![]() |
|
![]() | ||
|
Subject:
Usual Course of Professional Practice
Category: Health > Medicine Asked by: pharmboy-ga List Price: $20.00 |
Posted:
09 Aug 2003 16:34 PDT
Expires: 08 Sep 2003 16:34 PDT Question ID: 241928 |
The definition of a valid prescription for a controlled substance includes the prescription written in the usual course of professional practice. What arguments can be made to prove that a prescription can be legitimate via an online consultation with a physician, using any court cases to support your argument? In other words, what support is there to claim that a prescription written without the old standard face-to-face examination is a valid prescription? |
![]() | ||
|
There is no answer at this time. |
![]() | ||
|
Subject:
Re: Usual Course of Professional Practice
From: neilzero-ga on 10 Aug 2003 06:12 PDT |
Face to face doctors often invest as little as 5 minutes, choosing a perscription drug for a patient, without considering anyone else's opinion. An on line Doctor with a good staff of researhers should make no more errors on the average, if they are extra dilligent. Should a large claim occur,IMO the lawyers will eat you alive. and you could get busted by a regulatory agency and/or something like 60 minutes on TV. Neil |
If you feel that you have found inappropriate content, please let us know by emailing us at answers-support@google.com with the question ID listed above. Thank you. |
Search Google Answers for |
Google Home - Answers FAQ - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy |