|
|
Subject:
Origins of Restrictive Emotionality
Category: Family and Home > Families Asked by: moti-ga List Price: $2.00 |
Posted:
12 Aug 2003 11:15 PDT
Expires: 11 Sep 2003 11:15 PDT Question ID: 242954 |
Because boys are raised by their opposite sex parent,they must put rigid boundaries between themselves and their mothers in order to define themselves as masculine.If the boy's mother is emotionally expressive and his father is not,then emotions are experienced as feminine and they threaten masculine identification. When the boy feels something, he becomes anxious about his masculinity and learns to deny and devalue feelings.What do you think? |
|
Subject:
Re: Origins of Restrictive Emotionality
Answered By: politicalguru-ga on 26 Aug 2003 04:53 PDT |
Dear Moti, There is a dominant theory that an anti-femininity norm lays at the heart of the emotional expression of the men, or rather, the lack of them. However, in modern families, this could be disputed, and the origins of restrictive emotionality could be associated with previous life experiences (Snell, W. E., Jr., Belk, S., & Hawkins, R. C. II. (2001). Chapter 8: The masculine role as a moderator of stress-distress relationships. In W. E. Snell, Jr. (Ed.), New directions in the psychology of gender roles: Research and theory. Cape Girardeau, MO: Snell Publications. WEB: <http://cstl-cla.semo.edu/snell/books/gender/gender.htm>) and not only those associated with home rules, but with the rest of the society - socialisation processes that include the nursery schools ("boys don't cry"), the youth clubs ("this is a girlie game/toy", "don't run like a girl"), and ending with workplace, further education and other means of socialisation. Gender role conflict, thus, could, but does not have to be, related to parental emotional legacy. Moreover, another explanation altogether could arise: when the parents are emotionally cold (whether it is the father or the mother), the boy does not learn how to express his emotions effectively, and has a conflict that is not only connected with his gender role, but also with his relationships with his parents. I hope that answered your question. In order to answer it, I used my own knowledge and analysis (after all, you asked for my opinion, "What do you think?"), but also searched the Internet <://www.google.com/search?num=50&hl=en&lr=&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&q=%22Restrictive+Emotionality%22&sa=N&tab=gw>. If you need any clarifications on this answer before you rate/tip it, let me know and I'll clarify. |
|
Subject:
Re: Origins of Restrictive Emotionality
From: steph53-ga on 12 Aug 2003 20:08 PDT |
Hi moti-ga... I cannot agree with your question on restrictive emotionality. I raised my son on my own from birth to present ( he is now 27 yrs old ). I am the *mom* and to this day, my son has never questioned his masculinity or any denial of feelings. He has grown into a wonderful young man with whom I have the pleasure of calling "my friend" now...no dad ws ever in the picture... |
Subject:
Re: Origins of Restrictive Emotionality
From: pinkfreud-ga on 12 Aug 2003 20:51 PDT |
I've known several men who grew up with emotionally effusive mothers and stone-faced fathers. I don't notice any "devaluing of feelings" in these men. If anything, they seem more comfortable with emotional expression than other men. |
If you feel that you have found inappropriate content, please let us know by emailing us at answers-support@google.com with the question ID listed above. Thank you. |
Search Google Answers for |
Google Home - Answers FAQ - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy |