![]() |
|
![]() | ||
|
Subject:
SSL Certificates - SGC, 40-bit v. 128-bit, Export Only Browsers and more...
Category: Computers > Security Asked by: xramp-ga List Price: $50.00 |
Posted:
09 Oct 2003 23:40 PDT
Expires: 08 Nov 2003 22:40 PST Question ID: 264840 |
I would like to know (and need credible references for) the percentage of web browsers that are currently in use that are ONLY capable of 40-bit encryption (export strength). Background: Prior to Jan 1, 2000 it was not possible to export browsers capable of 128-bit encryption (only 40-bit). In 1997 the government started to allow SSL certificates that utilized Server-Gated Cryptograpy "SGC" to be issued to financial institutions, which allowed export versions of browsers communicate with financial institutions using 128-bit encryption. I _believe_ that all browsers AFTER Jan 1, 2000 were made capable of 128-bit encryption without the use of SGC, but I need references to back this up as well. Verisign and Thawte offer a "GlobalServer ID" and a "SuperCert" respectively that offer SGC for much higher prices than their standard certificates which are capable of establishing 128-bit encryption with all "export only" 40-bit versions of browsers. I understand that Netscape has not provided an "export only" version since Netscape version 4.74 (released July 2000), and all Netscape versions since then are capable of 128-bit encryption without the use of SGC. I do not know if or when Microsoft stopped offering an "export" version of their browsers. I believe that the vast majority of browsers out there are now capable of 128-bit encryption, but I need some facts to back this statement up. In short, I am trying to prove that since almost all browsers are capable of 128-bit encryption that there is no reason to spend the extra money on purchasing a SGC capable certificate and SGC certificates are quickly becoming a thing of the past. It is important for me to know the answer to this question whether I am right or wrong in my assumptions. I will need information and references to either back up or refute my assumptions. |
![]() | ||
|
There is no answer at this time. |
![]() | ||
|
Subject:
Re: SSL Certificates - SGC, 40-bit v. 128-bit, Export Only Browsers and more...
From: ame1o-ga on 10 Oct 2003 12:35 PDT |
What you are asking, I believe, boils down to a browser market share question. Upsdell tracks, via multiple sources, browser percentages and reports the following: Browser Stats (use with caution) Browser: Source 1 Source 2 Source 3 Source 4 IE6 62% 70% 55% 54% IE5 32% 13% 29% 19% IE4 .95% .25% 1.1% .85% Gecko based 2.3% 9.0% 4.6% 15% NN4 1.1% 1.3% 3.1% 1.7% Opera 1.2% 2.2% .3% 1.0% other .1% 1.9% .25% .3% unidentified 1.4% 2.4% 6.1% 8.5% Given that the late-model IE browsers support 128-bit SSL - and that the vast majority of users, by any measure, are using those offerings - you should be good to go with 128-bit certs. As an aside, 40-bit certs are considered relatively insecure (easy to brute-force crack), so you have a "marketing" angle to your client-side requirement of 128-bit encryption. Cheers. |
If you feel that you have found inappropriate content, please let us know by emailing us at answers-support@google.com with the question ID listed above. Thank you. |
Search Google Answers for |
Google Home - Answers FAQ - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy |