|
|
Subject:
domestic legal question
Category: Relationships and Society Asked by: whyme2-ga List Price: $10.00 |
Posted:
20 Jun 2003 22:58 PDT
Expires: 20 Jul 2003 22:58 PDT Question ID: 219965 |
is name calling or inslulting with name calling a crime if only the person receiving the inslult or name heard it? | |
| |
|
|
Subject:
Re: domestic legal question
Answered By: justaskscott-ga on 21 Jun 2003 12:45 PDT Rated: |
Hello whyme2-ga, As I noted initially, we cannot provide legal advice. If you need legal advice on this issue, you should consult an attorney licensed to practice law in California. It appears that pinkfreud-ga has accurately identified the issue as one of slander. Here is a glossary of California law that defines "slander" (as well as the related terms "defamation" and "libel"), as well as a general guide to slander and other aspects of defamation in California: "Glossary" California Courts - Self-Help Center http://www.courtinfo.ca.gov/selfhelp/glossary.htm "Defamation" FACE Intel http://www.faceintel.com/defamation.htm Even assuming that Ms. X could sue Ms. Y for calling Ms. X a whore in front of Mr. Z, it still does not appear that California would charge Ms. Y with a crime. You will notice on the following page a gap in the California Penal Code between Sections 248 and 261. "California Penal Code" Official California Legislative Information http://www.leginfo.ca.gov/cgi-bin/calawquery?codesection=pen&codebody=&hits=20 Apparently, there used to be laws in that space for criminal libel and criminal slander. However, the California legislature repealed those laws in 1991. "Amicus brief in Ivey v. Alabama - B. Overview of current criminal defamation law in the United States" Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press http://www.rcfp.org/news/documents/iveyala.html#IB "Chapter 19 - Assault, Reckless Endangering, Terrorizing" [under Comment to §19.10] Guam Laws On-Line http://www.guam.net/gov/guam-law/09/9GC19.94U.html "U.S Report Under the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights" (July 1994) [see third-to-last paragraph on that page] Electronic Research Collections http://dosfan.lib.uic.edu/erc/law/covenant94/Specific_Articles/17.html I hope that this information is helpful. - justaskscott-ga Search terms used on Google: california defamation slander glossary california defamation slander california "criminal slander" |
whyme2-ga
rated this answer:
and gave an additional tip of:
$5.00
i greatly appreciate the way the analagy was et up and to have the backing to refer to later. I did hav ethe opportunity to speak with an attorney. his comment was protected anbd contigent "ofcourse" however if comment was made to her only as reponse to this action,then only one defaming is the whore. |
|
Subject:
Re: domestic legal question
From: angy-ga on 21 Jun 2003 00:17 PDT |
Regardless, I think the problem would lie in proving that the name -calling took place. |
Subject:
Re: domestic legal question
From: pinkfreud-ga on 21 Jun 2003 06:29 PDT |
I cannot speak to the situation in other nations, but in the United States, insulting someone is not necessarily a crime. Slander is more than just "name-calling"; there must be a deliberate attempt to injure someone's reputation by uttering false statements. Most name-calling, however unkind it may be, is not against the law. |
Subject:
Re: domestic legal question
From: pinkfreud-ga on 21 Jun 2003 06:33 PDT |
Another point: if, as mentioned in the question, the only person who hears the name-calling is the recipient of the insults, I doubt that any case for slander could be made. How can a person's reputation be damaged if no one other than the victim is aware of the insults? |
Subject:
Re: domestic legal question
From: anonymoose-ga on 22 Jun 2003 22:09 PDT |
In California there might be a an applicable section that MIGHT make this a crime (reportable, but probably no interest from any D.A. unless you know one personally). I would read California Penal Code §415.3 it will be stretch any way you slice it but........ The other thing to consider is that Slander et al only apply if what is being uttered is false. While a matter of opinion the shoe might fit. In other words you have one has no recourse if what was said is in fact factual. Whore: 1. A prostitute. 2. A person considered sexually promiscuous. 3. A person considered as having compromised principles for personal gain |
Subject:
Re: domestic legal question
From: justaskscott-ga on 22 Jun 2003 22:18 PDT |
Good find, anonymoose! (And clever name, too.) I had heard of such laws elsewhere, which is why I asked about "fighting words" in my initial request. I suppose that calling someone a "whore" to her face might be "fighting words" -- or words "inherently likely to provoke an immediate violent reaction." But calling a person who isn't in the room a "whore" does not seem, in my opinion, to fit into this category. |
Subject:
Re: domestic legal question
From: echolalia-ga on 24 Jun 2003 23:23 PDT |
the comment would be put under two different sections of the law depending on the comment either; 1. defamation; in which case you would not be held in any legal context, as it was not published or heard by a third party and could not have caused the person involved any loss financially or in their reputation. 2. verbal assault; depending on how extravent the comment was, and if it was intended on threatening or assaulting the person emotionally to a harsh degree then it could be taken as verbal assault, but most people tend not to take such claims to court as the outcome doesn't meet the price of the hearing itself let alone representation. |
If you feel that you have found inappropriate content, please let us know by emailing us at answers-support@google.com with the question ID listed above. Thank you. |
Search Google Answers for |
Google Home - Answers FAQ - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy |