|
|
Subject:
search engine optimization
Category: Computers > Internet Asked by: evilal-ga List Price: $10.00 |
Posted:
17 Jun 2002 16:56 PDT
Expires: 24 Jun 2002 16:56 PDT Question ID: 28173 |
Looking for material discussing domain registrations of .com and.net and if one or the other holds a better chance for a good SE ranking, particularly... will a site ending in .net be penalized in rankings if they are trully a commerce site, and not a network? | |
| |
|
|
Subject:
Re: search engine optimization
Answered By: acorn-ga on 24 Jun 2002 10:12 PDT |
The common thought on this issue, as even evidenced by the comments about your question, has been that .net does not suffer noticeably when compared with .com. However, a June 10, 2002 article in _Site Pro News_, "Domains and URLs: Search Engine Ranking" By James D. Brausch, Vice President of Marketing for Target Blaster, Inc., an Internet Marketing firm specializing in targeted traffic, indicates that this thinking is incorrect. "Recently we performed large statistical analysis of the top ranking sites and studied the domain names and URLs to see if we could find any correlation. Over 20,000 listings were examined for 110 separate factors and the results tabulated and statistically analyzed...We never expected the ".net" domains to be ranked lower, but that is what the data suggests. In fact it is a very strong correlation. We used to think that a ".net" domain was almost as good as a ".com" domain. We will now avoid them." < http://www.sitepronews.com/archives/2002/june/10.html > Unfortunately, the statistical reports themselves must be purchased for $95, but they are available. < http://www.targetblaster.com/serf/ > It is easy for us to convince each other that something is so. It may very well have been that several years ago, there was no discernible difference between .net and .com extensions. However, if current statistical analysis shows that there now is a noticeable and negative difference, I personally would accept that and avoid .net extensions. I hope this answers your question in time. | |
|
|
Subject:
Re: search engine optimization
From: jharokha-ga on 17 Jun 2002 18:39 PDT |
https://answers.google.com/answers/main?cmd=threadview&id=13783 This question has some tips about search engine optimizations. Though I don't thnk you might find the answer for.com vs .net From my knowledge, the ranking of a site *should* hot be affected whether it is a .com or a .net site. The reason being that there has been too much pollution in the .com, and the .net domains. If the search engines do give a prefrential treatment then they will be at a loss as their rankings of websites will not seem to be correct. regards |
Subject:
Re: search engine optimization
From: gaurav-ga on 17 Jun 2002 21:50 PDT |
hi evilal, i own a web-designing company and have over 100 .com and .net domains registered. However the search engine does not base its listing around the domain extension. Rather it looks at the meta data ( keywords , description and title ) and then looks at the content to check whether the specified meta data is appropriate. So, from the point of SE, its the content and the meta data thats important, not the extension of the site. In case of any clarification, i'll be glad to help let me know, gaurav |
Subject:
Re: search engine optimization
From: peakplacement-ga on 23 Jun 2002 10:25 PDT |
I agree with the first post. From and SEO perspective, there is no difference between a .COM and a .NET. The difference is only perception from a users standpoint, with a .COM obviously being the preferred. Relevant content and inbound links are 2 major keys to high search engine rankings. For more info re: SEO check out: www.searchenginewatch.com www.searchengineforums.com www.peakplacement.com www.webmamma.com www.seopros.net Hope this helps! |
If you feel that you have found inappropriate content, please let us know by emailing us at answers-support@google.com with the question ID listed above. Thank you. |
Search Google Answers for |
Google Home - Answers FAQ - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy |