![]() |
|
![]() | ||
|
Subject:
upside down/rightside up tower
Category: Science > Technology Asked by: groendog-ga List Price: $5.00 |
Posted:
21 Oct 2003 11:28 PDT
Expires: 20 Nov 2003 10:28 PST Question ID: 268317 |
In Elk Grove Village, Illinois, there is a radio (??) tower that appears to be upside down. Rational thought indicates that this is not so, and that the engineers meant for the pointy part to be on the ground and the part that looks like the base in the air. Could you please enlighten me as to why this is so? I nearly drive off the road laughing every time I see it. |
![]() | ||
|
There is no answer at this time. |
![]() | ||
|
Subject:
Re: upside down/rightside up tower
From: snsh-ga on 22 Oct 2003 00:04 PDT |
Post a picture!! Vague explanation: Radio station antennas can be a single short rod, but then the station would broadcast evenly in all directions. Their coverage area would be circular. Radio stations in neighboring towns with similar frequencies are always competing over coverage, with the FCC as referee. So, if you live south of San Francisco, and your favorite SF radio station has weak signal, it's probably because a station in San Jose doesn't want your station to send signal down there and cause interference. To limit and shape its coverage area, a radio station needs an array of antennas arranged like bowling pins. A fancy setup like that can broadcast south and north and east, but not, say, northwest or northeast. This makes the antenna a wide thing. So, something like that might be going on. Maybe they're a service broadcasting at lower frequency than FM radio (like 10 Mhz instead of 100 Mhz), which makes the antenna array wider than a few feet. Or do you think maybe the antenna is for hire, so they need room to mount antennas for lots of companies? Or do you think maybe they had a zoning problem and could make the antenna wider on top, but not allowed to make it wider on bottom? |
Subject:
Re: upside down/rightside up tower
From: knowledge_seeker-ga on 22 Oct 2003 06:19 PDT |
Your description reminds me of the electric or "hydro" towers I've seen in Quebec. They always looked upside down to me as well. It appears these V-structures were developed to reduce the amount of steel used. "When the first high-voltage lines were run from the Manic-Outardes complex to the load centres, very massive self-supporting towers were used. These towers require an average of 21 tonnes of steel for each kilometre of line. Hydro-Québec researchers then developed the guyed-V tower, which requires only 11.8 tonnes of steel per kilometre of line, on average." Picture: The James Bay transmission system http://www.hydro.qc.ca/visit/virtual_visit/images/i_reseau_transport_02.jpg Article: The James Bay transmission system http://www.hydro.qc.ca/visit/virtual_visit/reseau_transport.html -K~ |
Subject:
Re: upside down/rightside up tower
From: groendog-ga on 22 Oct 2003 12:21 PDT |
Alas, I have no photo, as it is near where another member of my family lives, not I. However, it is just one spear--not the V-shape as in Quebec. One spear, with the tip at the ground and the flat base at the top and a hundred-million wires holding it up, thank heavens. Also it may not be a radio tower at all. I really have no idea what it is for. Contacting aliens? |
If you feel that you have found inappropriate content, please let us know by emailing us at answers-support@google.com with the question ID listed above. Thank you. |
Search Google Answers for |
Google Home - Answers FAQ - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy |