|
|
Subject:
meta tagging
Category: Computers > Algorithms Asked by: kotemaori-ga List Price: $10.00 |
Posted:
08 Jan 2004 23:21 PST
Expires: 24 Jan 2004 21:22 PST Question ID: 294656 |
question for serenata.ga i am paying close attention to the meta tagging of www.ozpeopletrace.com.au. please advise with regard to search engines, 1)will the people and trace parts of my title be viewed as two words or one,ie,can i use the people part of ozpeopletrace as part of a keyword,people search australia,will the australia part of my title (OZpeopletrace australia) be recognised as part of this keyword if it is in the brackets and out of the correct order.i am looking at writing a title of 60 characters or thereabouts,can i use the most important keywords in any order,does the title tag have to be descriptive of my site,can i leave out punctuation marks,the words i need to include are people search australia,people finder australia,australian people search,find people in australia,find person australia.are the name of my site in brackets ie(OZpeopletrace.Australia)included in the count of 60 characters ,which seems to be the advised limit 2)i have far too many keywords, as in i have australia 17 times,people 15 times,i opted to use the actual search term as a keyword,ie people search australia,people finder australia,and this has been successful every where except google and one or two others,i think im being penalised for too many australia,too many people etc.now i intend to list every keyword as a seperate word,and include the 5 terms(phrases)that get 82% of impressions for me.please advise on the use or ommision of commas,and the best way to write the phrases to suit most search engines.using phrases has worked most places except google,so i figure if i cut down the number i may not be penalised there 3)description tag,do i write a tag to entice clicks or search engines.if i can use only 150 characters my thinking is to load it up with keywords,does it need to be grammatically correct for those search engines which state that this is required i only require a short answer for most of my questions,i dont need you to spell things out in detail | |
|
|
There is no answer at this time. |
|
Subject:
Re: meta tagging
From: robertskelton-ga on 09 Jan 2004 11:14 PST |
Don't worry too much about meta keywords, they are all but ignored by search engines. Write the description to attract customers. It can show up in search result snippets, and sites (esp. directories) often use it when linking to a site. Title tags are the most important part of optimizing a page. In my experience, the closer a title tag fits a search query, the higher it ranks, so if someone searched for [australia people search], the first of the following title tags would rank much higher, all other things being equal: people search australia people search australia,people finder australia,australian people search,find people in australia,find person australia More than two instances of a keyword in a title can be seen as spamming, and people are wising up to keyword filled titles being more likely to spammy results. Your site needs to appear to have credibility from every angle. Your best option is to optimize each page of your site for a different keyphrase, rather than all of them for your homepage. Using characters like [ and >> in the title looks nice, but search engines might count them as words, and therefore make your title less of a match to a search query. Make sure that targeted keyphrases also appear once or twice in the text of the page. robertskelton-ga Google Answers Researcher |
Subject:
Re: meta tagging
From: robertskelton-ga on 09 Jan 2004 13:30 PST |
And about the word ozpeopletrace - look at what is in bold in the search result, and look at the cached copy of the page to see what Google has recognised: ://www.google.com/search?q=%22australia+locate+missing%22+people+oz |
Subject:
Re: meta tagging
From: kotemaori-ga on 09 Jan 2004 14:39 PST |
thanks robert,i have noticed that your site is well positioned.i intend to write title tags for each page to give it a better ranking,i was intending to look closely at the keywords ive written into each page with much sweat and cursing to get it right,and pick pages to suit search terms |
Subject:
Re: meta tagging
From: robertskelton-ga on 09 Jan 2004 15:02 PST |
I have actually been quite lazy when it comes to optimizing my sites. The ones that do best have done so because I have put effort into content, and people have chosen to link to it. Links from high quality sites and some simple SEO gives much better results than links from a few low quality sites and complex SEO. The site you are probably referring to has 285 links to it that are PR4 or higher. According to AlltheWeb 7,427 links in total. Once you get that many links, you can put any not-terribly-popular keyphrase in a page title and rank well for it, such as madonna sex book. |
Subject:
Re: meta tagging
From: kotemaori-ga on 09 Jan 2004 19:32 PST |
hi serenate.ga i would like your advice as i have followed it to date with very sccessful results |
Subject:
Re: meta tagging
From: serenata-ga on 12 Jan 2004 19:06 PST |
Hi Again, Kotemaori~ Since another Google Answers Researcher has already given you his answer (even if it is in the form of a comment), it really wouldn't be ethical for me to step in at this point, and I must decline since he has already begun an answer to your question. Thank you, though, for thinking of me, and continued succes to you. Serenata |
If you feel that you have found inappropriate content, please let us know by emailing us at answers-support@google.com with the question ID listed above. Thank you. |
Search Google Answers for |
Google Home - Answers FAQ - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy |