Google Answers Logo
View Question
 
Q: Regarding fees for replacement license plates after being reported stolen ( Answered 5 out of 5 stars,   0 Comments )
Question  
Subject: Regarding fees for replacement license plates after being reported stolen
Category: Miscellaneous
Asked by: happers-ga
List Price: $2.00
Posted: 13 Jan 2004 17:47 PST
Expires: 12 Feb 2004 17:47 PST
Question ID: 296167
While travelling in CAlifornia, my front license plate was stolen.  I
am required by law to report...therefore I did.  Officer taking report
answered my question over worrying about being stopped by an officer
and paying fines for no plate; his answer being...you make report, it
goes into data base as being stolen, we void it completely....Should
you be stopped...your license plate number will come up void....and
you will not suffer infraction.  When you get home...you go to your
Licensing Dept and tell them the same.. When they put the license
number in computer...it will come up void, reported in a timely
manner...and there will be no charge for your replacement plates. 
Fine.  I followed instructions and was told at City Hall they could
not put the license number in until I paid the fee.  Didn't sound
right.  Went to Police Station...and was told if I did not pay the fee
I the infraction for driving around town without front license would
be 101.00.  I asked for a report to be made which would assist me in
initiating my problem, and time to discover the truth, the laws on
books to protect such a situation.  I was refused.  Is there or is
there not an amendment of some sort going along with RCW 46.16.24
which addresses stolen, reported in a timely manner requirement for
citizens of U.S.A.
The word that creates the confusion here is VOID
over...stolen/mutilated, lost.    Please help.   I await the law in WA
state that would cover Voided /stolen license plate replaclement. 
Thank you.
Answer  
Subject: Re: Regarding fees for replacement license plates after being reported stolen
Answered By: aht-ga on 13 Jan 2004 18:28 PST
Rated:5 out of 5 stars
 
happers-ga:

Thank you for your question regarding the laws affecting stolen
license plates for the State of Washington.

I sympathize with your plight, replacing a license plate tends to be a
very bureaucratic process.

Unfortunately, it appears that the information you received from the
police officer in California, is only applicable to the State of
California and vehicles registered with their department of motor
vehicles.

Under the California Vehicle Code, section 4457 addresses the loss of
a single license plate:

-----------------------
"4457.  If any registration card or license plate is stolen, lost,
mutilated, or illegible, the owner of the vehicle for which the same
was issued, as shown by the records of the department, shall
immediately make application for and may, upon the applicant
furnishing information satisfactory to the department, obtain a
duplicate or a substitute or a new registration under a new
registration number, as determined to be most advisable by the
department.  An application for a duplicate registration card is not
required in conjunction with any other application."

http://www.leginfo.ca.gov/cgi-bin/waisgate?WAISdocID=04608411227+2+0+0&WAISaction=retrieve
-----------------------

There is no mention of the applicant needing to pay any fee for the
duplicate or substitute plate. However, again this is only applicable
to vehicles registered and licensed in the State of California.

From your question, it appears that you are a resident of the State of
Washington. The Revised Code of Washington, Chapter 46.16, covers
vehicle licensing for vehicles registered and licensed in Washington.
In particular, replacement of plates is covered by section 46.16.270,
which states in whole:

-----------------------

"RCW 46.16.270
Replacement of plates -- Fee.
The total replacement plate fee shall be deposited in the motor vehicle fund.

     Upon the loss, defacement, or destruction of one or both of the
vehicle license number plates issued for any vehicle where more than
one plate was originally issued or where one or both have become so
illegible or in such a condition as to be difficult to distinguish, or
upon the owner's option, the owner of the vehicle shall make
application for new vehicle license number plates upon a form
furnished by the director. The application shall be filed with the
director or the director's authorized agent, accompanied by the
certificate of license registration of the vehicle and a fee in the
amount of three dollars per plate, whereupon the director, or the
director's authorized agent, shall issue new vehicle license number
plates to the applicant. It shall be accompanied by a fee of two
dollars for a new motorcycle license number plate. In the event the
director has issued license period tabs or a windshield emblem instead
of vehicle license number plates, and upon the loss, defacement, or
destruction of the tabs or windshield emblem, application shall be
made on a form provided by the director and in the same manner as
above described, and shall be accompanied by a fee of one dollar for
each pair of tabs or for each windshield emblem, whereupon the
director shall issue to the applicant a duplicate pair of tabs, year
tabs, and when necessary month tabs or a windshield emblem to replace
those lost, defaced, or destroyed. For vehicles owned, rented, or
leased by the state of Washington or by any county, city, town, school
district, or other political subdivision of the state of Washington or
United States government, or owned or leased by the governing body of
an Indian tribe as defined in RCW 46.16.020, a fee shall be charged
for replacement of a vehicle license number plate only to the extent
required by the provisions of RCW 46.16.020, *46.16.061, 46.16.237,
and 46.01.140. For vehicles owned, rented, or leased by foreign
countries or international bodies to which the United States
government is a signatory by treaty, the payment of any fee for the
replacement of a vehicle license number plate shall not be required."

http://www.leg.wa.gov/RCW/index.cfm?fuseaction=section&section=46.16.270
-----------------------

Unfortunately, the law for your state clearly states that a fee of
three dollars per plate is required for issuing a replacement plate,
if the original plate is lost, defaced, or mutilated. The fact that
the loss in this case is the result of a theft is irrelevant to the
law.

The term 'void' that the police officer mentioned to you is not
applicable under the Revised Code of Washington. Each state is
responsible for establishing and enforcing motor vehicle regulations
for vehicles registered in that state. Even if the State of California
has recorded that your plate was stolen in their systems, so as to
excuse you temporarily from being fined for driving without proper
license plates displayed, this has no impact on the State of
Washington.

I know that this is not what you were hoping to hear, but
unfortunately it is, as you requested, "the law in WA state that would
cover" the replacement of a stolen license plate. Just for your
reference, in my own location, the cost to replace lost of stolen
plates is $18 (Canadian). I keep my license plates secured with
extremely-hard-to-remove security bolts and lock nuts.

Please let me know if you require any clarification to this Answer,
using the "Request Clarification" button above.

Thank you,

aht-ga
Google Answers Researcher

Request for Answer Clarification by happers-ga on 13 Jan 2004 20:00 PST
Hi 'aht';....Thanks so  much for your great response time..  I am
perplexed now as to why I was asked to pay 10.45 if 3.00 is the charge
per plate.  Anyway...I stand corrected in my disappointment toward
interstate disparities on the subject
of stolen....license plates.  I think I have a 'case of sic-n-tired of
buerocratic use of chaos'.  Could I have then been stopped on my way
home to WA and charged for the infraction of driving with only one
plate?  Our local policeman told me this infraction's penalty is
$10l.00.   I will take heed...and go tomorrow to get my new plates... 
Do do do...have a Happy New Year.  You are great and good!

Clarification of Answer by aht-ga on 13 Jan 2004 21:38 PST
happers-ga:

I think that if you had been pulled over, you probably would have been
able to explain the situation to the officer and simply been given the
equivalent of a warning.

As for the difference in the cost ($10.45 versus $3.00), it is most
likely a service charge. $3 goes to the state, $7.45 goes towards
covering the costs of providing the service (it *IS* the government,
after all...).

Hope all goes well, and thank you for the tip!

aht-ga
Google Answers Researcher
happers-ga rated this answer:5 out of 5 stars and gave an additional tip of: $3.00
I could not believe how fast this response was....how knowlegeable and thorough.
I want to tip 3.00.   Oh....this is my first experience and hope I
have completed properly...sincerely, happers...

Comments  
There are no comments at this time.

Important Disclaimer: Answers and comments provided on Google Answers are general information, and are not intended to substitute for informed professional medical, psychiatric, psychological, tax, legal, investment, accounting, or other professional advice. Google does not endorse, and expressly disclaims liability for any product, manufacturer, distributor, service or service provider mentioned or any opinion expressed in answers or comments. Please read carefully the Google Answers Terms of Service.

If you feel that you have found inappropriate content, please let us know by emailing us at answers-support@google.com with the question ID listed above. Thank you.
Search Google Answers for
Google Answers  


Google Home - Answers FAQ - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy