![]() |
|
![]() | ||
|
Subject:
Running a large number of LEDs in series with 110 volts.
Category: Science > Technology Asked by: j4bbbbb-ga List Price: $15.00 |
Posted:
28 Jul 2003 21:51 PDT
Expires: 30 Jul 2003 18:38 PDT Question ID: 236404 |
I need to run as many LEDs as possible using a generator putting out 110 volts AC. The LEDs are rated at 2 volts 30 mA. I will use a full wave bridge to get the most light as possible. How many LEDs should I put in series and what resistance should I add? They will be encased in a 2 inch plastic tube. Do I need to wory about heat buildup? I'd like to run 3 circuits of lights in the tube. These will be mounted where I cannot get to them so I need as much reliability as possible. What kind of protection filtering should I put in the circuit since it will be running on a generator? Is ther anything else I should know? |
![]() | ||
|
There is no answer at this time. |
![]() | ||
|
Subject:
Re: Running a large number of LEDs in series with 110 volts.
From: sublime1-ga on 28 Jul 2003 22:10 PDT |
j4bbbbb... LEDs require DC voltage, so you'll have to convert your AC to DC with some form of power supply. This earlier, related question and answer may also be helpful: http://answers.google.com/answers/main?cmd=threadview&id=208170 |
Subject:
Re: Running a large number of LEDs in series with 110 volts.
From: j4bbbbb-ga on 28 Jul 2003 23:48 PDT |
That is what the full wave bridge is for. If I just run it on ac it will fire on half the cycle. I have a friend who has done this. I am more concerned with how many LEDs to put in the circuit. My friend says I should run about 75 to be safe. This would cover the peak voltages of 150 volts. I'm also concerned about heat buildup since they will be contained in a plastic tube. |
Subject:
Re: Running a large number of LEDs in series with 110 volts.
From: bobthedispatcher-ga on 29 Jul 2003 05:25 PDT |
you may have a bigger problem though running 110 volts DC can be more difficult to handle - insulation, switches, may be different, check specs, and be aware that personal contact will zap you a LOT worse than AC, ikely to be fatal. And if one led dies, they all go out, or try to arc over and burn severely. AC / DC have very different characteristics Howabout a combo serial/parallel circut on a 12 volt DC line (many generators supply this too) 1 pos 12V 1 neg12V and as many strips of 6x2v leds as needed A lot easier to build & fix |
Subject:
Re: Running a large number of LEDs in series with 110 volts.
From: leoj-ga on 29 Jul 2003 08:06 PDT |
What you want to do is to have a rc filter after the bridge. That will smooth the voltage waveform and allow you to maximize the light output from the LEDs. Something to keep in mind is that LEDs being diodes have a very non-linear I-V curve. Once you start conducting, not too much more voltage with give a very large increase in current. Your goal is to make the LED string conduct all the time right in the middle of the safe operating zone. Secondly, the threshold voltage of each LED will be slightly different from it's spec'd number. However, with that many in series, it will average out to be very close to what it should be. More important however is the fact that there is a temperature coefficient on that, so the threshold voltage will be high when the diodes are cold, but lower when they are hot - exactly backwards from what you want. None of this should be too big a problem if you are careful. The reason for the RC is twofold. First, the R provides the stability you want by creating negative feedback, the higher the current flowing, the lower the voltage across the diodes. They will therefore find a stable operating point for a given bridge voltage. Second, the filter smoothes out the voltage fluctuations in the cycle, so their is less of a variation in the operating point, and therefore less stress on the diodes. First, you need to size the resistor so that the rms average voltage from the output of the bridge equals the voltage across all the diodes that you want it to run at, + the product of the current you want times the resistor value. Or, Vrms = N*Vd + Id * R, where N is the number of diodes in series, Id is the total current you want flowing and R is the resistor value in ohms. Next, you need to size the capacitor for the RC filter. If you are using 60Hz as the input source, the time constant should be somewhere in the neighborhood of 30Hz (it is a low pass filter, so that means that by 30Hz, only 50% of the original variation is going to pass, and it goes down by 3dB every octave.) To do that just take the inverse of 30 to get the time constant in seconds, or .033sec. That is equal to RC, so divide the time constant by the resistor you used and that gives the value of the capacitor to use. All that is left is to make sure that peak current the diodes carry is within their safe operating zone, and that they never shut off - mainly because that will look bad. Just recalculate the governing equation using the maximum voltage they will see (That is the average plus the ripple of ~25% of the difference between the average and the peak of the source.) makes sure everything is okay. Hope that helps - I was bored at work and figured this was halfway interesting. |
Subject:
Re: Running a large number of LEDs in series with 110 volts.
From: j4bbbbb-ga on 29 Jul 2003 12:46 PDT |
Can I buy a RC filter to put in the circuit? What size should it be if I am trying to run as many LEDs as possible so that I would not be using a resistor in the circuit.. 60 would give me a drop of 120v, but do I need to worry about the peak voltages or just the RMS? Or does the RC filter handle this problem? I probably want to err toward the safe side. |
Subject:
Re: Running a large number of LEDs in series with 110 volts.
From: j4bbbbb-ga on 29 Jul 2003 19:26 PDT |
The LEDs need 50 mA. Does this mean I should have a 3k resistor in the circuit addition to the 75 LEDs? I was a physics major and it's been a while since my classes in electricity. |
Subject:
Re: Running a large number of LEDs in series with 110 volts.
From: leoj-ga on 30 Jul 2003 08:07 PDT |
You say the LEDs need 50mA. What is the manf and model #, 50mA sounds very high as the needed current. It sounds more like an upper limit to me. (2V * .05 = .1W, since the efficiency of these things in absolute terms is low, .1W sounds like it is near the case dissipation limit.) How did you get to 75 LEDs? It seems you are missing the whole point in what I said, since the point of the RC is to reduce the focus on the peak voltage and put it on the rms avg. Say you knew the voltage of the LEDs was exactly 2V, lit up at 20mA, burnt up at 50mA and was just perfect at 30mA. The solved equation for 50 LEDs gives a R of 667 Ohms, with a parallel capacitor of anything over 60 microfarads. The capacitor should be rated for 200V or more. If you used 75-2V LEDs, giving 150V, and had .05A going through 3k, you would need at average voltage of 150 + .05 * 3k = 300V. The idea is to have the total voltage of the load equal the total voltage of the source, at the operating point you want. What you did was to have the two parts of the load EACH equal some voltage. I guess the good part is that would hurt you, but on the other hand, it wouldn't do anything useful either. |
Subject:
Re: Running a large number of LEDs in series with 110 volts.
From: j4bbbbb-ga on 30 Jul 2003 13:54 PDT |
I don't know what I was thinking about the resistor. I went to the spec sheet for the LED. You are right. It's #ET6-5TS630-30.....30Ma - 1.84v to 2.4v, typical 1.94v. Here is the circuit as I understand it: I can use 60 LEDs in series with a capacitor in parallel of at least 60 microfarads rated 200v or more and a full wave bridge rectifier and no resistor. Does this sound right? Thank you for following up on this. |
Subject:
Re: Running a large number of LEDs in series with 110 volts.
From: leoj-ga on 30 Jul 2003 15:22 PDT |
lol, this is more than I bargained for timewise, but there you go. I would need to know the manufacturer in order for the part number to mean anything to me. The problem with deleting the resistor is twofold. First, in order for the RC to do anything, you need both the R and the C. If you delete the R, you are just using the line resistance, and the bridge resistance to work with. I seriously doubt that that add up to more than a few ohms. So, there will be no filtering of the AC ripple. Second, without the filter you have an input voltage that will swing from 0 to 120*1.414, or ~170V. At 170 volts you are going to have nearly 3 volts per LED. Unless they are able to handle that, you are going to have fireworks. Speaking of fireworks, I didn't think about it before, make sure the resistor is sized for the dissipation level with margin. Also, during the charge up of the capacitor, the resistor with dissipate a huge slug of heat (1/2*C*V^2), so you need to be aware of that. A 3 watt wire wound would be safe, I believe. Is this a home project? If not, have you considered just having an engineer design up a real circuit for you. The correct way to do this is with a tiny pwm circuit to actively control the current though the diodes. The parts would probably cost a total of $10 in quantity. Just be careful any time you are playing around with rectified AC. Good luck. |
Subject:
Re: Running a large number of LEDs in series with 110 volts.
From: j4bbbbb-ga on 30 Jul 2003 18:37 PDT |
Thank you, leoj. You have been incredibly helpful. This is a home project. I'm building a large heart that will be in a 60 ft wooden man for the Burning Man festival as a special suprise. I will use the circuit for 50 LEDs that you described. Thank you very much again. My knowledge of EE has gotten fuzzy and was not that great to begin with. I'm glad that I was at least good for a laugh. |
If you feel that you have found inappropriate content, please let us know by emailing us at answers-support@google.com with the question ID listed above. Thank you. |
Search Google Answers for |
Google Home - Answers FAQ - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy |