![]() |
|
|
| Subject:
Real "health" lowdown on saunas - Infrared saunas vs. regular saunas
Category: Miscellaneous Asked by: schmooz-ga List Price: $20.00 |
Posted:
07 Aug 2003 11:57 PDT
Expires: 06 Sep 2003 11:57 PDT Question ID: 241075 |
I am sooooooooooo confused, so once again, I come to the ONES with the answer: I have searched the Internet to find out if Infrared saunas are hype, better or the same as regular saunas. Everything I find on the Internet seems to be written by those who manufacture or sell the infrared saunas. I read that infrared saunas do a better job at a much lower temperature than the regular saunas. I read that the wood should be poplar not cedar. I read that the number of heaters (the more the better) and others that say that it is the wattage, hang the number of heaters. I read that infrared saunas can spur weight loss - with up to 600 calories spent in 1/2 hour. How do I find real information on infrared saunas: Health benefits, technology and if I decide to buy, a way to approach the decision on which company? I would appreciate any comments too. |
|
| There is no answer at this time. |
|
| Subject:
Re: Real "health" lowdown on saunas - Infrared saunas vs. regular saunas
From: pinkfreud-ga on 07 Aug 2003 14:11 PDT |
I gave this a try, but I could not seem to find info about infrared saunas that didn't come from websites that were promoting them and/or selling them. I am highly skeptical of such sources of data, since it's unlikely that anything negative would ever be presented by a vendor. I very much doubt the weight-loss claims. Other than a considerable loss of fluids (which must be replenished later, since dehydration can be very dangerous), I can't see how sitting passively in a hot room is going to peel the pounds off. |
| Subject:
Re: Real "health" lowdown on saunas - Infrared saunas vs. regular saunas
From: neilzero-ga on 07 Aug 2003 17:40 PDT |
In a sence all saunas are infrared. The wave length distribution will vary some what, so the claims of a lower air temperature may be honest. I think pinkfred is correct; Saunas are not an effective way to lose weight and may have zero health benefits. Used to excess they are dangerious, even fatal. Neil |
| Subject:
Re: Real "health" lowdown on saunas - Infrared saunas vs. regular saunas
From: snsh-ga on 10 Aug 2003 05:13 PDT |
Quick thermo tutorial: There are three common methods of heat transfer: conduction, convection, radiation. Imagine a basketball court. The ball represents a unit of heat. The team (lets say, the 98 bulls) are molecules/matter. And you are the hoop, resting in your sauna. Conduction is when michael jordan passes the ball to pippen, pippen to kerr, kerr to rodman, and rodman dunks it. Convection is when jordan drives the ball to basket and sinks a layup. Radiation is when jordan makes a 3-point jumpshot. Most saunas work by convection -- moist, hot air is circulating towards you. It's not really conduction -- you're sitting on tiles that are not-so-hot. The critical difference is probably moisture -- having all that fresh steam brought to your skin helps wash your sweat away. IR lamps warm you with radiation. I that probably results in a lot less steam -- how does steam form, when the heat source is directly heating you? Having less steam also means less humidity -- you dehydrate more and lose water weight. I also believe (but I'm not certain), that IR penetrates the skin somewhat deeper. So, all things equal, your outer dermis will be cooler, and your lower dermis warmer with IR than with plain old steam. Biologically, I don't know what this means for you. I'm rambling. Hopefully someone with better physiology knowledge can complete this thought... |
If you feel that you have found inappropriate content, please let us know by emailing us at answers-support@google.com with the question ID listed above. Thank you. |
| Search Google Answers for |
| Google Home - Answers FAQ - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy |