|
|
Subject:
Opposing medical effects
Category: Health > Conditions and Diseases Asked by: apteryx-ga List Price: $2.97 |
Posted:
26 Jan 2004 21:59 PST
Expires: 07 Feb 2004 14:29 PST Question ID: 300601 |
[Probably not for the squeamish.] If cancer causes unwanted tissue to grow and leprosy eats tissue away, what happens when cancer meets leprosy? I'm just curious, but it's not a flippant question. It seems like there ought to be some sort of medical possibility to explore there. But even if not...I'm curious. Thank you, Apteryx |
|
There is no answer at this time. |
|
Subject:
Re: Opposing medical effects
From: surgeon-ga on 27 Jan 2004 22:25 PST |
the effects of leprosy (which is an infection caused by a mycobacterium, the type of organism that also causes TB) are extremely slow; tissue injury takes place over months and years. Cancer grows very fast; in addition, there's no way to target the organism specifically to cancerous tissues. It's an interesting idea, but it doesn't work that way. While I don't know for sure, I'd be certain many people with leprosy have died of cancer; because cancer is common enough and leprosy is indolent enough, and there are enough people over the years that have had leprosy that some would get cancer. And they'd be treated in the same way as anyone else, with the same results. Interestingly, trials have been done with a vaccine called BCG, used (with limited effectiveness) to treat TB, to see if such stimulation of the immune system would cause reactivity to cancer. It hasn't had success. Nor, so far as I'm aware, is there evidence that people with leprosy have reduced incidence of cancer. Since there are around 13 million people with leprosy currently, one would expect such a trend to have been noticed were it true. |
Subject:
Re: Opposing medical effects
From: heybill-ga on 29 Jan 2004 11:31 PST |
well, leprosy "eats tissue" by killing the little nerves that go to that part of the tissue which eventually destroys blood flow and it's kind of "dry rot". Angiogenesis inhibitors [factors that stop the growth of new blood vessels ] may have a role in the treatment of cancer. They arbeing studied intensively. Tumors produce signalers that cause new blood vessels to grow into them. If they could be blocked, the cancer cells would die. Maybe go into medical research? ; ) Bill |
Subject:
Re: Opposing medical effects
From: apteryx-ga on 07 Feb 2004 14:28 PST |
Thanks, surgeon and heybill, for your willingness to entertain my admittedly off-the-wall notion and comment on it. I don't think I'm likely to get more of an answer than that after two weeks, so I'll close it. Apteryx |
If you feel that you have found inappropriate content, please let us know by emailing us at answers-support@google.com with the question ID listed above. Thank you. |
Search Google Answers for |
Google Home - Answers FAQ - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy |