Congratulations on your engagement!
The foliage in Washington, D.C. will not show much color as early as
October 11, 2003. So the November 1 date is your better bet, although
it likely will turn out to be a week or so past the peak--too bad you
can't take October 25.
Take a look at this Virginia map:
http://climate.virginia.edu/Climate/foliage_dates.html
As you can see on the map, the colors show early at the higher inland
elevations. Given D.C.'s sea level location, it occupies the
right-hand band and the latest set of dates.
As you noted, Autumn, 2002 featured very unseasonable weather for the
D.C. area.
http://www.nws.noaa.gov/om/presto/presto2002/2002novtable.pdf
October, 2002 was far wetter than usual, with 5 inches of
precipitation for the month.
http://www.nws.noaa.gov/om/presto/presto2002/2002octcover.pdf
But I think you're wrong in assuming that the weather we've had so far
this year will make much of a difference in what the trees do next
Fall. If the Summer of '03 gets its share of rain, there will be good
color.
"[A]mple late summer rainfall and an abundance of crisp, cool days in
the early fall provide for the most spectacular displays of red by
such species as the maples, dogwoods and sumacs."
Leafing Through Autumn
http://climate.virginia.edu/Climate/foliage_vca.html
So let's hope for a wet August-September and a dry October. In the
end, it will be the October '03 rainfall that controls the final
result--not because of the trees' health, but because heavy rainfall
in October will spoil the show if there's enough wind and rain to
knock the leaves off the trees.
But anyway, they won't be looking at the trees--they'll be looking at
the bride!
Search terms used:
"peak foliage" virginia
Thanks for your interesting question. If you find any of my answer
unclear, please request clarification. I would appreciate it if you
will hold off on rating my answer until I have a chance to reply.
Sincerely,
Google Answers Researcher
Richard-ga |