In speaking of the period from 500 BCE to 1500 CE, the historian
William McNeill has said, "Contact from one end of Eurasia to the
other tended, despite some setbacks, to increase in frequency as the
centuries passed. This permitted leaders of one culture to borrow or
adapt items from other civilizations which happened to interest them.
Such crosscultural borrowing was, indeed, one of the principal
stimuli to innovation within each separate civilization." |
Request for Question Clarification by
tutuzdad-ga
on
08 May 2003 11:11 PDT
Indeed. As predicted below, I am perplexed my the lack of a question mark.
Regards;
tutuzdad-ga
|
Clarification of Question by
shockna-ga
on
08 May 2003 15:10 PDT
Essay William McNeill's thesis as outlined below. Identify the
innovations.- Astrong case-Evidence
The question is:
In speaking of the period from 500 BCE to 1500 CE, the historian
William McNeill has said, "Contact from one end of Eurasia to the
other tended, despite some setbacks, to increase in frequency as the
centuries passed. This permitted leaders of one culture to borrow or
adapt items from other civilizations which happened to interest them.
Such cross cultural borrowing was, indeed, one of the principal
stimuli to innovation within each separate civilization."
|
Clarification of Question by
shockna-ga
on
08 May 2003 20:05 PDT
Written essay William McNeill's thesis as outlined below. Identify the
innovations.- A strong case-Evidence
The question is:
In speaking of the period from 500 BCE to 1500 CE, the historian
William McNeill has said, "Contact from one end of Eurasia to the
other tended, despite some setbacks, to increase in frequency as the
centuries passed. This permitted leaders of one culture to borrow or
adapt items from other civilizations which happened to interest them.
Such cross cultural borrowing was, indeed, one of the principal
stimuli to innovation within each separate civilization."
|
