Google Answers Logo
View Question
 
Q: Continuity ( Answered,   0 Comments )
Question  
Subject: Continuity
Category: Science > Math
Asked by: fmunshi-ga
List Price: $5.50
Posted: 14 Jun 2003 22:01 PDT
Expires: 14 Jul 2003 22:01 PDT
Question ID: 217496
Show that if f is bounded and monotone on [a,b] that the lim f(x) from
the right and that the lim f(x) from the left exist

Request for Question Clarification by livioflores-ga on 16 Jun 2003 10:44 PDT
Please can you clarify this: "lim f(x) from the right and that the lim
f(x) from the left exist", are you referring to the limits for f(x)
when x tends to a from the right and when x tends to b from the left?
If the question is yes I think that I am in the position to answer
your question.
Answer  
Subject: Re: Continuity
Answered By: mathtalk-ga on 19 Jun 2003 12:05 PDT
 
Let f:[a,b] -> R be a real-valued (weakly) monotone function.  By
monotone function, we mean one that is always (weakly) increasing:

x < y implies f(x) <= f(y)

or always (weakly) decreasing:

x < y implies f(x) >= f(y)

In either case f will be bounded:

min{f(a),f(b)} <= f(x) <= max{f(a),f(b)}

but needed not be continuous.  

[Such functions are, however, of bounded variation and can have at
most a countable number of discontinuities.  In proving that at each
point x for which it makes sense, both a left- and right-sided limit
exist, we are in fact showing that any discontinuity must be a
so-called "jump" discontinuity.]

First consider the case that f is increasing and take point x
belonging to (a,b], so that it makes sense to ask about a left-sided
limit of f at x (or the limit of f as we approach x "from below"). 
Does such a limit exist?

Intuitively the left-sided limit of f at x should be the least upper
bound of f applied to [a,x).  To make this rigorous we note that
f[a,x) has a least upper bound s by the least upper bound property of
the real numbers:

[Least Upper Bound Property of the Real Numbers]
http://www.shu.edu/projects/reals/infinity/proofs/lubprop.html

because f(x) is an upper bound of f[a,x) (use the fact that f is
increasing) and f[a,x) is nonempty (it contains f(a)).

It remains to show that f(z) approaches s as z approaches x from below
(the left-sided limit).  Let epsilon > 0 be given.  According to the
definition of limits, we want to show the existence of delta > 0 such
that:

x - delta <= z < x implies |f(z) - s| < epsilon

To prove the existence of such delta, it suffices to find y in [a,x)
such that:

s - epsilon < f(y)

If no such y were to exist, then s - epsilon would be an upper bound
on f[a,x), contradicting the choice of s as least upper bound.  So
pick some y and let:

delta = x - y

Now, if x - delta <= z < x, then by our choice of delta:

y <= z 

whence, by the monotonic increasingness of f:

f(y) <= f(z)

Combining this with our choice of y s.t. s - epsilon < f(y), we have:

s - epsilon < f(y) <= f(z) <= s

Thus since |f(z) - s| = s - f(z) and:

s - epsilon < f(z) implies s - f(z) < epsilon

we have:

|f(z) - s| < epsilon

as desired.

Having shown the existence of the left-sided limit for monotone
increasing function f, it should be seen that the remaining cases can
be reduced to this.  For if f were instead a decreasing function
(rather than increasing), the prior arguments would apply to -f, and
the existence of left-side limit s for -f at point x is equivalent to
the existence of left-sided limit -s for f at point x.

Furthermore the questions of existence of right-sided limits can be
resolved by applying the results already obtained to function
g:[-b,-a] -> R defined by:

g(x) = f(-x)

For it will be observed that g is monotone increasing (decreasing)
whenever f is monotone decreasing (resp. increasing), and the
existence of a right-sided limit for f at point x is equivalent to the
existence of a left-sided limit for g at point -x.

regards, mathtalk-ga
Comments  
There are no comments at this time.

Important Disclaimer: Answers and comments provided on Google Answers are general information, and are not intended to substitute for informed professional medical, psychiatric, psychological, tax, legal, investment, accounting, or other professional advice. Google does not endorse, and expressly disclaims liability for any product, manufacturer, distributor, service or service provider mentioned or any opinion expressed in answers or comments. Please read carefully the Google Answers Terms of Service.

If you feel that you have found inappropriate content, please let us know by emailing us at answers-support@google.com with the question ID listed above. Thank you.
Search Google Answers for
Google Answers  


Google Home - Answers FAQ - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy