I am going out on a big, big limb here with this answer and probably
going against everything GA stands for as well as what you might be
wanting from us, but I think it is very worthwhile to do so.
I have no idea what your current company name is. But since you have
already invested 15 years building the reputation for excellence you
claim to have, there is no reason the name you are now using can't
become the powerful, meaningful and memorable name you want it to be.
With the directorate of your company having the reputation it does,
the power of your current name, whatever it may be, is already
established. It is already meaningful and memorable. You would not
be in the position you are if it weren't and you would not have the
trust and respect you do.
A glitzy sounding name is not going to make your business. Only you
and your directors can do that.
Don't throw away a decade and a half of investment by muddying the
waters with a new name, regardless of how classy it may sound. You
already have name identification to go along with your reputation.
Call it "brand" recognition if you want to.
I can understand if you want to change a logo. I can understand if
you were a new business just getting off the ground.
But you are not a new business. You are one that is already flying.
Don't ground that flight by having to re-educate your prospective
clientel to a new name.
Other companies have done this in the past. And while they were doing
well with the name they had, too often they have vanished from sight
after a name change. To many consumers, a name change does no more
than send up a red flag that something might, just might, be wrong.
And even if it isn't, it can often be difficult to change popular
perceptions.
So, my answer to your question is keep the name you have, regardless
of how unclassy or miserable it may sound to your own ears or to the
ears of your directors.
To the clients which praise you, and to the potential clients they may
recommend because of your good service, your current name already has
power, it is already meaningful and it is already memorable.
It can be summed up in a very old adage: "If it ain't broke, don't
fix it."
Cheers
digsalot |
Clarification of Answer by
digsalot-ga
on
04 Jun 2003 22:05 PDT
Hello again
I will present a selection of ideas and the reasoning behind them
which may lead to a further exchange of ideas and thoughts whereby we
can narrow things down even more. You are making an important step
and it may very well take more than just a note or two, back and
forth, to find exactly what you want.
First of all, with your type of business I like the word "inductions"
as part of a name. It sort of signifies that the quality of your
candidates is sufficient that upon presentation to a client, it is a
"done deal" and that all that is left to do is induct that person into
his or her new position. I have also targeted words such as
"accountability," "competency," "adaptions," and "synthesis" All of
these deal with people, futures and careers in a positive light.
With this first presentation, some of the terms will be repeated in a
series of combinations. Some will probably sound overly simple and
some pompous and stiff. However, I can only apply those criteria to
my own interpretation of things due to cultural influences. I'm not
that familiar with Australian business culture, only US, so perhaps
between us we can work it out.
You may also want to point me in a completely different direction
after going through these.
Dynamic Inductions
Dynamic Adaptions
Dynamics in Adaption
Dynamic Accountability
Competency Recruitment Solutions
Synthesis Solutions
Dynamic Recruitment Solutions
Competency for Induction (s)
Competency in ( or "for") Accountability
Synthesis (in) Adaptions
Synthesis Adaptions Inductions
Dynamic Synthesis
Dynamics in Accountability
Targeted Competency
Targeted Adaptions
Targeted Management
Targeted Analysis for Targeted Adaptions - (or "Targeted Inductions")
Competency Profilers
Competency Profilers & Adaptions
Competency (in) Recruitment Consulting
This initial list is general in nature and does not target either the
textile or property industries. I could find none of them already in
use though you should do additional research from your end. My
resources for such a search are only those found on the web and I'm
sure the record is incomplete.
Please give further direction from here.
cheers
digs
|