|
|
Subject:
Simple Chemistry Problems #3
Category: Science > Chemistry Asked by: jwheel-ga List Price: $20.00 |
Posted:
15 Oct 2003 18:13 PDT
Expires: 14 Nov 2003 17:13 PST Question ID: 266719 |
o make a long story short, my youngest daughter decided to endure through 4 semesters of chemistry, and now is paying up for it. She is a talented little girl, but science is not her thing and it hurts for me to see her study so hard but understand so little. It runs in the family. I wanted to help myself, but me and my wife are no scientists at all, plus it was so long ago. Tutoring is very very weak at where she goes, and we know few friends around here who are capable of helping, most of which already are looking at us the wrong way for asking so much. I decided to open my pocket and let you, Chemistry folks, help us out. I secretly took the next set of questions from my daughters assignment section, and here they are. I understand that many (or most) of you would have the problem to giving direct help like this, "learning and understanding the material is the most important", right ? Wrong. Only but a few of you would understand the pain I feel when I see my daughter quietly cry in her room over her low assignment grades after hours and hours of studying daily. Below I copied down some of the questions and choice answers that came along. I tried my best to copy down everything number to number, word for word. Its a little bit difficult to transfer everything to text, but I tried. Please feel free to clarify if you did not understand a part. I am asking for a list of answers to the problems, in numerical + content format, as such : Question 1: Answer 3. The number of moles is 4.0. Question 2: Answer 5. The reaction is reversed. Time is an issue, but I would like the answers to be correct. I do not want to check my daughters answers and tell her that one of her correct answers is incorrect simply because what was given to me is a wrong answer. Once again I apologize for such rude question, but I am desperate, and I ran out of all other options. I am also considering a big tip for those who'll work hard on these, do all (or most) of the questions, provide the correct answers and hopefully as soon as possible. Thank you once more. You are my last hope. I'm breaking a list questions into separated entries as bobbie7-ga suggested (Thank you bobbie7-ga). Please provide the answer to the following problems: 1) Given the equilibrium reaction MgSO4(s) <--> MgO(s) + SO3(g) which of the following statements is true ? 1. The same equilibrium condition would result if we started with only pure MgSo4(s) in a closed container as if we started with only pure MgO(s) in a closed container. 2. Decreasing the volume of the closed container at constant temperature would result in more MgO(s) being formed. 3. At equilibrium, the forward and reverse reactions have stopped. 4. If the container were opened to the atmosphere, eventually only MgSO4(s) would remain. 5. If pure MgSO4(s) were placed in a closed container filled with N2(g) at 1atm, the total pressure would increase, due to SO3(g) being formed. 2) Consider the reaction: N2 + 3H2 <--> 2NH3 Increasing the volume of the reactor without removing or adding any reactants or products will 1. (Z3) increase the value of the equilibrium constant. 2. (Z2) decrease the value of the equilibrium constant. 3. (Z4) will change the pressure in the reactor. 4. Both (Z1) and (Z4) 5. (Z1) not affect the equilibrium constant. |
|
Subject:
Re: Simple Chemistry Problems #3
Answered By: synarchy-ga on 15 Oct 2003 19:21 PDT Rated: |
Hello - 1) Given the equilibrium reaction MgSO4(s) <--> MgO(s) + SO3(g) 1 - this is untrue, if only pure MgO was in a closed container, there would be no S03 with which to react to form MgSO4, so, this reaction would not take place. If pure MgSO4 was in a container, the reaction would still proceed 2 - decreasing the volume of the container would increase the relative concentration of the reactants, thereby driving the reaction towards the products, producing less MgO not more 3 - at equilibrium, the reactions have not stopped, their rates are simply equal such that there is no net change in the amount of product or reactant, so, untrue 4 - untrue - if the container were open to the atmosphere, SO3 would escape, therefore the concentration of SO3 would be constantly diminishing, this would drive the reaction towards more consumption of products, so, less MgSO4 5 - in this case, the pressure would increase as SO3 is formed - N2 is not a reactant in this case and thus it's pressure does not directly influence the reaction so, answer - 5 - If pure MgSO4(s) were placed in a closed container filled with N2(g) at 1atm, the total pressure would increase, due to SO3(g) being formed 2) increasing the volume of the reactor, without changing the amount of reactants will not change the equilibrium constant - hence it's name "constant". Increasing the volume will however, decrease the pressure of the vessel - pressure is related to the number of molecules divided by the volume, so, if the volume goes up, and the number of molecules stays the same, the pressure will decrease. So, this gives us to true answers, Z1 and Z4. answer - 4 Both (Z1) and (Z4) - not affect the equilibrium constant and will change the pressure in the reactor Please feel free to ask for any clarification needed. synarchy reference: 1) - http://hsc.csu.edu.au/chemistry/core/acidic/chem935/chem935net.html see section on "explain the need for refluxing" for a similar situation 2) http://www.hyper-ad.com/tutoring/chemistry/chem_eqm.htm search equilibrium chemistry |
jwheel-ga
rated this answer:
and gave an additional tip of:
$5.00
Thank you, great help. Keep up the good work! |
|
There are no comments at this time. |
If you feel that you have found inappropriate content, please let us know by emailing us at answers-support@google.com with the question ID listed above. Thank you. |
Search Google Answers for |
Google Home - Answers FAQ - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy |