|
|
Subject:
For Jem ONLY .... (please)
Category: Business and Money > Employment Asked by: probonopublico-ga List Price: $15.00 |
Posted:
17 Sep 2003 06:41 PDT
Expires: 17 Oct 2003 06:41 PDT Question ID: 257617 |
Ive been helping a client to obtain a pension that arose out of an employment that ended in 1978. He had a letter from the Pension Administrators that seemed to give him the inconvertible right to a pension estimated at some £2,000 p.a. (It was a supplementary scheme, also known as a top hat.) However, he forgot all about it and the employer in question succumbed to a takeover, as did its new owners, ad infinitum. Fortuitously, he discovered the letter of entitlement in January 2002 but, after a long haul, he has only recently established who the insurer was, etc. So, at last, a happy ending is in sight. Indeed, a very happy ending because, had he taken the pension when he became entitled at age 65 (in 1997), he would have missed out on an apparently huge demutualisation windfall. Now that you have soaked up all that, here are the questions (just do your bestest and yes he will take professional advice, etc.): 1) What would have happened to the fund if he had popped off before taking, say, a cash option (for whatever, if available) or buying an annuity? 2) Would NOT making a decision (ie leaving the fund where it is) be an option? And why might this not be attractive? Incidentally, hes in great shape and he has no need for either income or capital. If possible, he would welcome your learned opinion within a week but, if you need longer, then thats no problem either. Bryan | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
|
|
Subject:
Re: For Jem ONLY .... (please)
Answered By: jem-ga on 26 Sep 2003 08:24 PDT Rated: |
Hi Bryan :) At long last, an answer - hurrah! Many thanks again for your patience. In response to your questions, namely; 1) What would have happened to the fund if he had popped off before taking, say, a cash option (for whatever, if available) or buying an annuity and; 2) Would NOT making a decision (i.e. leaving the fund where it is) be an option? And why might this not be attractive? I can comment as follows: I have been asked by those who have assisted with this research to highlight the fact that the information provided within the context of this answer is on the basis of *general commentary and opinion* only and may not necessarily reflect any rules and/or provisions contained within your client's pension scheme. Without exception, each expert that I consulted (see Research Strategy below) advised your client to contact the insurer directly and request a copy of the applicable rules relating to his pension. They also suggested that your client specifically address his questions directly to the insurers who will either respond accordingly OR direct the questions to any trustees of the pension scheme, as applicable. Question 1: What would have happened to the fund if he had popped off before taking, say, a cash option (for whatever, if available) or buying an annuity? The short answer to this very much depends on the rules of the pension scheme which, as noted above, should be available from the insurer. The general consensus is that if your client had "popped off" before taking, say, a cash option *whilst the employer was still in business*,then in all likelihood, a lump sum would have been payable to his dependants. On the assumption that the pension scheme is now *in the hands of new trustees* (i.e. no longer being administered by your client's previous employer), then the situation might be slightly different. For example, if your client "pops off" now before taking, say, a cash option, then it is in the trustees' discretion as to how they would administer the pension (ideally, you should check the rules of the scheme to see just how much discretion the trustees have). For example, it's possible that instead of a lump sum, your client's wife might receive a "widow's pension". The paragraph immediately above also highlights that in general, pensioners whose pension fund has become part of a demutualisation windfall may not automatically have any direct entitlement to the proceeds of such windfall. Such windfall, being payable directly to the trustees of the scheme, hypothetically could be; a. used for the benefits of ALL the members of the scheme; b. used to "prop up" the existing scheme; c. used to provide extra pensions/benefits to one or a selected number of members of the scheme or; d. used in any way that the trustees see fit. This is one of the main reasons why it's imperative for your client to see the rules of the existing scheme and, in particular, to see what latitude the insurance company and/or trustees have with respect to administering the scheme. Question 2: Would NOT making a decision (i.e. leaving the fund where it is) be an option? And why might this not be attractive? Leaving the fund where it is might be an option. In this case, it would simply be held on deposit until your client decides to draw on it. Bear in mind that the entire time that the fund remains with the insurance company, the insurance company is getting the benefit of the money, not your client. So, unless there are taxation issues, your client might want to consider starting to draw from the fund now. There is always the possibility that the fund could grow in value and that by not taking his entitlement now, your client's final pension benefit might, in fact, be worth more at a later stage. Of course, there is no guarantee of this. Additionally, as suggested previously, if your client does not take any benefits that he is entitled to during his lifetime, any subsequent death benefits payable might be entirely at the discretion of the trustees. I have compiled a short list of some websites which your client may find useful for further reference: 1. The Department for Work and Pensions has a good, basic reference site on pensions at: http://www.pensionguide.gov.uk/ including a selection of factsheets for download from: http://www.pensionguide.gov.uk/guides/download.htm 2. The Financial Services Authority's ("FSA") consumer pension website at: http://www.fsa.gov.uk/consumer/financial_faqs/pensions/mn_pensions.html In particular, they have a number of pension related guides and factsheets for download at: http://www.fsa.gov.uk/consumer/consumer_publications/mn_consumerpubs.html 3. The Pensions Advisory ("OPAS") website found at: http://www.opas.org.uk/ As listed on their website noted above, OPAS is "an independent non-profit organisation that provides information and guidance on the whole spectrum of pensions covering State, company, personal and stakeholder schemes. We also help any member of the public who has a problem, complaint or dispute with their occupational or private pension arrangement." 4. The Plain English Campaign's A to Z dictionary of pension terms - noted on their website as "designed to give you a fighting chance in the baffling world of pensions": http://www.plainenglish.co.uk/PensionsA-Z.html and http://www.plainenglish.co.uk/PensionsA-Z.html#top 5. The FSA's excellent and easy to use pension calculator found at: http://www.pensioncalculator.org.uk/pages/calculator1.php?Submit=I+accept Straightforward assumptions and background information relating to the use of the calculator can be found at: http://www.pensioncalculator.org.uk/pages/home.php This tool is a very good and effective starting point for determining how much money you'll need in retirement. Suggest using it armed with a strong shot of brandy and/or several glasses of champagne - the resultant calculations can be quite sobering! If any part of this answer requires clarification, please do not hesitate to let me know. I suppose the main message behind this answer is that your client really needs to ensure a) that he has the full rules applicable to his pension scheme sent to his attention and b) that he takes full and proper professional advice from a qualified independent financial adviser before making any decisions with respect to his pension. With kind regards jem-ga :) p.s. no bagpipes were consulted during the course of this research ;) Search/Research Strategy: 1. Google Keywords: pension advice UK ://www.google.com/search?hl=en&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8&q=pension+advice+UK 2. Personal conversation held with UK-based independent financial advisor (NBJ Benefits Consultants Ltd.). 3. Telecon with FSA Consumer Helpline representative: Telephone 0845 606 1234 The FSA Consumer Helpline is open between 8 am and 8 pm Monday to Friday - out of hours the automated service is available 24 hours a day seven days a week. 4. Telecon with OPAS Consumer Helpline representative: Telephone 0845 601 2923 The OPAS Consumer Helpline is open from 8.30am to 6.30pm Monday to Friday. They do not operate an out of hours automated service. |
probonopublico-ga
rated this answer:
and gave an additional tip of:
$15.00
Hi, Jem You just get better and better. It was EXACTLY what I wanted and I hate to think what's going to happen in GaGaLand when you, too, pop off. (It happens to most of us but, being a very Godly person, I shall certainly prove to be an exception.) Very many thanks! Bryan |
|
Subject:
Re: For Jem ONLY .... (please)
From: jem-ga on 22 Sep 2003 08:00 PDT |
Hi Bryan :) Sorry to hear of your friend Peter's illness - I trust he has recovered and is prepared to be trounced in dominoes? I find a good game of Canasta helps to build stamina ;) Whilst you are so patiently and kindly awaiting your answer on this question, I thought I'd provide you with a few fun links and tidbits to keep you amused and entertained. 1. AskOxford's Aug/Sept. 2003 Quick Crossword (with printer-friendly version): http://www.askoxford.com/wordgames/crosswords/crosswordarchive/qu_aug03.ccj/ 2. A sampling of AskOxford's "Sound Bites" for the period April - June 2003: "I'm sorry, we don't do God." - Alastair Campbell, British Press Secretary to the Prime Minister, when Tony Blair was asked about his Christian faith in an interview for Vanity Fair magazine. "Sorry, I don't do offal." - Jamie Oliver, British chef, when invited by MPs to help improve the food from the Parliamentary Kitchens http://www.askoxford.com/worldofwords/quotations/soundbites/ 3. Wasn't particularly impressed with Merriam-Webster's Word for the Day for today but their offering for August 19 is good, robust one: http://www.m-w.com/cgi-bin/mwwodarch.pl?Aug.19 4. Am currently re-discovering Agatha Christie after watching several BBC productions of The Miss Marple Mysteries starring Joan Hickson. Excerpt from the original short story "The Tuesday Night Club" by Agatha Christie: "I know, dear," said Miss Marple, "that your books are very clever. But do you think that people are really so unpleasant as you make them out to be?" "My dear Aunt," said Raymond gently, "keep your beliefs. Heaven forbid that I should in any way shatter them." "I mean," said Miss Marple, puckering her brow a little as she counted the stitches in her knitting, "that so many people seem to me not to be either bad or good, but simply, you know, very silly." http://www.agathachristie.com/tuesday/bsp/intro2.shtml 5. This site gets points for sheer obscurity - yep, you guessed it - Fermat's Last Theorem Poetry Challenge found at: http://raphael.math.uic.edu/~jeremy/poetry.htm My particular favourite from this site, a la Edgar Allan Poe: Once upon a midnight dreary, As I pondered weak and weary, O'er many a quaint and etale sort of cohomology, While inducing representations, I was led to deformations, And the ramifications of modular forms in characteristic p. So I struggled to break free. Ah, discreetly I conjectured, to myself alone I lectured, As the virile bust of Fermat wrought its ghost upon my floor, Suddenly there came an insight, that these flat group schemes were finite And I represented functors never dreamed about before. Then my soul began to soar. "Taniyama!" I then shouted, As the logic from me spouted, "It all comes down to looking at the prime l equals 3!" Modularity is the conclusion, And the Frey curve an illusion, So Fermat's equation cannot have nontrivial roots in Z! Quoth the raven, "Q.E.D". - Author: Matt Baker as quoted at http://raphael.math.uic.edu/~jeremy/poetry.htm Kindest regards jem-ga :) |
Subject:
Re: For Jem ONLY .... (please)
From: probonopublico-ga on 22 Sep 2003 09:52 PDT |
Hi, Jem You've cheered me up. Many thanks ... I needed it. You see, Peter gave his coldy thing to Nell (his partner) and then somebody gave it to me. There are now too many suspects for me to pin it down. (Even Poirot would be puzzling over this, never mind Miss Maple Syrup.) Me? I've been in bed most of the day and I'm still feeling rough. BTW I hope you noticed that 'Latics won on Saturday & that Lancashire are not only the 1-Day Champions in Div 2 but also Runners Up in the County League Div 1. Not bad, uh? |
Subject:
Re: For Jem ONLY .... (please)
From: jem-ga on 25 Sep 2003 01:14 PDT |
Hi Bryan :) I AM sorry to hear that you've been unwell :( and hope that you are now feeling a bit better. Yes, I did notice 'Latics won on Saturday & that Lancashire are not only the 1-Day Champions in Div 2 but also Runners Up in the County League Div 1. Perhaps the cold is some sort of retribution? <evil grin>. A tool to even the odds...?: http://www.instantvoodoo.com/default.asp?flash=true& I must apologise again for the delay in supplying your answer and thank you for hanging on and being patient. This one really is testing all of my resources but I WILL get you an answer :) Kindest regards jem-ga :) |
Subject:
Re: For Jem ONLY .... (please)
From: probonopublico-ga on 25 Sep 2003 04:10 PDT |
Hi, Again, Jem Great to hear from you .... And I am delighted to know that, finally, I have managed to test ALL your resources (allegedly). However, I've now forgotten what the question was. Was it something to do with bagpipes? Kindest regards Bryan |
Subject:
Re: For Jem ONLY .... (please)
From: jem-ga on 26 Sep 2003 11:25 PDT |
Hi Bryan :) Delighted to have been able to assist and many thanks for the great rating and generous tip! Speaking of popping, it's a friend's hen night tomorrow and I'll be joining her for drinks - she's suggested rum cocktails however I've managed to persuade her that champagne really is the right way to get things started ;) Kind regards jem-ga :) |
Subject:
Re: For Jem ONLY .... (please)
From: probonopublico-ga on 26 Sep 2003 13:29 PDT |
Hmmmmmmm I'm not sure about the champagne .... Why not get a real pain ........? I'm VERY invite-able. |
If you feel that you have found inappropriate content, please let us know by emailing us at answers-support@google.com with the question ID listed above. Thank you. |
Search Google Answers for |
Google Home - Answers FAQ - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy |