Hi,
Thank you for your question.
The proof of the mean value theorem requires Rolle's theorem.
Rolle's theorem states:
Let f be differentiable on (a,b) and continuous on [a,b]. If f(a) =
f(b) = 0, then there is at least one point c in (a,b) for which f'(c)
= 0.
Note that either f(x) is always 0 on [a,b] or f varies on [a,b].
Case 1: If f is not positive or negative on the interval [a,b], then f
must be zero everywhere on the interval. That is, f = 0, and in
particular, f is constant. The derivative of a constant function is
zero, so f'(c) = 0 for all c between a and b. Thus, the conclusion of
Rolle's theorem holds in this case.
Case 2: f is positive somewhere on the interval [a,b]
Suppose that f is positive somewhere on the interval [a,b]. A
continuous function on a closed interval takes on a maximum value
somewhere on the interval; suppose that f attains its max at x = c.
Since I know f is positive somewhere on the interval, the max f(c)
must be positive; since f(a) = 0 and f(b) = 0, c can't be either a or
b. Therefore, a < c < b. In particular, f is differentiable at c. But
at a point where a differentiable function attains a max, the
derivative is zero. Thus, f'(c) = 0, and Rolle's theorem holds in this
case as well.
Case 3: f is negative somewhere on the interval [a,b]
Suppose that f is negative somewhere on the interval [a,b]. A
continuous function on a closed interval takes on a minimum value
somewhere on the interval; suppose that f attains its min at x = c.
Since I know f is negative somewhere on the interval, the min f(c)
must be negative; since f(a) = 0 and f(b) = 0, c can't be either a or
b. Therefore, a < c < b. In particular, f is differentiable at c. But
at a point where a differentiable function attains a min, the
derivative is zero. Thus, f'(c) = 0, and Rolle's theorem holds in Case
3.
That proves Rolle's theorem. This proof is from:
A Proof of Rolle's Theorem
http://www.millersv.edu/~bikenaga/calculus/mvt/rollepf.html
We can now prove the mean value theorem.
Let us write the equation for the secant through (a,f(a)) and (b,f(b)):
f(b)-f(a)
y-f(a) = --------- (x-a)
b-a
which we can rewrite as
f(b)-f(a)
y = ---------- (x-a)+f(a).
b-a
Let
f(b)-f(a)
g(x) = f(x)-[ ---------- (x-a)+f(a) ]
b-a
Note that g(a) = g(b) = 0. Also, g is continuous on [a,b] and
differentiable on (a,b) since f is. So by Rolle's Theorem there exists
c in (a,b) such that
g'(c)= 0.
But g'(x) = f'(x)-[(f(b)-f(a))/( b-a)], so
f(b)-f(a)
g'(c) = f'(c)- ---------- = 0
b-a
Therefore,
f(b)-f(a)
f'(c) = ----------
b-a
That proves the theorem!
You can find the proof here, the presentation might be better on those pages:
The Proof of the Mean Value Theorem
http://www.millersv.edu/~bikenaga/calculus/mvt/mvtpf.html
and here:
The Mean Value Theorem
http://www.math.hmc.edu/calculus/tutorials/mean_value/
I hope this helps. If you require any clarifications please do not hesitate to ask.
Thanks.
endo
Search strategy
mean value theorem proof
://www.google.com/search?hl=en&lr=&ie=ISO-8859-1&safe=off&q=mean+value+theorem+proof |