![]() |
|
![]() | ||
|
Subject:
economic efficiency of de-jure and de-facto/consortia standards
Category: Computers Asked by: lipovitan-ga List Price: $25.00 |
Posted:
15 Jun 2003 08:21 PDT
Expires: 22 Jun 2003 01:34 PDT Question ID: 217586 |
What are the differences in the economic efficiency regarding de-jure standards and de-facto/consortia-standards? (de-jure = standards of recognized standardisation bodies e.g. ISO, ANSI) (de-facto/consortia = standards of the W3C, ATM-forum or Microsoft Windows etc.) Questions I'd ask myself when thinking about the main question: From which type of standard does the user benefit the most? Which type of standard is the most efficient for companies and why? Thinking about further devellopment of a standard, the different standardization processes influence the economic efficiency, but how? |
![]() | ||
|
There is no answer at this time. |
![]() | ||
|
Subject:
Re: economic efficiency of de-jure and de-facto/consortia standards
From: omnivorous-ga on 15 Jun 2003 08:25 PDT |
Good topic for a book. |
If you feel that you have found inappropriate content, please let us know by emailing us at answers-support@google.com with the question ID listed above. Thank you. |
Search Google Answers for |
Google Home - Answers FAQ - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy |