Terminator 2 was one of my favorite movies of all time....I was
disappointed at the sequel, terminator 3...and had a series of
questions about the movies and comparing them..
1)Terminator 3 looked like the film image quality was low...was it
shot in digital?? or edited in digital??  Or was I just watching a
35mm verison and maybe I had seen the 70 mm version of 2...it looked
very grainy....and almost out of focus at times???
2)How expensive was each one to make...did T2 have the best
director/best screenwriter/best actors/best cinematorgraphers??? 
Those were the old Carlco days, and I think that they just spent tons
of money on t2...Is that correct???
3) I heard that Arnold paid money to make the movie better...is that
true????
4) The special effects were better in t2 than t3...do u agree..and why
is this true, as special effects usually get better over time??

Try: 

http://www.imdb.com/Title?0103064
http://www.boxofficemojo.com/movies/?id=terminator2.htm
http://www.leesmovieinfo.net/wbotitle.php?t=261

http://www.leesmovieinfo.net/wbotitle.php?t=1933
http://www.boxofficemojo.com/movies/?id=terminator3.htm