|
|
Subject:
Smokers v Non-Smokers
Category: Health > Beauty Asked by: probonopublico-ga List Price: $2.00 |
Posted:
23 Aug 2003 02:54 PDT
Expires: 22 Sep 2003 02:54 PDT Question ID: 247893 |
My observations lead me to conclude that Non-Smokers are invariably more gorgeous than Smokers. Are there any scientific studies to support my observations? |
|
Subject:
Re: Smokers v Non-Smokers
Answered By: knowledge_seeker-ga on 25 Aug 2003 09:42 PDT Rated: |
Thanks Bryan, Glad I could help! In addition to what I gave you below, here are a couple of other references --- "A new study from the Twin Research Unit at the London Hospital involved 50 pairs of identical twins where one smoked and the other didn't. The study found that the skin of the smoking twin was on average a quarter thinner than the twin who didn't. Wrinkles occur as the skin thins. Identical twins, would age and wrinkle at the same rate unless affected by external factors ." NON SMOKERS UPDATE 1997 http://www.nsma.org.au/update16.htm "Smokers Face" was defined as one or more of the following: lines or wrinkles on the face, typically radiating at right angles from the upper and lower lips or corners of the eyes, deep lines on the cheeks, or numerous shallow lines on the cheeks and lower jaw." WHAT IS SMOKER'S FACE? http://www.stopsmokingsupport.com/smokersface.htm And finally, in addition to "smoker's face," there may be a psychological reason that smokers "appear" less attractive to nonsmokers: "Research has shown that nonsmokers tend to attribute negative characteristics to smokers. Nonsmokers perceive smokers less favorably than other nonsmokers on a number of characteristics, including intelligence, sophistication, consideration, health, and maturity (Gibson, 1997)." COLLEGE STUDENTS DIFFERENTIAL PERCEPTIONS OF UNDERGRADUATES WHO SMOKE CIGARETTES AND THOSE WHO DONT SMOKE CIGARETTES http://academic.uofs.edu/organization/psychcon/16th/abstracts.html Thanks for your question, -K~ search terms: twin smokers faces twins smoking nonsmoking aging |
probonopublico-ga
rated this answer:
and gave an additional tip of:
$3.00
Great answer. Many thanks! Thanks also to everyone who has commented. |
|
Subject:
Re: Smokers v Non-Smokers
From: omnivorous-ga on 23 Aug 2003 03:06 PDT |
Bryan -- Beyond odors and yellowing of teeth and skin, there are quantifiable differences in skin appearance: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=12648216&dopt=Abstract Google search strategy: smoking + aging Best regards, Omnivorous-GA |
Subject:
Re: Smokers v Non-Smokers
From: mvguy-ga on 23 Aug 2003 07:52 PDT |
Scroll down to Presentation 2, which indicates no correlation between smoking and physical attractiveness: http://fisher.osu.edu/marketing/scp/apa2001.htm On the other hand, here's a reference to a 1992 study (which I couldn't find) that indicates there is a positive correlation between nonsmoking and physical attractiveness: http://alegent.iqhealth.com/atoz/lifestyles/SmokeOut/sexy.htm |
Subject:
Re: Smokers v Non-Smokers
From: kik-ga on 25 Aug 2003 07:05 PDT |
How Smoking Affects Appearance March 23, 2001 (Ivanhoe Newswire) -- It is well known that long-term smokers usually look older than do non-smokers of the same age. However, until now, the cause for the effect on the skin has been elusive. Both smoking and UV radiation like that from the sun cause the protein called MMP-1, or matrix metalloproteinase-1, to be produced in high quantities under the skin's surface. MMP-1 unstabilizes collagen, which accounts for 70 percent of the skin's weight and maintains its healthy appearance. In healthy skin, a combination of a gene and MMP-1 inhibitors remove the excess MMP-1 before it can do harm. However, in smokers, there is too much MMP-1 produced and not enough of the natural counteractive proteins and genes. In a study reported in this week's Lancet, 14 smokers and 19 non-smokers exposed the skin on their buttocks to solar-like UV light to mimic the effects of tobacco smoke inhalation. Genetic analysis allowed the researchers to measure how much MMP-1, MMP-1 inhibitor and the gene, was present in the UV-exposed skin before and after. The results show that while MMP-1, the collagen-destroying protein was created in excess quantities, the counteracting genes and proteins remained at the same levels, neither increasing nor decreasing. Researchers believe a combination of sunlight and tobacco's effect on MMP-1 production speeds up the collagen breakdown, resulting in the aged appearance of long-term smokers. Copyright © 2001 Ivanhoe Broadcast News, Inc. From (http://www.jhbmc.jhu.edu/healthcarenews/01032301.html) |
Subject:
Re: Smokers v Non-Smokers
From: probonopublico-ga on 25 Aug 2003 07:15 PDT |
Wow, Kik! Fascinating stuff. Many thanks. (If you were a Researcher, I would have asked you to post your Comment as an Answer.) |
Subject:
Re: Smokers v Non-Smokers
From: knowledge_seeker-ga on 25 Aug 2003 09:23 PDT |
Hey PB, I remember seeing an article years ago that showed a pair of mid-aged twin women, one a lifelong smoker and one not. The difference was incredible. The smoker could have passed for the other one's mother! In a quick search I couldn't find that particular image, but did find this reference -- "In one set of twins, the sibling with a 40-year history of smoking had approximately 50% more gray hair than his nonsmoking twin. Other than smoking history, the two had "virtually identical" lifestyles." http://www.coachsos.com/genetic.html Here's the source article: How environment and lifestyle choices influence the aging process http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=10597816&dopt=Abstract This twin has been "faked" using makeup, but give you an idea of the effects of smoking on the face -- Women unaware of smoking risks http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/health/1566191.stm -K~ |
Subject:
Re: Smokers v Non-Smokers
From: probonopublico-ga on 25 Aug 2003 09:29 PDT |
Hi, Knowledge Seeker You have again confirmed what everyone has always known ... Brilliant! Why not post as an answer? Regards Bryan |
Subject:
Quickie summary
From: emptycagegirl-ga on 06 Sep 2003 17:12 PDT |
Cigarette smoke produces harmful free radicals. Free radical damage is what is thought to be a major cause of aging and destruction of the skin/tissues. Other sources of free radicals- sun, smog, alcohol. Free radicals are atoms with unpaired electron groups that basically will latch onto anything they can to balance their unbalanced charge. Free radicals latch onto healthy cells and tissues and complex slowly destroying the cell's dna or membrane. I have always thought of this process much like oxidation/reduction reactions. Think of a car becoming oxidized. Essentially the same thing is occuring with your skin. Since cigarrette smokers are more exposed to the damage causers (free rads) often times their skin shows earlier signs of aging and no longer has that radiant glow. There are ways to combat free radical damage. 1) SUNSCREEN!!! 2) antixoxidant vitamin regimine your antioxidants are vitamin A, E, C, and the mineral Selenium. 3) Hydration |
Subject:
Re: Smokers v Non-Smokers
From: probonopublico-ga on 07 Sep 2003 01:07 PDT |
Hi, EmptyCageGirl A very interesting Comment. Many thanks. Bryan |
Subject:
Re: Smokers v Non-Smokers
From: bowler-ga on 09 Sep 2003 08:08 PDT |
I don't know about looks but take a look at their lungs: http://www.aklung.org/Images/GoodLungBadLung.gif (smoker's lung is on right) |
Subject:
Re: Smokers v Non-Smokers
From: bowler-ga on 09 Sep 2003 08:09 PDT |
I mean smoker's lung is on the left, duh! |
Subject:
Re: Smokers v Non-Smokers
From: probonopublico-ga on 09 Sep 2003 09:40 PDT |
Wow, Bowler ... You still continue to amaze me. Many thanks. Bryan |
Subject:
Re: Smokers v Non-Smokers
From: bowler-ga on 09 Sep 2003 09:56 PDT |
BTW Probonopublico, Just picked up a copy of "Approaching Zero" at the library. Enjoying it so far! Bowler-ga |
Subject:
Re: Smokers v Non-Smokers
From: probonopublico-ga on 09 Sep 2003 10:38 PDT |
Hi, Bowler A library book? Surely, you would like your own copy? It's supposed to be 'unputdownable' so how come you've put it down? It just gets better and better. One of the best books that I've ever read. Kindest regards Bryan |
If you feel that you have found inappropriate content, please let us know by emailing us at answers-support@google.com with the question ID listed above. Thank you. |
Search Google Answers for |
Google Home - Answers FAQ - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy |