|
|
Subject:
Digital Camera
Category: Computers Asked by: redsoxone-ga List Price: $5.00 |
Posted:
11 Jun 2002 06:33 PDT
Expires: 18 Jun 2002 06:33 PDT Question ID: 24305 |
Looking for a digital camera for use by a novice. Please supply links.Money is not a factor |
|
Subject:
Re: Digital Camera
Answered By: till-ga on 11 Jun 2002 07:29 PDT |
Well the camera market for digital photography offers a wide variety of brands and models from simple amateur equipment to professional super-cameras. It certainly depends on what you want to do with the camera. You said money wasnt a factor, so I exclude the simple low cost cameras. I tried out four cameras of different brands during the last 12 months. I had an Olympus which was very compact (put-it-in-the-pocket-style), a Casio which was very fine with some minor disadvantages described below, a Pentax and a Fuji (an El Cheapo one, but good for the web. Major differences between then cameras are: - number of (mega-) pixels of camera This determines the amount of information that can be stored when you do a picture. If you need the pictures for web-publishing purposes no 4 or 5 megapixel- camera is needed. Pictures will need to much space to be transferred through the net. If you plan to print the pictures youve made using a home color-printer or a print-service you should certainly select a camera with a high pixel rate (say 4 - 5 megapixels). Then you can make your own pront outs in even bigger sizes and you will be satisfied with the results. -zoom capability Most or all cameras of the middle-price region will supply zoom optics. Donīt mix up the electronic (often called digital) zoom with an optical zoom. Digital zoom performs zooms that will reduce the quality of a picture because the zooming is simulated electronically. I tried a Casio Model with 7 x optical zoom and received excellent results. It corresponded to a 200 mm conventional lens system and was still light sensible enough. And the price was about 1400 DM (app. 700 $) -storage system Quite important point. Are you going to shoot series of hundreds of high-resolution photos without wanting to have to change anything on the camera ? Or will say 50 photos that can be stored do it for you ? Most cameras use the compact-flash technology to save the data. These storage cards can be read out afterwards using standard usb interface on your PC. For professional purposes (or for amateurs with some ambitions) micro-drives (very small hard-disks) built in the cameras are becoming rather cheap. And then you can take hundreds of high-res pictures without having to care for storage problems. -special considerations I returned the excellent Casio camera because it had on major but for me very deciseful disadvantage: After pressing the release button to take a picture it took up to 0.75 seconds before the photo was made (not stored !) For fast moving objects this is a long time. Assume you want to photograph sports. No chance with that stuff. If you want to make stills-photos that doesnt bother you of course. -flash light If you plan to make photos were flash-light is needed you should select a model with an external flash connector. My casioīs in-built flash was alright up to say 5-7 meters. But you will have the annoying red-eye effect until you use professional indirect flashing. -power consumption All digital cameras consume quite a lot of battery power, so you should have at least one set of batteries in spare. Select the highest rate of mAh for the batteries available. My experiences with rechargeable batteries are quite good. Do not use NiCDīs since they have memory effects and may be unusable rather soon. NiMh are ok. Now what I would recommend: 1. (rather) low price with reasonable quality Casio QV-2300UX Plus, which is almost exactly the one I myself tested. About 700 $. Good choice for beginners. ( http://www.imaging-resource.com/PRODS/QV2300/Q23A.HTM ) 2. an excellent choice for amateurs Several friends of mine use a nikon coolpix and all say that it is a great choice for the amateur + level Nikon Coolpix 5000 at app. 1000 $ Read the review at the site listed below. I donut think you need me to copy all that is referred there. ( http://www.imaging-resource.com/DIGCAM01.HTM ) 3. the professional state of the art cam Almost any professional uses the Nikon D1. A perfect thing, with capabilities that will certainly amaze you. Price is about 5400 $ ( http://www.imaging-resource.com/PRODS/D1X/D1XA.HTM ) You will find more proposals and a lot of data and pictures done with the cams at ( http://www.imaging-resource.com ) I doīnt know if you understand German. If you do an excellent German page covering almost any question about digital cams is found at ( http://www.imaging-one.de ) If you need more information feel free to post a clarification request. I can mail you photos done with the casio if you wish. till-ga | |
| |
|
|
Subject:
Re: Digital Camera
From: seedy-ga on 11 Jun 2002 16:03 PDT |
Digital cameras vary greatly in price and quality as has been pointed out by till-ga. One of the ways to see if the camera has satisfied other purchasers is to go to one of the comparison sites and examine what other people have said about their purchase. Since I buy so many things from amazon.com, I go to their site and search on "digital cameras". A current search brings up the Olympus Camedia D-380 2MP Digital Camera with a five star user rating at $189 for a 2megapizel camera (not as good quality as the ones till has suggested). rated at five stars. My first digital camera was about this spec about 6 years ago and works just fine for my amateur activities. From personal experience, I'd recommend the Kodak DX3700 EasyShare 3MP Digital Camera. It is dead easy to use, dead easy to download to the computer and gives very good quality. This is a 3.3megapizel camera listed at $235.94. rated at 3 1/2 stars.. Reading the user reviews at amazon.com will give you some interesting observations which you can use to make your purchase. seedy |
Subject:
Re: Digital Camera
From: calebu2-ga on 11 Jun 2002 19:15 PDT |
I have a Kodak DX3900. If money is no object, go with the Kodak camera with the highest number (DX4900 or something). The camera looks like and behaves like a normal camera, it just uses memory cards instead of film. Software works really easily (especially if you have XP or ME). I figure the reason you are asking google answers instead of going with the reviews on epinions.com or amazon.com is that you want a personal recommendation and want it short... so that's my recommendation. |
Subject:
Re: Digital Camera
From: mshe-ga on 14 Jun 2002 13:16 PDT |
The new Pentax Optio 230/330 are good good novice cameras. The 230 is a 2.0MP camera while the 330 is a 3.0MP camera. Both are point and shoot type cameras. Imaging Resource has more information on the 330: http://www.imaging-resource.com/PRODS/P330/P33A.HTM Aside from this camera, the Fuji 2600 or any Kodak Camera is good. Kodak digital cameras have extremely easy to use menus. |
Subject:
Re: Digital Camera
From: smartee-ga on 14 Jun 2002 18:31 PDT |
You can get some good advice on selecting a digital camera's on consumer reports web site for free. http://www.consumerreports.org You will be able to find Digital Camera's under Electronics category in consumer reports. For 2Mega Pixel the top 2 suggested are 1.Olympus Camedia C-2040 Zoom 2. Toshiba PDR-M61 For more better ones you can go for Canon Powershot G1 Olympus Camedia C-3040 Zoom Sony Cyber-shot DSC-S75 |
Subject:
Re: Digital Camera
From: mmxtreme-ga on 15 Jun 2002 13:08 PDT |
I have a Canon Powershow A20, but I don't think that this model is still available. I think it's been superseeded by the A40 which is the exact same camera but includes the option to take short movies with sound and it has a couple more features for taking night pictures. I think that the Powershot series is the best choice for its ease of use, relatively cheap price and quality. Go with the Powershot S40 if you're looking for extreme quality and still the same ease of use. These cameras have so many great features, yet they're so easy to use. |
Subject:
Re: Digital Camera
From: redface-ga on 19 Jun 2002 19:06 PDT |
I recently purchased a Samsung Digimax 130 (1.3megapixels) at WalMart for $130 and have been extremely satisfied. The only way you will be able to determine the "best" camera for your specific needs is to try some.....and compare. WalMart has liberal return policies and as long as you take care of the item while using it, and keep all the materials, you can return them with no hassle. I tried several before determining the Samsung was the best value. They also have a 210 model (2.1 megapixels) that is available on the www for $260. It has 3x optical zoom. I typically purchase this type of product with a credit card that doubles the manufacturers warranty. |
Subject:
Re: Digital Camera
From: sparky4ca-ga on 20 Jun 2002 02:35 PDT |
For ease of use AND quality pictures/good features, I hoave found HP to be pretty good. Their best is the 618, which of course is discontinued. buy it on Ebay or something. If you prefer new, buy the 715. The 812 has lots of features that you'll probably never use. Simplicity? 1. unpack box. 2. charge batteries (if it comes with rechargeables) if not, then install batteries. 3. slide memory card in 4. turn on. set date and time. very easy. 5. point and shoot. LOADS of advanced features that you may or may not use. Comfortable. Feels and looks like a camera, not a "3.1 megapixel toy" (quoting a really annoying fujifilm ad). features at a glance: fully automatic or manual modes flash with redeye reduction. optical and digital zoom LCD screen audio capture 2.24 megapixel (enough to print 8 x 10s) tv display etc. All referring to the 618 which is my current camera. |
If you feel that you have found inappropriate content, please let us know by emailing us at answers-support@google.com with the question ID listed above. Thank you. |
Search Google Answers for |
Google Home - Answers FAQ - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy |