Hello.
Through my local library, I have access to the New York Times'
archive.
I checked the stock tables in the New York Times for the dates you
requested.
Cisco - April 7, 2000
P/E ratio: CC* (* >100)
source:
The New York Times, April 8, 2000 (covers April 7, 2000 trading), page
C8.
MCI Worldcom - April 7, 2000
P/E ratio: 32
source:
The New York Times, April 8, 2000 (covers April 7, 2000 trading), page
C10.
Lucent - October 19, 2000
P/E ratio: 26
source:
The New York Times, October 20, 2000 (covers October 19, 2000
trading), page W3.
---------------
Note, as indicated, the New York Times listed Cisco's P/E ratio as
'CC,' meaning that it exceeded 100, and they don't bother publishing
P/E ratios that large. In fact, Cisco's P/E at the time was
approximately 200.
As Morris mentions below, the P/E is calculated on the basis of
earnings per share for the trailing twelve months.
Here are Cisco's per-share-earnings for the preceding 12 months:
2nd Quarter 2000: .125
1st Quarter 2000: .065
4th Quarter 1999: .09
3rd Quarter 1999: .095
----------
Trailing 12 mos.: .375
Cisco's closing price on April 7, 2000 was 74.94. That implies a
price-to-earnings ratio of 199.84 (i.e., 74.94 divided by .375 =
199.84).
sources (NOTE: per share earnings above are adjusted for Cisco stock
splits that took place on 6/22/1999 & 3/23/2000):
Cisco quarterly earnings:
2nd Quarter 2000
http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/146/pressroom/2000/feb00/corp_020800.htm
1st Quarter 2000
http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/146/pressroom/1999/nov99/15.html
4th Quarter 1999
http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/146/pressroom/1999/aug99/12.html
3rd Quarter 1999
http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/146/pressroom/1999/may99/19.html
The earnings per share calculated above are also consistent with the
P/E ratio that was reported in a newsgroups post by an internet user
on April 14, 2000, after Cisco has dropped considerably in the
preceding week:
"I really believe people will keep selling till Cisco has a PE in the
50s.
Even now at 57 it is 149x earnings."
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=2000+%22cisco+has+a+pe%22&hl=en&lr=&ie=UTF-8&selm=38f77231.172276838%40news.newsguy.com&rnum=1
If the P/E was 149 when Cisco was at 57, that is consistent with
per-share-earnings of .38 and a P/E of almost 200 when Cisco was at
75.
search strategy:
new york times archive
cisco earnings "second quarter" 2000, etc
"cisco has a pe" 2000
I hope this helps. |
Clarification of Answer by
juggler-ga
on
04 Nov 2003 13:23 PST
As indicated above, the source for the MCI Worldcom P/E was:
The New York Times, April 8, 2000 (covers April 7, 2000 trading), page
C10.
The source for the Lucent P/E was:
The New York Times, October 20, 2000 (covers October 19, 2000
trading), page W3.
|