Google Answers Logo
View Question
 
Q: Leagl question about forced easements. ( No Answer,   1 Comment )
Question  
Subject: Leagl question about forced easements.
Category: Relationships and Society > Law
Asked by: jmhines123-ga
List Price: $25.00
Posted: 25 May 2003 09:02 PDT
Expires: 09 Jun 2003 11:44 PDT
Question ID: 208455
I have learned that a local riding club has asked the county to grant
a permanent equestrian easement across land that I purchased 6 months
ago.  My knowledge of their desire for an easement comes from a letter
they submitted to the Planning Board in connection with the public
review process for the neighboring development.

Apparently a prior owner of my land granted permission to the club to
cross my land.  I no longer wish to permit horses on my land (it
drives my dogs nut!)and I certainly do not want to grant anyone any
permanent rights over my land.
 

An adjoining property is going through the process of getting approval
for a new subdivision.  The club has asked the county to require the
developers to set aside land for a horse trail.  Additionally, the
club is also trying to secure easements covering several paths in the
area, including one crossing my land.
 
Can they really get an easement over my objection?  Under what 
circumstances? 

Great answers get great tips from me

Request for Question Clarification by journalist-ga on 25 May 2003 09:10 PDT
Researchers please see this customer's recent question at
http://answers.google.com/answers/main?cmd=threadview&id=208050

The location given by the customer is Sandy Springs, Maryland, in
Montgomery county.  Also, Digsalot has shown one reference to the
query in the previous question:

"Time is a factor in your case.  In Maryland if an easement has been
granted or implied through what is known as "adverse use" for 20
years, then it is a legal easement. 
http://www.houselist.com/forms/que/easement.htm"

I post this so that other Researchers may be assisted in their
searches and not repeat what the customer already knows.

Request for Question Clarification by pafalafa-ga on 25 May 2003 11:25 PDT
Couple of questions, if you don't mind, the answers to which would
help researchers get a handle on this:

1. Easements ordinarily convey with property, and the sellers of the
property (along with real estate agents, title search services, etc)
generally have an obligation to inform buyers of existing easements. 
Was any such information brought to your attention when you acquired
the property?

2.  Existing easements should be noted on your property plat, which
you may have, or if not, is on file with the county.  Anything on
there about an easment?

The county probably has unambiguous authority to compel an easement
for a new development, new subdivision, or a change in zoning.  It's
less certain that they would have the authority to force an easement
on existing property, outside of a dire public need like flood
protection, or another public safety matter.

If you can answer the questions -- and provide any other information
on the situation -- I can perhaps give you some more specific
guidance.  I doubt you will be able to get a definitive answer,
though, unless you ask the planning board point blank.

Clarification of Question by jmhines123-ga on 25 May 2003 14:40 PDT
No easment has ever been established or granted.  They say they were
given permission to cross 10 years ago -- and that is correct - I have
been able to verify that with the prior owners.  I have withdrawn
their permission.

Request for Question Clarification by pafalafa-ga on 25 May 2003 14:58 PDT
The permission given ten years ago most likely creates what is called
an "implied easement".  Whether that easement transfers with the
property (as would a formal easement) is an unclear area of law in
Maryland.  My guess would be that the commission would not issue an
easement as they would not want to risk a legal challenge on an issue
with so much uncertainty -- but that's just a guess.

I've looked for actual cases on this topic and haven't found much, so
I'm posting this as a clarification rather than an answer.

It might be time to consult with a real lawyer.

Good luck.

Request for Question Clarification by journalist-ga on 25 May 2003 19:25 PDT
I'm also curious if the easement was disclosed when you purchased the
property.  If not, you may have legal recourse there as well.  Check
your disclosement papers.

Request for Question Clarification by journalist-ga on 25 May 2003 19:26 PDT
Correction: Make that "disclosure."  lol
Answer  
There is no answer at this time.

Comments  
Subject: Re: Leagl question about forced easements.
From: expertlaw-ga on 26 May 2003 23:32 PDT
 
Dear jmhines123,

In a typical state, there is nothing that would stop a riding club
from making the request they made in relation to the developer's
property - municipalities and counties often extract concessions from
developers in association with approving projects or plats. It is much
less clear that they would have any right to make a claim in relation
to your land.

Ordinarily, an easement may be obtained either by grant (express or
implied), or by prescription. In very simple terms, an easement arises
by express grant when a formal conveyance is made. An easement arises
by implied grant when a conveyance accidentally leaves a parcel of
land landlocked, and a court implies the grant of an easement to allow
access. An easement arises by prescription when a third party uses the
land in a particular manner for a statutory period (journalist's
comment above suggests a 20-year statutory period for Maryland) -
typically with the requirement that the use be continuous, open and
obvious, and hostile (in this context, meaning "without the owner's
permission"). The specific factors which give rise to an easement can
vary from state to state, but in most states the facts you have
provided would not give rise to an easement as there is neither a
grant nor any hostile use of the land.

That is not to say that there may not be special common law or
statutory provisions in your state which apply to easements, rights of
way, or even specifically to recreational trails. That is why I asked
for the basis upon which the easement was requested, in response to
your earlier question - had the riding club pointed to a particular
common law or statutory basis for its request, it would be easier to
analyze its merits. Without that basis, absent a familiarity with
these legal issues under Maryland law, this could turn into a very
extensive research project as a researcher tries to find laws and land
use regulations which may not even exist. It is possible that the
riding club has no legal basis for its request, in which case the
search for any authority governing their request becomes, in essence,
an effort to "prove a negative".

There are a number of actions that might be appropriate for your
situation, but it is difficult to know what self-help or legal
remedies are best suited to your situation without considerable
research into your state's laws and policies. In some states, you
might be able to barricade the trail (of course, in an obvious manner
so as to avoid injury to horses or riders), but other states might
frown on that type of self-help. In some states, it might be best to
bring a legal action to "quiet title" to the claimed trail - that is,
to ask a court to rule that you have ownership and that there is no
easement or right of way vested with the riding club or general
public. However, depending upon your state's laws, that also might not
be an appropriate tactic, or may be expensive. Also, before bringing
such an action, it is important to have a full understanding of the
potential validity of the claim for a trail, as the last thing you
would want is for the court to ultimately rule against you.

I know that quite a few researchers have looked into your question,
which is both interesting and challenging. I am wary of tacking this
question, as it would take many hours to produce what I would consider
to be a reasonable answer, and as the answer, no matter how complete,
may not provide you with any definitive resolution of the questions
you have posed.

- expertlaw

Important Disclaimer: Answers and comments provided on Google Answers are general information, and are not intended to substitute for informed professional medical, psychiatric, psychological, tax, legal, investment, accounting, or other professional advice. Google does not endorse, and expressly disclaims liability for any product, manufacturer, distributor, service or service provider mentioned or any opinion expressed in answers or comments. Please read carefully the Google Answers Terms of Service.

If you feel that you have found inappropriate content, please let us know by emailing us at answers-support@google.com with the question ID listed above. Thank you.
Search Google Answers for
Google Answers  


Google Home - Answers FAQ - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy