategy (on Google News): canadian troops iraq mexican troops iraq mexico troops iraq | |
| |
|
4103-ga rated this answer: |
|
Subject:
Re: Mexico and Canada in 'Operation Iraqi Freedom'
From: steph53-ga on 31 Mar 2003 19:54 PST |
Sadly... none |
Subject:
Re: Mexico and Canada in 'Operation Iraqi Freedom'
From: davemb28-ga on 31 Mar 2003 20:20 PST |
Some thoughts (mostly from Ted Rall): Why do we hate France? Doesn't Congress have better things to do than renaming fried potatoes? These so-called policymakers have turned an honest disagreement between two historical allies into a testosterone-charged game of tit-for-tat. France calmly comments- "French fries were invented in Belgium" The trouble began when President Jacques Chirac openly expressed the private beliefs of virtually every other world leader--that George W. Bush's desire to start an unprovoked war with Iraq is both crazy and immoral. It has quickly disintegrated into a ferocious display of American nativism that would be hilarious if its gleeful idiocy wasn't so frightening. Every American schoolchild learns that a French naval blockade trapped Cornwallis' forces at Yorktown, bringing the American revolution to its victorious conclusion. But fewer people are aware that King Louis XVI spent so much money on arms shipments to American rebels that he bankrupted the royal treasury, plunged his nation into depression and unleashed a political upheaval that ultimately resulted in the end of the monarchy. Franklin Roosevelt wrote some fat checks to save France; Louis gave up his and his wife's heads to save America. No two countries were closer during the 19th century. Americans named streets after the Marquis de la Fayette, Louis' liaison with the founding fathers. During the Civil War, France bankrolled the Union to neutralize British financing for the Confederacy. How many Americans remember that the Statue of Liberty was a gift from French schoolchildren? Despite that long friendship, the French remain one of the few groups Americans still feel free to openly insult. A recent Gallup poll shows that 20 percent fewer Americans view France favorably because of its unwillingness to go along with Bush's war on Iraq. Support for Germany, perpetrators of Nazism and the Holocaust (and which also opposes war), holds steady at 71 percent. French-bashing is a nasty symptom of an underlying American predilection for anti-intellectualism. The fact is, France is a good friend and ally trying to make us see reason, and it doesn't deserve to be treated this shabbily. The United States, as led by Bush and his goons, is like a belligerent, out-of-control drunk trying to pick a fight and demanding the car keys at the same time. The French want to drive us home before we cause any more trouble, so we lash out at them, calling them rude names and impugning their loyalty. Sure, we'll be ashamed of our behavior in the morning, after the madness wears off. But will we have any friends left? |
Subject:
Re: Mexico and Canada in 'Operation Iraqi Freedom'
From: sol9-ga on 01 Apr 2003 18:38 PST |
In my opinion, you received a very poorly researched answer to this question. While it is true that Canada is not part of the Coalition of the Willing, it should be noted that Canada has done and is doing far more to aid the U.S. war effort than the vast majority of nations on this list. Canada has several naval ships patrolling in the gulf, the aforementioned exchange troops, and also has some AWACS crews serving in the war. It should also be noted that Canada is getting ready to deploy 2000 troops to Afghanistan, freeing up some U.S. troops for Iraq. (Source: http://www.globeandmail.com/servlet/ArticleNews/TPStory/LAC/20030331/COSANDERS/TPComment/TopStories) I think Americans should take Canadas non-participation in the Coalition of the Willing with a grain of salt, since even if Canada WAS in this coalition, our military contribution would be almost identical to what it already is. Do Americans really think that Canadas official endorsement of their every action is necessary to retain relations between the two countries? |
If you feel that you have found inappropriate content, please let us know by emailing us at answers-support@google.com with the question ID listed above. Thank you. |
Search Google Answers for |
Google Home - Answers FAQ - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy |