Hi Dear
I have two Questions and for each one, i need minimum one page, answer.
1.Some critics have observed that FRANKENSTEIN is a critique of what
it means to be human.Frankenstein-passionate about his projec--
appears to know what he is doung as he creates his human-like monster.
However, the creature only has to open his eyes and Frankenstein flees
from his creation. Other than the obvious, i. e., the creature looks
hideous , why does Frankenstein UTTERLY reject the monster? Craft a
critical theory about Frankenstein and his humanity, please.
2.Victor states: "A human being in perfection ought always to preserve
a calm and peaceful mind, and never to allow passion or a transitory
desire to disturb his tanquility. I do not think that the pursuit of
knowledge is an exception to this rule. If the study to which you
apply yourself has a tendency to weaken your affections,and to destroy
your taste for those simple pleasures in which no ally can possibly
mix, then that study is certainly unlawful, that is to say, not
befitting the human mind. If his rule were always observed; if no man
allowed any pursuit whatsoever to interfere with the tranquility of
his domestic affections, Greece had not been enslaved; Caesar would
have spared his country; America would have been discovered more
gradually and the empires of Mexico and Peru had not been
destroyed."Explain critically in the context of Frankenstein, please. |
Request for Question Clarification by
omniscientbeing-ga
on
25 Nov 2003 14:59 PST
aghaalireza-ga,
Allow me to make a suggestion. Since you're seeking as many opinions
as possible in order to "compare several points of
view," it would make sense for you to split this Question into 2
separate Questions, for $50 each, rather than one big 2-part question
for $100.00 as it is now. That way, you'll get 2 different researcher
responses instead of only one, and you'll get more focused responses
from researchers who feel they can asnwer the question thoroughly, and
you'll likely get at least one of the answers sooner than waiting a
longer time for both.
I can answer the first part of your Question in a manner I'm sure
you'll be happy with, but I'm not so sure about the second part. What
do you think of splitting the question up into 2 new questions?
omniscientbeing-ga
Google Answers Researcher
|
